Learn more
These promotions will be applied to this item:
Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism Kindle Edition
'A clear, concise, easy-to-read account of the issues between sex, gender and feminism . . . an important book' Evening Standard
'A call for cool heads at a time of great heat and a vital reminder that revolutions don't always end well' Sunday Times
Material Girls is a timely and trenchant critique of the influential theory that we all have an inner feeling known as a gender identity, and that this feeling is more socially significant than our biological sex.
Professor Kathleen Stock surveys the philosophical ideas that led to this point, and closely interrogates each one, from De Beauvoir's statement that, 'One is not born, but rather becomes a woman' (an assertion she contends has been misinterpreted and repurposed), to Judith Butler's claim that language creates biological reality, rather than describing it. She looks at biological sex in a range of important contexts, including women-only spaces and resources, healthcare, epidemiology, political organization and data collection.
Material Girls makes a clear, humane and feminist case for our retaining the ability to discuss reality, and concludes with a positive vision for the future, in which trans rights activists and feminists can collaborate to achieve some of their political aims.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFleet
- Publication dateMay 6, 2021
- File size2.5 MB
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Customers who bought this item also bought
This disregard for the interests of people of lower socio-economic status or education is not unusual within modern trans activism.Highlighted by 357 Kindle readers
In this context, treating males with female gender identities as women in every possible context is a politically inflammatory act. In effect it sends a contemptuously dismissive message to women already conscious of unequal treatment of their interests. This message says: the interests of males with female gender identities are more important than yours.Highlighted by 324 Kindle readers
Many trans people assume – wrongly, as I will eventually argue – that the existence and recognition of their political and legal rights depends upon gender identity theory’s correctness.Highlighted by 323 Kindle readers
Editorial Reviews
Review
Reading the book I felt an intense sense of relief that finally a comprehensive account of gender identity theory was presented and explored with both clarity and depth . . . a clear, concise, easy-to-read account of the issues between sex, gender and feminism . . . an important book, and it is the middle ground who need to read it as it shows how, if we are to live in a world where gender identity trumps biological sex, then it will be women - the physically weaker sex - who lose out―Stella O’Malley, Evening Standard
In her commitment to free speech, good-faith debate, clear and careful argument and upholding reason over dogma, Stock writes faithfully in the tradition of the Enlightenment―Mary Carington, UnHerd
A fearless, rigorous study of gender identity . . . [Material Girls is] a brave, enlightening, closely argued book―Jane O’Grady, Daily Telegraph
A clear-sighted analysis in tricky territory―Evening Standard
Anyone who has felt confounded by the shifting debate about sex and gender will find some clarity here. More importantly, you will find a curious mind and a generous spirit―Sarah Ditum, Mail on Sunday
From the Back Cover
'Brave, enlightening, closely argued' Jane O'Grady, Daily Telegraph
Material Girls is a timely and trenchant critique of the influential theory that we all have an inner feeling known as a gender identity, and that this feeling is more socially significant than our biological sex.
Professor Kathleen Stock makes a clear and feminist case for our retaining the ability to discuss reality. She surveys the philosophical ideas that led us to where we are now and considers biological sex in a range of important contexts, including women-only spaces and resources, healthcare, epidemiology, political organisation and data collection.
'For anyone who has been trying to figure out what on earth is going on with gender and sexuality these days, this is the book for you' Stella O'Malley, Evening Standard
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B091969ZJN
- Publisher : Fleet
- Accessibility : Learn more
- Publication date : May 6, 2021
- Language : English
- File size : 2.5 MB
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 325 pages
- ISBN-13 : 978-0349726595
- Page Flip : Enabled
- Best Sellers Rank: #326,384 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #29 in Transgender Studies
- #71 in Gender Studies (Kindle Store)
- #133 in Feminist Theory (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers praise the book's logical reasoning, with one noting it provides a balanced examination of the topic and is backed by cold philosophical argument. Moreover, the writing quality receives positive feedback, with one customer highlighting the author's clearly articulated arguments. Additionally, the book's pacing is engaging, with one customer describing it as though-provoking. However, customers disagree with the book's stance on gender identity theory.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers appreciate the book's logical reasoning, finding it intellectually disciplined and backed by cold philosophical argument, with one customer noting its excellent balanced examination of the topic.
