
Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$14.99$14.99
FREE delivery: Wednesday, June 14 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $12.00
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
91% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.


Live Not by Lies: A Manual for Christian Dissidents Hardcover – September 29, 2020
Price | New from | Used from |
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.99
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership |
- Kindle
$13.99 Read with Our Free App -
Audiobook
$0.99 with Audible Membership - Hardcover
$14.99 - Paperback
$16.99

Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
-
90 days FREE. Terms apply.
90 days FREE of Amazon Music Unlimited. Included with purchase of an eligible product. You will receive an email with signup instructions. Renews automatically. New subscribers only. Terms apply. Offered by Amazon.com. Here's how (restrictions apply)
Purchase options and add-ons
Additional Details


For years, émigrés from the former Soviet bloc have been telling Rod Dreher they see telltale signs of "soft" totalitarianism cropping up in America--something more Brave New World than Nineteen Eighty-Four. Identity politics are beginning to encroach on every aspect of life. Civil liberties are increasingly seen as a threat to "safety". Progressives marginalize conservative, traditional Christians, and other dissenters. Technology and consumerism hasten the possibility of a corporate surveillance state. And the pandemic, having put millions out of work, leaves our country especially vulnerable to demagogic manipulation.
In Live Not By Lies, Dreher amplifies the alarm sounded by the brave men and women who fought totalitarianism. He explains how the totalitarianism facing us today is based less on overt violence and more on psychological manipulation. He tells the stories of modern-day dissidents--clergy, laity, martyrs, and confessors from the Soviet Union and the captive nations of Europe--who offer practical advice for how to identify and resist totalitarianism in our time. Following the model offered by a prophetic World War II-era pastor who prepared believers in his Eastern European to endure the coming of communism, Live Not By Lies teaches American Christians a method for resistance:
• SEE: Acknowledge the reality of the situation.
• JUDGE: Assess reality in the light of what we as Christians know to be true.
• ACT: Take action to protect truth.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn famously said that one of the biggest mistakes people make is assuming totalitarianism can't happen in their country. Many American Christians are making that mistake today, sleepwalking through the erosion of our freedoms. Live Not By Lies will wake them and equip them for the long resistance.
- Print length256 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSentinel
- Publication dateSeptember 29, 2020
- Dimensions6.24 x 0.9 x 9.27 inches
- ISBN-100593087399
- ISBN-13978-0593087398
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Highest rated | Lowest Pricein this set of productsAnother Gospel?: A Lifelong Christian Seeks Truth in Response to Progressive ChristianityPaperback
Special offers and product promotions
- 90 days FREE of Amazon Music Unlimited. Included with purchase of an eligible product. You will receive an email with signup instructions. Renews automatically. New subscribers only. Terms apply. Offered by Amazon.com. Here's how (restrictions apply)
- Relatively few contemporary Christians are prepared to suffer for the faith, because the therapeutic society that has formed them denies the purpose of suffering in the first place, and the idea of bearing pain for the sake of truth seems ridiculous.Highlighted by 2,941 Kindle readers
- As part of its quest to define reality, a totalitarian state seeks not just to control your actions but also your thoughts and emotions. The ideal subject of a totalitarian state is someone who has learned to love Big Brother.Highlighted by 2,025 Kindle readers
- The old, hard totalitarianism had a vision for the world that required the eradication of Christianity. The new, soft totalitarianism does too, and we are not equipped to resist its sneakier attack.Highlighted by 1,646 Kindle readers
Editorial Reviews
Review
“In this remarkably prescient book, Dreher sets Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s timeless appeal to ‘live not by lies’ as the cornerstone of his own bold warning. His suggestion of a dawning post-Christian, ‘pre-totalitarian’ society is impossible to dismiss in light of the patient case he builds for his passionate, if provocative, thesis.”—Ignat Solzhenitsyn, conductor and pianist
“With characteristic foresight, Rod Dreher has written an invaluable compendium of how to live fearlessly under totalitarianisms, old and new. Better still, the book is a counsel of hope and joy for even the bleakest days—and an encouragement we need, especially today in this time of cascading crises.”—Patrick Deneen, author of Why Liberalism Failed
"Live Not By Lies will cement Rod Dreher’s reputation as the most important Christian thinker of our age."—Crisis Magazine
“Christians who care about the future of the gospel in America should give heed to Dreher's manual. Live Not by Lies is a timely, perhaps even prophetic book."—Touchstone Magazine
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Kolakovi the Prophet
Sometimes, a stranger who sees deeper and farther than the crowd appears to warn of trouble coming. These stories often end with people disbelieving the prophet and suffering for their blindness. Here, though, is a tale about a people who heard the prophet's warnings, did as he advised, and were ready when the crisis struck.
