Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning Hardcover – January 8, 2008
|New from||Used from|
Featured resources in history
Explore these featured titles, sponsored by Springer. Learn more
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
From Publishers Weekly
In this provocative and well-researched book, Goldberg probes modern liberalism's spooky origins in early 20th-century fascist politics. With chapter titles such as Adolf Hitler: Man of the Left and Brave New Village: Hillary Clinton and the Meaning of Liberal Fascism—Goldberg argues that fascism has always been a phenomenon of the left. This is Goldberg's first book, and he wisely curbs his wry National Review style. Goldberg's study of the conceptual overlap between fascism and ideas emanating from the environmental movement, Hollywood, the Democratic Party and what he calls other left-wing organs is shocking and hilarious. He lays low such lights of liberal history as Margaret Sanger, apparently a radical eugenicist, and JFK, whose cult of personality, according to Goldberg, reeks of fascist political theater. Much of this will be music to conservatives' ears, but other readers may be stopped cold by the parallels Goldberg draws between Nazi Germany and the New Deal. The book's tone suffers as it oscillates between revisionist historical analyses and the application of fascist themes to American popular culture; nonetheless, the controversial arc Goldberg draws from Mussolini to The Matrix is well-researched, seriously argued—and funny. (Jan. 8)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
“Brilliant, insightful, and important.” —New York Sun
“Well-researched, seriously argued, and funny.” —Publishers Weekly“Bold and witty… [Goldberg] makes a persuasive case that fascism was from the beginning a movement of the left.” —New York Post“Jonah Goldberg is the first historian to detail the havoc this spin of all spins has played upon Western thought for the past seventy-five years, very much including the present moment.” —Tom Wolfe
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
The 'people' become god. A 'person' becomes nothing. Amazing! Astounding! Appalling!
''Accordingly, they declared war on Christianity, attempting to purge it from society and replace it with a “secular” faith whose tenets were synonymous with the Jacobin agenda. Hundreds of pagan-themed festivals were launched across the country celebrating Nation, Reason, Brotherhood, Liberty, and other abstractions in order to bathe the state and the general will in an aura of sanctity. As we shall see, the Nazis emulated the Jacobins in minute detail.'' (235)
Robespierre, a French lawyer, was the original 'terrorist'.
Goldberg uses 'fascist' as meaning -
''Fascism is a religion of the state. It assumes the organic unity of the body politic and longs for a national leader attuned to the will of the people. It is totalitarian in that it views everything as political and holds that any action by the state is justified to achieve the common good.''
''It takes responsibility for all aspects of life, including our health and well-being, and seeks to impose uniformity of thought and action, whether by force or through regulation and social pressure. Everything, including the economy and religion, must be aligned with its objectives. Any rival identity is part of the “problem” and therefore defined as the enemy. I will argue that contemporary American liberalism embodies all of these aspects of fascism.''
Introduction: Everything You Know About Fascism Is Wrong
1. Mussolini: The Father of Fascism
2. Adolf Hitler: Man of the Left
3. Woodrow Wilson and the Birth of Liberal Fascism
4. Franklin Roosevelt’s Fascist New Deal
5. The 1960s: Fascism Takes to the Streets
6. From Kennedy’s Myth to Johnson’s Dream: Liberal Fascism and the Cult of the State
7. Liberal Racism: The Eugenic Ghost in the Fascist Machine
8. Liberal Fascist Economics
9. Brave New Village: Hillary Clinton and the Meaning of Liberal Fascism
10. The New Age: We’re All Fascists Now
Afterword: The Tempting of Conservatism
''The answer resides in the fact that Fascism was born of a “fascist moment” in Western civilization, when a coalition of intellectuals going by various labels—progressive, communist, socialist, and so forth—believed the era of liberal democracy was drawing to a close. It was time for man to lay aside the anachronisms of natural law, traditional religion, constitutional liberty, capitalism, and the like and rise to the responsibility of remaking the world in his own image.''
''God was long dead, and it was long overdue for men to take His place. Mussolini, a lifelong socialist intellectual, was a warrior in this crusade, and his Fascism—a doctrine he created from the same intellectual material Lenin and Trotsky had built their movements with— was a grand leap into the era of “experimentation” that would sweep aside old dogmas and usher in a new age.''
Which, of course it did. Devastating wars, horrible genocides, etc..
This work provides a historical analysis of the overriding worship of political power that started with the French Revolution and accelerated with Woodrow Wilson, Mussolini, Hitler and is still present. Goldberg provides detailed evidence for his argument.
The current overwhelming impact of political power, political thought, political influence, is obvious. Nevertheless, Goldberg leaves reader somewhat puzzled. What is he proposing as an alternative?
He casually mentions the old liberal, enlightenment thinkers - Adam Smith, Locke, and a few others. However, this work seems more focused on defending himself from those who attack him as a 'fascist', than presenting his own thinking. After reading, we know what he is against - but we don't understand what he is for.
(In contrast, Herbert Butterfield, renowned for his synthesis of these ideas, is cogent, clear, and presents his alternative . . .
''Christianity conducts the battle on behalf of righteousness in a manner that is its own, not in the manner of the men of the world. Our fight is not against blood and flesh, but, to use the New Testament phrase, Principalities and Powers - meaning by these not states or political bodies, and certainly not human beings, but pervading systems.'' (57)
''Modern secular humanism has repeatedly confessed its bankruptcy in the twentieth century, and modern humanitarianism provided no guarantees against the terrible cruelties. Modern science, running on its own momentum and escaping all directing control, dictates to the human race the way in which it should go and opens vistas to new kinds of inhumanity.''
''Here is one of the reasons why it is well for us if we hold fast to Christ and to spiritual things while retaining great elasticity of mind about everything else.''; CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPEAN HISTORY. The Riddell Memorial Lectures 1951 by Herbert Butterfield)
About five hundred footnotes (links worked on iPad). No bibliography.
So much detail that sometimes slides into redundant repetition. Closer to textbook than essay.
(See also, ''Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era'', by Thomas C. Leonard. Covers similar history; also ''The Demon in Democracy: Totalitarian Temptations in Free Societies'', by Ryszard Legutko. Amazing conclusion!)
My problem is Jonah Goldbergs writing style.
Frequently this book reads like a graduate level college textbook. I feel like I should have earned five credits upon completion.
Jonah, we get it. You're smart. You're well read and you have a large vocabulary.
However, there is no need for the constant verbal gymnastics. I like learning a new vocabulary word as much as the next guy. But a new word every page or two? It becomes tedious.
That being said - I learned so much in this book.
From the dissection of Fascism to the detailed accounts of past Presidents.
Hence the three stars. The book is extremely informative, but so is an auto repair manual. I can't recommend this book to my friends without a disclaimer.
"It's informative, but be ready to take notes like a college class."
If he toned it down just a wee bit - he might reach more people.
I'd highly recommend this book to everybody regardless of their political orientation. If you are a modern liberal (not a classic liberal) you benefit by better understanding who you are and what your ideology actually is. If you are an American conservative or libertarian (or a classic liberal) you will become more informed and be able to better debate a liberal.
Frankly, considering the importance of the information this book brings forth, I'd make it mandatory reading for seniors in high school or at least for for college students of journalism, political studies and related fields.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
He first talks about the difficulties of defining Fascism.Read more