"...Even more, she provides a charitable explanation for each of the areas she critiques, without any snark or sarcasm...." Read more
"...She offers up history, philosophy, and logic in this book." Read more
"...It's excellent both as a thought-clarifier for anyone who's been involved in the argument for a long time, and as an in-depth introduction for..." Read more
"A masterful work of feminism and philosophy." Read more
Customers find the book highly readable, describing it as essential reading for every citizen.
"...This book is well-worth your time." Read more
"An authoritative, scholarly but not boring, book written by an interesting and engaging professor of Philosophy...." Read more
"An essential read for every citizen." Read more
"One of the best books I've read this decade..." Read more
Customers praise the writing quality of the book, finding it well and clearly articulated, with one customer noting its conversational style.
"Kathleen Stock is an incredible author with a lot to say. She offers up history, philosophy, and logic in this book." Read more
"...argument (in this book the arguments are really suggestions) in conversational prose yet rigorous logic...." Read more
"...The author provides very clearly articulated arguments for her positions and there is nothing in any way shape or form about this book that could..." Read more
"...The author is an exceptionally clear thinker and writer and she cuts through the incoherence of gender identity theory like a hot knife through..." Read more
Customers find the pacing of the book engaging, with one describing it as though-provoking and another noting it's not boring.
"...is that most people who bother to read this book will find it to be interesting and compelling and perhaps a bit stunning...." Read more
"An authoritative, scholarly but not boring, book written by an interesting and engaging professor of Philosophy...." Read more
"Well written and though provoking...." Read more
Customers have mixed views on the book's approach to gender identity, with some finding the gender identity theory harmful, while one customer notes it is not a critique of trans people.
"...by an (openly) lesbian non-conforming woman, this book is NOT a critique of trans people...." Read more
"...Stock’s thesis is that this “gender identity theory” is harmful and should be discarded...." Read more
"Stock's thesis is that "gender identity theory" is harmful...." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2022"[𝘛𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦] 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦, 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘵𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘮𝘢, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘦 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘰. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴. 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦, 𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳, 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘭𝘺 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘰𝘱𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦; 𝘯𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘨𝘨𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯'𝘵 𝘢𝘴𝘬 𝘧𝘰𝘳, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱𝘴 𝘣𝘺 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘥-𝘸𝘰𝘯 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴. 𝘕𝘰𝘳 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘷𝘶𝘭𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦." - Chapter 8
Written by an (openly) lesbian non-conforming woman, this book is NOT a critique of trans people. It is a critique of the trans activist groups who lobby and claim to speak for trans rights while simultaneously undermining them. It is a philosophical critique of their ideology, of their push to have gender identity replace (rather than supplement) biological sex in social policies, causing needless harm to the progress already made for other minority groups.
To reiterate: this author believes trans rights are human rights. This author is NOT against people's freedom of expression nor having additional categorizations to accommodate the idea of gender identity. What she is against is activist groups denying biology and sex differences altogether, cherry-picking data of intersex people as proof there isn't a sex binary, and allowing ideology to replace facts under the guise of "inclusion".
In the activist group's crusade for social justice, groups like Stonewall and Mermaids have replaced evidence-based activism for abstract postmodern theories. Rather than acknowledge sex differences, these groups opt to push "gender identity" as the only determining factor on whether someone's a male or female (e.g. "trans women are women"). Rather than see how their theoretical frameworks undermine the very minority groups they once defended, especially women's rights, these groups opt to claim anyone who disagrees with their perspective is automatically "transphobic" and/or "erasing trans people's existence".