In 1943, a Jesuit priest and anti-fascist activist named Tomislav Poglajen fled his native Croatia one step ahead of the Gestapo and settled in Czechoslovakia. To conceal himself from the Nazis, he assumed his Slovak mother's name-Kolakovic-and took up a teaching position in Bratislava, the capital of the Slovak region, which had become an independent vassal state of Hitler. The priest, thirty-seven years old and with a thick shock of prematurely white hair, had spent some his priestly training studying the Soviet Union. He believed that the defeat of Nazi totalitarianism would occasion a great conflict between Soviet totalitarianism and the liberal democratic West. Though Father Kolakovic worried about the threats to Christian life and witness from the rich, materialistic West, he was far more concerned about the dangers of communism, which he correctly saw as an imperialistic ideology.
By the time Father Kolakovic reached Bratislava, it was clear that the Red Army would defeat the Germans in the East. In fact, in 1944, the Czech government in exile-which also represented Slovaks who refused to accept the nominally independent Slovak state-made a formal agreement with Stalin, guaranteeing that after driving the Nazis out, the Soviets would give the reunited nation its freedom.
Because he knew how the Soviets thought, Father Kolakovic knew this was a lie. He warned Slovak Catholics that when the war ended, Czechoslovakia would fall to the rule of a Soviet puppet government. He dedicated himself to preparing them for persecution.
The Unready Christians of Slovakia
Father Kolakovic knew that the clericalism and passivity of traditional Slovak Catholicism would be no match for communism. For one thing, he correctly foresaw that the communists would try to control the Church by subduing the clergy. For another, he understood that the spiritual trials awaiting believers under communism would put them to an extreme test. The charismatic pastor preached that only a total life commitment to Christ would enable them to withstand the coming trial.
"Give yourself totally to Christ, throw all your worries and desires on him, for he has a wide back, and you will witness miracles," the priest said, in the recollection of one disciple.
Giving oneself totally to Christ was not an abstraction or a pious thought. It needed to be concrete, and it needed to be communal. The total destruction of the First World War opened the eyes of younger Catholics to the need for a new evangelization. A Belgian priest named Joseph Cardijn, whose father had been killed in a mining accident, started a lay movement to do this among the working class. These were the Young Christian Workers, called "Jocists" after the initials of their name in French. Inspired by the Jocist example, Father Kolakovic adapted it to the needs of the Catholic Church in German-occupied Slovakia. He established cells of faithful young Catholics who came together for prayer, study, and fellowship.
The refugee priest taught the young Slovak believers that every person must be accountable to God for his actions. Freedom is responsibility, he stressed; it is a means to live within the truth. The motto of the Jocists became the motto for what Father Kolakovic called his "Family": "See. Judge. Act." See meant to be awake to realities around you. Judge was a command to discern soberly the meaning of those realities in light of what you know to be true, especially from the teachings of the Christian faith. After you reach a conclusion, then you are to act to resist evil.
V‡clav Vako, a Kolakovic follower, recalled late in his life that Father Kolakovic's ministry excited so many young Catholics because it energized the laity and gave them a sense of leadership responsibility.
"It is remarkable how Kolakovic almost instantly succeeded in creating a community of trust and mutual friendship from a diverse grouping of people (priests, religious and lay people of different ages, education, or spiritual maturity)," Vako wrote.
