Industrial Deals Beauty Best Books of the Year So Far STEM nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc Starting at $39.99 Wickedly Prime Handmade Wedding Shop Book House Cleaning gotcatchup gotcatchup gotcatchup  Introducing Echo Show All-New Fire HD 8 Kids Edition, starting at $129.99 Kindle Oasis AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Shop Now toystl17_gno

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Showing 1-10 of 36 reviews(Verified Purchases). See all 75 reviews
on January 27, 2011
The book is about 600 pages long, but very readable. It does a decent job of explaining the main tenets of Wittgenstein's philosophy (think very high level) while presenting his biography. My understanding from my university seminar is that compared to other biographies, this book actually talks about his philosophical views and is therefore more helpful for phil majors. I gave the book only 3 stars for two reasons.

One, I think it spends too much time on biographical details at the expense of Wittgenstein's phil views. I think that the author could have gone more in depth without losing the layman. I don't think he did a very good job of explaining why some of Wittgenstein's phil views were so novel, or why he became so famous so quickly, or why everyone ended up reading the Tractatus. In contemporary philosophy W is considered one of the greatest modern philosophers, but I think the book does not adequately explain why this is so. All you get from the book is that he was eccentric, refuted the views of his old mentor Russell and argued with some famous profs at Cambridge. At the same time though, he was a recluse and didn't really publish. Interestingly, there is a lot of emphasis on his childhood which gets tedious, but no discussion whatsover of what mental illness W might have had, or whether there was some other hereditary condition (most of his brothers were geniuses who committed suicide). Was he autistic for example? I would like to know.

Second, I think as a literary piece the book is not that well balanced. This is purely an aesthetic point of view, and I appreciate that in a biography it's difficult to balance details with broader sketches. However, I feel like the author often belabored some point, citing many different letters, but then would start on another point and end very abruptly. The author also concludes sections with sweeping statements about how certain events connect up in W's life, without really discussing why he came to that conclusion. Anyway, you have to read it for yourself, but I found bits of the book jarring. It could have been a smoother read.

If you are interested in turn of the century Vienna, you might enjoy reading Stefan Zweig's "The World of Yesterday." It is beautifully written and paints a very good picture of what it was like to live in Europe from 1890-1940 or so, in the midst of some of the most famous scientists, philosophers and literati. If you don't know about Zweig, in the 1920s-30s he was considered one of the best writers in Europe. He wrote some excellent novellas and biographies. His book is also interesting because it discusses turn of the century attitudes to intimacy, which is relevant to the Wittgenstein biography - Monk includes a postscript where he discusses Wittgenstein's personal life as particularly influenced by contemporary views on the subject. The World Of Yesterday

Finally, I really hate this edition of the book - it's a thick paperback, but printed on very flimsy paper. I treat my books well, but this one already has dog ears and the cover has started to split in several places. It is easy to tear the pages. I wish a more high quality version, or hardback, were available. Unfortunately the UK Amazon seems to sell the same version.
22 comments| 14 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on June 15, 2015
Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius (1990), by Ray Monk, is a superb biography that illuminates both the life and the work of a modern genius. A critic writing for The Christian Science Monitor states: "Great philosophical biographies can be counted on one hand. Monk's life of Wittgenstein is such a one. It's a probing, moving experience."

Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein was born on April 27, 1889, in Vienna, Austria-Hungary. He died at the age of 62 on April 29, 1951, in Cambridge, England. Many academic professionals rate him as the most important and most influential philosopher of the 20th century.

Wittgenstein had two completely different careers: the “early" Wittgenstein, author of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1921), a work which many critics believed (incorrectly) that Wittgenstein was a logical positivist, and the “late” Wittgenstein, author of Philosophical Investigations (published posthumously in 1953) in which he argued that all philosophical "problems" are merely linguistic confusions--misunderstandings of the proper use of language.

In Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Wittgenstein wrote: "Philosophy aims at the logical clarification of thoughts. Philosophy is not a body of doctrine but an activity. A philosophical work consists essentially of elucidations. Philosophy does not result in 'philosophical propositions,' but rather in the clarification of propositions. Without philosophy, thoughts are, as it were, cloudy and indistinct: its task is to make them clear and to give them sharp boundaries."