But, what is the actual scientific evidence to some of the claims they make? The problem is most of the evidence they use to justify their views are very weak and/or misleading. Other times, their ideas simply come from postmodern thinkers like Judith Butler (e.g. the claim that all sex is socially constructed).
- Contrary to the claim 1.7% of people are intersex, the number is actually much closer to .018% when you account for how the original claim also included MEN and WOMEN with DSD (Differences in Sex Development). And just because there are rare instances of intersex people (who of course deserve the same rights as everyone else) doesn't automatically mean 99.9% of people aren't men or women.
- Contrary to the claim trans kids are killing themselves at "epidemic" levels, the actual amount of suicides are extremely rare. And this DOESN'T mean we shouldn't care about suicides, but that these activist groups are fearmongering rather than being honest.
- Contrary to the claim puberty blockers are absolutely safe to use on children, there's limited data overall, and the data that is available tends to be weak. And just because a maturing kid is confused doesn't automatically make them trans; they may grow up to be gay or lesbian, or neither. Applying permanent solutions for what may be a temporary problem is never wise. People who have de-transitioned exist.
Again, debunking these claims DOESN'T mean the author doesn't care about trans rights. She does (and I do too). The problem is the very groups being made to represent trans rights are not representing them so much as they are tokenizing them and confused children for political means. These groups are no longer fighting for clear, tangible goals but vague, radical changes without considering the long-term consequences.
These are just but a few points the author makes throughout the book. But if you're expecting a book filled with anecdotes, cherry-picked evidence, and hyperbole this is NOT the book for you. To my surprise, this author didn't go for any low-hanging fruit; 80% of the book is pure philosophical reasoning. Even more, she provides a charitable explanation for each of the areas she critiques, without any snark or sarcasm. Needless to say, her career as a philosopher fits her well!
As for solutions? Rather than activist groups adhering to ideology, the author advocates for "less theory and more data". Because there's so little actual data around the issues themselves!
Here are just a few areas she'd like to see more research done:
- 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘴𝘺𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯-𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘧𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘯 𝘧𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘦𝘹𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘶𝘭𝘵.
- 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘺 𝘣𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘳𝘴.
- 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴.
- 𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘧 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴.
- 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘴𝘺𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘹𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘴, 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘱𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘥 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵.
In sum, I think activism can be a force for good. I think it can bring awareness to causes people wouldn't normally be aware of. It paved the way for women to vote, for racial minorities to have civil rights, and most recently for gay marriage. But as of late, it seems activists want their causes to be recognized so badly that they're willing to push them forward at the expense of truth.
Frankly, it astounds me how much influence they've had over major medical and psychological associations in America based (again) upon weak data to begin with. For a breakdown on all the available evidence to date, look up the article "Trans Matters: An Overview of the Debate, Research, and Policies" from Skeptic magazine. And 2 recent in-depth articles were published October 2022 and December 2022 from Reuters titled: "As more transgender children seek medical care, families confront many unknowns" and "Why detransitioners are crucial to the science of gender care".
If there's any consolation, more and more people are starting to push back on what's going on. Slowly but surely, countries like Finland and Sweden have ended their "gender-affirming care" models in favor of psychotherapy as the first line of treatment. In October 2022, England joined them too. The United States, however, is still a work in progress...
I'll end this review with a quote from Steve QJ summarized on Medium: "𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴. 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘧𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 '𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘣𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯,' 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘴. 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘮𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘬𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦 (𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯) 𝘢𝘣𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘮𝘦𝘯."
Simply put, you can support trans rights AND wholeheartedly disagree with the anti-intellectualism of current trans activism. Don't let them gaslight you into believing you're a "transphobe" or "TERF" or "anti-trans" for doing so.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2025Kathleen Stock is an incredible author with a lot to say. She offers up history, philosophy, and logic in this book.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2021Kathleen Stock is a philosopher, and her exposition of the various concepts used and often elided in arguments about transactivism vs women's rights is clarifying and refreshing. She has the true intellectual's gift of being able to express very complex concepts in straightforward language without losing detail and nuance. At the very least, the book lays the ground for a common vocabulary, something lamentably absent in this debate.
