Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Lincoln and the Decision for War: The Northern Response to Secession (Civil War America) Book Club (BCE/BOMC) Edition

4.1 out of 5 stars 9 customer reviews
ISBN-13: 978-0807831885
ISBN-10: 0807831883
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Buy used
$9.50
Condition: Used - Good
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: dust jacket discoloration due to sticker removal...small tears along dust jacket edge... New book with shelf wear along the edges
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
65 Used from $0.01
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.
More Buying Choices
24 New from $3.94 65 Used from $0.01 2 Collectible from $9.85
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Prime Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
click to open popover

Editorial Reviews

From Booklist

The American Civil War often seems inevitable in retrospect, but to historians who examine the secession crisis of 1860–61, it does not seem quite so obvious. Succeeding works such as And the War Came, by Kenneth M. Stampp (1950), and Days of Defiance, by Maury Klein (1997), McClintock’s contribution assesses the impact in the North of South Carolina’s belligerence following Lincoln’s election. Through the lens of politics, McClintock analyzes how the factions composing the Republican and Democratic parties reacted, and how partisan newspaper editors attempted to influence these factions. From this bottom-up viewpoint, McClintock usefully changes the usual focus from Lincoln to a northern public worried about the possibility of war but uncertain how to avert it. Its fears consolidated into camps of hard-liners and conciliators, argues McClintock, who recounts the failures of compromise formulas that left Republicans opposed to concessions (Lincoln) with the upper hand over would-be deal cutters (William Seward). Intended to redress an oversight in scholarship, McClintock’s study should find favor with general readers interested in the Civil War’s immediate origin. --Gilbert Taylor

Review

[This] work should . . . be the beginning of a reappraisal.--The Journal of American History



A substantial contribution. . . . A fine study that deserves to be read along with the work of Daniel Crofts, Kenneth Stampp, and David Potter.--Journal of Illinois History



[In Lincoln and the Decision for War], McClintock usefully changes the usual focus from Lincoln to a northern public worried about the possibility of war but uncertain how to avert it. . . . Intended to redress an oversight in scholarship, McClintock's study should find favor with general readers interested in the Civil War's immediate origins.--Booklist



McClintock understands . . . the complexity of what was happening in the slave states.--History News Network



Tells this story in a straightforward manner with minimum back tracking. . . . Informative and enjoyable.-- James Durney, independent Book Reviewer



[A] splendid study. . . . The success of McClintock's book lies not only in its welcome reconsideration of Republican policy but also in its highlighting the crying need for a modern treatment of the secession winter as a national crisis, a climax of decades of sectional dynamics across the North's and the South's porous political and physical borders.--Journal of Southern History



[McClintock's] analysis is exceptionally clear and well written, easily accessible to the layperson as well as the scholar; it stimulates thought about the nature of leadership and crisis management.--Choice



McClintock contributes greatly to Civil War scholarship and perhaps even helps Army officers understand the current political climate. . . . McClintock has truly mastered his subject.--Military Review



Though McClintock's topic may not be new, his conclusions are. Lincoln and the Decision for War is an important contribution to our understanding of the causes of the American Civil War.--Military History of the West



Reader[s] will revel in McClintock's attention to detail and presentation of his interpretation and information in this rich narrative. His ability to immerse the reader within the politics and personalities of the nineteenth century is skillful indeed. . . . Should be the one book that scholars and interested readers consult on the matter of Northern attitudes towards secession at the brink of the Civil War.--Virginia Libraries



This fine analytic book anatomizes the currents of need at the time, the efforts of the many varied cultures to cope with them and the results.--Journal of American Cultures



McClintock transports the reader into the realm of antebellum American brinksmanship. . . . [A] satisfying account.--Civil War Times



A worthy addition to Civil War scholarship.--H-Net Reviews



A balanced and erudite examination of the secession crisis from the all too neglected northern political angle. . . . [This] deeply researched study promotes fresh interpretations and insights that are deserving of a wide readership. The literature of the secession winter is appreciably richer for its existence. Highly recommended.--Civil War Books and Authors



It is the rare reader who will not find this an eminently satisfactory book. McClintock has consulted an impressive range of primary sources to construct his narrative, illustrate his points, and support his analysis, and [he] demonstrates a solid grasp of secondary literature.--Journal of Illinois History



Indispensable for students of political history.--Georgia Historical Quarterly



Those interested in better understanding Lincoln's role in the crucial period between his election and the call for volunteers in mid-April 1861 would do well to consult Russell McClintock's new book. . . . Does a fabulous job of uncovering the sense of contingency that existed throughout the nation in the early months.--Louisiana History



Outstanding book.--Indiana Magazine of History



McClintock's well-written and brilliantly analyzed account is a most important contribution to the study of the Civil War. . . . Illuminates the immediate origins. . . . Provides an intimate understanding of the antebellum political system.--The McCormick Messenger



With deft strokes, McClintock describes the various competing concepts of union among Republicans, Democrats and others and discovers that in the end they agreed that representative democracy must oppose disunion or else self-government itself would be lost. . . . More than any other scholar, McClintock incisively shows that in the end the North and Lincoln simply could not let the South go. Highly recommended.--Library Journal, starred review



Ably researched and well-written.--Bowling Green Daily News



In telling the story so thoughtfully and with such attention to detail, this fine piece of scholarship certainly deserves to take its place alongside the familiar historiographical landmarks.--American Historical Review



[A] highly readable, thoroughly researched, and welcome narrative. . . . McClintock's book has set a high standard--indeed, a Lincolnian one.--Civil War History