The Family groups came together at first for Bible study and prayer, but soon began listening to Father Kolakovic lecture on philosophy, sociology, and intellectual topics. Father Kolakovic also trained his young followers in how to work secretly, and to withstand the interrogation that he said would surely come.
The Family expanded its small groups quickly across the nation. "By the end of the school year 1944," Vako said, "it would have been difficult to find a faculty or secondary school in Bratislava or larger cities where our circles did not operate."
In 1946, Czech authorities deported the activist priest. Two years later, communists seized total power, just as Father Kolakovic had predicted. Within several years, almost all of the Family had been imprisoned and the Czechoslovak institutional church brutalized into submission. But when the Family members emerged from prison in the 1960s, they began to do as their spiritual father had taught them. Father Kolakovic's top two lieutenants-physician Silvester KrcÿmŽry and priest Vladim’r Jukl-quietly set up Christian circles around the country and began to build the underground church.
The underground church, led by the visionary cleric's spiritual children and grandchildren, became the principle means of anti-communist dissent for the next forty years. It was they who organized a mass 1988 public demonstration in Bratislava, the Slovak capital, demanding religious liberty. The Candle Demonstration was the first major protest against the state. It kicked off the Velvet Revolution, which brought down the communist regime a year later. Though Slovak Christians were among the most persecuted in the Soviet Bloc, the Catholic Church there thrived in resistance because one man saw what was coming and prepared his people.
The New Totalitarianism
Why did Father Kolakovic know what was coming to the people of Central Europe? He was not supernaturally gifted, at least not that we know. Rather, he had studied Soviet communism intensely to prepare for missionary work in Russia and understood how the Soviets thought and behaved. He could read the geopolitical signs of the times. And as a priest who had been organizing Catholic resistance to the Nazi version of totalitarianism, he had on-the-ground experience with clandestine combat against monstrous ideology.
Today's survivors of Soviet communism are, in their way, our own Kolakovices, warning us of a coming totalitarianism-a form of government that combines political authoritarianism with an ideology that seeks to control all aspects of life. This totalitarianism won't look like the USSR's. It's not establishing itself through "hard" means like armed revolution, or enforcing itself with gulags. Rather, it exercises control, at least initially, in soft forms. This totalitarianism is therapeutic. It masks its hatred of dissenters from its utopian ideology in the guise of helping and healing.
To grasp the threat of totalitarianism, it's important to understand the difference between it and simple authoritarianism. Authoritarianism is what you have when the state monopolizes political control. That is mere dictatorship-bad, certainly, but totalitarianism is much worse. According to Hannah Arendt, the foremost scholar of totalitarianism, a totalitarian society is one in which an ideology seeks to displace all prior traditions and institutions, with the goal of bringing all aspects of society under control of that ideology. A totalitarian state is one that aspires to nothing less than defining and controlling reality. Truth is whatever the rulers decide it is. As Arendt has written, wherever totalitarianism has ruled, "[I]t has begun to destroy the essence of man."
As part of its quest to define reality, a totalitarian state seeks not just to control your actions but also your thoughts and emotions. The ideal subject of a totalitarian state is someone who has learned to love Big Brother.
Back in the Soviet era, totalitarianism demanded love for the Party, and compliance with the Party's demands was enforced by the state. Today's totalitarianism demands allegiance to a set of progressive beliefs, many of which are incompatible with logic-and certainly with Christianity. Compliance is forced less by the state than by elites who form public opinion, and by private corporations that, thanks to technology, control our lives far more than we would like to admit.
Many conservatives today fail to grasp the gravity of this threat, dismissing it as mere "political correctness"-a previous generation's disparaging term for so-called "wokeness." It's easy to dismiss people like the former Soviet professor as hysterical if you think of what's happening today as nothing more than the return of the left-wing campus kookiness of the 1990s. Back then, the standard conservative response was dismissive. Wait till those kids get out into the real world and have to find a job.
Well, they did-and they brought the campus to corporate America, to the legal and medical professions, to media, to elementary and secondary schools, and to other institutions of American life. In this cultural revolution, which intensified in the spring and summer of 2020, they are attempting to turn the entire country into a "woke" college campus.
