Managed by the Markets: How Finance Re-Shaped America Illustrated Edition
| Gerald F. Davis (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
illuminating account of how finance has replaced manufacturing at the center of the American economy over the past three decades, explaining how the new finance-centered system works, how we got here, and what challenges lay ahead.
Since the early 1980s, Gerald F. Davis shows, finance and financial considerations have increasingly taken center stage, dramatically reshaping American society. Corporations now have an overriding focus on creating shareholder value, while their personnel practices no longer provide secure
employment, economic mobility, health insurance, or retirement benefits. Instead, employees must become shareholding free-agents, left to their own fate. Banking has shifted from the traditional role of taking in deposits and making loans to the widespread use of "securitization," turning loans
(such as mortgages or corporate debt) into bonds owned by institutional investors. The financial services industry is both more concentrated among large banks and mutual funds, yet more spread out among under-regulated specialists such as mortgage finance companies and hedge funds. And states
increasingly act as "vendors" in a global marketplace of law, emulating firms such as Nike, hiring contractors to do much of the work of government.
As a result, individuals and households find their welfare tied to the stock market and the mortgage market as never before. And the turbulence of recent years starkly underscores the dangers of depending too much on financial markets. Written in the spirit of C. Wright Mills' penetrating The Power
Elite and White Collar, this brilliant study provides an invaluable map of the finance-driven American society.
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
"An ambitious, magisterial, and yet not-too-long effort to sketch the social consequences of a finance-driven economy."--Matthew Yglesias, The American Prospect
"A compelling read...offers provocative clues for anyone seeking to understand the current financial crisis and Americans' financial security."--Publishers Weekly
"Timely and thought-provoking."--CHOICE
"This is a valuable and novel perspective...In contemplating the wreckage of the crisis, one should follow Davis's example, and ask whether this was either inevitable or desirable, and what, if anything, we might learn from it." --Strategy+Business
"Jerry Davis has been one of our most thoughtful researchers on the topic of how publicly traded corporations have changed in the past 25 years. ...many of the remedies proposed here are wending their way into law. ...a good place to start for anyone who is interested in what really [caused the
financial crisis]."--Administrative Science Quarterly
"A valuable, timely and gripping analysis...Davis's book should be required reading for anyone, whether academic, practitioner, or policy maker, who needs to think critically about finance which, rather than a mechanistic set of transactions, is presented in the book as a social phenomenon that is
invading our lives."--Accounting, Economics, and Law
"The meltdown of American financial markets has been catastrophic but the cause elusive. In Managed by the Markets, Gerald Davis offers a compelling explanation for it and so much more. To understand the disintegration of big corporations, securitization of just about everything, and transformation
of our zeitgeist from producing products to making money, this is the book, a gripping portrait of the triumph of financial markets over all else."--Michael Useem, Professor of Management and Director of the Leadership Center at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
"In this intellectual tour de force, Jerry Davis describes the evolution of the American economy to where we are now-where everything is a security or an option and, therefore, tradable in some sort of market. He also details the profound costs we have paid for this evolution. Timely, engaging, and
filled with facts and analysis, Managed by the Markets explains how we got to where we are and maybe, just maybe, where we need to go next."--Jeffrey Pfeffer, Professor of Organizational Behavior at Stanford University and author of What Were They Thinking? Unconventional Wisdom About Management
"Davis's book is as compact and clear a description of how we screwed up a fine economy as you will find...Managed by the Markets is not some mere Progressive or left-liberal polemic against Wall Street manipulators. Because it is based in an accurate historical review of the stepwise process by
which financial considerations replaced virtually every other concept of economic or social good, Davis's book delivers a solid, and negative, verdict against management by unregulated markets, which always crash." --Maui News
"This is a valuable and novel perspective...In contemplating the wreckage of the crisis, one should follow Davis's example, and ask whether this was either inevitable or desirable, and what, if anything, we might learn from it." --Strategy+Business
"Davis reminds his readers of the history of U.S. corporate law, and how individuals states competed to offer favorable law of incorporation to large firms." -- Contemporary Sociology
