Buying Options
| Digital List Price: | $20.00 |
| Print List Price: | $29.95 |
| Kindle Price: |
$15.49
Save $14.46 (48%) |
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Losing Military Supremacy: The Myopia of American Strategic Planning Kindle Edition
by
Andrei Martyanov
(Author)
Format: Kindle Edition
|
Andrei Martyanov
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$22.71 | — |
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherClarity Press
-
Publication dateJune 4, 2018
-
File size578 KB
Customers who read this book also read
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
War with Russia?: From Putin & Ukraine to Trump & RussiagateKindle Edition$13.99$13.99& Free Shipping
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
How The Specter of Communism is Ruling Our WorldEditorial Board of "Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party"Kindle Edition
Amazon Business: Make the most of your Amazon Business account with exclusive tools and savings. Login now
Editorial Reviews
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The coming of the revolutionary S-500 air-defense system may completely close Russia and her allies’ airspace from any aerial or even ballistic threats. These developments alone completely devalue the astronomically expensive USAF front line combat aviation and its colossal investment into the very limited benefits of stealth, a euphemism for primarily “invisibility” in radio diapason, the mediocre F-35 being a prime example of the loss of common engineering, tactical and operational sense. Radiophotonics detection technologies will make all expenditures on stealth, without exception, simply a waste of money and resources. No better experts on how to waste resources exist than those sponsored by the US military-industrial complex. The situation is no better at sea. The introduction into service in 2017 of the 3M22 Zircon hyper-sonic missile is already dramatically redefining naval warfare and makes even remote sea zones a “no-sail” zone for any US major surface combatant, especially aircraft carriers. Currently, and for the foreseeable future, no technology capable to intercept such a missile exists or will exist. The US Navy still retains a world-class submarine force, but even this force will have huge difficulties when facing the challenge of increasingly deadly and silent non-nuclear submarines which are capable, together with friendly sea and shore-based anti-submarine forces, to completely shut down their own littorals from any kind of threat. Once access through littorals and the sea and even some oceans zones that matter are shut down, as they are being now, one of the main pillars of American naval doctrine and strategy―the ability to project power―collapses. With it collapses the main pillar of American superpowerdom, or, at least, of its illusion. The late Scott Shuger formulated an American naval contradiction:
"Because navies can go quietly over the horizon in ways armies can’t, naval development presents a country with unique opportunities for going wrong. When a continental power like the United States disregards its natural defense barriers and builds big battle fleets, it has turned from geopolitical realities towards a troublesome kind of make-believe. This kind of navy exists only to defeat other navies that are similarly inclined. That’s justifiable only if other navies like that already exist."
No carrier-centric navies, other than the US Navy, exist, nor will they exist in the nearest future ... --This text refers to the paperback edition.
"Because navies can go quietly over the horizon in ways armies can’t, naval development presents a country with unique opportunities for going wrong. When a continental power like the United States disregards its natural defense barriers and builds big battle fleets, it has turned from geopolitical realities towards a troublesome kind of make-believe. This kind of navy exists only to defeat other navies that are similarly inclined. That’s justifiable only if other navies like that already exist."
No carrier-centric navies, other than the US Navy, exist, nor will they exist in the nearest future ... --This text refers to the paperback edition.
Review
Martyanov's must-read book is the ultimate Weapon of Myth Destruction (WMD). And unlike the Saddam Hussein version, this one actually exists.
-- "Asia Times" --This text refers to the mp3_cd edition.About the Author
Andrei Martyanov is an expert on Russian military and naval issues. He was born in Baku, USSR, in 1963. He graduated from the Kirov Naval Red Banner Academy and served as an officer on the ships and staff position of Soviet Coast Guard through 1990. He took part in the events in the Caucasus which led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. In mid-1990s he moved to the United States where he currently works as laboratory director in a commercial aerospace group. He is a frequent blogger on the US Naval Institute blog.