Today in our societies, dissenters from the woke party line find their businesses, careers, and reputations destroyed. They are pushed out of the public square, stigmatized, canceled, and demonized as racists, sexists, homophobes, and the like. And they are afraid to resist, because they are confident that no one will join them or defend them.
The Gentleness of Soft Totalitarianism
It's possible to miss the onslaught of totalitarianism, precisely because we have a misunderstanding of how its power works. In 1951, poet and literary critic Czesaw Miosz, exiled to the West from his native Poland as an anti-communist dissident, wrote that Western people misunderstand the nature of communism because they think of it only in terms of "might and coercion."
"That is wrong," he wrote. "There is an internal longing for harmony and happiness that lies deeper than ordinary fear or the desire to escape misery or physical destruction."
In The Captive Mind, Miosz said that communist ideology filled a void that had opened in the lives of early-twentieth-century intellectuals, most of whom had ceased to believe in religion.
Today's left-wing totalitarianism once again appeals to an internal hunger, specifically the hunger for a just society, one that vindicates and liberates the historical victims of oppression. It masquerades as kindness, demonizing dissenters and disfavored demographic groups to protect the feelings of "victims" in order to bring about "social justice."
The contemporary cult of social justice identifies members of certain social groups as victimizers, as scapegoats, and calls for their suppression as a matter of righteousness. In this way, the so-called social justice warriors (aka SJWs), who started out as liberals animated by an urgent compassion, end by abandoning authentic liberalism and embracing an aggressive and punitive politics that resembles Bolshevism, as the Soviet style of communism was first called.
At the turn of the twenty-first century, the cultural critic RenŽ Girard prophetically warned: "The current process of spiritual demagoguery and rhetorical overkill has transformed the concern for victims into a totalitarian command and a permanent inquisition."
This is what the survivors of communism are saying to us: liberalism's admirable care for the weak and marginalized is fast turning into a monstrous ideology that, if it is not stopped, will transform liberal democracy into a softer, therapeutic form of totalitarianism.
The Therapeutic as the Postmodern Mode of Existence
Soft totalitarianism exploits decadent modern man's preference for personal pleasure over principles, including political liberties. The public will support, or at least not oppose, the coming soft totalitarianism, not because it fears the imposition of cruel punishments but because it will be more or less satisfied by hedonistic comforts. Nineteen Eighty-Four is not the novel that previews what's coming; it's rather Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. The contemporary social critic James Poulos calls this the "Pink Police State": an informal arrangement in which people will surrender political rights in exchange for guarantees of personal pleasure.
Soft totalitarianism, as we will see in a later chapter, makes use of advanced surveillance technology not (yet) imposed by the state, but rather welcomed by consumers as aids to lifestyle convenience-and in the postpandemic environment, likely needed for public health. It is hard to get worked up over Big Brother when you have already grown accustomed to Big Data closely monitoring your private life via apps, credit cards, and smart devices, which make life so much easier and more pleasurable. In Orwell's fictional dystopia, the state installed "telescreens" in private homes to keep track of individual's lives. Today we install smart speakers into our homes to increase our sense of well-being.
How did maximizing a feeling of well-being become the ultimate goal of modern people and societies? The American sociologist and cultural critic Philip Rieff was not a religious believer, but few prophets have written more piercingly about the nature of the cultural revolution that overtook the West in the twentieth century that defines the core of soft totalitarianism.
In his landmark 1966 book, The Triumph of the Therapeutic, Rieff said the death of God in the West had given birth to a new civilization devoted to liberating the individual to seek his own pleasures and to managing emergent anxieties. Religious Man, who lived according to belief in transcendent principles that ordered human life around communal purposes, had given way to Psychological Man, who believed that there was no transcendent order and that life's purpose was to find one's own way experimentally. Man no longer understood himself to be a pilgrim on a meaningful journey with others, but as a tourist who traveled through life according to his own self-designed itinerary, with personal happiness his ultimate goal.