While completely sympathetic to the distress of trans people, she's extremely clear on the need for a model of trans rights which does not erase women's rights, and she doesn't sidestep any of the most contentious issues. She's equally forthright about the level of policy capture which has brought us to the current situation.
Underlying all this is a very satisfying swipe at the archpriests of 'high' theory, in particular Judith Butler, and a postmodern school of thought which has attempted, with the disastrous consequences we're currently facing, to divorce language from any requirement that it attempt to model reality with any degree of consensual accuracy. Her call for an evidence-based approach to the issue is also an eviscerating critique of politicians, both in the UK and the US, who have been caught up in a fashionable issue du jour, pandered to a noisy and aggressive activist lobby which does not represent the real interests of trans people, and abjectly failed to do their jobs where balancing activist demands with women's rights is concerned. (Here's looking at you, Joe Biden.)
I'm not sure I agree with her model of sex or preference for a cluster concept - I think gamete class should be the category concept because of how new individuals are formed, and the cluster discussion makes sense as a way of dealing with edge cases like CAIS women, not as a definition of sex itself.
I also think she underestimates autogynephilia as a driver of the MTF phenomenon, and is thus in my view unduly critical of feminists such as Sheila Jeffreys and Julia Long. I think a reckoning with the impact of violent and freely available internet porn on young people developing their sexuality is due, and it won't be pleasant. Boys are being sucked into forms of pornography like sissy hypno and forced feminization. Girls are shown images of horrific abuse of women which boys expect them to replicate; small wonder that identifying as male seems like an escape hatch, regardless of the damage to their bodies. And the medical industry is capitalising on this instead of condemning it, although this seems to be shifting.
But none of that detracts from the scope of the book and the quality of the arguments. It's excellent both as a thought-clarifier for anyone who's been involved in the argument for a long time, and as an in-depth introduction for people new to the debate. And yes, there is a debate.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 2, 2022A friend of mine was becoming transgender. Bought this book to strengthen my understanding of a rather complex topic. None of this is easy, folks.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2025A masterful work of feminism and philosophy.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 4, 2024The material in this book is worth knowing. It’s not as accessible to the reader as Helen Joyce’s “TRANS, When Ideology Meets Reality,” but then, Professor Stock is a philosopher. One would expect the book written by a journalist (H. Joyce) to be more accessible than a book written by a philosophy professor (K. Stock).
Biological sex is material reality. Gender is a social construct. Professor Judith Butler and her postmodernist colleagues are spouting a lot of nonsense, and the nonsense has become dangerous. Read “Material Girls” to get a better view of the damage trans activism is doing to girls, women, and especially to lesbians.
Time for me to re-read Material Girls.
Top reviews from other countries
Amazon CustomerReviewed in the United Kingdom on July 19, 20235.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant, thought provoking & evidence based
Overall I think this book is very intelligently written & thought provoking. Stock is an excellent writer and articulates her ideas well. She is not anti-trans like her critics decry. She respects trans identities and simply thinks Stonewall would be better off fighting for a third gender neutral space for GNC people who don’t fit neatly into a male or female space, instead of demanding that people use the space that reflects their ‘gender identity’. It is not that *all* men or trans identifying women are a safety risk - it’s just that statistically speaking, female people are very vulnerable to violence from male people and thus we need single sex spaces to ensure their protection. This does not mean that all trans women, or even all men, are predators, of course that’s not true.
There is also no way to distinguish between a genuine trans woman and a male who pretends to be trans in order to gain access to vulnerable women, as gender identity is an inner state that can’t be externally guaranteed. Especially so with the new idea that trans people don’t have to try and ‘pass’, or take hormones etc. It’s impossible to tell who is trans from looking at them.
