- Paperback: 270 pages
- Publisher: LexisNexis / National Institute for Trial Advocacy; 3rd edition (June 1, 2001)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1556815387
- ISBN-13: 978-1556815386
- Package Dimensions: 10 x 7 x 0.8 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 4.8 out of 5 stars See all reviews (14 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #240,967 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Logic for Lawyers : A Guide to Clear Legal Thinking 3rd Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
See the Best Books of 2017 So Far
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for the best books of the year so far in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Developing good legal reasoning habits is essential to a quality law practice. Judge Aldisert examines legal thinking from a variety of perspectives to help guide lawyers through appropriate reasoning patterns. One Amazon.com reviewer says the book "provides a shortcut to understanding the basics of legal reasoning, including the common law doctrine of precedent, identifying weaknesses in legal arguments, and fashioning winning arguments through syllogisms." --David Marshall Nissman, J.D.
"...an exposition of how the use or misuse of logic promotes or impairs the development of law..." -- Jeffrey W. Grove, Professor, Indiana University School of Law
"Logic for Lawyers is the product of a keen mind that has benefitted from opportunities to engage in and examine legal thinking from a variety of perspectives. This volume fills a surprising void in the current legal literature." -- Mark A. Nordenberg, Chancellor, University of Pittsburgh
"Logic for Lawyers points out the fallacies of which we are all guilty from time to time....It will aid in avoiding the development of bad habits in legal reasoning." -- Elizabeth H. Patterson, Professor, Georgetown University Law Center
"The book's constituency includes all who labor in the law--from apprentice to master craftsman--and care about understanding their work and doing a credible job." --Jeffrey W. Grove, Professor, Indiana University School of Law, Indianapolis
Browse award-winning titles. See more
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top customer reviews
This book's outstanding revelation to me was neither its (useful) discussion of deductive or inductive reasoning (which, to me, were comparatively elementary), nor syllogistic reasoning (which to me was not only elementary but problematic).
The book's discussion of "formal" fallacies, including syllogisms, is interesting and worthwhile, and knowledge of the existence of these formal fallacies is important. However, I question the need, as a criteria of reasoning validity, of strict, universal application of these formal reasoning structures to an analysis and evaluation of judicial opinions or practical legal reasoning.
This book's blockbuster revelation to me was its discussion of "informal" fallacies, including the need for developing one's skill in recognizing or spotting "informal" fallacies in the reasoning of others - and in avoiding the commission of "informal" fallacies in one's own reasoning.
Other reviewers of this book comment on the need for studying a course on logic, as an adjunct to this book. I agree, with a qualification. I feel the greatest need, in practical or legal reasoning, is for treatises providing in-depth analysis of each "informal" fallacy. Fortunately, such treatises are now beginning to appear.
Another significant deficiency in modern logic textbooks is their failure to provide compelling and unique examples of the "informal" fallacies noted (on a theoretical basis) in these textbooks. In this area of illustrative examples, Judge Aldisert's book contains a treasure trove of numerous examples of "informal" fallacies, the value of which is enhanced by the fact that they are all discussed in the context of judicial opinions from court cases, which Judge Aldisert quotes in his text.
No matter how many treatises regarding "informal" fallacies which have now appeared and will now appear in the future, Judge Aldisert's book will always remain on my bookshelf - this book remains my "first stop" in my search for relevant issues of "legal logic."
My award of "five stars" to this book is not because this book is definitive (it is not), but because it is seminal, and in my heart and mind, is a classic, and remains an indispensable, introductory overview to any prospective law student or practitioner.
DO NOT expect, however, that you will have A+ easily in most law classes after reading this book. Success in lawschool or any other law-related classes in gradschool/college depends on many things. A sharp legal mind alone can be frustrated by laziness. Besides, although the knowledge in this book looks like a long list of recipes that will help you ace whatever classes, it only provides you a minimum amount of prerequisites that you'd better consider as a "must have", rather than a "luxurious decor"