Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Leo Strauss and the Problem of Political Philosophy
For Strauss, political philosophy presented a “problem” to which there have been a variety of solutions proposed over the course of Western history. Strauss’s work, they show, revolved around recovering―and restoring―political philosophy to its original Socratic form. Since positivism and historicism represented two intellectual currents that undermined the possibility of a Socratic political philosophy, the first part of the book is devoted to Strauss’s critique of these two positions. Then, the authors explore Strauss’s interpretation of the history of philosophy and both ancient and modern canonical political philosophers, including Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, and Locke. Strauss’s often-unconventional readings of these philosophers, they argue, pointed to solutions to the problem of political philosophy. Finally, the authors examine Strauss’s thought in the context of the twentieth century, when his chief interlocutors were Schmitt, Husserl, Heidegger, and Nietzsche.
The most penetrating and capacious treatment of the political philosophy of this complex and often misunderstood thinker, from his early years to his last works, Leo Strauss and the Problem of Political Philosophy reveals Strauss’s writings as an attempt to show that the distinctive characteristics of ancient and modern thought derive from different modes of solving the problem of political philosophy and reveal why he considered the ancient solution both philosophically and politically superior.
- ISBN-10022613573X
- ISBN-13978-0226135731
- PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
- Publication dateJune 30, 2014
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9 x 6.3 x 0.7 inches
- Print length387 pages
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Leo Strauss and the Problem of Political Philosophy offers a welcome exposition and defense of Strauss as a political philosopher. Given the considerable range and depth of Strauss’s writings, serious readers could use a reliable overview and a connecting thread for seeing their way through them. These the Zuckerts seek to provide. Of the recent books on Strauss, none matches this one in scope or detail.” -- Martin D. Yaffe, University of North Texas
“In 2008 the Zuckerts published The Truth about Leo Strauss primarily to defend Strauss against the charge of being the ideological source behind unpopular initiatives within American foreign policy. This book seeks rather to explain Strauss’s political philosophy from within by showing the various influences to which he was responding and to test his philosophy for completeness and coherence. In this second project, they succeed admirably. . . . A fascinating study.” ― Heythrop Journal Published On: 2015-04-21
“Essential. . . . Catherine Zuckert and Michael Zuckert have taken on the ambitious task of analyzing Leo Strauss’s entire intellectual career. The result is a very good introduction to Strauss’s published works. It is more than a summary of one of the twentieth century's most influential political theorists, however, as the Zuckerts attempt the even more ambitious goal of trying to reconcile Strauss's entire career into a coherent statement of his ultimate view of philosophy.” ― Choice Published On: 2015-06-23
“[The book] not only illuminates many fundamental issues but also gives readers more food for thought and wonderment.” ― Perspectives on Political Science Published On: 2015-11-04
“The Zuckerts have succeeded beautifully. This latest effort will serve both as an excellent introduction for those unfamiliar with Strauss’s thought and influence and as a path to a much fuller understanding for those who are already familiar with some aspects of his works.” ― Perspectives on Politics Published On: 2015-12-29
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : University of Chicago Press (June 30, 2014)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 387 pages
- ISBN-10 : 022613573X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0226135731
- Item Weight : 1.5 pounds
- Dimensions : 9 x 6.3 x 0.7 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,891,689 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #652 in Political History (Books)
- #4,361 in Philosophy (Books)
- #5,319 in Political Philosophy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The prologue is very useful, discussing and offering productive ways to think about different controversial aspects of Strauss’s work that sometimes serve as a barrier to understanding. These include the complicated relationship between political philosophy and historical studies, the question of esoteric writing (especially as applied to Strauss himself), and the multifarious yet related meanings attached to the term political philosophy. By articulating the various meanings Strauss gives to political philosophy, the Zuckerts bring to light the multiple problems of political philosophy, thereby laying the foundation for serious engagement with their text.
