Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Mad As Hell: How the Tea Party Movement Is Fundamentally Remaking Our Two-Party System Hardcover – September 14, 2010
Today’s raucous revolt against Washington and Wall Street is a classic populist uprising. In Mad as Hell, political pollsters Scott Rasmussen and Doug Schoen discuss how the Tea Party movement is fundamentally remaking our two-party system and what it means for the future of American politics. For political junkies of every stripe—from both the left and the right side of the aisle—Mad as Hell is mandatory reading.
- Print length336 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHarper
- Publication dateSeptember 14, 2010
- Dimensions6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100061995231
- ISBN-13978-0061995231
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Editorial Reviews
Review
What makes this new book a must-read ... is the reality that our daily news cycle is in many ways driven by the Tea Party. (Huffington Post)
Useful and balanced book...Readers who think they are in the political class might do well to pay heed. (Foreign Affairs)
Rasmussen and Schoen’s book clarifies much about our contemporary politics and identifies important causes of our current political malaise. It is the best available guide to the politics of 2010. (The Atlantic)
Essential to understanding America in 2010. (The Daily Caller)
What [Rasmussen and Schoen] convincingly show is that economic stagnation and the collapse of equality and opportunity have produced an equally catastrophic decline in confidence in every sort of public institution - including political parties, big business, big labor, the media and mainline organized religion. (Los Angeles Times)
From the Back Cover
The riotous tea parties and angry town hall meetings of last summer seemingly took everyone by surprise. They shouldn’t have: populistmovements have always arisen in times of economic hardship and uncertainty. In Mad As Hell, pollsters Scott Rasmussen and Doug Schoen use extensive and original research to explore the mind and heart of the populist uprising that has suddenly thrown American politics into turmoil.
In the past, populist movements have taken root either on the right or on the left. Today’s populist revolt is unusually broad and has two wings: a left wing that wants universal health care and redistributiveeconomic policies, and a right wing that wants to reduce the power of government to interfere in our lives. Both are hostile to the Washington political class, Wall Street, and the mainstream media—all of which they consider out of touch with the concerns of “real” Americans. The key difference is that left populists are effectively represented by Barack Obama and congressional Democrats who are pursuing their agenda, while right populists are chiefly representedby Fox News and Rush Limbaugh— an angrier and potentially more powerful political force.
So-called professionals in politics, business, and media have completely failed to comprehend the new populism and have dismissed it as marginal and extreme. The authors explore the broad-based natureof the new populist movement and explain how it is reshaping American politics—whether politicians and elite journalists like it or not.
The Tea Party movement is not a flash in the pan,as many have assumed. Nor is it a movement of racist rednecks and ignorant boobs, as its detractors have crudely suggested. To the contrary, it is an authenticgrassroots movement of concerned American citizens demanding to be heard by an out-of-touch political establishment. Their concerns are real and their issues are legitimate, the authors maintain; moreover, the new populism is here to stay, and it has already changedour politics for the better.
In Mad As Hell, Rasmussen and Schoen have produced an authoritative guide to the new populism, featuring a combination of proprietary polling data, political analysis, results from online focus groups,and interviews with on-the-ground players. It is must-reading for anyone interested in American electoral politics for the remainder of the decade.
About the Author
Douglas Schoen, who co-founded the landmark political polling firm Penn, Schoen, and Berland, is a moderate Democrat who is a Fox News contributor, and publishes editorials for the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, Forbes.com, Politico, and The Huffington Post.
Product details
- Publisher : Harper; First Edtion edition (September 14, 2010)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 336 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0061995231
- ISBN-13 : 978-0061995231
- Item Weight : 1.1 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #368,385 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #222 in Political Parties (Books)
- #884 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Scott Rasmussen is a Senior Fellow for the Study of Self-Governance at The King’s College in New York City. He is also editor at large at Ballotpedia, the Encyclopedia of American Politics.
A familiar face on television news programs, Rasmussen spent two decades as one of the world’s leading public opinion pollsters. The Wall Street Journal called him “a key player in the contact sport of politics.” The Washington Post said Scott is a “driving force in American politics.”