A fine study.--Sean Wilentz, The New Republic



McClintock's vision of the period in which events led to a new president's decision to go to war to preserve a union is to comprehend the war, its causes and effects, more deeply, more complexly.--The Advocate



"Well-written, shows appreciation for the complexity of northern sentiment during the secession crisis, and treats the crisis for the essentially political drama it was.--Civil War Book Review



It is only through such books that we can begin to come to a new, fresher understanding of the origins of the Civil War and the role of northerners in that contest.--Journal of the Early Republic

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

The latest book club pick from Oprah
"The Underground Railroad" by Colson Whitehead is a magnificent novel chronicling a young slave's adventures as she makes a desperate bid for freedom in the antebellum South. See more

Product Details

  • Series: Civil War America
  • Hardcover: 400 pages
  • Publisher: The University of North Carolina Press; Book Club (BCE/BOMC) edition (April 1, 2008)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0807831883
  • ISBN-13: 978-0807831885
  • Product Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.5 x 1.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #646,105 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

By James W. Durney VINE VOICE on May 21, 2008
Format: Hardcover
The normal historical point of view for November 1860 to April 1861 is Southern. Lincoln and the efforts to find a comprise are noted but the main story is what the South is doing. This book changes that by concentrating on Northern politics and reactions. Secession and all the maneuvering for and against it, take place off stage. Except for South Carolina, leaving the Union was a wrenching process. Many Southern states resisted secession until the very end. Kentucky was not able to make a choice and Maryland may not have been able to choose. Their stories are the subject of most histories about this period.
What about the North? How did the political, personal and public opinion shape a response to the crisis? This book tells that story and what a story it is. The Democrats, badly damaged by the events 1860, try to blame everything on the Republicans. While they work to construct a comprise to save the Union one more time. The Republicans are not united nor are they sure how to proceed. A substantial part of the party sides with the Democrats in trying to find a comprise. Another large faction is ready to allow the South to leave the Union. Large numbers feel that secession is wrong but that the Federal government lacks the authority to force states back into the Union. Many question if it is desirable to use force to maintain the Union and if doing so would not destroy the Union. Added is the plea of Southern Unionists for something to stop secession.
Lincoln, Douglas, Seward stride across these pages. Each man with multiple agendas that create and destroy alliances. Each man trying to lead his political party, maintain the Union and do what he feels is best for the nation.
Read more ›
2 Comments 27 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
McClintock's first historical non-fiction fully engages the reader in the politics and personalities that defined the most important four months in the history of the United States, the months between Lincoln's election and the firing on Fort Sumter. Although clear that the ultimate decision for the war lied with Lincoln, McClintock provides insight into the significance of other key players, from Democratic leader Stephen Douglas to Republican party leader William Seward. However, more than just a politcal history, letters and quotes from common townspeople provide a complete view of the perceptions of the time. As an avid reader of history, I can safely say that this work combines the detail of Shelby Foote with the adventure of David McCullough. Bravo McClintock!
Comment 23 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
Russell McClintock describes in great detail the political response to secession in the North. Most of his focus is on the action in Congress and the Republican party.

Oddly, President Lincoln seems to almost float above the contrevoursy between the time he is elected and the final decision to resupply Ft. Sumter. He evidently was greatly distracted by doling out patronage positions to Republican conies while the nation slid towards civil war. That's the impression one gets up until the final chapter or two, when McClintock seems to let Lincoln off the hook by inferring a higher purpose and reasoning behind his actions (or lack thereof).

Basically, McClintock makes the case that the immediate reason/cause of the war (not to be confused with the causes of secession) was that Lincoln and the Republican party felt that to surrender Ft. Sumter was to implicitly acknowledge secession and cede Federal authority in the South, and that in turn would lead to anarchy and the end of the government as other states went their own way. In other words, secession did not necessarily have to lead to war - the North (or more specifically the Republican Party) chose war rather than cede authority in the South. Ironically, Ft. Sumter, like most of the other coastal fortications built in the wake of the War of 1812, was functionally obsolete by 1861 and of little military value. Sumter's significance was mainly as a symbol of Federal authority.

Although McClintock acknowledges that the upper South did not secede until Lincoln called for 75,000 troops to put down the rebellion (in fact, the upper South had explicitly and overwhelmingly rejected secession), he seems to let Lincoln off the hook here.
Read more ›
1 Comment 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
This is a review of the book, "Lincoln, The Decision for War" by Russell McClintock by someone who has limited knowledge of this aspect of history. My earliest realization that there was an alternate view of the greatness of Abraham Linclon was, when walking home from first grade, Johny Panholzer said, "My Grandmother hates him because he freed the slaves." This was in a white school in Washington D.C. in 1946, so his grandmother just may have heard this from a father who wore the uniform of the Confederacy.

"Historiography" describes the changes in how historians and the public view past eras, actors and events. While this book is an unbiased recounting of such elements, rather than a polemic, it explores how these two men faced the same crisis of impending secession, one a lame duck President, the other a President-elect, during the fateful sixteen weeks between election and inauguration. In considering this one aspect of Buchanan's presidency alone, the author states (pp 205) After Lincoln's first week in office being finally briefed on the reality of the crisis, " Whether Lincoln knew it or not, in practical terms the policy he marked out was quite similar to Buchanan's."

It contrasts the new fragile anti-slavery Republic party which would control national policy under Lincoln, and the then bifurcated Democratic party, focusing on the individual who was elected by this party, James Buchanan who was required to actually make decision with not only limited information, but inability to convey specific orders by an incomplete telegraph system. After his inauguration. Lincoln was in this seat where reality, and the limits of action, caused such a shock that he almost physically collapsed within the first month.
Read more ›
1 Comment 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse