I highly recommend this book. I’m not sure why another reviewer described the writing as awful. The book is well done. It is comprised of multiple short, concise, clearly written chapters covering all the facets of climate change science in just the right amount of depth. The accompanying graphics are excellent--- better in color on my Kindle Fire versus my black and white. I didn’t notice any distracting ebook issues at all. It is a science book, as advertised, which is what I was looking for.
In my view, the discovery of empirical methods has been the key driver of modern human material prosperity. That’s kind of a truism, but it is intriguing to observe how even very smart people can sometimes lose the focus on basic principles of valid statistical inference. A strength of this book is the focus on those very basic principles as applied to climate science.
The scientific proposition driving climate change alarmism is that we can predict the future---that climate is predictable to a level of accuracy and precision on the relevant timeframe such that public policy can reasonably be based on those predictions.
In light of current understanding of complex non-linear systems one may reasonably ask: What is the prior probability that human-made computer algorithms starting around the end of the 20th century will accurately predict global temperature 20, 50 or 100 years into the future? It’s an extraordinary claim. It’s a hypothesis requiring robust empirical validation by out of sample prospective data. Stated more technically: the prospective data must reject the null hypothesis that climate is unpredictable. In any other discipline that last sentence would be uncontroversial. But somehow, along the way, in climate science the null hypothesis has now shifted to imminent dangerous anthropogenic global warming. It’s as if the burden of proof is now on those that doubt predictions of climate catastrophe.
As very well reviewed in this book, the climate models used for the IPCC consensus reports are predicting substantially more warming than is actually occurring. There is a systematic error in the climate models. To my view, this is the nut of the problem with climate alarmism, casting real doubt on the myriad predictions of all sorts of severe climate related problems. But now that the null hypothesis has somehow shifted to dangerous global warming there is no failure of the models that can ever disprove the null hypothesis. All of the multiple retrospective explanations for failure of the models are presented as refinements of our understanding of global warming instead of post hoc reasoning. It is argued that the models are good enough. We can’t wait 50 years for them to be validated. Because global warming. Objecting to the lack of empirical validation of predictions of catastrophe now becomes anti-science and immoral.
1.3 billion people live without access to electricity, mostly living in Sub-Saharan Africa and developing Asia. The attempts to block the construction of coal-fired power plants in Africa and India because of predictions of dangerous global warming decrease the chance that young people in these regions will have access to electricity in their lifetimes. Poverty kills people. Lack of access to affordable electricity shortens lifespans. The WHO estimates that 3.2m million deaths per year are caused by indoor biomass burning. This is real harm to real people in the here and now.
Humans have a strong proclivity to predict the future, especially apocalypse. It’s been a feature of humankind since the beginning. Environmentalists don’t have any better track record than others in making accurate predictions, although they may be the champs on the apocalypse scale. We need to be very sure that climate alarmism in not just another chapter in the story of human evolutionary psychology, with the digital computer as the latest Oracle of Delphi.
The other driver of modern human material prosperity is exploitation of energy concentrated in fossil fuels. Decision makers in the rich nations owe it to people living without energy security to be scrupulously scientific when examining predictions of climate catastrophe caused by burning fossil fuels. This book presents a thorough discussion of the quality of the science from an appropriately skeptical stance.
Other Sellers on Amazon
$10.95
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
belles-books
Sold by:
belles-books
(110099 ratings)
96% positive over last 12 months
96% positive over last 12 months
Only 6 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$9.99
+ $4.99 shipping
+ $4.99 shipping
Sold by:
Emin Bookstore
Sold by:
Emin Bookstore
(19 ratings)
100% positive over last 12 months
100% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$14.31
+ $4.99 shipping
+ $4.99 shipping
Sold by:
agoodealofbooks
Sold by:
agoodealofbooks
(12058 ratings)
98% positive over last 12 months
98% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
Send link
Processing your request...
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Lukewarming: The New Climate Science that Changes Everything Paperback – Illustrated, September 7, 2016
by
Patrick J. Michaels
(Author),
Paul C. Knappenberger
(Author)
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length250 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherCato Institute
-
Publication dateSeptember 7, 2016
-
Dimensions6.12 x 0.73 x 8.95 inches
-
ISBN-101944424032
-
ISBN-13978-1944424039
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
Pat Michaels and Paul Knappenberger are real climate scientists, who think that man-made global warming is real. But they refuse to buy into the politicized pseudoscience that has increasingly been used to buttress the case that global warming is also likely to be dangerous. For this they have been routinely vilified. In this light but serious book, they expose many shocking myths about climate change and make a devastating case for lukewarming. -- Matt Ridley, author of The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves and How Innovation Works: And Why It Flourishes in Freedom
About the Author
Patrick J. Michaels is the director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute. Michaels is a past president of the American Association of State Climatologists and was program chair for the Committee on Applied Climatology of the American Meteorological Society. He is the author or editor of six books on climate and its impact, and he was an author of the climate “paper of the year” awarded by the Association of American Geographers in 2004.
