Buy new:
$50.00$50.00
Delivery Tuesday, December 10
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Like New
$6.05$6.05
This item cannot be shipped to your selected delivery location. Please choose a different delivery location.
Ships from: ThriftBooks-Atlanta Sold by: ThriftBooks-Atlanta
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Measuring Success: Testing, Grades, and the Future of College Admissions
Purchase options and add-ons
Standardized tests have become the gateway to higher education . . . but should they be?
For more than seventy-five years, standardized tests have been considered a vital tool for gauging students’ readiness for college. However, few people―including students, parents, teachers, and policy makers―understand how tests like the SAT or ACT are used in admissions decisions. Once touted as the best way to compare students from diverse backgrounds, these tests are now increasingly criticized as being biased in favor of traditionally privileged groups. A small but growing number of colleges have made such testing optional for applicants.
Is this the right way to go? Measuring Success investigates the research and policy implications of test-optional practices, considering both sides of the debate. Does a test-optional policy result in a more diverse student body or improve attainment and retention rates? Drawing upon the expertise of higher education researchers, admissions officers, enrollment managers, and policy professionals, this volume is among the first to investigate the research and policy implications of test-optional practices.
Although the test-optional movement has received ample attention, its claims have rarely been subjected to empirical scrutiny. This volume provides a much-needed evaluation of the use and value of standardized admissions tests in an era of widespread grade inflation. It will be of great value to those seeking to strike the proper balance between uniformity and fairness in higher education.
Contributors: Andrew S. Belasco, A. Emiko Blalock, William G. Bowen, Jim Brooks, Matthew M. Chingos, James C. Hearn, Michael Hurwitz, Jonathan Jacobs, Nathan R. Kuncel, Jason Lee, Jerome A. Lucido, Eric Maguire, Krista Mattern, Michael S. McPherson, Kelly O. Rosinger, Paul R. Sackett, Edgar Sanchez, Dhruv B. Sharma, Emily J. Shaw, Kyle Sweitzer, Roger J. Thompson, Meredith Welch, Rebecca Zwick
- ISBN-101421424967
- ISBN-13978-1421424965
- PublisherJohns Hopkins University Press
- Publication dateJanuary 15, 2018
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6 x 1.06 x 9 inches
- Print length344 pages
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star61%39%0%0%0%61%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star61%39%0%0%0%39%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star61%39%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star61%39%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star61%39%0%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
"Measuring Success" makes a compelling case for why the standardized test adds value to the higher education admissions process and is careful not to dismiss the idea that high school grades are important. Even in the one chapter that focuses on grade inflation, the authors acknowledge that high school grades do matter, but some caution should be given to how grades are inflating faster for some groups but not others. In the book, and as far as I have read in press accounts, test-optional advocates never offer a data-driven refutation of this point.
The best pro-test optional chapter in the book focuses on interviews conducted by a researcher at the University of Southern California. One particularly strong set of quotes comes from two different sources where one test-optional school admitted that before they went test-optional they became dependent on the standardized test they used. Another admissions officer thought admissions officers could abuse testing. A cautionary tale to be sure. My sense was that beyond the anecdotes which do resonate, there does not seem to be a lot of methodologically rigorous evidence with generalizable data.
First, the tests are not biased against low-income students, non-whites, or women, and the tests are accurate predictors of university performance. This point is well-known to those familiar with the literature, but may come as a shock to readers who have been fed the anti-test propaganda that is common in U.S. society. Although there are income and racial gaps in how students perform on the tests, these performance gaps reflect differences in academic aptitude. The tests are equally good predictors for students across income levels and races -- in fact, the tests overpredict the performance of non-whites (that is, the tests predict that non-whites will get higher grades than they actually do), so if anything they have an anti-white bias. As for the gender gap, the tests underpredict the performance of women, but this is because women's college grades are boosted by their superiority over men in classroom discussion, performing extra credit projects, etc. When one examines purely academic performance (i.e., on tests, quizzes, etc.), the admissions tests equally predict male and female grades.
Second, and news to me, is that the calls for abolishing admissions tests serve the interests of wealthy elites and university managers concerned with improving how prestigious their institutions are perceived to be. Grade inflation and grade compression are both greater at high-income high schools. Further, high schools that are more likely to send graduates to prestigious universities are also more likely to not publicly reveal class rank. Thus, abolishing admissions tests presents universities from distinguishing between wealthy children, when a huge number of wealthy children have 4.0s (or higher, given the greater number of AP and honors courses at wealthy high schools that enable rich children to inflate their grades well above a 4.0). As for universities, going test optional has little-to-no impact on increasing racial or socioeconomic diversity in the student body. Instead, going test optional (i) increases the number of applications and (ii) allows the university to have a higher average SAT score, since the students who submit scores have higher scores than non-submitters. Taken together, (i) and (ii) improve a university's ranking.