--This text refers to the mp3_cd edition.Product details
- ASIN : B07DVSM76H
- Publisher : Clarity Press (June 4, 2018)
- Publication date : June 4, 2018
- Language : English
- File size : 578 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 251 pages
- Lending : Not Enabled
- Best Sellers Rank: #443,008 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
92 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2018
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
This is an excellent book, that makes a number of very important points:
1. The US myths about previous wars, especially WW2. The author notes that it was the Russians that defeated the vast majority of Germany's armed forces, with the US etc. fighting only a small percentage of them. What he doesn't mention enough is that it was the same in the Pacific, with the Chinese fighting the vast majority of the Japanese army and the US engaged in relatively small scuffles (Iwo Jima, Okinawa etc.) and sea battles.
2. Since WW2 the US has fought wars against weak nations (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Panama, Grenada). It was handed a major defeat in North Korea when it advanced beyond the Chinese "red line" and ended up fighting the Chinese Red Army. Also forgotten is the Beirut fiasco of the 1980s.
3. The US defence policy groups tend to be staffed by academics with little or no military training, which is very different to countries such as China and Russia. Leads to an unwarranted reliance of high tech comms etc. that can be quickly degraded in a real battle with a real opponent (as against some small nation with no electronic counter measure technologies.
4. All of the above leads to the possibility of a major US military miscalculation through arrogance from a misreading of history and easy victories over easy opponents. Hopefully, the recent demonstrations of new weapon systems by Russia and China may cool the US ardour for war.
Overall very much worth the read, and a great antidote for what goes for academic and mainstream publishing on such issues (I am doing a PhD in International Relations focused on Security Studies so spend a lot of my time with such stuff).
1. The US myths about previous wars, especially WW2. The author notes that it was the Russians that defeated the vast majority of Germany's armed forces, with the US etc. fighting only a small percentage of them. What he doesn't mention enough is that it was the same in the Pacific, with the Chinese fighting the vast majority of the Japanese army and the US engaged in relatively small scuffles (Iwo Jima, Okinawa etc.) and sea battles.
2. Since WW2 the US has fought wars against weak nations (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Panama, Grenada). It was handed a major defeat in North Korea when it advanced beyond the Chinese "red line" and ended up fighting the Chinese Red Army. Also forgotten is the Beirut fiasco of the 1980s.
3. The US defence policy groups tend to be staffed by academics with little or no military training, which is very different to countries such as China and Russia. Leads to an unwarranted reliance of high tech comms etc. that can be quickly degraded in a real battle with a real opponent (as against some small nation with no electronic counter measure technologies.
4. All of the above leads to the possibility of a major US military miscalculation through arrogance from a misreading of history and easy victories over easy opponents. Hopefully, the recent demonstrations of new weapon systems by Russia and China may cool the US ardour for war.
Overall very much worth the read, and a great antidote for what goes for academic and mainstream publishing on such issues (I am doing a PhD in International Relations focused on Security Studies so spend a lot of my time with such stuff).
55 people found this helpful
Helpful
Reviewed in the United States on August 3, 2018
Verified Purchase
I think Trotsky might have said that you may not be interested in War but War is interested in you. This is a very important book if you like an early warning before the sirens.
I carefully checked Andrei Martyanov out and he seems solid and he posts on the US Naval Institute site as well.
Many of the weapons he refers to are real, in production, and deployed.
It appears more likely than at any time since 1983 that there will be another massive war soon. This is not so surprising as it has been 73 years since the last major struggle between major powers and in historical terms this is an extended period though there have been lesser upheavals.
We would look at the era 1815 -fall of Napoleon until 1914-WW1.
You can appreciate that the Pentagon cannot keep ratcheting up the pressure on Russia decade after decade WITHOUT WW3 eventually, right?
I carefully checked Andrei Martyanov out and he seems solid and he posts on the US Naval Institute site as well.
Many of the weapons he refers to are real, in production, and deployed.
It appears more likely than at any time since 1983 that there will be another massive war soon. This is not so surprising as it has been 73 years since the last major struggle between major powers and in historical terms this is an extended period though there have been lesser upheavals.
We would look at the era 1815 -fall of Napoleon until 1914-WW1.
You can appreciate that the Pentagon cannot keep ratcheting up the pressure on Russia decade after decade WITHOUT WW3 eventually, right?
