Making Patriots 1st Edition, Kindle Edition
|
Walter Berns
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
Learn more
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Editorial Reviews
From the Inside Flap
Walter Berns's Making Patriots is a stirring and provocative essay on precisely this paradox. How is patriotism inculcated in a system that, some argue, is founded on self-interest? Expertly and intelligibly guiding the reader through the history and philosophy of patriotism in a republic, from the ancient Greeks through contemporary life, Berns considers the unique nature of patriotism in the United States and its precarious position as we enter the twenty-first century. He argues that while both public education and the influence of religion once helped to foster a public-minded citizenry, the very idea of patriotism is currently under attack.
Berns finds the best answers to his questions in the thoughts and words of Abraham Lincoln, who understood perhaps better than anyone what the principles of democracy meant and what price adhering to them may exact. The graves at Arlington and Gettysburg&;and Omaha Beach in Normandy&;bear witness to the fact that self-interested individuals can become patriots, and Making Patriots is a compelling exploration of how this was done and how it might be done again.
From the Back Cover
Walter Berns's Making Patriots is a stirring and provocative essay on precisely this paradox. How is patriotism inculcated in a system that, some argue, is founded on self-interest? Expertly and intelligibly guiding the reader through the history and philosophy of patriotism in a republic, from the ancient Greeks through contemporary life, Berns considers the unique nature of patriotism in the United States and its precarious position as we enter the twenty-first century. He argues that while both public education and the influence of religion once helped to foster a public-minded citizenry, the very idea of patriotism is currently under attack.
Berns finds the best answers to his questions in the thoughts and words of Abraham Lincoln, who understood perhaps better than anyone what the principles of democracy meant and what price adhering to them may exact. The graves at Arlington and Gettysburg—and Omaha Beach in Normandy—bear witness to the fact that self-interested individuals can become patriots, and Making Patriots is a compelling exploration of how this was done and how it might be done again.
About the Author
Amazon.com Review
The short answer is that Americans dedicate themselves to universal principles enumerated in the Declaration of Independence and other founding documents. This is, at bottom, a book on why Americans love their country. But it does not drip with star-spangled sentiment. Rather, it is almost wholly intellectual. Berns might have included more storytelling and less analysis on these pages. His narrative is occasionally character-driven--Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass make significant appearances--but Berns is primarily interested in their ideas. Making Patriots has the virtue of being both succinct and direct, and it addresses a set of thorny problems in clear language. Berns offers smart chapters on how patriotism interacts with religious devotion and racial identity, plus commentary on how patriotism is learned ("No one is born loving his country; such love is not natural, but has to be somehow taught or acquired"). Making Patriots may be read quickly, even as its insights are deep. Readers will find themselves returning to the book again and again, long after they thought they were done with it. --John J. Miller --This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.
Review
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.
--This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.
From Library Journal
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.
Product details
- ASIN : B004I5ADOG
- Publisher : University of Chicago Press; 1st edition (September 15, 2002)
- Publication date : September 15, 2002
- Language : English
- File size : 1276 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Enhanced typesetting : Not Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 164 pages
- Lending : Enabled
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#2,341,472 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #2,664 in Nationalism (Books)
- #5,995 in Political History (Kindle Store)
- #8,089 in Ideologies & Doctrines
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
"Patriotism" should not be denigrated just because it has on occasion been twisted into extreme forms of nationalism that can be evil, as in the extreme case of Hitler's Germany. Nor should it be used to justify expansionism. But practiced as support of one's country and as supportive compassion for fellow citizens, it is an essential formative asset to a nation's good character
The reviewer who gave the book one star makes some good points but does seem obsessed with the erroneous belief that patriotic Republicans and industrialists got us into the two World Wars and Vietnam under the guise of patriotism--and that therefore patriotism is bad: "Neo-cons and their flunkies . . . do not like reviews like this because they strip away the myths that are their bread and butter. (Heaven only knows what they would do without their foundations and corporate-funded academic chairs.) As they seek at virtually all costs to delude Americans into fighting for Mom and apple pie . . . "
That reviewer obviously,(and delibeartely?) misses the huge point that it was 5 Democratic presidents that mobilized the nation for all such foreign adventures--Wilson, FDR, JFK, Johnson and Truman. And he also curiously misses the point that the major Foundations and academic chairs in academia are all anti-Republican, pro Democratic, and represent the fanatic liberal Left's love of internationalism and who are most enthralled with World Organizations and International activities. The "isolationmists" who opposed entry into the two World Wars were Republicans-conservatives.
