Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
& FREE Shipping
87% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Lessons of History Paperback – February 16, 2010
| Will Durant (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Unabridged, Audiobook, CD
"Please retry" | $14.95 | $3.95 |
Enhance your purchase
With their accessible compendium of philosophy and social progress, the Durants take us on a journey through history, exploring the possibilities and limitations of humanity over time. Juxtaposing the great lives, ideas, and accomplishments with cycles of war and conquest, the Durants reveal the towering themes of history and give meaning to our own.
- Print length128 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateFebruary 16, 2010
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.4 x 8.44 inches
- ISBN-10143914995X
- ISBN-13978-1439149959
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
--Dana D. Kelley, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
About the Author
Will and Ariel Durant, after spending over fifty years completing the critically acclaimed series The Story of Civilization, were awarded the Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction in 1968. In 1977, the Durants were presented with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Champions of human rights and social reform, the Durants continue to educate and entertain readers the world over. For more information on their work, visit www.willdurant.com.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Hesitations
As his studies come to a close the historian faces the challenge: Of what use have your studies been? Have you found in your work only the amusement of recounting the rise and fall of nations and ideas, and retelling "sad stories of the death of kings"? Have you learned more about human nature than the man in the street can learn without so much as opening a book? Have you derived from history any illumination of our present condition, any guidance for our judgments and policies, any guard against the rebuffs of surprise or the vicissitudes of change? Have you found such regularities in the sequence of past events that you can predict the future actions of mankind or the fate of states? Is it possible that, after all, "history has no sense," that it teaches us nothing, and that the immense past was only the weary rehearsal of the mistakes that the future is destined to make on a larger stage and scale?
At times we feel so, and a multitude of doubts assail our enterprise. To begin with, do we really know what the past was, what actually happened, or is history "a fable" not quite "agreed upon"? Our knowledge of any past event is always incomplete, probably inaccurate, beclouded by ambivalent evidence and biased historians, and perhaps distorted by our own patriotic or religious partisanship. "Most history is guessing, and the rest is prejudice." Even the historian who thinks to rise above partiality for his country, race, creed, or class betrays his secret predilection in his choice of materials, and in the nuances of his adjectives. "The historian always oversimplifies, and hastily selects a manageable minority of facts and faces out of a crowd of souls and events whose multitudinous complexity he can never quite embrace or comprehend." -- Again, our conclusions from the past to the future are made more hazardous than ever by the acceleration of change. In 1909 Charles Peguy thought that "the world changed less since Jesus Christ than in the last thirty years". and perhaps some young doctor of philosophy in physics would now add that his science has changed more since 1909 than in all recorded time before. Every year -- sometimes, in war, every month -- some new invention, method, or situation compels a fresh adjustment of behavior and ideas. -- Furthermore, an element of chance, perhaps of freedom, seems to enter into the conduct of metals and men. We are no longer confident that atoms, much less organisms, will respond in the future as we think they have responded in the past. The electrons, like Cowper's God, move in mysterious ways their wonders to perform, and some quirk of character or circumstance may upset national equations, as when Alexander drank himself to death and let his new empire fall apart (323 B.C.), or as when Frederick the Great was saved from disaster by the accession of a Czar infatuated with Prussian ways (1762).
Obviously historiography cannot be a science. It can only be an industry, an art, and a philosophy -- an industry by ferreting out the facts, an art by establishing a meaningful order in the chaos of materials, a philosophy by seeking perspective and enlightenment. "The present is the past rolled up for action, and the past is the present unrolled for understanding" -- or so we believe and hope. In philosophy we try to see the part in the light of the whole; in the "philosophy of history" we try to see this moment in the light of the past. We know that in both cases this is a counsel of perfection; total perspective is an optical illusion. We do not know the whole of man's history; there were probably many civilizations before the Sumerian or the Egyptian; we have just begun to dig! We must operate with partial knowledge, and be provisionally content with probabilities; in history, as in science and politics, relativity rules, and all formulas should be suspect. "History smiles at all attempts to force its flow into theoretical patterns or logical grooves; it plays havoc with our generalizations, breaks all our rules; history is baroque." Perhaps, within these limits, we can learn enough from history to bear reality patiently, and to respect one another's delusions.
Since man is a moment in astronomic time, a transient guest of the earth, a spore of his species, a scion of his race, a composite of body, character, and mind, a member of a family and a community, a believer or doubter of a faith, a unit in an economy, perhaps a citizen in a state or a soldier in an army, we may ask under the corresponding heads -- astronomy, geology, geography, biology, ethnology, psychology, morality, religion, economics, politics, and war -- what history has to say about the nature, conduct, and prospects of man. It is a precarious enterprise, and only a fool would try to compress a hundred centuries into a hundred pages of hazardous conclusions. We proceed.