A person who is only passingly familiar with Wittgenstein and his philosophy probably has heard at least of Wittgenstein's explication of "language games," a method which, he affirms shows that the words and concepts of our various "languages" are rooted in our idiosyncratic "life-stream" and are formed by the particular culture which we inherited and inhabit. Wittgenstein's explanation of how "language games" work (and often don't work) is one of the most fascinating and intriguing aspects of his philosophy, especially as found in his Philosophical Investigations.

Wittgenstein also stated, "Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language." The aim in philosophy is to dispel the fog of confusion, or to use another metaphor, "to show the fly the way out of the fly-bottle."

At Trinity College, Cambridge, Wittgenstein was a protégé, and later the "master," of another world-famous philosopher, Bertrand Russell, who described Wittgenstein's philosophy as "a curious kind of logical mysticism." A troubled and tortured individual, Wittgenstein is portrayed by Ray Monk as a relentless truth-seeker who struggled to live with ethical seriousness, honesty, and integrity.

Was Wittgenstein a genius? provides this definition: "genius.--[a person] having an exceptional natural capacity of intellect, especially as shown in creative and original work in science, art, music, etc.: the genius of Mozart." One's evaluation and assessment of Wittgenstein's ostensible genius depends not only upon one's level of intelligence and culture, but also upon one's own philosophical stance, including the ability, or inability, to "see" life and the world from a perspective akin to Wittgenstein's.

Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius is a brilliant work that presents an embarrassment of riches defying the ability of reviewers to do it justice. If it is legitimate to make such a claim, Ray Monk shows in this volume that in the genre of writing biographies, he is himself a genius!

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Ray Monk is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southampton, England, where he has taught since 1992. His interests lie in the philosophy of mathematics, the history of analytic philosophy, and philosophical aspects of biographical writing. His works include Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude, 1872-1921 (1996); Bertrand Russell: The Ghost of Madness, 1921-1970 (2001); and Robert Oppenheimer: A Life Inside the Center (2014).
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on November 26, 2011
I chose to read this because I wanted an easy and gentle introduction to Wittgenstein, and because I thought that Wittgenstein might have something useful to say to Psychotherapy and Psychiatry. Reading it as a Psychiatrist I was intrigued and pleased to learn that Wittgenstein encouraged many of his students to give up Philosophy for a career in Medicine or Psychiatry, and he himself contemplated this course of action at one point. As a Psychiatrist I was also drawn into thinking about Wittgenstein's own quality of mental health.

Wittgenstein was a self-declared follower of Freud and drew parallels between his project and psychoanalysis. In this regard what come to mind is Freud's definition of mental health in terms of 'lieben und arbeiten'(to love and to work). In these terms, was Wittgenstein an example of mental health? He comes across as having been unhappy for much of his life, tormented by feelings of guilt and inadequacy which seemed to alternate with narcissistic contempt for the world and people around him. But beyond this, was he capable of work and love? A good life isn't of necessity a happy life.

Other than Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, and an Austrian primary school dictionary, he seems to have not completed any single piece of work in his lifetime. Much of what was published in his lifetime are fragments which were collated by his students and friends, and which were subject to continuous revision and amendment. His major work, Philosophical Investigations, was published after his death and the second half, it seems, was essentially still a work-in-progress, a collection of notes which he intended to return to and refine. He was never happy with his own work, and frequently stated that he believed he had produced little or nothing of value in his lifetime. On the other hand, perhaps this shifting, unfinished quality of his work is in keeping with his message: that truth cannot be pinned down, and that philosophy (and language) has meaning only as part of the 'flow of life'. What comes to mind here is the Buddhist assertion that the dharma is 'neither deficient nor complete, neither defiled nor immaculate' (from 'The Heart Sutra'). His work might never have been completed, but his impact has been huge, so perhaps we can take it that he met the 'work' criterion of mental health.

