Buying Options
| Kindle Price: | $12.99 |
| Sold by: | Macmillan Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Author
OK
Master of the Mountain: Thomas Jefferson and His Slaves Kindle Edition
| Henry Wiencek (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $22.98 | $5.99 |
Is there anything new to say about Thomas Jefferson and slavery? The answer is a resounding yes. Master of the Mountain, Henry Wiencek's eloquent, persuasive book—based on new information coming from archaeological work at Monticello and on hitherto overlooked or disregarded evidence in Jefferson's papers—opens up a huge, poorly understood dimension of Jefferson's world. We must, Wiencek suggests, follow the money.
So far, historians have offered only easy irony or paradox to explain this extraordinary Founding Father who was an emancipationist in his youth and then recoiled from his own inspiring rhetoric and equivocated about slavery; who enjoyed his renown as a revolutionary leader yet kept some of his own children as slaves. But Wiencek's Jefferson is a man of business and public affairs who makes a success of his debt-ridden plantation thanks to what he calls the "silent profits" gained from his slaves—and thanks to a skewed moral universe that he and thousands of others readily inhabited. We see Jefferson taking out a slave-equity line of credit with a Dutch bank to finance the building of Monticello and deftly creating smoke screens when visitors are dismayed by his apparent endorsement of a system they thought he'd vowed to overturn. It is not a pretty story. Slave boys are whipped to make them work in the nail factory at Monticello that pays Jefferson's grocery bills. Parents are divided from children—in his ledgers they are recast as money—while he composes theories that obscure the dynamics of what some of his friends call "a vile commerce."
Many people of Jefferson's time saw a catastrophe coming and tried to stop it, but not Jefferson. The pursuit of happiness had been badly distorted, and an oligarchy was getting very rich. Is this the quintessential American story?
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFarrar, Straus and Giroux
- Publication dateOctober 16, 2012
- File size1009 KB
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The thunderstorm that shook the mountain during the telling of Peter Fossett's story passed. We tourists were deposited back into the present, with shafts of sunlight illuminating a peaceful scene--a broad pathway stretching into the distance, disappearing over the curve of the hillside. Jefferson named it Mulberry Row for the fast-growing shade trees he planted here in the 1790s. One thousand yards long, it was the main street of the African-American hamlet atop Monticello Mountain. The plantation was a small town in everything but name, not just because of its size, but in its complexity. Skilled artisans and house slaves occupied cabins on Mulberry Row alongside hired white workers; a few slaves lived in rooms in the mansion's south dependency wing; some slept where they worked. Most of Monticello's slaves lived in clusters of cabins scattered down the mountain and on outlying farms. In his lifetime Jefferson owned more than 600 slaves. At any one time about 100 slaves lived on the mountain; the highest slave population, in 1817, was 140.1
The labyrinths of Monticello mirror the ambiguities of its maker. As you approach the house, you are taken in by one of Jefferson's cleverest tricks: through the artful arrangement of windows he achieved the illusion of having his three-story building appear to have only one floor. He had to have a house like the ones he'd seen in Paris when he was the U.S. minister there. "All the new and good houses are of a single story," Jefferson said, in the tone of someone who has discovered a new law of physics.
So in the 1790s he tore apart his first house--eight rooms, two floors--and began work on a twenty-one-room mansion, ingeniously concealing its bulk. Its innovations included skylights, indoor privies, and a system of drainpipes and cisterns to capture rainwater. He brainstormed on novel solutions for ventilating smells and smoke, such as tunnels to carry away the odor of the privies and an underground piping system to direct the smoke of cooking fires away from the house. He built the privy tunnels, through which a slave had to crawl once a month, for a dollar, to clean them; he dropped the idea of the underground pipes, considered smokestacks in the shape of obelisks, and finally settled on just having chimneys.2
One feature that Monticello does not have is a grand staircase, usually the centerpiece of a Virginia squire's entrance hall. A waste of space, Jefferson thought, and in any event he didn't need one, because he rarely went upstairs. He had everything he needed in his private, L-shaped suite of rooms on the main floor--the bedroom, the study or "cabinet," the book room, and the greenhouse, with its access to a private terrace and the lawns. A visitor called this spacious domain Jefferson's "sanctum sanctorum." His extended family--beloved daughter, impecunious son-in-law, widowed sister, grandchildren, nieces, and nephews--packed themselves into the second and third floors, reached by an extremely narrow, steep, and winding staircase--a treacherous ascent for anyone and doubly dangerous for someone carrying a load or a squirming infant. Jeff Randolph recalled the cramped quarters allotted him as a child: "I slept a whole winter in an outer closet."3 The granddaughters, desperate for private space where they could read and write, improvised their own sitting room out of an architectural gap over a portico, contending with wasps for control of the room.4
Jefferson grasped the ways geometry talks to the eye and mind, and in his hands that arid specialty yielded visual music. He imparted an uncanny sense of motion to the inanimate mass of bricks, glass, and wood, playing variations on geometrical themes. The facades of Monticello and many of its rooms have no real corners, which puts the eye, expecting right angles, off-balance. (His design for his country retreat, Poplar Forest, which he started in 1806, called for a pure octagon containing a cube.) Today we are accustomed to skylights, but in his time people did not expect to stand indoors in gentle sunlight coming from above, banishing the expected shadows and making others.
So innovative and eccentric in its irregularities and geometric illusions, Monticello not only baffled but irritated people of Jefferson's time, who expected something more conventionally pompous. "This incomprehensible pile," grumbled one visitor, calling the house "a monument of ingenious extravagance...without unity or uniformity." Another visitor, granted a rare tour of Jefferson's private suite of rooms by the master himself, pronounced herself "much disappointed in its appearance, and I do not think with its numerous divisions and arches it is as impressive as one large room would have been." Having heard the murmurings, Jefferson had to acknowledge that his "essay in architecture" was derided as being "among the curiosities of the neighborhood."5
Then as now, people were charmed by gadgets, and Monticello was full of them. "Everything has a whimsical and droll appearance," said one guest.6 One enters the parlor through an automatic double door in which both doors open or close when just one is pushed, being linked by an unseen chain under the floor. A visitor to his sanctum sanctorum would have found telescopes, a microscope, thermometers, surveying equipment, and an astronomical clock for predicting eclipses. "His mind designs more than the day can fulfill," a visitor remarked. Laid up one day with rheumatism, Jefferson passed the hours "calculating the hour lines of a...dial for the latitude of this place."7 To satisfy an omnivorous mental appetite, he designed an ingenious revolving book holder that accommodated five open volumes at a time. Reclining on a chaise, he composed his voluminous correspondence at a polygraph, a two-pen, two-sheet proto-copying machine that produced a duplicate of a letter as it was written. Even his bed is an item of interest. He placed it in an alcove with open sides--on one side lay his dressing room, on the other his study--but the reason for the open alcove arrangement was not to provide convenient access to one room or the other from the bed but to create a "breezeway" through which the cool night air would flow with increased speed. It is often said that he invented the polygraph, which he did not, and to this day the rumor persists that his bed could be raised on ropes into a hidden compartment in the ceiling--a false story that expresses the abiding belief that Jefferson practiced all manner of disappearing tricks.
Indeed, a great deal went on here out of sight. In designing the mansion, Jefferson followed a precept laid down two centuries earlier by Palladio: "We must contrive a building in such a manner that the finest and most noble parts of it be the most exposed to public view, and the less agreeable disposed in byplaces, and removed from sight as much as possible."8
The mansion sits atop a long tunnel through which slaves, unseen, hurried back and forth carrying platters of food, fresh tableware, ice, beer, wine, and linens while above them twenty, thirty, or forty guests sat listening to Jefferson's dinner-table conversation. At one end of the tunnel lay the icehouse, at the other the kitchen, a hive of ceaseless activity where the enslaved cooks and their helpers produced one course after another.
During dinner Jefferson would open a panel in the side of the fireplace, insert an empty wine bottle, and seconds later pull out a full bottle. We can imagine that he would delay explaining how this magic took place until an astonished guest put the question to him. The panel concealed a narrow dumbwaiter that descended to the basement. When Jefferson put an empty bottle in the compartment, a slave waiting in the basement pulled the dumbwaiter down, removed the empty, inserted a fresh bottle, and sent it up to the master in a matter of seconds. Similarly, platters of hot food magically appeared on a revolving door fitted with shelves, and the used plates disappeared from sight on the same contrivance. Guests could not see or hear any of the activity, nor the links between the visible world and the invisible that magically produced Jefferson's abundance.
Looming above Mulberry Row was a long terrace where Jefferson appeared every day at first light, walking alone with his thoughts. A slave looking up from Mulberry Row would see a very imposing figure outlined against the magnificent architectural features of his mansion. Jefferson was a tall man, over six feet two inches, well muscled, and "straight as a gun barrel," his overseer Edmund Bacon said; "he had an iron constitution and was very strong."9 One of his slaves, the blacksmith Isaac Granger, remembered his master as "a tall, strait-bodied man as ever you see, right square-shouldered...a straight-up man, long face, high nose."10 Jefferson owned a spring-driven strength tester called a dynamometer that he imported from France to gauge the force needed to pull a new plow he was designing. He and his neighbors decided to test their own muscles on this proto-Nautilus machine. His son-in-law Colonel Thomas Mann Randolph could out-pull all contestants, but Jefferson beat him.11
From his terrace Jefferson looked out upon an industrious, well-organized enterprise of black coopers, smiths, nail makers, a brewer, cooks professionally trained in French cuisine, a glazier, painters, millers, and weavers. Black managers, slaves themselves, oversaw other slaves. A team of highly skilled artisans constructed Jefferson's coach. The household staff ran what was essentially a midsized hotel, where some sixteen slaves waited upon the needs of a daily horde of guests.
Below the mansion there stood John Hemmings's* cabinetmaking shop, called the joinery; a dairy; a stable; a small textile factory; and a vast garden carved from the mountainside--the cluster of industries Jefferson launched to supply his plantation and bring in cash. "To be independent for the comforts of life," Jefferson said, "we must fabricate them ourselves." He was speaking of America's need to develop manufac...
--This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.About the Author
Henry Wiencek, a nationally prominent historian and writer, is the author of several books, including The Hairstons: An American Family in Black and White, which won the National Book Critics Circle Award in 1999. He lives with his wife and son in Charlottesville, Virginia.
--This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.Product details
- ASIN : B008MWL8ZE
- Publisher : Farrar, Straus and Giroux (October 16, 2012)
- Publication date : October 16, 2012
- Language : English
- File size : 1009 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 352 pages
- Lending : Not Enabled
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,071,401 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #736 in Colonial Period History of the U.S.
- #979 in Biographies of US Presidents
- #1,044 in US Revolution & Founding History (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The reason for the more favorable treatment of George Washington is also disclosed. He helped lead the counter-revolution to establish the "powerful central government" that the "progressive" author adores. Of course, Thomas Jefferson was considered the leader of the ANTI-FEDERALISTS, though he was a poor one. We are NOT all federalists now. Libertarians of all breed oppose the powerful central government of George Washington, who based on the author's own books was far more brutal to his slaves in every way than Jefferson. Jefferson also freed slaves while alive.
I also find the great acclamation of Washington's efforts upon death to be extremely overblown. He had nothing to lose at that point, unlike Jefferson who freed some of his slaves while alive. Further, excuses are made for Washington not freeing all his slaves, that they are owned by his wife, etc. I find this a pathetic rationalization. George Washington can't maneuver his own wife at THAT time? I don't believe it for a second. And, of course, he also lived large and in debt and could have otherwise bought those slaves from his wife and freed them. He KNEW those slaves wouldn't be freed, despite his will. So, it was a weak and hollow PR gesture.
In conclusion, I find this work extremely biased compared to the favorable treatment of George Washington. The bias is obviously due to the author's political agenda in favor of "progressive" authoritarianism and thus an all powerful central state with its all powerful aristocracy of professional, rich liars. Indeed, the warnings of the anti-federalists that this system would end in tyranny are now proven prescient. Always remember, the federalists opposed the Bill of Rights and only put in a weakened version because they couldn't completely stop it. The progressives want everyone enslaved equally.
The first 3/4 of the book is a bit choppy, and seemingly lost in repetitious detail. I thought it could have been better organized and edited. Perhaps focusing on Jefferson's public persona and contrasting it with his personal actions more directly.
The final 1/4 of the book, however, brings it all together. Jefferson ultimately must be revered as a tragic revolutionary hero, who succumbs to his own greed and vanity at the great expense of hundreds of less unfortunate, helpless individuals.
Top reviews from other countries
It will force you to reconsider how you regard Thomas Jefferson, as well as the sanitized version of early US history.
It will help you understand why racism is as evil as it truly is, and as difficult to eradicate.
I know I was a fan of Thomas Jefferson pretty much from the first day I heard his name. As a child, I absorbed and internalized the hagiography that rendered the Founders of the USA as infallible as the first 12 Apostles are to traditionally-minded Christians, or as infallible and perfect as the Prophet is to observant Muslims.
In fact, of course, Thomas Jefferson sustained his comfortable and elegant lifestyle, and his power base, on the arithmetic of harshest slavery. Even against the objections of those closest to him, he calculated the profits to be earned from small black boys toiling away in his nail factory -- enduring whippings if they slacked off or were not prompt enough in the pre-dawn hours (when naturally a five- or -six-year-old will want to sleep); he regarded the fertile women he "owned" as wombs for breeding more assets (the goal being to keep them pregnant as often as possible, and never mind how this was to be accomplished)... Wiencek's meticulously researched book, eloquently set forth and brilliantly written with many unexpected, startlingly vivid and thought-provoking passages is an absolute must-read for Americans and for anyone doing business with Americans.
To be sure, those who persist in arguing for an "exceptional" America with "infallible" Holy Founders are going to be upset and some will spew venom both at the book and at its author.
So will those who choose to regard the "relationship" with Sally Hemings as some kind of romantic love affair between a senior statesman and a teenage girl to whom he was a "benefactor" -- rather than a menacing despot.
The fact that he kept his own progeny as slaves to be mortgaged should expose the lie of that kind of thinking.
Count Leo Tolstoy, by the way, no less venerated by some than Thomas Jefferson, also kept his own progeny from relationships with peasant-concubines as lifelong domestic servants -- consigned to a considerably less dignified position than his own legitimate offspring, who were, of course, heirs and heiresses to his vast wealth. In the "new Russia" this unwholesome fact is being carefully written out of the "official" biographies: a challenging feat considering the total number of direct descendants from the prolific author of "War and Peace" still alive today.
The history of nations is also the history of the women who were at the mercy of the most powerful men. To deny that there were unacceptable, abusive, unethical practices imposed by some of the most-admired men who ever lived is to attempt to erase the truth of what actually happened, that was indelibly written in the blood and tears and agony of powerless women, the world over, and that today is visibly in evidence, via our own bloodlines and the indisputable facts of human DNA.
A human flesh merchant, a liar of the first order, a vile hypocrite, he had no use for anyone unless you could serve him or his goals.
Henry Wiencek sets the record straight about the so-called "Apostle of Democracy", an apostle who whipped children chained in slavery.
Nothing was ever too good for the Apostle, as long as others would pay the price and carry the burden.
Master of the Mountain should be required reading in every US High School.
Offenbar hatte er bald nach seiner Eheschließung eine Lieblingssklavin, die sogar eine eigene Hütte hatte, und von der sehr viele Abkömmlinge es schafften, später sich freizukaufen.
Es bleibt aber bei dem tiefen Graben zwischen seinen Idealen und der Wirklichkeit in seinem persönlichen Leben.
Es werden historische und private Ereignisse geschildert, und einige Seiten lang hoffte ich, mich mit diesen Werte-Systemen auseinandersetzen zu können.Tatsächlich wird alles aber soooooooooo langweilig geschildert, dass ich das Buch an momox verkaufen werde, wenn sie es nehmen.
Der Einband verspricht so viel, und es wäre interessant aus diesem Blickwinkel amerikanische Geschichte zu durchdenken, es war mir aber unmöglich, überhaupt wach zu bleiben bei der Lektüre.
Henry Wiencek soll mehrere Preise für seine Bücher erhalten haben, ich kann es einfach nicht verstehen!
GUNDA PETERSEN









