OR
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Messiah Matrix Kindle Edition
Price | New from | Used from |
- Kindle
$0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 4 million more titles $6.99 to buy - Paperback
$12.01
"… a unique combination of carefully researched material and breathless adventure story," Book, Bones & Buffy.
LIMITED TIME SPECIAL OFFER PRICE
To what lengths would the Vatican go to suppress the secret origins of its power?
A renowned priest is killed in Rome. A Roman coin is recovered from a wreck off the coast of ancient Judea.
It’s up to a young American Jesuit priest and a vivacious, brilliant, female archaeologist to connect these seemingly disparate events and unravel the greatest mystery of all.
From the ancient port of Caesarea to Rome's legendary catacombs and the sacred caves of Cumae, this straight from the headlines thriller follows their quest to uncover the truth about the historical existence of the real "Christ Savior."
Essential Reading for fans of Dan Brown or James Rollins.
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateJanuary 10, 2014
- File size4215 KB
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- ASIN : B007ZJL4TK
- Publisher : Imprimatur Britannia and Story Merchant Books (January 10, 2014)
- Publication date : January 10, 2014
- Language : English
- File size : 4215 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 412 pages
- Page numbers source ISBN : 0996368957
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,297,731 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #2,877 in Religious Historical Fiction (Books)
- #3,220 in Historical Thrillers (Kindle Store)
- #11,593 in Historical Thrillers (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

"I believe we can change the world through stories. 'The universe,' says Muriel Rukeyser, 'is not made of atoms, but of stories.' I believe in making a difference in the lives of others through the power of storytelling, both as a story teller myself and as a "story merchant" who enables other storytellers to make a difference."
Dr. Ken Atchity loves being a writer, producer, teacher, career coach, and literary manager, responsible for launching hundreds of books and films. His life's passion is finding great stories and storytellers and turning them into bestselling authors and screenwriters--and making films which send their stories around the world.
His books include, most recently, novels THE MESSIAH MATRIX and SEVEN WAYS TO DIE (with William Diehl) and nonfiction books for writers at every stage of their career. Based on his teaching, managing, and writing experience, he's successfully built bestselling careers for novelists, nonfiction writers, and screenwriters from the ground up.
Atchity has also produced 30 films, including "Hysteria" (Maggie Gyllenhaal and Hugh Dancy), "The Expatriate" (Aaron Eckhart), "The Lost Valentine" (Betty White), "Gospel Hill" (Danny Glover), "Joe Somebody" (Tim Allen), "Life or Something Like It" (Angelina Jolie), "The Amityville Horror: The Evil Escapes," "Shadow of Obsession" (Veronica Hammel), "The Madam's Family" (Ellen Burstyn). Full film bio at http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0040338/
He was born in Eunice, Louisiana; and raised in Kansas City, Missouri, where he attended Rockhurst High School (and was editor in chief of The Prep News). After undergraduate work at Georgetown (A.B., English/Classics), and getting his Ph.D. in comparative literature from Yale, he served as professor and chairman of comparative literature and creative writing at Occidental College and Fulbright Professor at the University of Bologna. He was Distinguished Instructor, UCLA Writers Program, and a regular columnist-reviewer for The Los Angeles Times Book Review.
As CEO of www.storymerchant.com, his Story Merchant companies, www.aeionline.com and www.thewriterslifeline.com, provide a one-stop full-service development and management center for commercial and literary writers who wish to launch their storytelling in all media--from publishing and film and television production, to Web presence and merchandising & licensing.
PRESS:
Newtopia Magazine Interview
Mongrel Patriot Review: Producer and Writer Kenneth Atchity by Tamara Spivey
A dreamer who realizes his dreams and helps others do the same, Ken Atchity has impressive credits in the worlds of film, television and publishing.
Read more: http://newtopiamagazine.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/mongrel-patriot-review-producer-and-writer-kenneth-atchity/
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
What separates Atchity's book from the tiresome vulgate of the roman historique is the firmness of Atchity's unadorned style, a style seemingly embedded in Atchity's erudition as a Classicist. (If ever one wanted to study good English prose written by someone well-versed in highly inflected languages such as Attic Greek or Classical Latin, without having to grapple with Chase and Phillips' Introduction to Greek or Gildersleeve's daunting grammar tome, then Atchity is your meat.) Also, even though Dr. Atchity's bona fides as a well-traveled academician are beyond me, I can certainly appreciate a fellow who apparently knows his way around Rome when writing about Rome. (I imagine Atchity could blindly find his way from the Mausoleum of Augustus on the east bank of the Tiber River to the Temple of Jupiter near where the Via Flaminia pierces the center of The Eternal City.)
With plucky heroes such as devout archaeologist Emily Scelba and quavering priest Father Ryan, both desperately fighting the forces of darkness (and trying to stay one step ahead of a Holy See that would preserve the myth of our well-known Χριστος as well as Jesuits hell-bent—literally—on bringing on the advent of the Deified Augustus as the true Christ—The Messiah Matrix lives up to its mission, providing thrills couched in provocative questions.