Copyright © 1968 by Will and Ariel Durant
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Simon & Schuster; 1st edition (February 16, 2010)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 128 pages
- ISBN-10 : 143914995X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1439149959
- Item Weight : 4.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.4 x 8.44 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #7,348 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3 in Philosophy History & Survey
- #21 in History of Civilization & Culture
- #54 in Historical Study (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

William James Durant (/dəˈrænt/; November 5, 1885 – November 7, 1981) was an American writer, historian, and philosopher. He is best known for The Story of Civilization, 11 volumes written in collaboration with his wife Ariel Durant and published between 1935 and 1975. He was earlier noted for The Story of Philosophy (1924), described as "a groundbreaking work that helped to popularize philosophy".
He conceived of philosophy as total perspective, or, seeing things sub specie totius, a phrase inspired by Spinoza's sub specie aeternitatis. He sought to unify and humanize the great body of historical knowledge, which had grown voluminous and become fragmented into esoteric specialties, and to vitalize it for contemporary application.
Will and Ariel Durant were awarded the Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction in 1968 and the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1977.
Bio from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Photo by Will Durant Foundation (http://will-durant.com/bio.htm) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviewed in the United States on December 13, 2021
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
And they succeed! The book packs a wealth of insights into a hundred pages. The authors discuss, in turn, the forces that have shaped history. The forces considered include natural (geography, biology), human behavior (character, morality), and human constructs (religion, economic systems, and government). The last essay considers the question "Is progress real?".
The essay on economics argues that wealth inequality is a natural and inevitable consequence of the "concentration of ability" within a minority of a society, and this has occurred regularly throughout history. The authors state: "The relative equality of Americans before 1776 has been overwhelmed by a thousand forms of physical, mental, and economic differentiation, so that the gap between the wealthiest and the poorest is now greater than at any time since Imperial plutocratic Rome."
This leads into the essay on socialism, which strives to counteract the forces that drive wealth inequality. The authors survey "socialist experiments" in ancient Sumeria, Egypt, Rome, China, and South America - all centuries before the industrial revolution. It was fascinating to read this history which contains a mixture of failures and successes. The authors argue that the trend is towards a synthesis of capitalism and socialism (rather than one system winning outright).
The next essay discusses the various forms of government and descibes the special circumstances that enabled democracy to take root and flourish in the American colonies. The authors argue that many of the favorable conditions that were present in the years following the American Revolution have disappeared. The essay ends with the haunting warning: "If race or class war divides us into hostile camps, changing political argument into blind hate, one side or other may overturn the hustings with the rule of the sword. If our economy of freedom fails to distribute wealth as ably as it has created it, the road to dictatorship will be open to any man who can persuasively promise security to all; and a martial government, under whatever charming phrases, will engulf the democratic world."
Hopefully this review has provided a flavor for how the authors have distilled the insights they have gained from years of study. It should not come as a surprise that the lessons gleaned from several thousand years of recorded history continue to ring true today.
This is a book that I wish I'd read in high school or perhaps Freshman year of college. It's a wonderfully written study of how we got to where we are today.
The authors apparent advocacy of social darwinism flies in the face of not only what we know about Darwin's actual theories, but it contradicts so much of what sociology and social psychology has learned in the past 50 years or so. Moreover, this idea is presented in such a way as to reinforce ideas such as "capitalism is infallible" and "rich people deserve to be rich" which are disproven by even common observation. Now, while such ideas may have been included at the time given the Cold War, today they creak and thud like any other outdated notion.
Similarly, the authors chapter on race is genuinely painful to read. While defenders may point out that the authors circle around at the end of the chapter to make a point that race theories have been disproven, its bizarre that in every other chapter outdated theories are presented as "they thought this" and "it was once thought", but the race chapter simply presents the ideas as if they are a currently valid line of thought. The fact that so much time is spent on outdated and honestly racist theories without a hint of contextualizing them makes that chapter frankly uncomfortable to get through.
As for the rest of the book, perhaps the patterns and lessons presented in the book were revolutionary at the time, but now most of them are common and reiterated frequently. Unlike other groundbreaking works, however, there's little left here to make seeing the (possible) original source of the idea worth reading on its own.
Probably best to find another work on the subject.
My favorite line of the book: "The labors of educators are apparently cancelled out in each generation by the fertility of the uninformed."
My only complaint about this book is that the Durants felt compelled to awkwardly shoehorn their distaste for modern art into practically every chapter. It became a recurring topic that was almost always an irrelevant and annoying distraction form the topic at hand. We get it. You're art snobs. Why are we taking about this here?
In fact it's more important that the youth read this book right now than any other time with all the BS that's going on in the western world.
It baffles me that in our schools we read history books with random dates and facts but never books like these.
A must read!
Durant's strategy for explaining the how and why of History's lessons make sense and helps readers understand to compartment their own world, yet maintain the connectedness among all the compartments.
A delightful work that reminded me of what I once loved about History and Historiography.