This was a revolution even more radical than the 1917 Bolshevik event, said Rieff. For the first time, humankind was seeking to create a civilization based on the negation of any binding transcendent order. The Bolsheviks may have been godless, but even they believed that there was a metaphysical order, one that demanded that individuals subordinate their personal desires to a higher cause. Almost a quarter century before the fall of the Berlin Wall, Rieff predicted that communism would not be able to withstand the cultural revolution coming from the West, one that purported to set the individual free to pursue hedonism and individualism. If there is no sacred order, then the original promise of the serpent in the Garden of Eden-"[Y]e shall be as gods"-is the foundational principle of the new culture.
Rieff saw, however, that you could not have culture without cult-that is, without shared belief in and submission to a sacred order, what you get is an "anti-culture." An anti-culture is inherently unstable, said Rieff, but he doubted that people brought up in this social order would ever be willing to return to the old ways.
Product details
- Publisher : Sentinel (September 29, 2020)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 256 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0593087399
- ISBN-13 : 978-0593087398
- Item Weight : 15.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.24 x 0.9 x 9.27 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #13,224 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2021
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Live by Lies is a book ironically with a positive message despite the dystopic warnings it lays down through past parallels and current warning signs. Rod Dreher's command of Russian Communist history is welcomed in a current world where no one talks about this subject enough. His title is based off an essay by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and justifiably so, Solzhenitsyn is an obvious inspiration for this book in many areas.
As someone who is only 22, I have been studying this time in history for three years. Not only because of how taboo it seems to be in academic circles, or how ignorant the people are on this, but my interest lies in how past communism can show us how to avoid a similar situation.
Dreher covers everything that is important in this contemporary struggle. He openly talks about the technocracy that has not only come into fruition, but has invited itself into our homes by our own will. Paraphrasing a great line "Orwell worried about a future where books were burned, that is not where we are. Huxley warned of a world where all books and information are open to all, yet no one cares. This is where we are at." Beautifully illustrated, and can be greatly appreciated by those who have read 1984 and Brave New World.
Most people who are aware of these tyrannical attempts to destroy the soul will not be surprised by much of his studies and passages. However Dreher has a raw talent to put these seemingly complex evolution of totalitarianism into an easier format for people who have decided not to delve into these subjects. Live not By Lies can serve as a great book for people fresh, or even people who are well advised in these harsh realities. For new beginners it can open them to new sources, new ways of thinking or simply educating them on the truth of communism. On the latter, for advanced readers, it can serve as a solitary book to solidify research and to open more avenues of study.
Dreher intelligently laid out first hand accounts of surviving communism. The contrast of Russian anti-communist, and contemporary Western pro-consumer culture is best explained in this book. Privacy is a precious commodity for the Russian anti-communist, the thought that Americans gladly sell their privacy through "Big Data" horrifies them. Who can blame them?
Americans are voluntarily selling their freedoms as we speak. It happened through the Patriot Act to fight "Global terrorism" in response to 9/11, it has happened again during the Pandemic "to keep us all safe" from the "invisible enemy". Some of the conclusions of the anti-communist came down to believing most people prefer soft-totalitarianism instead of freedom. Why? Freedom is not easy. Freedom means responsibility and discipline in one's own conscience. Leaving our fate in the hands of the state is easy, takes no thought at all. From my experience living in a foolish blue state, many people believe that corrupt politicians will pay for all their problems.
Dreher's sources are concrete, he is clearly well versed in many cultural critics both past and living. This brings in the many questions of why communism is so attractive to many ignorant people. Without spoiling too much of the book, it brings back what I read from Theodore Kaczynski's recent publications on society and technology. Both books hit the mark on social media and it's devastating effect on society's mental health. This includes one of the topics being, the atomization of people. Isolation, loneliness, depression at an all time high.
Why are suicides at a higher rate than ever before seen when Western society has everything it materialistic desires? This is due to the lack of higher purpose, which Dreher goes into great detail. Even going as far as saying the Bolshevik's of the 1917 Revolution, perpetrators of the Red Terror were more spiritual than the modern day progressive. The Bolsheviks did not believe in God, but they believed in a higher metaphysical purpose. Today there is no belief in any god or purpose by the machine of progressive tyrants, they are the gods of their own egotistical religion.
