These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

eBook features:
  • Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Buy for others

Give as a gift or purchase for a team or group.
Learn more

Buying and sending eBooks to others

  1. Select quantity
  2. Buy and send eBooks
  3. Recipients can read on any device

These ebooks can only be redeemed by recipients in the US. Redemption links and eBooks cannot be resold.

Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Lost Battalion of Tet: The Breakout of 2/12th Cavalry at Hue (Association of the United States Army) Revised Edition, Kindle Edition

4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars 77 ratings

Published to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the Tet Offensive, this new paperback edition brings back into print a book that became an essential source for a 2006 study of the battle by the U.S. Army s Center of Military History. It takes a critical look at what went wrong in early 1968 during one of the first engagements of Tet, when a U.S. infantry battalion was ordered to attack a large North Vietnamese force near Hue City without air or artillery support. The tragic military foul-up resulted in over 60 percent casualties for the 2d Battalion, 12th Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, when the soldiers were surrounded by the enemy and began running out of ammunition. The bold decision by battalion commander Lt. Col. Richard Sweet to break out with his remaining soldiers under cover of darkness saved this encirclement from being a total disaster. Author Charles Krohn, the unit s intelligence officer at the time, provides a much-needed analysis of what took place and fills his account with details that have been confirmed as factual by other survivors. Krohn examines the battalion s involvement in two other major attacks for lessons learned when vital systems break down lessons, he says, that are timeless and applicable anywhere. This book is published in cooperation with the Association of the United States Army.

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Gripping, inspiring, and tragically timely." -- Nathaniel Fick, author of One Bullet Away

About the Author

Charles A. Krohn, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel, is a combat veteran of Vietnam. As a civilian, he served as the Pentagon's deputy chief of public affairs from 2001 to 2004, including three months in Iraq as an advisor to the director of the Infrastructure Reconstruction Program. Recently, he was a visiting professor of journalism at the University of Michigan. He now works for the American Battle Monuments Commission and lives in Virginia.

Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B00CGNRVEC
  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Naval Institute Press; Revised edition (May 11, 2013)
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 11, 2013
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 4471 KB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 285 pages
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars 77 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Charles A. Krohn
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Charles Krohn was born in Saginaw, Michigan in 1937, the youngest of four sons, all who served in the US Army. After graduating from the University of Michigan in 1959 he attended Stanford Law School, but only for three semesters. Realizing he had little interest in law as a profession, he performed his ROTC-obligated 2-year commitment in South Korea and Oakland Army Terminal. He then worked for several newspapers in Michigan, including The Flint Journal. As the war in Vietnam escalated, Krohn aspired to be a military writer and went to work for UPI in Chicago, hoping for an assignment in UPI's Saigon bureau. That didn't seem likely so he accepted the Army's invitation to return to active duty as the public affairs officer of the 1st Air Cavalry Division. His experience as the intelligence officer provided the basis for his book, The Lost Battalion of Tet. Afterword he had assignments in Germany, Fort Stewart, GA, the Pentagon and Fort Monroe, VA. He had a second assignment in Vietnam as an advisor, 1970-71. He ended his career, first in the Pentagon as the Army's deputy chief of public affairs, briefly as a public affairs officer in Iraq, then as a visiting professor of journalism at the University of Michigan, and finally as a public affairs advisor to the Secretary of the American Battle Monuments Commission in Arlington, VA. He may be reached at clex@msn.com

Customer reviews

4.3 out of 5 stars
77 global ratings

Customers say

Customers find the book excellent and well-written. Opinions are mixed on the narrative quality, realism, and candor. Some find the story amazing, while others say it's poorly planned and executed.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

8 customers mention "Readability"8 positive0 negative

Customers find the book excellent, well-written, and honest. They also say it's exciting, tragic, and well-researched.

