Buy new:
$16.35$16.35
Delivery Wednesday, March 27
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: CE_BOOKHOUSE
Buy used: $7.00
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $8.32 shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
+ $8.32 shipping
+ $17.07 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality Hardcover – July 7, 2020
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Purchase options and add-ons
A groundbreaking account of the dangerous marriage of plutocratic economic priorities and right-wing populist appeals―and how it threatens the pillars of American democracy.
The Republican Party appears to be divided between a tax-cutting old guard and a white-nationalist vanguard―and with Donald Trump’s ascendance, the upstarts seem to be winning. Yet how are we to explain that, under Trump, the plutocrats have gotten almost everything they want, including a huge tax cut for corporations and the wealthy, regulation-killing executive actions, and a legion of business-friendly federal judges? Does the GOP represent “forgotten” Americans? Or does it represent the superrich?
In Let Them Eat Tweets, best-selling political scientists Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson offer a definitive answer: the Republican Party serves its plutocratic masters to a degree without precedent in modern global history. Conservative parties, by their nature, almost always side with the rich. But when faced with popular resistance, they usually make concessions, allowing some policies that benefit the working and middle classes. After all, how can a political party maintain power in a democracy if it serves only the interests of a narrow and wealthy slice of society?
Today’s Republicans have shown the way, doubling down on a truly radical, elite-benefiting economic agenda while at the same time making increasingly incendiary racial and cultural appeals to their almost entirely white base. Telling a forty-year story, Hacker and Pierson demonstrate that since the early 1980s, when inequality started spiking, extreme tax cutting, union busting, and deregulation have gone hand in hand with extreme race-baiting, outrage stoking, and disinformation. Instead of responding to the real challenges facing voters, the Republican Party offers division and distraction―most prominently, in the racist, nativist bile of the president’s Twitter feed.
As Hacker and Pierson argue, Trump isn’t a break with the GOP’s recent past. On the contrary, he embodies its tightening embrace of plutocracy and right-wing extremism―a dynamic Hacker and Pierson call “plutocratic populism.” As Trump and his far-right allies spew hatred and lies, Republicans in Congress and in statehouses attack social programs and funnel more and more money to the top 0.1 percent of Americans. Far from being at war with each other, reactionary plutocrats and right-wing populists have become the two faces of a party that now actively undermines democracy to achieve its goals against the will of the majority of Americans.
Drawing on decades of research, Hacker and Pierson authoritatively explain the doom loop of tax cutting and fearmongering that characterizes our era―and reveal how we can fight back.
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherLiveright
- Publication dateJuly 7, 2020
- Dimensions6.4 x 1 x 9.6 inches
- ISBN-101631496840
- ISBN-13978-1631496844
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
Tyranny of the Minority: Why American Democracy Reached the Breaking PointHardcover$8.32 shippingOnly 6 left in stock (more on the way).
Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer--and Turned Its Back on the Middle ClassHardcover$8.48 shippingGet it as soon as Wednesday, Mar 27Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Review
― Franklin Foer, New York Times Book Review
"[Hacker and Pierson] offer a strong case that the Republican Party’s dependence on its top donors explains much of its trajectory in recent decades, culminating in the rise of Trump. . . . Their historical explanation of how the GOP became radicalized raises legitimate concerns that the party, its judicial appointees and its donor class will carry on 'fomenting tribalism, distorting elections, and subverting democratic institutions, procedures, and norms' regardless of the electoral outcome in November. Those who would resist this development should carefully consider the analysis that Hacker and Pierson lay out in such convincing and depressing detail."
― Geoffrey Kabaservice, The Washington Post
"If these two political scientists . . . are painting an accurate picture, we ought to see the same sort of political processes at play in other deeply unequal societies facing crises like pandemics. Turns out we do."
― Sam Pizzigati, Inequality.org
"Political scientists Hacker (Yale) and Pierson (Univ. of California, Berkeley) synthesize many scholarly studies and journalists’ reports to mount a compelling . . . argument that what they call ‘plutocratic populism’―reactionary economic priorities and right-wing cultural and racial appeals―dominates the Republican Party, undermining democracy. . . . A cogent and dispiriting contribution to the growing number of analyses of the ailing American democracy."
― Kirkus Reviews
"A standout among recent releases, timed for the 2020 presidential election cycle, that seek to help readers make sense of the often-confusing political climate.... The authors, both political scientists, find evidence to build their thesis by carefully analyzing recent history.... The answers the authors come up with are cogent and distressing―and convincing. Highly recommended."
― Gary Day, Booklist
"This [is a] barbed and cogent account. . . . Hacker and Pierson pull disparate pieces into a lucid narrative that goes a long way toward explaining the current iteration of the Republican Party. Liberals will be equal parts enraged and edified by this deeply sourced polemic."
― Publishers Weekly
"This essential book makes clear that American democracy is threatened less by Trump than by the extreme economic inequality that set the stage for his election. Growing plutocratic power preceded Trump, and will outlast him. Unless these larger forces are reckoned with, the authors warn, the United States may be locked in an escalating ‘doom loop.’"