29 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2018
Verified Purchase
This book has opened my eyes to historical and contemporary reality. The slag heap of the American Deep State is a snake pit of liars and thieves blindly leading the world into Ragnarok. Western intelligentsia answers the facts laid out in this book only with arrogant denial, as it does in so many other areas where the truth is inconvenient. The hypnogogues of Hollywood and the sinistral mainstream media cannot face the fact that the U.S. is no longer militarily omnipotent and is in uncontrollable decline. Perhaps the sudden and "unexplained" sinking of an American aircraft carrier somewhere will awaken the "indispensable nation" to its true condition vis-a-vis Russia, but even that is in doubt for such willful blindness. Thank you, Andrei Martyanov!
22 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 24, 2018
Verified Purchase
One of those couldn't put it down books that is interesting and enjoyable to read in spite of the bad news.
The first third is history, mostly WWII and mostly Russian which serves as a backdrop for the idea that America has an inflated view of it's part in WWII and it's own power. It then goes into the issue of winning battles and loosing wars which is a hook for a veteran like me. The technical parts were of greatest interest to me but was the part that made me wish I could deduct a half star. There were things that made me wonder at the source since much of it would seem to properly be classified. I was left to wonder it there was a bit of inflation. Since our guys are my guys I must admit that I hope so.
Certainly enough of it was credible enough to be both believable and depressing. Not because I'm a fan of empire or the neocon agenda (I'm not), but because while I don't view war from the soul of a Russian, one of the things I brought home so many years ago was that nothing can be worse than having war on your own soil. A war with first rate military will be hell.
The first third is history, mostly WWII and mostly Russian which serves as a backdrop for the idea that America has an inflated view of it's part in WWII and it's own power. It then goes into the issue of winning battles and loosing wars which is a hook for a veteran like me. The technical parts were of greatest interest to me but was the part that made me wish I could deduct a half star. There were things that made me wonder at the source since much of it would seem to properly be classified. I was left to wonder it there was a bit of inflation. Since our guys are my guys I must admit that I hope so.
Certainly enough of it was credible enough to be both believable and depressing. Not because I'm a fan of empire or the neocon agenda (I'm not), but because while I don't view war from the soul of a Russian, one of the things I brought home so many years ago was that nothing can be worse than having war on your own soil. A war with first rate military will be hell.
30 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 25, 2018
Verified Purchase
This is one of the more intriguing books I have read lately. Initially, I was very impressed with a number of points the author made but increasingly I found myself shaking my head and finding fault with much that was said. I agree for example, that the part that the Soviet Union played in the defeat of Nazi Germany is by and large unknown in the larger US. I agree that our defense spending is out of control, and I agree that Russia's armed forces are certainly a force worthy of respect, not least because of the tremendous progress they have made in the past 2 decades.
However, it seems churlish to begin by saying that Russia has no aggressive intentions for the US and then criticize the US for not being able to meet that threat. Its apparent that if any war were to break out that the casualties on both sides would be egregious and that the Russian mind set is better prepared for the scale of destruction that conflict would inevitably cause. Little mention is made in this book of Putin and it seems that any discussion of the Russian Military is incomplete without considering the man who wields it with almost exclusive control. As the book continues, there are less and less factual comparisons made and more often subjective comparisons appear. Broad generalizations begin to encroach whose legitimacy is at best doubtful.
This book is captivating most as an opposing view point to others that I have read and despite my disagreements I believe it to be a very valuable read. The book is well written, and the author is intelligent and obviously passionate. I hope that this book stimulates a lot of discussion within the military industrial apparatus, among the public, and especially among the 'American elites'.
However, it seems churlish to begin by saying that Russia has no aggressive intentions for the US and then criticize the US for not being able to meet that threat. Its apparent that if any war were to break out that the casualties on both sides would be egregious and that the Russian mind set is better prepared for the scale of destruction that conflict would inevitably cause. Little mention is made in this book of Putin and it seems that any discussion of the Russian Military is incomplete without considering the man who wields it with almost exclusive control. As the book continues, there are less and less factual comparisons made and more often subjective comparisons appear. Broad generalizations begin to encroach whose legitimacy is at best doubtful.
This book is captivating most as an opposing view point to others that I have read and despite my disagreements I believe it to be a very valuable read. The book is well written, and the author is intelligent and obviously passionate. I hope that this book stimulates a lot of discussion within the military industrial apparatus, among the public, and especially among the 'American elites'.