About the Author
Gerald F. Davis is the Wilbur K. Pierpont Collegiate Professor of Management at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business. He has published widely in management, sociology, and finance. Recent books include Social Movements and Organization Theory (with Doug McAdam, W. Richard Scott, and
Mayer N. Zald) and Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open System Perspectives (with W. Richard Scott). He is currently Associate Editor of Administrative Science Quarterly and Co-Director of the Interdisciplinary Committee on Organization Studies (ICOS) at the University of
Michigan.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; Illustrated edition (June 15, 2009)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0199216614
- ISBN-13 : 978-0199216611
- Item Weight : 1.59 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.3 x 1.3 x 6.1 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,768,855 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #4,580 in Company Business Profiles (Books)
- #6,464 in United States History (Books)
- #8,466 in Sociology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Gerald F. Davis is the Wilbur K. Pierpont Collegiate Professor of Management at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business. He has published widely in management, sociology, and finance. Recent books include Social Movements and Organization Theory (with Doug McAdam, W. Richard Scott, and Mayer N. Zald); Organizations and Organizing (with W. Richard Scott); Managed by the Markets (which won the 2010 Terry Award for best book from the Academy of Management); and Changing your Company from the Inside Out (with Christoper White). His newest book is The Vanishing American Corporation: Navigating the Hazards of a New Economy. He is Editor of Administrative Science Quarterly and Director of the Interdisciplinary Committee on Organization Studies (ICOS) at the University of Michigan.
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Dr. Davis of the Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan covers a lot of ground to explain how the U.S. economy became molded its current form with everything (possessions, children, & friends) valued in the form of a "position" in an investment portfolio. In closing the book he soberly poses the question, do we really want to view our marriages, our children, our homes, our savings, and our friendships as "a quickly disposable position" and not a meaningful commitment to each other? I sure don't! This new American economic thinking appears to be unique as other leading economies like Japan, Germany, even view a corporation as having positive social obligations to society in addition the pecuniary one of "Value Creation". Praise God!
His writing on finance is from the perspective of an oracle observer from a wide perspective. Though he teaches at a leading business school, he is sociologist and not economist or finance expert. His writing is similar to Dr. John Kenneth Galbraith of Harvard University (which I mean as the highest possible compliment).
Steven Greseth, M.B.A, P.E.
Louisville, Kentucky
It is presented in the form of a quick history of the changes in American business over the past century or so, and while I think it leaves out some important stuff, it does hit the high points.
One thing it leaves out is that until the 1920s, about two-fifths of American households were primary producers (farmers, mostly) or almost totally and directly dependent on primary producers (country stores, millers). These people represented a good deal less than two-fifths of wealth, but they were not greatly dependent on big city banks. They were dependent on wider markets and suffered when prices crashed in 1922, but if there had been a run on National City Bank, they would hardly have noticed.
Bankers were important, but their role was circumscribed. There could not have been a national housing bubble in the '20s, because mortgage lending was local, as was much banking. There was no FDIC, although some states, like Nebraska, had state bank deposit insurance (which, in the case of Nebraska, went bust in '28, without setting off any wider tremors). As Davis recognizes, banking was about to become even more circumscribed in the middle years of the century.
The dominant firms of the American economy, the giant manufacturers, were so profitable that they didn't need Wall Street or banks for any fundamental task: They found the capital they needed for expansion and renewal in their retained earnings. (Davis, keeping his eye on the target, does not mention that one of the biggest, Ford, twice nearly went broke and both times bulled its way through without giving up control to bankers or bondholders. Even if Ford was hardly typical of American management style, the fact that it could ignore bankers in a crisis confirms Davis's conception.)
As manufacturing waned as a proportion of the overall economy, finance took over. I think Davis puts this too late. The turning point can be exactly dated, to 1953, when General Motors went to the bond market for the first time and when its replaced its chief, who until then was always a production man, with an accountant.