Why did I begin saying Live by Lies is ironically positive? After the first half of the book which describes the coming soft-totalitarianism in the West, and the use of technology illustrated by China to subdue its citizens with the "Social Credit System". The second half of the book purely focuses on tragic first hand experiences of gulag survivors and families who kept their honor and faith through a system of lies. This is an incredible part of Dreher's work, a page turner.
Dreher allows the survivors to show their true faith, and resistance to communism by their deeds and actions in life. This is very important, this allows the distinction between being hypocritical and being one of action. Some may misconceive the religious aspect of Dreher's message is to seek suffering, and misery to strengthen the soul. This is not the case and is not encouraged. It is encouraged that if a time of suffering befalls upon you, then take that time to develop spiritual strength, to not let the system destroy you. Dreher wonderfully compartmentalizes Solzhenitsyn's experience from his "Gulag Archipelago''. After all of the torture, suffering and misery and witnessing barbarity to unimaginable levels, Solzhenitsyn became closer to God then ever before. Many other stories illustrate this example of suffering and overcoming it.
A couple of these stories brought out sorrow in me, I teared on a few of the survivor's accounts and stories. Despite knowing the horrors of communism from studying the subject for a long time, these personal accounts really hit me in the gut. Not just the sheer horror man inflicts on man, but the amazing fortitude of the "victims". The "victims" did not break down spiritually, they did not become hateful or bitter. They embraced God and Jesus in such an unimaginably painful way.
Let me emphasize the word victim. One of the people Dreher interviewed was a documentary filmmaker. The filmmaker searched for stories to honor "victims", but eventually the amazing spirit of these people made him realize they were not victims, but "heroes".
"Heroes". That is a word that we hear too much in the west today. A word that has been diluted, it's meaning construed for current political narrative. Using the word "hero" for these transcendent survivors does not do justice for me due to the watering down of that word "hero". The modern progressive would look down on such men of true heart and courage. The modern progressive labels their dictators and oppressors of freedom as heroes. No I have a better word for those brave souls who died in what they believed in. They were "Champions of the Soul".
I am not a religious man, I do not speak of Jesus or God that much. But after reading this, I feel truly ashamed at my doubts in faith. These men died for their beliefs, like many other great men of our time. The beauty of such courage and love should be proof enough of God and Jesus. For that brings the question. If God is a mere illusion, then why do the communist try so hard to eradicate our connection with the metaphysical? Because they declare themselves God, they want to be the molders of our reality, they want to erode us into empty vessels for them to fill and molest to their heart's content. They are filled with jealousy that man can love something higher than this mortal journey.
This book leaves me hopeful that the spirit of man can endure even the darkest of realities. Orwell believed in the endurance of the human spirit as well, and Dreher highlights this in his book. Read this book, whether you agree or not with some of the author's views or his first hand sources. More people need to be aware of the past and history or we will have no future.
4.5/5 Page turner, needed more focus in some segments but nevertheless had a strong message.
First off the good:
Many of the stories the author recounts do, indeed, show similarities between the happenings leading up to Bolshevist takeovers and what is happening today in America. One area the author is particularly successful with is stories discussing the risk of ubiquitous data collection and surveillance, how Big Tech already has or could easily be subverted to exploiting this toward totalitarian ends and how the level of concern is just not where it should be. Stories which convey the sense of always worrying about what you say because it might be politically incorrect and cost you your job and never being sure who you can trust also seem to ring true in the current woke age. There is also a warning that social isolation and loneliness were common in pre-Bolshevist societies (as well as in the Weimar Republic), leaving people vulnerable to totalitarian ideologies to fill the void. Dreher mentions studies showing that these things are again on the rise in America today.
The book is also successful in sounding a general alarm to prepare for things to get worse and discusses some of the things that the preparation should involve. The author emphasizes that the most important areas of resistance if things do go totalitarian will be the family and small communities. He explicit refers to these as "resistance cells" and discusses how they formed the backbone of resistance to Bolshevism in Eastern Europe.