What about his capacity to love? It is clear that Wittgenstein was chronically unhappy in love, falling in love with several younger men (and one woman) but apparently unable to bring himself to, or allow himself, real intimacy. It seems he battled against his homosexuality and this was a major part of his anguish and self-recrimination. Not only was he apparently incapable of mutual love, he was capable of real hurtful behaviour which was almost sadistic at times, such as his abusive treatment of his pupils when he was a primary school teacher. It seems that as his life progressed he developed some awareness of these aspects of his personality and expressed deep remorse about his actions, to the extent of going back to apologise to the children he had hurt. But was he capable of real empathy? I am inclined to agree with those who have speculated that he had Asperger's syndrome: he just 'didn't get' other people, and to the extent that he understood the people around him it seems that this was due to his ability to bring his huge analytical intelligence to bear on the problem, rather than any intuitive capacity for empathy. Despite this, Wittgenstein had some deep and enduring life-long friendships, with people who could tolerate his emotional intensity and egocentricity, and furthermore he was deeply loved by some, for example Frances Skinner (whose love it seems he deliberately chose to spurn). Wittgenstein was clearly connected into a web of relationships and so I would concede that he met the 'love' criterion of mental health, in his own very odd way.

Did he have a good life? His dying words were, apparently, "Tell them I've had a wonderful life." (p 579)

And where does this book take me in my own intellectual 'flow of life'? I've decided I have to read some Tolstoy and some Dostoyevsky, two authors who seemed to have had a significant formative impact on Wittgenstein and who are referred to repeatedly in his biography.

Oh and -- by the way, it's a great book! Read it!
0Comment| 7 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on May 17, 2017
Interesting. Probably more than I wanted to know about Wittgenstein.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on April 25, 2017
This amazingly written biography is compelling and engrossing. I find everything the author says easy to believe (I know I shouldn't, but he does a great job providing quotes from close companions of Wittgenstein and other good evidence).
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on September 26, 2015
Reading this has helped me understand the Tractatus A lot better. I don't like bios for the most part but this one was very interesting. A weird but brilliant man with a weird life. If you have an interest in his philosophy or him this is where you need to start. More than one of my professors say this is the best bio of him
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on December 13, 2010
It has often been noted that Wittgenstein was not particularly good at expressing himself. He is a man in need of an interpreter, and there have been philosophers who have acted as interpreter for him, beginning with Russell, Schlick, Carnap, and on to countless others. Now we can add another important interpreter to the list: Monk. Of course, what Monk has done is not as important to academic philosophy as the others, but in another way what Monk has done is more important because he interprets not only the philosophical positions, but the man himself.

I have been taking a great deal of intellectual pleasure in reading this book. Granted, philosophers and those interested in philosophy will always be a minority, but for a few special types this is the perfect book. It is the best biography I've read since Morris' volumes on Theodore Roosavelt. I'm VERY GLAD to have found it.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on June 21, 2012
I recently received this from Amazon. It was recommended to me by a philosophy professor whom I met socially. I am very pleased with the text and would recommend it to anyone interested in philosophy or the history of ideas. However, the paper of this edition is very cheap newsprint and the photographs are just horrible looking--dark, fuzzy, impenetrable. They look like they were printed on an old xerox machine. I know that sharp prints of these photos exist, because I have seen them before in other books on Wittgenstein. The general feeling you get is that the publisher doesn't give a damn about the reader's experience of the book. They just want your money, and they want to get it with the minimum possible expenditure of time, care, and of course money. In my opinion, it's an insult to the reader's sensibilities. Penguin, if you want to see the paper book go the way of the music CD, just keep printing inferior quality books like this. I have always preferred the feel of a real, physical book to any kind of e-reader, but this kind of junk publishing makes Kindle Fire or iPad seem more attractive by the minute. Five stars for the text, minus two for the shameful publication quality.
0Comment| 7 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on June 14, 2015
I loved the book just as I love the man. Much of his philosophical writing & all his math are over my head. But when I do understand I find myself mostly in full agreement. It's also a cautionary tale of what being gay in the first half of the 20th Century entailed.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on February 6, 2017
The difficulty in reading this book lies in the complexity of subject not with the writing. It is well done and fascinating.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse