Mapping the deep Paperback – January 1, 2000
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Customers who bought this item also bought
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
It deserved 5 stars easy. I plan to reread it in the future.
Top international reviews
Not enough pictures/diagrams and some diagrams were too small/fuzzy to see clearly; needed metric measurements - is America the last place in the world to use feet in science books?
I have given up with this book. It doesn't even do a good job of deception!
There are elements in this world that are hell bent on distorting reality and whether intentionally or otherwise this author is one of them.
It's going in the bin. Constant references to space and long laborious narrative.
Scientists seem to think this somehow solves the question of the origin of life but the ridiculous "big bang" had to have been supernatural like God is supernatural. Their fables are a religion too. Establishment deceit and indoctrination.
Naturally no mention of the evidence that the earth is still and flat. The "curve", which we hear, very little about (strange eh), is supposed to be 66feet over 10miles but is apparent nowhere. Corsica can be seen from 137miles away and the suez canal is 100miles long with no locks. Antarctica is 30degrees colder than the arctic and does not get 24hour sunlight. Ships that disappear into the distance come back into view with telescopes. The tides are not uniform and do not affect lakes. The cycle of the moon bears no correlation to the position of the sun. He writes about aspects of water but does not, and obviously cannot, explain how surface water apparently curves across vast expanses of land we call oceans. There is much more evidence.(Edward Hendrie, 2016).
He talks about hms Challenger which "circumnavigated" the Antarctic in 1875 covering the masonic favourite of 69,000 miles. Naturally he does not tell the truth. Well the circumference of flat earth is 52,800 miles so that's plenty of miles to cover it. Strange how there's a place in Antarctica named "DOME" Charlie and how Admiral Byrd went there in OPERATION HIGH JUMP with 4000 troops and witnessed planes hitting a invisible wall! I don't think this "scientist" will cover those elements.
I'm guessing now that this book is also full of evolutionary nonsense too. It's fascinating how these "scientists" consider "brains". Not sure what they think a "brain" implies. Does it imply analytical ability or does it mean you have "genetic signals"(code word for we have no idea how or why living thins do things but we are good of identifying the benefits). Just one very simple example out of billions of similar mysteries. How does a Monarch butterfly known know how to navigate from North America to Mexico? How does it know when to go? How does it know to go there in the first place? How did it rationalise the reason for going? How does it know it can fly so far? Does it actually know what it's going for? How does it physically manage the journey? Does it need "food" or water?
Though they may lie, they don't how a chameleon changes colour, how animals can freeze and come back to life, how starfish re grow their entire bodies from just a arm, how pigeons can locate home, how deep sea animals cope with the pressure, lack of oxygen and freezing temperatures, how siphonophores behave as a single organism, how animals migrate thousands of miles, how salmon find their way back to their original breeding ground, how metamorphosis "works". The list is endless though they never admit it. And don't think that all birds and other animals have the same anatomies like humans do. All animals are perfectly designed for their habitat by God.
The establishment promulgates blatant lies as though they were truth. They fit whatever they like into their little fantasy worlds of living things. Truth is they know virtually nothing about God's creations. So you have the compulsory Oxbridge, establishment, religious, evolution, indoctrination based on no true "scientific" evidence pedalled here.
For more evidence against evolution see Walt Brown, In the Beginning. Darwin himself said his "theory" was fundamentally flawed. True science has refuted evolution and the globe model. Fossil records do not show the evolution of species and the complexity of life such as DNA and the organisation, behaviour and capacity of animals implies a hidden force which the establishment will do all they can to conceal, deny or ignore (see Walt Brown, In the beginning). Fossil evidence in fact is evidence of a enormous catastrophe like a world wide flood because that explains how animals could have been fossilised as otherwise they would have been consumed by nature and not fossilised.
Our perception of the world has been corrupted by money. So I consider they are trying to hide something. Now why would you go to so much effort to hide something that isn't true or is insignificant? Given they have gone to so much length to conceal the evidence supporting Genesis of the KJV bible, and God creating heaven and earth I can only conclude that it's the truth. Whichever way you look at it don't let them deceive you that evolution is anything other than a religion buried under layers of scientific "facts". Nature is fundamentally supernatural being created by God. The high priests rebelled against God in ancient times and are still at it today. And the idolatry, injustice and immorality prevalent in the establishment is evidence of that. Fear God not man nor losifer.