― Jane Mayer, New York Times bestselling author of Dark Money
"Hacker and Pierson provide a persuasive and insightful explanation of the current extremes of American political polarization: it is the response to a fundamental and deep problem for conservatives, of how to enlist support for their self-interested economic policies in order to maintain a plutocratic society that benefits the few. Hacker and Pierson show that the conservative Republican Party's appeal to nativism and tribalism, while deep rooted in US history, is not inevitable. There is yet hope for American democracy. A must-read for anyone interested in understanding contemporary American politics."
― Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2011 Nobel Laureate, economic sciences
"Let Them Eat Tweets is the perfect title for a wise and passionate book that distinguishes between a populism genuinely challenging to elites and the 'plutocratic populism' of Donald Trump whose purpose is to entrench the power of the already privileged. Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson have an admirable record of seeing around corners and their warnings about threats to majoritarian democracy―from the right and from the way our institutions are working―are telling and worrying. In the face of this danger, they offer realistic hope that democratic action can rescue democracy itself. An important book for our moment."
― E.J. Dionne Jr., author of Code Red: How Progressives and Moderates Can Unite to Save Our Country
"Highly readable, historically grounded, analytically clear, and carefully argued, Let Them Eat Tweets exposes generations of Republican lawmakers who serve the narrow goals of the uber wealthy while cynically disregarding the needs of their own constituents. This book is for everyone who wants to move beyond a singular focus on the Trump presidency and gain a broader understanding of how we arrived at this political moment― and how we can move beyond it."
― Melissa Harris-Perry, the Maya Angelou Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Wake Forest University
"A superb and much-needed work! It will be the coming season’s book."
― Andrew Hacker, author of Downfall: The Demise of a President and His Party and Two Nations: Black and White, Separate, Hostile, Unequal
"For almost twenty years respected scholars Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson have been ahead of the curve in diagnosing how the increasing concentration of wealth in America has diminished democratic accountability and threatened the underpinnings of our constitutional democracy. Now they have written a fantastic capstone volume tying together the essential elements of their story: plutocracy, asymmetric partisan polarization, counter-majoritarianism, and right-wing populism. It is a tour de force, embedded in sophisticated historical and comparative analysis yet immensely helpful in making sense of the daily headlines in these troubling times."
― Thomas E. Mann, coauthor of the New York Times bestseller It’s Even Worse Than It Looks
"This book makes intelligible how the nightmare of our current politics has happened. With their usual acuity and verve, Hacker and Pierson confront us with an uncomfortable reality: extreme economic inequality has left America vulnerable to a right-wing extremism that has destroyed other countries' democracies in the past. Hacker and Pierson's message is not that democracy in America is doomed. But to save it, we need to come to grips with the underlying economic forces pulling it apart today."
― Daniel Ziblatt, Professor of Government at Harvard University and coauthor of the New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die
"Democracy, or plutocracy enabled by dog whistle politics? Those are the heart-stopping stakes, according to the compelling volume in your hands. Read this book and get in the fight."
― Ian F. Haney López, author of Merge Left: Fusing Race and Class, Winning Elections, and Saving America
About the Author
Paul Pierson is a political scientist at the University of California, Berkeley, and the coauthor of three books, including the New York Times bestseller Winner-Take-All Politics. He lives in Berkeley, California.
Product details
- Publisher : Liveright (July 7, 2020)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1631496840
- ISBN-13 : 978-1631496844
- Item Weight : 1.08 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.4 x 1 x 9.6 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #904,518 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #563 in Political Parties (Books)
- #1,389 in Economic Conditions (Books)
- #1,874 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Related products with free delivery on eligible orders Sponsored | Try Prime for unlimited fast, free shipping
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The answer, as the authors explain, is fairly straightforward. It begins with a question philosophers and statesmen have been asking about democracy as far back as ancient Greece: What happens when an economic system that concentrates wealth in the hands of the few is combined with a political system that gives the vote to the many?
What happens is two distinct economic classes develop divergent and competing interests. Capitalism creates a class of economic elites that try to preserve their wealth, while democracy gives the vote to the masses, who can collectively vote for wealth redistribution. To prevent this from happening, the economic elites require political representation, and that political representation is the Republican party.
The Republican party, however, faces a daunting task, described by the authors as the Conservative Dilemma:
“Then and now, the basic question for conservative leaders was the same: how to reconcile their allegiance to wealth and power with the need to attract the electoral support of voters without much of either.”
It’s no secret that the right’s core constituency is big business and the wealthy, but to win elections, the right must appeal to a voter base that has little income or wealth. As the authors demonstrate in great detail, all conservative political strategy is centered on finding a way out of this dilemma.
To the right’s credit, they’ve been wildly successful in their solution to the conservative dilemma. It’s a hard sell to tell your voter base that your economic plan essentially amounts to taking all economic growth and channeling it to the top 1 percent of earners while everyone else’s income remains stagnant, as has happened over the last four decades.