Unfortunately some bad actors are out there, such as Darren Merager and Jeremy Melvin Carlson, convicted sex offenders/pedophiles who appropriated trans identities to gain access to vulnerable women. Stock has a point about keeping people like this out of women’s spaces. But in places with Self ID, there is nothing to stop these people from going into a woman’s changing room. I am glad we don’t have Self ID in the UK because it keeps out predatory men like them.
Stock criticises some of the flawed data or reasoning behind transgender activism - not because she hates them, but because she wants the best outcomes for all people involved, including trans people, and to do that we have to use good data and be honest about what that is. The flawed data she mentions, for example, include the Stonewall suicide statistics (which say half of trans people attempt suicide due to transphobia, but this is contradicted by the NHS’ GIDS data that showed only 3 trans patients attempted suicide in several years). It turns out the Stonewall survey isn’t adequate as the participants weren’t selected at random and so the results can’t be extrapolated to the population as a whole. It’s a very poor method for drawing data, according to statisticians. Additionally, it’s socially irresponsible for them to talk about suicide in this way as suicide is socially contagious. Attributing suicide attempts to a single cause goes against the Samaritans Media Guidelines, which also state that this type of irresponsible reporting gives others the idea to kill themselves.
I also like how she says all sides should focus on what they have in common rather than our differences, so we can work together to create change. For example, both nonbinary and gender critical people want to tear down gender stereotypes, so that’s a good starting point to work together. In an ideal world we could work together, and this book inspires me to try and do that in some way.
Like Stock I’m sympathetic to trans people, and I agree we need to be honest about evidence, data, gender identity etc, as this can only help trans and non-trans people, when done in a spirit of compassion.
Overall I give this book 5/5. There are some very minor points of reasoning I didn’t agree with but over all she did a brilliant job with this book.
(On a final note, I’d like to point out that as far as I can see, none of the 1 star reviews actually address any of the arguments in the book, and none of them are from verified purchases, so take from that what you will).
Maria P.Reviewed in Italy on July 25, 20235.0 out of 5 stars Bring back philosophy into society - It's badly needed
The author uses the deep, clear, and logical thinking that is characteristic of philosophy conveyed in accessible language and accompanied by accurate references to bring the light of reason into the conceptual and social muddle of hysterical, confused, and at times, ever more violent crowds.
-
356Reviewed in Japan on February 21, 20245.0 out of 5 stars 女子スポーツに平凡な男が侵入して優勝する悪夢を終わらせよう。
性別を「性自認」に置き換えるトランスアクティビズムの欺瞞についてとても丁寧に書いてあります。この問題を追っている人からすると知っていることばかりですが、これまで性別を性自認に変えてしまった歴史からまとめてありわかりやすい。現代を生きるすべての人に読んでほしい一冊です。
B. GiessenReviewed in the Netherlands on May 16, 20215.0 out of 5 stars The voice of reason
Kathleen Stock brings philosophical rigour to the hot-headed debate on transgender rights. The past few years have seen both sides take their views to extremes (though I don’t mean to equate threats of rape, murder and suicide by trans activists to occasional misgendering by feminists). The application of considered thought to the issue, with an insistence on clearly defined terms, is a breath of fresh air.
"Material Girls" goes through the main issues: what are sex and gender, why do they both matter, what is a gender identity, how should we use words like ‘woman’, and what should be the direction of policy and debate. As the book progresses, it becomes more and more compelling. Those who are not moved by it to rethink their assumptions about gender, need to open their minds.
In addition to a thesis about trans policies, the book is a lesson in clear thinking. Few can match Stock’s down-to-earth reasoning and wealth of ideas. You'd wish academics would be inspired to explore, for example, her hypothesis about gender identity. In the current climate they may not - but let's hope this book marks a turning point in the way we think about trans issues.
Raúl STReviewed in Spain on December 20, 20215.0 out of 5 stars Really good book on the genre/sex discussion
Analysis of concepts such as genre, sex and trans related questions. It may be seen as problematic though I think it is certainly not.