The book is divided into three sections. The first deals with Strauss’s treatment of positivism and historicism, which Strauss saw as obstacles to the recovery of political philosophy. (Historicism is the more worthy foe, positivism is seen as an untenable halfway house between science and historicism.) The second, middle section is the heart of the book. It deals with Strauss’s reading of the history of political philosophy, the conflict between Athens & Jerusalem, and Strauss’s call for the West to “return” to the lived tension between the irreducible alternatives represented by these two cities. This section also has wonderful chapters on Strauss’s treatment of different key philosophers. Strauss is of course linked with Platonic political philosophy, though here his highly unorthodox reading of Plato is brought to light. The Zuckerts also make a point of arguing that Strauss is not an Aristotelian, and show how in The City and Man Strauss brought attention to a usually overlooked connection between Aristotelianism and the coming of modernity. Speaking of modernity, the Zuckerts examine 4 of Strauss’s texts (three on Machiavelli and one on Marsilius of Padua) in order to show how Strauss over time refined his views on Machiavelli’s break with classical political philosophy. Similarly, the Zuckerts contend that Strauss’s interpretation of Locke, the most successful of modern political philosophers, improved over time. The essay on Locke in What Is Political Philosophy? is treated as superior to Strauss’s earlier handling of Locke in Natural Right And History: the later essay offered a philosophical critique of natural law that remained merely hypothetical in the earlier work.
The third section of the book deals with Strauss in the 20th century. There is a defense against extreme critics of Strauss who view him as some sort of radical right- winger. There is an exploration of Strauss as a Jewish thinker, and an examination of Strauss as a champion of liberal education. The most valuable chapter in section 3-and possibly my favorite chapter in the whole book-deals with Straussians. In an earlier work the Zuckerts spent time distinguishing between East coast and West Coast Straussianism. In this book, the Zuckerts take a different approach, grouping Straussian communities based on the handling of 2 basic issues. As to the issue of Strauss’s reason vs. revelation theme and its import for the status of philosophical activity, the Zuckerts distinguish Rationalists, Decisionists, Faith-based Straussians and Zetetics. This classification seems sound, as does the Zuckerts’ commentary on these positions. The authors see rationalism as the least defensible position with regards to Strauss’s body of work, because the rationalists deny the tension between Athens and Jerusalem that lies at the heart of Strauss’s work. In contrast, The Zuckerts see the Decisionists and Faith-based Straussians as seriously engaged with Strauss’s reason vs. revelation problematic, yet their positions and arguments mark them as Straussian outliers. The Zuckerts view the zetetics as most clearly aligned with Strauss, who defended philosophy as a distinctive way of life even in the face of the Athens/Jerusalem tension and the challenge this tension presents to philosophy. The second great issue the Zuckerts think Straussians divide on is the question of Plato vs. Aristotle, which is actually a question concerning the status of morality. It becomes clearer by reading the entire book than by reading just this chapter where the Zuckerts stand on this question. The Zuckerts affirm Strauss's Platonism.
The conclusion traverses ground that has been covered and raises some basic objections to Strauss’s work. Though these objections are not really explored in great detail, they are very important objections, and, if taken seriously, cast doubt on Strauss’s whole reading of the history of political philosophy. (To take just one “for instance,” the Zuckerts entertain the notion that Strauss distorts the thought of the classical philosophers by interpreting them in light of his reading of Maimonides and Al Farabi. And Strauss’s reading of the classics is obviously essential to his whole system.) However, the Zuckerts’ criticism is but a small part of what is clearly a “pro Strauss” book. It may whet the appetite of some curious readers, but such readers clearly cannot rest satisfied with the Zuckerts. If one wants to experience a full scale assault on the Straussian hermeneutic that the Zuckerts begin to question, one would do well to read Paul Gottfried’s book on Leo Strauss, a book that seems to me as important a text for understanding Strauss and the Straussians as the Zuckerts’ impressive text.