This is why the right has figured out that they’d better not talk about economics too much. The better strategy is to create cultural division, to get their voter base to hate the left so much socially and culturally that they are willing to vote against their own economic interests. And in this regard, the right could not have done a better job.
And the left plays right into it by largely ignoring economic issues as well. The right has set the conversation and the left plays right along, in many cases themselves moving far right economically, if not culturally.
The right knows the game they can win: By aligning itself with Christian fundamentalists, the NRA, and conservative media outlets, the Rupublican party spends almost all of its time—not advancing any practical solutions to political problems—but rather cultivating hate and anger towards liberals. If people hate each other culturally, they cannot unite economically should be the motto of the GOP.
The authors also dispel a common and annoying tendency for people to believe that both political parties are equally corrupt and biased. You often hear some variation of this statement: “Sure, the right is biased, but the left is equally guilty.” This is objectively and quantifiably false. Of course the left displays bias on many occasions, but what political scientists have found in the US is a phenomenon known as “asymmetric polarization,” where the right has drifted further right than the left has drifted left.
The Republican party in the US has radicalized, and is now further right compared to 1) its own historical policy stances, 2) conservative parties in other nations, and 3) the economic policy preferences of its own voter base. The left in the US, on the other hand, is considerably to the RIGHT of other liberal parties in other countries. There may be bias on both sides, but it is far from symmetrical.
The right advocates for radical free market fundamentalism, extreme cultural division, nationalism, authoritarianism, and a concentrated attack on democratic institutions and voting rights. For all the liberal bias that does exist, there is simply no left equivalents to these extreme positions.
There is good news, however. As the authors point out, the conservative strategy is not sustainable. Winning elections through constantly criticizing the other party is a tiresome game, and eventually people come to learn that you have no good policy ideas yourself. The fact is, an economic strategy that distributes wealth UPWARDS is a con game that can trick the population for only so long, once we stop distracting ourselves with manufactured cultural divisions.
Race has always been a subject of American politics, and in this book, the authors explain how it became embedded so that ‘white voters will stick with the Republican Party no matter how openly it shovels benefits to corporations and the rich’. The grand American democracy is now the Grand American Plutocracy. The authors explain the psychology of how this works. See, for instance, the example at pg. 127-129, of how having two Spanish speaking persons on a train full of white people will lead those white commuters to ‘offer substantially conservative responses to questions about immigration’.
America is so divided that Republicans will accuse the authors as quasi-Marxists when they are not. And Democrats will probably give this book favourable reviews. I am neither Republican nor Democrat, but I find the historical account well-researched, the text written in scholarly tones, and the arguments well-made. Its account of sustained minority rule trumping majoritarianism is forceful and, in a sense, alarming for democratic-minded people.
The authors take a negative view of the Republican Party. The authors are New Deal Democrats. They argue that the interests of the rich clearly “diverge from those of their fellow citizens.” H&P believe that American democracy is dying because the rich have bought the Republican Party. They discuss why the GOP has been so successful when its economic policies are not popular with ordinary people. Polls show that Medicare for all would be popular, but even Nancy Pelosi seems to be against it. H&P argue that democracy is a problem for the rich because it threatens their authority and privilege. Political parties that side with the rich usually face an electoral disadvantage because the rich are small in number. They need another angle to maintain power.
H&P describe how Republicans have persuaded ordinary citizens to vote for their party. H&P argue that the American system has morphed into what they call “plutocratic populism.” This combines neoliberalism with tax cuts for the rich. The Republican coalition also relies on support from groups like the NRA, evangelicals, along with people who fear immigration, political correctness, and minorities. The GOP is slowly turning into an angry white person’s party.
H&P claim that Wall Street and the very wealthy have used the GOP to make themselves wealthier. H&P suggests that greed is the root of the problem. Never content with the last tax cut or the last burst of deregulation, American plutocrats keep pushing for more. With each success, their economic agenda becomes more extreme and less sane. Donald Trump is the poster boy of the modern Republican party. He displays ever greater doses of toxic anger combined with tax cuts for the rich.
The Republican Party now focuses on cultural issues and outrage to attract ordinary voters. In Europe, the working classes have proven much better at protecting their interests. In Germany, there is universal healthcare and less inequality. Workers sit on company boards and as a result Germany still has a large manufacturing sector. Ordinary Germans have no interest in owning assault rifles, they are less religious, and abortion is not a controversial issue. Robert Reich argues that the plutocrats have captured both parties, and the political system needs to be radically changed if it is going to help working people. In Reich’s view, the Democrats’ move to the right on economic issues allowed the Republicans to move even further right.
The $64,000 question is what happens when ordinary people realize they have been duped? Will we have a reaction like the French Revolution with billionaires attacked in the streets? Mark Blyth who teaches economics at Brown University has written a book called Angrynomics. He likes to scare his hedge fund manager friends by telling them that "The Hamptons are not a defensible position. Very hard to defend a low-lying beach. Eventually, people will come for you." At what point does growing inequality reach a tipping point? H&P do not really answer that question, but somebody should try to.