"...Michael Shaara’s “The Killer Angels” was an enjoyable read, but it, too, seemed to me like a play—in this case, one in which larger-than-life union..." Read more

"...That adventure alone would make "The Lost Battalion of Tet" worth reading for any soldier, but every trooper could also benefit from meditating Krohn..." Read more

"The "Lost Battalion of Tet" is a well-written account of one unit's actions during the Tet Offensive of 1968...." Read more

"...Good book and well written, Charlie did a good job." Read more

8 customers mention "Narrative quality"4 positive4 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the narrative quality of the book. Some mention it's amazing and a timeless tale of infantry soldiers in contact. However, others say the cavalry was poorly planned and executed.

"...The result is a book that succeeds on many levels. It succeeds first at the level of story, as a timeless tale of infantry soldiers in contact..." Read more

"...The move north by the 1st Cav was poorly planned and very poorly executed -- at one point the 2/12 was ordered not to take ammunition with it on..." Read more

"...This work is valuable, not only for its amazing story, but because it provides a perspective from both the staff and individual combat level...." Read more

"Amazing story...." Read more

6 customers mention "Realism"3 positive3 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the realism of the book. Some mention it conveys candor, realism, and a sense of immediacy to today's U.S. military. They say it adds layers to the context of the battle and provides a perspective from both the staff and individual. However, others say the analysis is not always dispassionate, making it slightly suspect. They also mention the book spends too much time making excuses and justifying actions of officers.

"...This revision tells a true story that is not just harrowing, but it accomplishes that most difficult of things for a military history to achieve: it..." Read more

"...a High School term paper, confusing, not enough detail and lots of unnecessary filler, because the event doesn't seem to warrant a book, maybe a..." Read more

"...is valuable, not only for its amazing story, but because it provides a perspective from both the staff and individual combat level...." Read more

"Very disappointed with the book. Spent too much time making excuses and justifying actions of officers." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on February 18, 2015
What books are required reading for Army officers? When I was commissioned, Anton Myrer’s “Once an Eagle” was considered professional reading par excellence. This seemed remarkable because, frankly, the book bored me. It seemed poorly written. At best, I thought, it is a thinly veiled morality play in which the two main characters (Sam Damon and Courtney Massengale) represent antagonistic ideals. The good character exemplifies “great leadership,” which is presented as an end-in-itself, and the worst trait among the “bad” character’s many negative traits is that he is a poor commander. The moral to the story? It matters less where you lead your men or what they accomplish than that you lead them well, that you inspire them, that they follow you willingly, joyfully even (even if it is blindly off a cliff).

The esteem with which Elbert Hubbert’s “A Message to Garcia” was held I found even more baffling. This essay did not seem to rise even to the level of overly simplistic morality play. It is a diatribe, a rant, in which the quality of unquestioning loyalty is exalted above all other qualities, in which the willingness to, yes, jump off that cliff if so ordered is extolled. Hubbert, it seemed, would have made a great Nazi.

Ernest Dunlop Swinton’s “The Defense of Duffer’s Drift” taught me something about small-unit tactics on an infantry-pure battlefield, very little of value outside that laser focus. Michael Shaara’s “The Killer Angels” was an enjoyable read, but it, too, seemed to me like a play—in this case, one in which larger-than-life union and confederate generals say larger-than-life things and in which all the real muck and horror of war take place somewhere off-stage.

I could go on in this vein, but it is best I move to the heart of the matter: as a profession, the U.S. Army is in desperate need of better written and more useful “classics.” Recently, I came across one little-known book that could help fill this need. Charles Krohn’s “The Lost Battalion of TET: Breakout of the 2/12 Cavalry at Hue” was first published by Praeger in 1993. In honor of the TET offensive’s 40th anniversary, the Naval Institute Press published a substantial revision in 2008—a version that was just recently released on Kindle. This revision tells a true story that is not just harrowing, but it accomplishes that most difficult of things for a military history to achieve: it usefully instructs without moralizing.

During the Tet Offensive of early 1968, the 2/12 Cavalry battalion of the 3rd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, suffered a 65 percent casualty rate, including 81 KIA and more than 250 wounded in action. As we learn in Krohn’s book, the outcome easily could have been much worse. The battalion could have been annihilated. In fact, the battalion SHOULD have been annihilated.