Top reviews from other countries
The frankly bizarre discussions of race really remind you that the author was born in the 19th century, and reading this in 2020 makes you more than a little uncomfortable. I was misled by the publication date, 2012, which seems like more of a reissue of some very old material, little of which has aged particularly well, as this book's information should really show the actual publication date of 1968, for if I saw the book was this old, I would have avoided it. For its time, when it was published, this may have had relevance and insight, but in the 21st century there is very little here, especially in its 120 or so pages, that have no been covered far better and more in-depth by other authors and historians. This is the greatest disappointment of a non-fiction book I've ever had, which is a shame as I really wanted to enjoy it.
Ultimately, while this book attempts to provide real insight in just 128 pages, it just fails to deliver. In addition to the age, this book ends up as a Western-centric, borderline white supremacist view of the world, with no real insights into world history, human nature, or civilizations, it's the kind of book you'd expect from a religious missionary with the white man's burden out to convert some 'savages'. This book has almost confirmed for me that it is very difficult to both stay relevant over 50 years after publication and to provide genuine insight with such ambitious scope over a mere 128 pages. As a historical artifact, this is a fascinating piece of work. As the work of an intellectual, this sadly doesn't cut the mustard by 21st century standards.
If you are looking for more up to date authors with genuine historical insight, you are better off looking nearer to the 21st century, and at books over 128 pages in length, I simply don't think its possible to achieve genuine insights on the history of the planet and of human beings without reading less ambitious, and more focused books. I'd recommend Pinker's Enlightenment Now & Better Angels of Our Nature, Jared Diamond, Bill Bryson, Yuval Noah Harari, Paul Kennedy's Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, Ian Morris, Lewis Dartnell, Peter Frankopan, Niall Ferguson, Samuel Hungtington and John Darwin's After Tamerlane.
I have to say it had a very detached but still interesting perspective on various aspects of humanity. I wouldn't say it is full of insights but it logically looks at various aspects and comes to some very...particular conclusions on topics such as society, war and religion. I can't say I fully agree with every point, there are some which I understand their views and whilst I disagree it was a good book at inspiring thought on some of the topics and how they came to their conclusions.
Definitely worth a read for how cheap it is.
Isn't too long so fairly quick to read
Thought-provoking on some topics
They explain how in their view historic events are driven by several factors those being biology, race, morals, religion, economics, government, war, progress and decline. To support their conclusions they will present examples. Now, a couple of statements and findings are deeply coloured by the era when the authors were publishing (1967). So while most is timeless and universal, communism comes up a lot. But also homosexuality is cited as a symptom of the degeneration of societies as is modern art. And democracy is not presented as the panacea to all social strive.
In fact, they also make a point that monarchy has been the more stable successful form of government and that democracy is hard to execute in practice. The impact of religious institutions on societies in general is being played down a,s according to the authors, they only have a role in moderating personal behaviour. Even if you disagree with some of these views / findings it is still super interesting to think about these issues and form your own conclusions.
So I think this book is really brilliant and unique in its set up. The authors, even if a bit quaint from time to time, make a brave and bold effort to offer some general findings and insight, rather than proving insight on specific events. All statements and conclusions are supported by historic examples, so it makes an interesting read, even if you don’t agree with all conclusions.
I think that a wide range of readers can benefit from the wisdom in this book although it helps if you have a good framework of history and social science as this will tie a good few things together.
The book provides a readable, original look on history but some if it comes close to prose, some of the arguing deals with complex issues or topics that are only mentioned such as the Anabaptists (a topic that fascinates me tremendously). But if you give it a chance it should be well worth reading.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 18, 2020
They explain how in their view historic events are driven by several factors those being biology, race, morals, religion, economics, government, war, progress and decline. To support their conclusions they will present examples. Now, a couple of statements and findings are deeply coloured by the era when the authors were publishing (1967). So while most is timeless and universal, communism comes up a lot. But also homosexuality is cited as a symptom of the degeneration of societies as is modern art. And democracy is not presented as the panacea to all social strive.
In fact, they also make a point that monarchy has been the more stable successful form of government and that democracy is hard to execute in practice. The impact of religious institutions on societies in general is being played down a,s according to the authors, they only have a role in moderating personal behaviour. Even if you disagree with some of these views / findings it is still super interesting to think about these issues and form your own conclusions.
So I think this book is really brilliant and unique in its set up. The authors, even if a bit quaint from time to time, make a brave and bold effort to offer some general findings and insight, rather than proving insight on specific events. All statements and conclusions are supported by historic examples, so it makes an interesting read, even if you don’t agree with all conclusions.
I think that a wide range of readers can benefit from the wisdom in this book although it helps if you have a good framework of history and social science as this will tie a good few things together.
The book provides a readable, original look on history but some if it comes close to prose, some of the arguing deals with complex issues or topics that are only mentioned such as the Anabaptists (a topic that fascinates me tremendously). But if you give it a chance it should be well worth reading.