Another strength of the book is emphasizing that in life there will be suffering. It is unavoidable and especially if you want to stand on the side of the truth. Ray Dalio, a hedge fund manger, once said that if you live primarily to avoid pain you will end up having a very miserable life. I also thought Dreher offered good advice in encouraging Christians to be prepared to suffer but to neither actively seek it out nor to avoid it once it becomes necessary to endure. There is a theme of picking the right battles but not rationalizing away the need to fight at some point.
Finally, on the plus side, Dreher encourages Christians to co-operate with folks of other religious faiths and with atheists. He says not look to just look at the latter merely as conversion targets but as people, and people that Christians can genuinely learn from having, in some areas, better insights into certain aspect of society.
The Problems:
The biggest problem with the book is that it is not clear exactly where Dreher sees things going. He insists that America is more likely to turn into a "soft" versus "hard" totalitarianism due to its prior history and traditions. Despite this, the vast majority of examples involving people enduring things he thinks are unlikely to happen under America's coming soft totalitarianism. For example many of the stories involve people being imprisoned for long periods of time, tortured or having their children taken from them and placed in orphanages. There are also stories of mass executions. Since Dreher does not think these things are likely to happen in America it makes the discussions seem too abstract and, frankly, despite how horrific the abuses described are, it becomes boring at times. Why not, instead, discuss things he thinks are likely to actually happen under the "soft totalitarianism" he forsees? The stories are presumably so dramatic to capture your attention, but by being abstract compared to what is likely to happen, just ended up failing for me.
Another problem I had with Dreher's notion of a soft totalitarianism is that there is not much discussion of why he thinks it will stop at “soft”. Dreher correctly thinks the woke have fervor and moral certitude which can only be described as of being at a religious level. In history such people rarely stop at anything to crush all dissent once they have power in society and enemies in mind. It is my sense, and I am sure that I am not alone, that there is a certain bloodthirsty, retributive element to wokeism that should alert us to the danger of it turning into “hard totalitarianism". Dreher cites America's history and traditions as preventing this, but only spends a sentence stating this without elaborating on his reasoning. If he is thinking of our constitutional safeguards, well constitutional safeguard have been worked around in the past. All that is needed is the sense of an "existential threat" maybe from "fascists" or "literal Nazis" to secure a "temporary suspension" as occurred during the French Revolution. There its leaders, apparently, fully intended for it to be temporary. If the book had argued that a hard totalitarianism was likely, then the examples of Bolshevist abuses would have seemed far more relevant.
One big area that Dreher barely scratches the surface of is that wokeism appears to prefer to "capture" churches as opposed to proceeding into immediate battle with them. This is happening with the Southern Baptist Convention, for instance, as well as with the Mormon Church. It is likely that what will happen is that as much of existing churches will be captured as possible and the remnants will then present a particularly appealing targets since they will be taken to represent institutional or systemic problems with society. Again Dreher hints at this, but it deserves more than a sentence or two discussion.
Finally, I found that some of the claims in the book were not well presented or ran counter to what is really happening in society. For example, Dreher claims that "everyone" he talked to from Eastern Europe who had lived under Bolshevism saw parallels to what is happening in present day America. That would certainly be an extraordinary fact and something that should alarm us if true. The problem is that it needs to presented from at least a somewhat rigorous survey. Was it really every single person? How big was the sample size? How were the participants chosen? What exactly were the questions asked?
With regard to trends the author cites some which run contrary to what actually is happening in society. In "file under news you never thought you would hear" young people today are actually less interested in sex than previous generations. Also marriage is actually trending toward being more stable now than when divorce rates peaked during the late 70s and early 80s.
Top reviews from other countries

I wish there was a paper back or mass production version available to buy. I would buy several and hand them out.

This book reminds us of how important it is to live in truth. To wake up and smell the coffee.

I only wish that, "A Manual for Christian Dissidents" wasn't written in the title so that many non-Christians might be drawn to read it.