Every weekday, in partnership with Ballotpedia, Rasmussen releases “Scott Rasmussen’s Number of the Day.” The feature highlights newsworthy and interesting topics at the intersection of politics, culture, and technology.
At King’s, Rasmussen is guiding the development of an Institute for Community Driven Solutions. That Institute grew out of the message from this book, Politics Has Failed: America Will Not.
Like most Americans, Rasmussen believes our nation’s political system is badly broken. Unlike most, however, he is decidedly optimistic about America’s future. His book reminds us that governing involves far more than government. In fact, every organization and relationship has a vital role to play in governing society. It’s not about politics. It’s about figuring out the best way we can work together to find solutions.
A serial entrepreneur, Scott is the founder of Rasmussen Reports, co-founder of ESPN, a New York Times bestselling author, public speaker, and a syndicated columnist. Scott did his first radio commercial at the age of 7 and made his national television debut at 20. A career highlight was serving as emcee for hockey legend Gordie Howe’s 50th birthday celebration. Howe was Rasmussen’s childhood idol.
Rasmussen graduated with a degree in history from DePauw University and earned his MBA at Wake Forest University.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I have been to numerous rallies and protests, both locally and in D.C. I have joined a local Tea Party group that monitors local politicians and assists in tea party candidate election interests. I have donated to tea party candidates, most recently to Christine O'Donnell, Sharron Angle and Allen West. I am utterly disgusted by the lamestream media's coverage of these candidate patriots and their focus on stupid things like O'Donnell's "dabbling in witchcraft" AS A TEENAGER - when Hillary Clinton held séances in the White House to talk to Eleanor Roosevelt AS AN ADULT!!! Our mainstream media has the audacity to give us these clownish, disparate, uneven portrayals of candidates and thinks we don't notice? Don't even talk to me about Palin. I am not a big fan of hers, but the attack she sustained from our media was more than most of us could have handled without a psychiatrist. I have a phenomenal amount of respect for Palin, she is a woman who lives by her moral code even though it means huge sacrifices (and I'm referring to her child Trig). I don't know that she'd be the best candidate for president, but I do believe the woman is a powerhouse of integrity, has a tremendous amount of strength and did not deserve the despicable persecution she received. As a former governor I believe she had the experience and would have governed when the need was there if she and McCain had been in power during the BP oil spill -- as Obama did nothing useful -- he sat on his hands and bellyached about putting the boot on BP's throat -- he talked about suing instead of taking action (governing) and cleaning the oil spill. Now much of the Gulf Coast ocean floor has 2 inches of oil on it. I wonder how long it will be...how many decades before the ocean heals itself. But he's a Saul Alinsky ACORN lawyer, what can you expect? He knows nothing of governing or creating jobs, just rabble rousing, suing and voting present. But I digress...
Over time, over the past couple of years I have wondered how effective we are, we Tea Party people, or how effective we will be in the long run. (And no, we don't call ourselves Tea Baggers, if you don't know that's a sexual malicious slur, you are either stupid or mean-spirited.)
I had hope that there were enough people in America, good-hearted, well meaning, Americans who loved their country as much as I do, that were willing to join together to bring it back from the brink of bankruptcy; bring it back from the edge of defeat by it's enemies - both within and without; bring it back to prosperity and safety. I had hope, but whether it was rooted in optimism or realism I did not know.
This book gave me more hope. It may not be as well written as some of these reviewers would have liked it to be. It may have some imperfections. I personally was offended by the fact that Rasmussen and Schoen referred to the poster of Obama as Hitler as being something the Tea Party conjured up, whereas it is part of the Lyndon LaRouche for President campaign that drags itself to every Tea Party meeting it can (and can often be found in front of my local Trader Joe's). They are not Tea Party folks... far from it...they are Democrats. Cripes...how Rasmussen and Schoen didn't realize that after attending multiple Tea Party Rallies I don't know... but everyone has their own misconceptions and biases. These guys couldn't get it all right.