Chip Knappenberger is the assistant director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute, and coordinates the scientific and outreach activities for the Center. He has over 20 years of experience in climate research and public outreach. He has published numerous papers in the major atmospheric science journals on global warming, hurricanes, precipitation changes, weather and mortality, and Greenland ice melt, among many other areas, and is a very popular presenter at climate conferences worldwide.
Chip Knappenberger is the assistant director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute, and coordinates the scientific and outreach activities for the Center. He has over 20 years of experience in climate research and public outreach. He has published numerous papers in the major atmospheric science journals on global warming, hurricanes, precipitation changes, weather and mortality, and Greenland ice melt, among many other areas, and is a very popular presenter at climate conferences worldwide.
Start reading Lukewarming: The New Climate Science that Changes Everything on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Nolyn: The Rise and Fall, Book 1
In the depths of an unforgiving jungle, a legend is about to be born. Listen now
Product details
- Publisher : Cato Institute; Illustrated edition (September 7, 2016)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 250 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1944424032
- ISBN-13 : 978-1944424039
- Item Weight : 1.11 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.12 x 0.73 x 8.95 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#410,574 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #341 in Weather (Books)
- #356 in Rivers in Earth Science
- #471 in Environmental Policy
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
204 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on November 27, 2015
Verified Purchase
104 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 29, 2015
Verified Purchase
Told in very short essays, this book is tremendous. He gets quickly to the heart of each issue and explains it well. Using his definition I am a "lukewarmer" but I don't like the term much. I'm a scientist by trade and prefer the term skeptic. I still think skeptic is the accurate term for someone who questions the "settled" in "settled" science. But, the world is warming and man probably plays some unknown role in the warming. So, some like to say lukewarmer so they don't get confused with those that dogmatically deny the world is warming or that man has any role, no matter how small, in the warming. A lukewarmer would say that we don't know the causes of warming, we can't measure accurately the natural forces affecting warming, so we can't say how big man's contribution is. Which is also what a proper skeptic would say. In any case I found the book to be an enjoyable read and quite accurate. The nice thing about the book is it is written in short and easy to digest chapters. I disagree with the other reviewer who said the writing is poor. I thought the writing was quite good.
43 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2019
Verified Purchase
I bought this book because I saw an Interview of Patrick J Michaels on the Mark Levin show. He was very well informed and clearly explained the facts of the Climate Warming Hoax. He is an acknowledged expert on this matter.
The Book is Not for the average reader. It is more like a Textbook than anything else. Graphs, Acronyms and technical Data to the Extreme. It was very boring and Hard to Read for me (I have two Engineering Degrees). Additionally this is a Puffed up book. The main part of the book (pages 1 to 232) is full of Blank pages.Twenty Eight to be exact. Also there were Twenty three pages that were at least half blank. This, at a minimum, works out to be 17.4% of the book is BLANK! Another minor point. The thickness of the pages was absurd. Each time I turned the page it felt like I was turning 2 or 3 pages. (Thus Puffed up). Save some money and listen to the Mark Levin Interview (available on-line for free) and you will know about as much as I do, who read this book, without reading and wasting your time being frustrated as I was.
The Book is Not for the average reader. It is more like a Textbook than anything else. Graphs, Acronyms and technical Data to the Extreme. It was very boring and Hard to Read for me (I have two Engineering Degrees). Additionally this is a Puffed up book. The main part of the book (pages 1 to 232) is full of Blank pages.Twenty Eight to be exact. Also there were Twenty three pages that were at least half blank. This, at a minimum, works out to be 17.4% of the book is BLANK! Another minor point. The thickness of the pages was absurd. Each time I turned the page it felt like I was turning 2 or 3 pages. (Thus Puffed up). Save some money and listen to the Mark Levin Interview (available on-line for free) and you will know about as much as I do, who read this book, without reading and wasting your time being frustrated as I was.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on February 7, 2017
Verified Purchase
As I write this, Pres Trump has been in office just over two weeks. Even before his campaign, there has been a war on the facts of reality. Climate science is a perfect example. Many would have you believe that 95% or more of "scientists" agree with anthropogenic climate change alarmism. This strikes me as more of a, 'if everyone jumped off the cliff, would you jump too?'