Although lacking artillery support and, thanks to the weather, close air support, the battalion was ordered to attack an entrenched North Vietnamese Army (NVA) regiment across 200 yards of open field. This mission was, as Krohn describes, as futile and foolhardy as the famous Charge of the Light Brigade. The battalion, of course, was decimated. Then, the NVA regiment cagily drew the battalion in so as to completely surround it with superior numbers. Lacking any hope of reinforcements or supporting fires, only a desperate night exfiltration through a tiny gap in the enemy’s lines no wider than 75 yards allowed a majority of this battalion’s soldiers to escape enemy contact, reach higher ground, and survive.

When reading of their escape, I found myself holding my breath, hardly believing that these 300+ men were going to make it. Surely, I thought, just one American soldier is going to fall in the darkness, groan in pain, sneeze, cough, step on a dry branch—do something, to alert the enemy just yards away of their presence. But, miracle of miracles, they made it.

Thoroughly researched and well-written, Krohn’s account of this battle comes from the personal papers of the unit’s officers, captured enemy documents, and scores of interviews with survivors. Adding to his account’s authenticity is the fact that Krohn was there, a young captain serving as the battalion’s intelligence officer. This experience not only adds to the account’s authenticity, but it adds layers to the context of the battle, namely, the book’s descriptions of the NVA’s actions and his battalion’s actions relative to their enemy.

The result is a book that succeeds on many levels. It succeeds first at the level of story, as a timeless tale of infantry soldiers in contact with a superior enemy and of the many characters—often eccentric, all brought vividly to life—who fight courageously and desperately to avert total catastrophe.

It succeeds also as the best extant after-action review of this tactical defeat—the kind of defeat, as American military mythology would have it, the U.S. Army never suffered during the Vietnam War. How was it possible that a battalion of American soldiers could be ordered to attack a superior enemy across open terrain, and, once on their objective, find themselves surrounded and facing near-certain annihilation with no hope of rescue? Krohn does an excellent job of analyzing the many factors that led to the battalion’s desperate situation, from the havoc the NVA’s Tet Offensive wreaked on the U.S. supply system, to uniquely severe weather, to the choices made by a competent enemy, to false assumptions, and, in some cases, to ego-driven decision-making.

That the book succeeds on just these two levels make it worthwhile reading for U.S. leaders and soldiers. What makes this book truly essential reading, I believe, is its success on a third level: its unusually frank discussion of how American military culture, when faced with tragic mistakes, can cause service members to “close ranks” and be less than fully honest with themselves and each other.

Krohn discusses the nervous breakdown of the division commander at the height of the battle—a breakdown that was suppressed and went unreported to higher. He relates how the division’s embedded historians inaccurately described the battle, to include the notion that the battalion’s advance was supported by “indirect fire artillery, aerial rocket artillery, and helicopter gunships.” (The only item close to the truth here was that a lone gunship did try to aid the battalion’s advance, but this gunship accidentally fired upon the battalion rather than the enemy.) The historians are not to blame for these inaccuracies, though. They recorded what was reported to them by 1st Cavalry Division leaders. Krohn also discusses the damage done to the battalion commander’s reputation by the division commander, an ambitious man who clearly made errors and who just as clearly wanted to scapegoat the battalion commander for these errors.

In short, blatant careerism and the distorted, overly positive reports of subordinates created a false narrative—a myth—that could have inhibited learning and damned our Army to repeat the same mistakes. This institutional tendency toward self-deception, Krohn suggests, poses a danger that all American military leaders need to be aware of and to resist. I agree. Krohn’s story sounds uncomfortable echoes in the present, such as in the growing number of myths surrounding the Abu Ghraib debacle. (“Those crimes had nothing to do with interrogation policy.” “Only a few bad military apples tortured prisoners.” “Only the CIA tortured systematically: the military institution chose the moral high ground.” Etc.)

