| Publisher | Vintage; Reprint edition (June 28, 1994) |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Paperback | 288 pages |
| ISBN-10 | 0679733191 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-0679733195 |
| Item Weight | 8.4 ounces |
| Dimensions | 5.2 x 0.68 x 7.97 inches |
Other Sellers on Amazon
$12.71
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
allnewbooks
Sold by:
allnewbooks
(267508 ratings)
92% positive over last 12 months
92% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
$18.97
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
KnowledgePond
Sold by:
KnowledgePond
(8285 ratings)
88% positive over last 12 months
88% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
$18.97
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
Sandy Dunes Surplus
Sold by:
Sandy Dunes Surplus
(943 ratings)
89% positive over last 12 months
89% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Life's Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom Paperback – June 28, 1994
by
Ronald Dworkin
(Author)
|
Ronald Dworkin
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length288 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherVintage
-
Publication dateJune 28, 1994
-
Dimensions5.2 x 0.68 x 7.97 inches
-
ISBN-100679733191
-
ISBN-13978-0679733195
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Product information
Technical Details
Customer reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
38 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2018
Verified Purchase
Really enjoyed this exploration of the roots of disagreement on these contentious issues. Thoughtful and worthwhile book.
Reviewed in the United States on July 1, 2019
Verified Purchase
Very important book about unnatural death.
Reviewed in the United States on February 4, 2014
Verified Purchase
This book tackles really important questions about the sanctity of life, the questions that I feel are purposely glossed over when it comes to abortion and euthanasia debates because the answers, though true, are morbid and against many ideals that society has created regarding life. This book is definitely a keeper.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 22, 2016
Verified Purchase
Good book for my class. Much less expensive than college bookstore prices.
Reviewed in the United States on July 1, 2013
Verified Purchase
Nicely packaged and a good price for a bulk purchase. I bought it to use as a mordant in dying and the price makes it easy to use the quantities I need to dye large batches.
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2020
Attorney Ronald Dworkin has written a complex book on bioethics from an ethical and legal perspective. He covers the "two edges of life" in an examination of the morally problematic arguments concerning abortion and euthanasia.
The key question, Dworkin points out, is not whether a fetus is a person--with constitutional rights and interests--but how best to respect a conviction that many share, whether for philosophical or religious reasons: The life of any human creature, in any form, and at any stage, has intrinsic, sacred value. It may be regarded as immoral when human life at any stage is deliberately extinguished, and an insult to God's creative power. The question, Dworkin poses, is whether and when abortion is an unjustifiable waste of something of intrinsic importance.
For those who attest that life begins at conception, Dworkin discusses the issue of "ensoulment." He states that the pro-life argument is strengthened by insisting on immediate or early ensoulment. However, even in this is delayed, he suggests that there is nevertheless a human life preparing for a soul. He adds, "it seems undeniable that a human embryo is an identifiable living organism."
Religion often gets involved in social justice and is frequently criticized for delving into politics. Dworkin defends the involvement of religious organizations in the political arena.
Dworkin explains how abortion is regarded as a constitutional right of privacy, and therefore governments ought not legislate against it. He also attests that the claim of privacy treats pregnancy as if a woman and her fetus were morally and genetically separate entities. Legally, unborn children are not regarded as constitutionally protected persons, yet their mothers are granted procreative autonomy. He insists that if and when a fetus is given the right to live, a mother's interest should not be regarded as more important than that right. He adds that abortion is a kind of "self-destruction" in that a woman is destroying a part of herself.
Dworkin discusses whether a fetus has rights and interests in remaining alive, then applies these interests to euthanasia, citing examples from several court decisions. He provides helpful background on advanced medical directives and cites legal nightmares of those who by neglect are forced to rely on casual conversations to document the wishes of loved ones in a persistent vegitative state. He suggest that it is because life is sacred that we are not indifferent about what happens to us.
Medical ethics is a complex field requiring an understanding of the legal, social, and religious implications of medical decisions. Ronald Dworkin has provided a compelling, exhaustive presentation of a complex issue that ought to be read by everyone, regardless of which side of the issues they are on. This book is especially valuable for all who are grappling with what respect human life requires.
