Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ Free Shipping
Looking at Photographs: 100 Pictures from the Collection of The Museum of Modern Art Paperback – September 1, 1976
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Comments? I can only echo some of the reviews already written about this important book, such as the review written by Vladimir Belomestnov and Damon Webster.
This is an amazing book, less for the quality of the photographs (Which are remarkable and marvelous!) than for what the author Mr. Szarkowski painstakingly wrote about each photograph.
John Szarkowski's brief essay about each photograph truly opened my eyes to the subject photograph. First, I would look at a particular photograph in an effort to see what made the photo outstanding. Next, I would read John Szarkowski's discussion of the piece, and I would see aspects of the photograph that I had not previously seen.
This book discusses 100 photographers (100 shots with no artist twice). They are in approximately chronological order. The author discusses why the shots are the way they are in terms of technological limits, expectations/assumptions/conventions of the time, and composition; though not often all three for a single photo.
Following up on each photographer via wikipedia and image search was my roll-my-own version of a History of Photography. (but only up to 1969, which is the date of the last photo in this book.)
When I started, I didn't know that this was what I wanted, but it was.
-1 for the segmented feel, some descriptions are nondescript, i.e. there seem to be photographs that should precede the next but are not there.
Most likely the missing photographs were part of someones estate, copyrighted and/or otherwise not available for publication in this compilation.