“The Lost Battalion” is not without its flaws. Considering the loss of so many of his comrades, Krohn’s analysis is (understandably) not always dispassionate, making it slightly suspect in a few places. Nonetheless, by unearthing the truth and enabling honest conversations to take place about what happened, Krohn has performed a valuable service, both to the Army and to the memory of his dead comrades. If there is any justice in the world, “The Lost Battalion” will become a hallowed U.S. Army classic. Its pages convey greater candor, realism, and a sense of immediacy to today’s U.S. military professional than the pages of nearly all of the other books enshrined today as essential Army reading. All U.S. Army students, from cadets to colonels at the War College, can enjoy—and gain grim lessons from—this exciting, tragic, and searingly honest book.
12 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on June 21, 2013
Anyone conscious in the early months of 1968 cannot forget the word Tet and the name of Hue, the site of one of the fiercest battles of the war. Hue's Citadel was sacred to the Vietnamese, and the month-long reports of street-to-street fighting with heavy destruction were hard to read, even for a U.S. draftee stationed with the 9th Division in the distant south, at Nha Be, near Saigon.

Because reports then and since focused on the Marines' role in the battle, I did not know, or forgot, that Air Cavs were also called in, not really knowing till I chanced upon "The Lost Battalion of Tet" by Charles A. Krohn.

Krohn was with the 2/12th Cavalry. He was battalion S-2 responsible for gathering intelligence on VC and NVA movements, and was surprisingly good at his job. I say surprising because I was the clerk-driver-RTO for the S-2 in another battalion, the 4/39th of the 9th Division, and I never had the feeling that any of my rotating first-lieutenant bosses knew what was going on in our area. That's less disrespect for their youthful ignorance than it is great respect for the far greater wiles and wits of Sir Victor Charles.

Luck played a role with Captain Krohn, who was the beneficiary of a captured map that gave a clear indication of NVA plans to attack his Air Cav basecamp. With that information Krohn as S-2 could alert the troops on what to expect, and how best to fight the attack.

Here I must say that as battalion RTO I generally felt safe from the war's greater horrors, but I also felt an unspoken dread of what might happen if our basecamp was attacked and overrun. No one ever discussed such a possibility, so I had no idea how I'd react, or how I should react, and can only thank my stars that such an attack never came -- though it came to the 196th Brigade, Americal Division, a couple years after my return, when NVA troops swept across FSB Mary Ann, killing 33 GIs.

Who knew that even amid such fright one could calmly fight back? Not till I read Krohn's careful discussion on pages 43 and 44 of his paperback edition did I know. Here he details his warning to troops how the attack would likely begin, and how the best thing was to stay in place wherever you were -- even from the latrine -- and fend the flying doo from there. With such discipline, each trooper could then feel free to shoot anything that moves.

"The only way to defeat this tactic is to keep watching, and you've go to think about this from now on. You may get wounded, but better wounded than dead."

And when the attack sure enough came (while Krohn was on long-planned R&R), the battalion fought them off: not one NVA sapper made it through the barbed wire, and only one U.S. defender was killed, with 63 wounded.

And hey, did the troopers welcome R&R Krohn back? You bet they did: hailed as hero, everywhere he went, someone offering him a chilled beer.

That adventure alone would make "The Lost Battalion of Tet" worth reading for any soldier, but every trooper could also benefit from meditating Krohn's discussion of how to stay calm through days of intense fighting when men are dying all around. Do you think about death? No, you think about what's right in front of you: "During the pauses between gunfire bursts, soldiers concentrated on what they were doing" -- to include digging a better foxhole.

The main point of the book, of course, is how U.S. troops were sent into battle without proper support, and how the ghosts of the needlessly slain called to Krohn to tell their story. Many former officers didn't want the story of TFP told, and it's one reason so many decades have passed without wider awareness of the Air Cavs' role in Tet: how one badly mauled battalion managed to find its way home by defying conventional tactics and orders, and by walking away from the battle in the night: a wondrously disciplined movement that saved survivors from sure annihilation.

And I cannot close without expressing admiration for Charles A. Krohn's literary endurance: for battling decades of rejection and defeat, ever revising, ever coming back, ever reinforcing his diligent research -- his writer's spirit alone made it mandatory for me to read "The Lost Battalion of Tet."