The key question, Dworkin points out, is not whether a fetus is a person--with constitutional rights and interests--but how best to respect a conviction that many share, whether for philosophical or religious reasons: The life of any human creature, in any form, and at any stage, has intrinsic, sacred value. It may be regarded as immoral when human life at any stage is deliberately extinguished, and an insult to God's creative power. The question, Dworkin poses, is whether and when abortion is an unjustifiable waste of something of intrinsic importance.
For those who attest that life begins at conception, Dworkin discusses the issue of "ensoulment." He states that the pro-life argument is strengthened by insisting on immediate or early ensoulment. However, even in this is delayed, he suggests that there is nevertheless a human life preparing for a soul. He adds, "it seems undeniable that a human embryo is an identifiable living organism."
Religion often gets involved in social justice and is frequently criticized for delving into politics. Dworkin defends the involvement of religious organizations in the political arena.
Dworkin explains how abortion is regarded as a constitutional right of privacy, and therefore governments ought not legislate against it. He also attests that the claim of privacy treats pregnancy as if a woman and her fetus were morally and genetically separate entities. Legally, unborn children are not regarded as constitutionally protected persons, yet their mothers are granted procreative autonomy. He insists that if and when a fetus is given the right to live, a mother's interest should not be regarded as more important than that right. He adds that abortion is a kind of "self-destruction" in that a woman is destroying a part of herself.
Dworkin discusses whether a fetus has rights and interests in remaining alive, then applies these interests to euthanasia, citing examples from several court decisions. He provides helpful background on advanced medical directives and cites legal nightmares of those who by neglect are forced to rely on casual conversations to document the wishes of loved ones in a persistent vegitative state. He suggest that it is because life is sacred that we are not indifferent about what happens to us.
Medical ethics is a complex field requiring an understanding of the legal, social, and religious implications of medical decisions. Ronald Dworkin has provided a compelling, exhaustive presentation of a complex issue that ought to be read by everyone, regardless of which side of the issues they are on. This book is especially valuable for all who are grappling with what respect human life requires.
Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2000
Amazingly, Dworkin offers a new take on the abortion dispute--and I think a correct one. I don't agree with everything he says, but this book sheds more light on these issues than any other that I have read. I would say that it is the best philosophical book I have read in a long while. Among the many things that I appreciate about this book is that Dworkin along the way also has interesting and insightful things to say about the philosophy of mind, the meaning of life, and the nature of human dignity. If you are at all interested in bio-ethics, the philosophy of the abortion dispute, euthanasia, or the meaning of life--read this book. I plan to re-read it soon.
21 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 13, 1999
I'm reading this book as part of and Ethics and Health Care course and find Dworkin's argument to be a concise moral overview of the current debate on abortion and euthanasia. He does equal justice to views from the Catholic Church to the Women's movement on aspects of abortion and gives those with a less extensive legal background an easily understandable assessment of important precedents and pending legislation. I found his coverage on other other systems outside of the US to be lacking, but realize this is not the primary focus of his work. For a better analysis of the current acceptability and status of PAS and euthanasia in the Netherlands look for articles by Van der Maas and Angell in JAMA or the NEJM. Overall, Dworkin does justice to a highly controversial issue with adequate research and moral reasoning. An excellant beginner to understanding abortion and euthanasia.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Larisa Astley
5.0 out of 5 stars
Useful and as good as described
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 6, 2018Verified Purchase
Postage took a long time but I knew that
Kam
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 23, 2017Verified Purchase
Great price -- good read,
TOMASZ MAMELKA
5.0 out of 5 stars
very good!!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 20, 2014Verified Purchase
Just one word: very good!!!
MICHAEL FINOTTI🇺🇸🇬🇧
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Book!
Reviewed in Brazil on October 17, 2017Verified Purchase
Great book. Great author !
Clear, straight to the point and amazingly written.
The vook has given me a whole new outlook on Euthanasia and abortion. Splendid.
Clear, straight to the point and amazingly written.
The vook has given me a whole new outlook on Euthanasia and abortion. Splendid.
zahoori mohiuddin
4.0 out of 5 stars
Four Stars
Reviewed in India on March 23, 2016Verified Purchase
One of the finest moral philosophers along with Derek Parfit and Michael J. Sandell