The bottom line is that the book gave me hope. It gave me a better understanding of our Tea Party Movement from an outsiders perspective (it was interesting to find out that it was composed of three strands of belief systems) and we are not alone... we may be split off in multiple factions that have their own relevancy and life like the arms of a star fish. Some of us may not even be at Tea Party rallies to be considered Tea Party members, but we are Legion, we are in the millions... and if we keep working and paying attention to our politicians, we can get our government and our country back. Back to prosperity and safety from those that would see her fall. It won't take just one election though... we must stay vigilant from this day forward and teach our children the value of hard work, independence and freedom. Freedom is not something we should ever take for granted again... the progressive elites will take it from us by inches and miles when given the opportunity.
Everyone needs to understand the basic Tea Party premise: the more government grows, the less freedom we have; the more control that bureaucrats have over our lives, the more they dictate to us, the fewer choices we will have. We will be told what cars we may drive, how far we can drive them, how high we can have our thermostats, what we can eat. It starts seemingly innocuous but all are things that push into our freedom - things like identity cards, (keeping track of our movements); like federally mandated healthcare, (and you don't think in the interests of our health we won't be told what to eat if the government is paying for our dietary f-ups?); like preserving huge swaths of land for little fish despite the negative impact it has on hundreds of thousands of human beings (San Joaquin Valley); like the Cap and Trade legislation that limits energy consumption and therefore will force all but the ruling elite into driving SmartCars (was anything more badly named?) --but this government takeover of our freedoms will only grow more and more burdensome and ugly if we keep on letting it encroach upon us. There is no end to what the ruling Ivy League elites feel they can impose on us because they "know what's best for us." I have been to China. I have seen the people there and the streets where the police are not there to keep the peace but to keep citizens in their respective areas - they cannot leave the areas in the country they are supposed to live in. This is the control their government exerts on them. This is exactly the control that the progressives would eventually like to have over us. It's not pretty, it's not happy and it's not free.
I would like to thank the authors of this book for giving me more hope in our country's future. It renews my faith in the goodness of humanity again and fuels my efforts to continue the good fight to retain our freedom and make our beautiful country prosperous once again.
If you care, you should get involved too. It's time to join the fight or throw in the towel. There is more at stake than any of us ever dreamed there would be in our lifetime.
Most tea party insiders will agree with the demographic descriptions of its members, and what will keep the tea party movement alive or destroy it. The authors also make some thought-provoking connections to the support behind Ross Perot in the 1996 presidential elections.
Given the historic significance and impact of the tea party movement on 2010 mid-term elections and beyond, this book is a must-read for tea party leaders, elected officials and candidates for office, concerned citizens and political bystanders.
I intend to buy this book for several friends and family members, and add it to my recommended reading list for tea party participants.
For example, on p. 2, second paragraph, the second sentence has no verb; it is not a sentence. On p. 5, two out of three bullet points have no period at the end of the sentences. On p. 20, the first sentence of the third paragraph begins, "This is a very difference picture of America...." At the bottom of p. 20, last sentence, we have: "Since 2008, politics as usual have reined...." The word the authors are looking for is "reigned," not "reined." On p. 24, first paragraph, last sentence, we read: "Washington has become increasingly unresponsive, our politics increasing repulsive...." The word should be "increasingly." On p. 29, the word "delve" is used as a noun to indicate delving. A delve is actually a hollow or cave and is an archaic word, obviously misused by the authors. On p. 30, the word "whose" is used as a contraction for "who is": "...as a working mother whose probably never even going to be able to hit retirement...."
The thoughts are excellent, and the book is worth buying; but the writing is so poor as to make any educated reader quite irritated. There is needless repetition, as with the mention of Andy Stern's visits to the White House on p. 22 and again on p. 27. The ideas are jumbled at times. Any average newspaper editor could do a better job of editing. The authors could have done a better job of polishing themselves, no doubt; perhaps they were rushed by a deadline.
I do not fault the authors. I fault the editor of the book. HarperCollins is a major publishing house. I am astonished that they lowered the quality of a truly important work by allowing such an extreme lack of polish in one of their books.
The book may be as prescient as "The Emerging Republican Majority" was in its time.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with their conclusions, the data presented in the book is a real eye opener for students of politics. The book is very readable. The tables and graphs are placed conveniently so that readers do not have to keep flipping pages. The book is excellent and I thoroughly recommend it.