16 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Hande Z
5.0 out of 5 stars
The unknown unknowns
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 14, 2019Verified Purchase
One of Sun Tzu’s dicta on warfare is “Know yourself, know your enemy, and you shall win a hundred battles without loss”. This book by Martyanov is essentially that. The question he poses is whether the United States knows its main antagonist – Russia? He makes a convincing case that the administration and the Pentagon do not truly know Russia, and that they have, for a long time, believed its own hype that the US military is without peer; and by the same stroke, underestimated the power and strength of the Russians.
It is possible that Martyanov may be wrong, but it is equally possible that he may be right. And because of this, it is thus crucial that knowledge and understanding not only of the military capabilities of Russia must be complete and accurate, but that the US must also understand the true intent of Russia. Martyanov makes out a case that the US hawks have misled America by creating a false picture of Russia as having an aggressive intent. He points out that years ago, Russia held out the olive branch but was completely spurned by an America believing that the Communist world is dead and that the US is the one and only superpower that can do whatever it likes.
That, of course, is the great danger. Martyanov points to the eagerness to pick a fight with Iran. The warnings by Martyanov in this regard are absolutely important given how prescient he seems to be in 2018, now that we can see the tension rising in the Straits of Hormuz today. If Iran is attacked, Martyanov says, Russia may not sit idly by. He points out that Russian weaponry have already proved their worth in Syria, and Russian troops have done likewise in Georgia and Ukraine. American troops, on the other hand, have not faced an enemy like the Russians. Martyanov compares the wars with the Iraqis as fighting ‘children’.
It takes a lot to have a long-lasting peace, but years of peace can unravel very quickly by ignorance, misreading, and arrogance. These three factors are piling up in an America where hawks have been roosting for some time. The future looks bleak.
It is possible that Martyanov may be wrong, but it is equally possible that he may be right. And because of this, it is thus crucial that knowledge and understanding not only of the military capabilities of Russia must be complete and accurate, but that the US must also understand the true intent of Russia. Martyanov makes out a case that the US hawks have misled America by creating a false picture of Russia as having an aggressive intent. He points out that years ago, Russia held out the olive branch but was completely spurned by an America believing that the Communist world is dead and that the US is the one and only superpower that can do whatever it likes.
That, of course, is the great danger. Martyanov points to the eagerness to pick a fight with Iran. The warnings by Martyanov in this regard are absolutely important given how prescient he seems to be in 2018, now that we can see the tension rising in the Straits of Hormuz today. If Iran is attacked, Martyanov says, Russia may not sit idly by. He points out that Russian weaponry have already proved their worth in Syria, and Russian troops have done likewise in Georgia and Ukraine. American troops, on the other hand, have not faced an enemy like the Russians. Martyanov compares the wars with the Iraqis as fighting ‘children’.
It takes a lot to have a long-lasting peace, but years of peace can unravel very quickly by ignorance, misreading, and arrogance. These three factors are piling up in an America where hawks have been roosting for some time. The future looks bleak.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Stephen Fenwick
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent book
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 7, 2018Verified Purchase
The more American citizens that read this book the better. Hopefully, they will start coming to their senses and realize that they need to reign in the neocons and fantasists that are driving the US down a very bad path.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
MR J LEON
5.0 out of 5 stars
Early 21st century geoplitical military balance.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 5, 2021Verified Purchase
This book, the first of at the moment of writing, trilogy, very precisely details how and why the balance of power is changing away from the west as the world moves from a 5 century long hegemon of colonial powers zero sum politics into a new age of win win strategies. What will actually happen in the future is very much open to question but one can only hope wise heads in western political circles prevail.
TonyS
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great book, well written
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 28, 2019Verified Purchase
Brilliant book, an eye opener on the state of global armed forces.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Russ G.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Fabulous Book
Reviewed in Canada on July 30, 2020Verified Purchase
Andrei reveals exactly what has happened to the demise of the US military, in terms of might and philosophy. While the US government was wilfully enriching the military industrial complex, and while the "experts" considered Russia to be weak, Russia was developing technologies and weapons that were decades ahead of the US. I am deeply concerned the US has not "got it" in the 2 years since the book was written. Instead the likes of Trump and even worse, Pompeo, continue their bullying and illegal ways. This is not going to end well for the US unless there is a complete overhaul.
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1