This still might not have affected Joe Sixpack, but the worshippers of market dynamics wanted to persuade people who were too small to operate in financial markets to directly tie all their assets to market trading. Davis calls this the portfolio society. Its high (or low, depending on your point of view) point came when George Bush tried to bully Americans into transferring all their mobile wealth into the hands of Wall Street traders.
Even though Bush failed in his attempt to force Main Street to go to Wall Street, the American householder, seduced by the innovation of convenient home equity loans (you could, literally, treat them as checking accounts), transferred even his immobile wealth into the hands of Wall Street traders. If Main Street wouldn't go to Wall Street, Wall Street figured out how to come to Main Street. In the '20s, shoeshine boys played the stock market and, notoriously, Joseph Kennedy liquidated his securities when his taxi driver started giving him stock tips; but back on the farm, nobody was buying Radio on margin and hoping to see it break $1,000. By 2007, everybody was a playah.
The theory of market orientation as the sole and only good form of economic organization assumes participants (and especially those with asymmetrical power) are at least conventionally honest in the sense that you could invite them into tea and not have to count the spoons afterward. That was the unspoken foundation behind the Bush proposal.
In fact, of course, that assumption is unjustifiable. Davis has plenty of examples dating back to the Roaring Twenties and he makes use of many of them. Despite the fact that anybody who opened his eyes could see that the financial markets never had operated as the efficient market theorists had theorized, there was a well-greased publicity organization set up to persuade people not to believe their own eyes.
Davis calls this a faith-based economic system.
He is one of many observers to have noticed that the switchover from a production economy to a finance economy coincided with a generation of workers who, for the first time in American history, could not expect their children to enjoy better material terms of existence than they had; and, for the majority of workers, not even the ability to maintain their own position.
It was said that shipping productive jobs overseas would free American workers to do new, yet undreamed of tasks that would pay better. The theorists of this view failed to care that there were millions of Americans who were in no position to take these new jobs, even if they were offered (which, for the most part, they were not).
The only really basic economic statement ever made was spoken by a social worker, Harry Hopkins, who said, "People don't eat in the long run. They eat every day."
The prophets of finance never concerned themselves about that. In the new economy "workers were all temps."
It might have worked even so, if the financial manipulators had been honest and if they had understood the risks they were creating. With trivial exceptions, they were neither. "Wall Street came to Main Street like a tornado in a trailer park." Square dealing -- to the extent it was ever common -- was replaced by "cynical pragmatism."
Now all the fine theories have been exposed -- again -- as mistaken, but the fine theorists are not budging.
Despite the fact that the era of mixed capitalism inspired by the New Deal was the richest and most stable in history, the finance- and market-oriented theorists and practitioners worked hard and successfully to dismantle it.
"Managed by the Markets" is not some mere Progressive or left-liberal polemic against Wall Street manipulators. Because it is based in an accurate historical review of the stepwise process by which financial considerations replaced virtually every other concept of economic or social good, Davis' book delivers a believable verdict on a sort of mass delusion, akin psychologically and spiritually to the Children's Crusade of the Middle Ages or the witch mania of the 17th century.
I have read many books on economic history and found that this book gives a nice short history (some may say too short) of how major institutions developed in the country (book mostly has an American perspective), right up to the present place where financial institutions became predominant before their collapse in late 2008. The focus of the book is the past 30 or so years, with shift to an international, highly securitized economy. The book is neither a business book (i.e., how to invest) or really a history book per se, but more of a sociology book that shows how institutions changed and ultimately affected individuals -- i.e., moved from a one-employee career with benefits at a manufacturing firm to a day trader/401(k) who may own mutual funds or individual stocks but is very distant from any enterprise.
This is a very, very good book that doesn't have a particular view (e.g., capitalism is good or evil). I found it easy to read with lots of interesting content -- the (academic) author has done his research and knows his sources (there is a good set of references and endnotes).
I suppose my only complaint is that it really doesn't extrapolate things into the future (a dangerous thing I suppose). Although it has a very short "What's next?" section, it would have been nice to read how financial system might change after events of 2008 and what possible policies might be. There was so much good groundwork in this book, a little speculation would have been good.