Postscript: I rarely read publisher blurbs, but one quote on the inside cover page caught my eye after I read "The Lost Battalion." The writer credits Krohn for his "trenchant humor." One anecdote quickly came to mind: when Krohn was ordered by the battalion S-3 of higher rank to share his small, carefully dug trench with an RTO. "But he's an enlisted man. Do you think it's proper?" In such cramped quarters they slept, Krohn awakening in the night when the EM rubbed his leg lightly into Krohn's groin. "It was my only erotic experience of the campaign!" Krohn writes. In turn, from distant retrospect, a new generation asked Krohn how it felt to be in such a battle. He hesitated, then -- read the book if you want to know his flaccid reply.

Post postscript: Is it possible we're going to see the horror of Hue relived in the battle for Aleppo? See especially "Save Aleppo!" by Bernard-Henri Levy on the unfolding horrors in Syria ...
2 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Achilles Karathanos
4.0 out of 5 stars review
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 2, 2013
well written but less dramatic than its title suggests.one is still impressed by the NVA perfomance especiallyin comparison with the south vietnamese.Service was quick and in good condition
S.M.
3.0 out of 5 stars Le Lost Battalion du Viêtnam, raconté par l'un de ses membres
Reviewed in France on November 19, 2012
Charles A.Krohn a servi comme officier au Viêtnam, au sein de la 1st Air Cavalry Division. Il a ensuite travaillé pour le Pentagone et a notamment été conseiller en Irak pendant trois mois au sein du programme de reconstruction des infrastructures. Cet ouvrage a été initialement publié au Naval Institute Press en 1993. Il est consacré à un "bataillon perdu" pendant l'offensive du Têt, en pleine guerre du Viêtnam (1968), en l'occurrence le 2/12 Cavalry de la 1st Air Cavalry Division, encerclé par l'armée nord-viêtnamienne lors d'une progression au nord de la ville de Hué, pour dégager cette cité prise par les communistes dans sa quasi-totalité aux premiers jours de l'offensive. Les Américains raffolent des histoires de "bataillons perdus". Il y en avait eu un pendant la Première Guerre mondiale : plusieurs compagnies de la 77th Infantry Division isolées dans l'Argonne en octobre 1918 par les Allemands, épopée qui a inspiré plusieurs films (1919, 2001). Il y en a eu un aussi pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale : le 1st Battalion du 141st Infantry Regiment de la 36th Infantry Division du Texas, encerclé dans les Vosges le 24 octobre 1944. Il fallait donc qu'il y en ait un aussi pour le Viêtnam, pour ainsi dire.

Dans sa préface à la réédition, Krohn souligne combien son ouvrage lui a valu de réactions de la part des vétérans de l'unité ou de leurs familles. Il a revu d'ailleurs le chiffre des pertes : les tués passent de 60 à 81. Plus intéressant peut-être pour lui, un historien militaire du Center of Military History l'a contacté en 2006 pour l'histoire officielle de la guerre du Viêtnam qu'il était en train de composer. Krohn, à partir de son expérience au Viêtnam, pensait qu'une troupe d'infanterie légère ne pouvait résister à une force supérieure en nombre sans soutien d'artillerie. C'est ce qu'il plaida auprès du général Franks quand il vit avec horreur, raconte-t-il, que la 10th Mountain Division américaine partait en Afghanistan sans artillerie. Heureusement, dit-il aussi, la division suivante y allait munie d'un soutien d'artillerie ! Révélateur d'une certaine pensée américaine de la guerre, comme on le verra plus loin...