What these gentlemen have done, as I've come to expect from Cato's strong intellectual wellspring, is present unmanipulated facts on this topic. Their exhaustive analysis hits all the major talking points, and more. They sit between the denier and alarmist camps, stating that anthropogenic actions do emit greenhouse gases and that the effects of these are negligible; temperature changes are far and away a product of natural variability.
Still don't take my word for it, read this and decide for yourself. It will get a bit technical but hang in there, they've made the facts and the debate particularly readable.
What these gentlemen have done, as I've come to expect from Cato's strong intellectual wellspring, is present unmanipulated facts on this topic. Their exhaustive analysis hits all the major talking points, and more. They sit between the denier and alarmist camps, stating that anthropogenic actions do emit greenhouse gases and that the effects of these are negligible; temperature changes are far and away a product of natural variability.
Still don't take my word for it, read this and decide for yourself. It will get a bit technical but hang in there, they've made the facts and the debate particularly readable.
11 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Philip M
5.0 out of 5 stars
Essential reading to disentangle truth from hype about climate change.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 4, 2019Verified Purchase
This book, written by two real climate scientists, offers a well researched, informative and balanced look at the exaggerated claims of climate change made by politicians, some scientists and the media. The authors acknowledge climate change is real and partially man-made, but provide documented evidence that the scary forecasts are made by over-sensitive computer models, none of which can be substantiated by observed or experimental data.
By means of attributed references to meetings of the US Senate and the 2015 Paris Agreements, nearly all the major arguments supporting anthropogenic global warming are convincingly demolished and exposed as a sham. The book documents how governments have become the paymasters for scientific research, resulting in inevitable bias in climate research towards catastrophic predictions.
“Lukewarming” includes many wonderful quotes from prominent scientists and politicians, such as “It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true”, “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face to rule it”, “Climate scientists might exaggerate, but this is the only way to assure political action and more federal funding” and “A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect.” And many more.
Whether or not one accepts that the forecasts are exaggerated, “Lukewarming” is essential reading to help disentangle the facts from the hype. I have a large library of scientific and environmental economy books on this subject, and “Lukewarming” encapsulates the true science extremely well.
By means of attributed references to meetings of the US Senate and the 2015 Paris Agreements, nearly all the major arguments supporting anthropogenic global warming are convincingly demolished and exposed as a sham. The book documents how governments have become the paymasters for scientific research, resulting in inevitable bias in climate research towards catastrophic predictions.
“Lukewarming” includes many wonderful quotes from prominent scientists and politicians, such as “It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true”, “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face to rule it”, “Climate scientists might exaggerate, but this is the only way to assure political action and more federal funding” and “A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect.” And many more.
Whether or not one accepts that the forecasts are exaggerated, “Lukewarming” is essential reading to help disentangle the facts from the hype. I have a large library of scientific and environmental economy books on this subject, and “Lukewarming” encapsulates the true science extremely well.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Roger F. Alsop
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Christian Heresy
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 6, 2015Verified Purchase
This is a very rational and cool look at the issue of climate change. The authors make their case very well. They think that carbon dioxide truly is warming the world but only a little. But I'm also aware that others think that carbon dioxide has no influence whatsoever and that it is a product of warming. I'm beginning to think that Pascal Bruckner is the man to listen to though. He maintains that apocalyptic alarmism is a Christian heresy. It's easy to see that alarmism has a Christian theme of sin, guilt and redemption. This makes sense to me. It fulfils our obvious need for a religion.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Kindle Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars
Reality cheque!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 16, 2016Verified Purchase
Further evidence were it needed that when politicians and scientists become bedfellows real science dies a slow and painful death. We should treat our planet with respect but for the right reasons and not as a result of political scaremongering.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Gabe
5.0 out of 5 stars
Why didn't I know about this?
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 11, 2016Verified Purchase
Main stream media should make this known to the public
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
danny mclaughlin
5.0 out of 5 stars
well balanced
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 9, 2015Verified Purchase
one of the most balanced assessments of the subject
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Explore similar books
Tags that will help you discover similar books. 9 tags
weatherpolitics & governmentscience & mathpublic affairs & policyclimatologyenvironmental sciencepolitics & social sciencesearth sciencesenvironment
Results for:
Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1
Where do clickable book tags come from?
Book tags are created from a variety of sources, some of which are customer-generated. Amazon is not legally responsible for the accuracy of the tags represented. If you are an author or publisher and would like to remove a tag associated with your title, please contact your vendor manager or publisher support team.
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: climate science


















