- Publisher: Faber & Faber (2010)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0571253423
- ISBN-13: 978-0571253425
- Product Dimensions: 5.3 x 1.1 x 8.1 inches
- Shipping Weight: 15.5 ounces
- Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (14 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,639,039 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
How Many Friends Does One Person Need?: Dunbar's Number and Other Evolutionary Quirks Hardcover – 2010
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Top Customer Reviews
This book is a collection of previously published articles which have been updated for the book. As such, it doesn't have a strong, integrating theme. But it does provide a series of provocative insights into why we are as we are. Dunbar explains how our evolution has shaped how we are, what traits we share with the great apes and where we have surpassed them, and why we act as we do.
In a lively skip through many topics, Dunbar covers topics like why gossip is good, why we like presidential candidates who are tall and have symmetrical faces, and why kissing may be an adaptation for choosing mates with desirable immune systems. (Yes, really.) He even considers why humans are such religious critters. All-in-all, a highly engaging and thought-provoking book.
* Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language
However, I didn't give it 4 or even 5 stars, because it has major flaws.
For one thing, at least in the Kindle edition, the author doesn't cite any references.
More seriously, a lot of the author's statements are just wrong.
In chapter 10 'The Darwin Wars', it's stated, "Chris Organ from Harvard University and his colleagues carried out the first successful extraction of DNA from a 65 million year old Tyrannosaurus rex ..." Well, no actually, it was collagen protein. DNA is so fragile that around 100,000 years remains its limit for recovery. The only reference to dinosaur DNA and Chris Organ I can find is his observation that the lacunae in fossil T rex bone (which previously contained the bone cells, osteocytes, are smaller, so therefore the osteocytes were smaller, so therefore the nuclei were smaller, so therefore the genomes were smaller (with less 'junk' DNA)-like contemporary birds (there might be one or two 'therefores' too many).
In the very same chapter, it's stated, discussing Kennewick Man the 9,000 year old remains found in Washington state, "There is now compelling evidence to suggest that the earliest inhabitants of North America did in fact come from Europe (the vicinity of Spain, as it happens)" sometime around 20,000 years ago". Again no; extraordinary claims (humans managed to cross the Atlantic, in a glaciation, and then crossed the entire North American continent?) need extraordinary proof. The alternate interpretation that Kennewick Man more closely resembles the Ainu of northern Japan and came from there is more plausible.Read more ›
What I find more grating is how he continually speaks as if our ancestors, and their genes, had changed behaviour based on knowledge of future hardship:
"... their descendants decided to increase the size of their brains dramatically ... The inspired solution our ancestors eventually came up with was ..."
Maybe I'm going a bit Dawkins, but this is not how it works. I know Dunbar doesn't think anything other than evolution is involved here, but it'd be far better if his wording reflected this. I know this is hard to do, and I struggle now to think of an alternate wording, but the assignment of intentionality should be avoided if possible.
Factually, it raises itself above a lazy New Scientist article by delivering an occasional nugget of information you wouldn't often see. For example, men have only one X chromosome meaning they have a heightened chance of colour vision defects arising from mutations, compared to women who have two X chromosomes and hence a backup copy. This also means that mutations in one X chromosome can lead to extra receptor types in women. In a very real way, women may see differently than men. I don't buy his followup argument that this is why women are supposedly more colour conscious than men. Still this is populist science, and a nice hook.
I've previously read Dunbar's ...Read more ›
According to Dunbar, the complexity of human society--not tools, or walking upright, or hunting--it the primary force driving the growth of the human brain. Our brains enable us to speak and sing and otherwise communicate with each other without actually touching, so we can groom each other at a distance, so to speak. Because our social interactions don't require one-on-one contact, human groups can be larger than the groups of our primate cousins--but group size still has a limit, which appears to be about 150.
Dunbar's book is very readable and is filled with fascinating tidbits, like the fact that all human infants (even the ones who are carried to a full nine month term) are born premature. For our children to be born at the same level of development as, say, a chimpanzee, the gestation period would need to be about 22 months.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Fifteen the answer is 15 people... I do not like his assessment. We are the sheep on his cover for buying this garbage.Published 2 months ago by Gwendolyn T. Carr
Amazingly fascinating--friends, language, music. What makes us human.Published 6 months ago by Sarah Agnes
I had a good time reading this book. It's funny & builds on stories & research. It pokes you by relating all that science to things like gossip & culture. Read morePublished on December 31, 2013 by Souvik Mitra
Dunbar's number can be seen utilized in many successful businesses. This book gives a great deal of information regarding our own personal spheres of influence.Published on May 19, 2013 by Helga Kivisto
I originally sought out this book for a research paper I was doing on social networking and Dunbar's Number. Read morePublished on January 31, 2013 by Kalee Conklin
Dunbar is famous for defining how many friends one can have, but here he deals with many other antropological themes in a fun darwinian way.
Read this book and find out why 150 friends is the optimal number. Learn how appearances are deceiving- two subspecies of gorillas are more genetically different than humans and... Read morePublished on May 18, 2011 by Kindle Customer
No matter whether you are interested in evolution/anthropology or not, this very interesting book is full of interesting facts which can entertain you well in traffic and in... Read morePublished on April 28, 2011 by ServantofGod
We are the the product of our evolutionary history, according to professor (of evolutionary anthropology at Oxford University) Robin Dunbar. Read morePublished on January 8, 2011 by Simon Laub