Le 3 février 1968, les 400 hommes du 2/12th Cavalry sont jetés au nord de Hué contre une position retranchée nord-viêtnamienne, avec pour seul appui un gunship, sans soutien d'artillerie ni de l'aviation. A 3 contre 1, le commandant nord-viêtnamien tend un piège aux Américains et réussit à les encercler. Les premiers obus américains n'arrivent finalement que neuf heures après le premier contact avec l'ennemi. Le commandant du bataillon, Sweet, décide finalement d'opérer une percée vers l'ouest en laissant sur place les morts et le matériel lourd. Ces pertes tragiques provoquées par un manque de soutien sont exceptionnellement rares, selon l'auteur, dans l'armée américaine engagée au Viêtnam. Le général Tolson, commandant la 1st Cavalry Division, a en effet envoyé dans l'enfer un bataillon de sa 3rd Brigade pour dégager Hué, le 1er février 1968 : les Américains sont alors persuadés que l'assaut contre la ville est de faible envergure. Ce même jour, le 2/12 Cavalry est héliporté à PK 17, un camp au nord de Hué. Mais sans l'équipement lourd des soldats, ni leur soutien d'artillerie : seuls 2 tubes de 105 de l'ARVN sont sur la base pour soutenir les Américains. Et le gunship qui leur est affecté, le lendemain, commence par un friendly fire de bon augure...

Alors officier de renseignements (S-2) Krohn a participé lui-même à l'engagement. Précédemment, la 1st Air Cavalry Division a rencontré évasivement l'armée nord-viêtnamienne, fin 1967 et jusqu'au début 1968 et l'offensive du Têt, dans la vallée de Que Son. Le 3 février, le 2/12 Cavalry est envoyé à la sauvette, sans équipement lourd ni soutien, contre le 6ème régiment nord-viêtnamien dont des éléments protègent, en fait, rien moins que le PC de l'opération menée contre la ville de Hué. Encerclés, les Américains, sous les ordres du lieutenant-colonel Sweet, réalisent alors une percée nocturne qui leur sera beaucoup reprochée car ils ont temporairement abandonné les corps de leurs camarades. Pourtant l'unité se voit attribuer la citation présidentielle et 11 Distinguished Service Crosses.

Il est intéressant de voir comment Krohn semble atterré par cette expérience tragique qui n'aurait, selon lui, jamais dû arriver. Une bonne partie de l'ouvrage est d'ailleurs consacrée à déterminer les responsabilités, et en particulier celles des officiers supérieurs ou généraux de la 1st Air Cav. Sur le fond, on ne peut que constater la répugnance des officiers de la 1st Air Cavalry Division, pourtant souvent considérée comme faisant partie de l'élite de l'US Army au Viêtnam, à engager un adversaire, même supérieur en nombre, sans appui d'artillerie ou autre soutien. Comme si le combat au contact était une gageure pour l'armée américaine. C'est sans doute l'enseignement le plus intéressant du livre, à propos de la conception américaine de la guerre de manière générale. Comme beaucoup d'autres ouvrages du même genre, celui de Krohn est américanocentré. L'auteur essaye cependant, sur 6 pages, de se mettre à la place des Nord-Viêtnamiens, mais cela reste insuffisant et pas très convaincant. Imaginez que vous avez commandé un plat au restaurant et qu'on vous en apporte seulement la moitié, et que le serveur vous annonce que l'on n'a pas trouvé l'autre moitié pour vous la servir. C'est un peu l'impression que peut ressentir l'historien de formation quand on voit le récit d'un engagement comme celui-là, plutôt de faible envergure, mais vu seulement d'un côté. Un monologue en quelque sorte qui n'a d'intérêt que parce qu'il fournit l'analyse d'un engagement entre Américains et Nord-Viêtnamiens pendant l'offensive du Têt -en se basant largement sur des témoignages de vétérans et les documents officiels américains, comme le montre la bibliographie sinon très réduite (6 ouvrages !).

Notons cependant la présence de cartes en parallèle du texte (pas forcément très nettes, mais elles ont le mérite d'être là et assez nombreuses), d'un livret photo central et d'annexes fournis (composition d'un bataillon, liste des pertes, citation présidentielle, liste des DSC décernées à l'unité).
One person found this helpful
Report

Report an issue


Does this item contain inappropriate content?
Do you believe that this item violates a copyright?
Does this item contain quality or formatting issues?