And as for profit motive, America's industries were more interested in supplying foreign combatants with goods, than entering the Wars. It was primarily Wilsons intellectual dream of world government and "making the world safe for democracy" that motivated his ill-advised actions. If Wilson had been motivated by true patriotism he would have spared his countrymen the agony of the War!
Patriotism as a love for one's country and its established foundations has little to do with internationalism. The Monroe Doctrine that dictated no foreign entanglements prevailed for 140 years before the Princeton liberal intellectual Woodrow Wilson got millions of our people killed and entangled us in world organizations. Our huge national debt, up to the late 1960's in the time of Johnson's "Great Society" programs, was almost exclusively caused by these foreign engagements. Adding to the burden all Americans must share by running huge deficits can not be called a patriotic action.
The chief criticism of Bern's book should be simply that he dragged in our need to fight in these foreign conflicts as somehow related to patriotism. I suppose the fact that Americans were able to be led to such sacrifice was dependent on their patriotism, but the fault lay not in patriotism itself, but the Democratic leaders who used it to manipulate us into needless sacrifices in the hunt for their internationalist fantasies.
In short, a good patriot might fight fiercely for Mom's apple pie, a balanced budget, and good schools, but strongly desist from interfering in other nation's squabbles!
"Making Patriots is an extremely timely and important work. Walter Berns brilliantly and gracefully explains how our nation's future depends upon the patriot's understanding that freedom must serve the great cause of 'government of, by and for the people' and not only our own individual interests. Though patriotism, as Berns shows, may require sacrifice, it enlarges our hearts and minds, and forms a great and necessary bond among ourselves and with generations past and future."
I hope people will pardon my offering this quote rather than my own. It's just that he--and this book--offers a sentiment that is so right for our time. I wanted other readers considering the book to know that it's been so highly regarded by one of America's true and well-known patriots.
Analyzing Frederick Douglas' life and the impact he left behind, Mr. Berns offers some notions that defy longstanding, putative preconceptions. Mr. Douglas, himself rattles the established elite thinking when he is quoted as saying, "the federal Government was never in its essence anything but anti-slavery...If in its origin, slavery had any relation to the government, it was only as the scaffolding to the magnificent structure, to be removed as soon as the building was completed." Mr. Berns may not employ such majestic imagery but is nearly as profound when he deftly delves into present day race relations. Contrasting today`s military with modern college life, he challengingly notes that "enlisted men--blacks and whites--live in the same barracks, eat in the same mess halls, and although not required, frequently at the same table--something rarely encountered in universities." Interestingly, interracial harmony is found in the one environment where everyone is treated as an individual, while the debatably well intentioned "diversity" dictates of the other often lead to an unspoken, rigid separatism.
The final chapter, "The Patriot's Flag" presents genuinely stimulating insights on the First Amendment--so skillfully abused over the past fifty years. The very term "speech" has somehow been contorted into meaning a hodgepodge of nonverbal activities. Mr. Berns thoroughly appraises the Supreme Court's outrageous decision legalizing flag burning and successfully shows the sophistry of its ruling. Supporters of this spurious ruling may bristle when he writes "the First Amendment protects freedom of speech not expression, and whereas all speech may be expression, not all expression is speech" because his reasoning is as sublime as it is succinct. He suggests that spray painting graffiti on the Lincoln Memorial is not likely to be allowed under a torturous stretch of freedom of speech and wisely concludes, "there is something about the memorial that forbids its desecration, and because it, too causes us to remember, the same ought to be true of the flag."
At times his arguments become a trifle too abstract and the book's pace may hesitate occasionally, but several nuggets of wisdom can be gleaned from these pages. It sets forth many concepts that every Americans should contemplate, and it summons us all to evaluate whether or not we are taking our American birthright for granted.
At times you might think the book is about how being a Patriot is all about reading Lincoln' speeches but it does make one think about what being "Patriotic" really means and how citizens can be molded into Patriots. It also gives clear examples of how we as a nation are moving away from making Patriots.
All in all I would recommend this book because the subject matter is interesting and the points made are expressed clearly.