Considering the already sturdy tumulus of propaganda built up around the too sordidly human Octavian, who, in 42 B.C. became divi filius—"Son of God," we should not decry a few more harmless pieces of learned public relations. If Augustus and Livia had no biological children, they were blessed by a million minions of spin. The hype began with the Res Gestae Divi Augusti, probably composed in A.D. 13-76, begun a year before the death of the man significantly known as Sebastos (Reverend) but also as Imperator (General). This sort of conflation of Messiah and Master-of-Arms is a delightful hagiographic touch sure to please revolutionaries, apostates, and wise novelists looking to expand a genre designed to thrill and excite with liberal dashes of carnality and intellectualism. (If Kissinger was right about power being the ultimate aphrodisiac, then what better Viagra than a peek into the Mysteries, whether Eleusinian, Gnostic, or otherwise?)
Unlike many conventional thrillers, and more like the priapic Old Comedy of the Greeks, The Messiah Matrix seems less a plotted thing than a progression of heterogeneous episodes. The book deftly combines mythical patterns of threat, capture, escape, and pursuit—usually against terrible odds for success and under circumstances of hideous death. This is the formula of Edgar Rice Burroughs, epigone himself of many purple patches of narrative. The formula in The Messiah Matrix inheres with religious hysteria and a baroque melodrama that would have made Matthew "Monk" Lewis salivate. The book accelerates from the discovery of an aureus whose coin face shows a thorn-crowned Augustus to a series of Perilous Pauline chases through an underworld that is both heady and prosaic as the novel hits all the storytelling points required by a heroic descent in, and daring extrication from, chthonic imprisonment. (Here Atchity's bracingly correct prose enmeshes every subterranean action and texture in phrasing precisely capturing the sights, sounds, and smells of a marathon race out of Acheron.)
Deep characterization, stunning surprises, and piquant variations are not what The Messiah Matrix is about—on the seemingly intended surface, that is. Yet, a deeper reading of the book strangely teases and tantalizes. The story releases intermittent billows of ironic incense, redolent of what author Atchity may have been satirically intending all along. For example, not just another Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, Emily is, perhaps, an ironical avatar of Dan Brown's insipid "sacred feminine," glittering with the aegis of Athena (though, in the modern vein, hardly maintaining the chastity of an Artemis). Neither is the ineluctably defrocked young priest Father Ryan able to surprise and astonish by any veer away from a bathetic plunge into Emily's arms. (A last minute restoration of Ryan's Vow of Celibacy would have been refreshing, but, significantly, out of the book's intriguing ironies and sometimes caustic satire, an example of which is the terms of the Emily/Priest love affair. The couple's passions are relayed as effulgently as one might find in any conventional nouvelle de romancier, with worlds sundered by the power of lascivious consummation and universes imploding as long-repressed passions flare from the frisson of suspenseful expectation to the fission of the first consummative clinch. Considering, again, Atchity's possibly ironic position to The Messiah Matrix, we might wonder if the author keeping a straight face? Our irrepressible protagonists' love is apparently real and reciprocal, fine in itself, but seemingly forced as far as the fulsome descriptiveness goes. Fortunately, all this verbiage about "electricity" between our stalwarts does not, thank Augustus, lead to an actual scene of faradized fornication.)
Without revealing too much of The Messiah Matrix, while nevertheless suggesting that everything will, like a sacral unveiling, be revealed, this critic would not suggest anyone analyze too closely Atchity's New Advent. Those left dripping at the end of The Da Vinci Code will find no such simple crudities in Atchity's immeasurably more intelligent book. Nevertheless, some relatively simple logico-mathematical formulations—and a bit of reliance on Aristotle's Metaphysics—should be sufficient to dismantle the nascent New Post-Christian Revealed Faith. When the Big News is revealed—again, in decidedly ironic, one might say, satirical terms—at the end of the novel, one can happily grin at the book's conveyance of such an unworkable faith and any attendant ecclesia based thereupon. One has to consider the very nature of the propagandizing, manipulative, disingenuous Emperor Augustus. All this makes for a denouement and coup de theatre that are deliciously wry. How else is one to take the scene where the offspring of Emily and Father Ryan proclaims Duh Word? Is the litany some half-baked Paul Kurtz zeppelin of buncombe? Or is this scene and its material legitimately felt by the author, as an admittedly respectable secular humanist manifesto? Again, however, Atchity intrigues and inveigles, ending the book with a line that seems like a species of oblique, crafty, and adroit Menippean satire, when the rosy-cheeked young minister says, "Don't you know that I must be about the emperor's business?" (Note "emperor" and its tie-back to imperator, or general. Bravo, Atchity! This line is the sort of ingenious, lapidary reference that would have fit right into David Seltzer's The Omen.)
The Messiah Matrix should not convince anyone that it was only some Joe Jerusalem who died on the cross, about as divine as the two thieves flanking the Holy Rood. However, like many mystery stories whose contrivances are satisfyingly temporary but potent, the novel will entertain. This new genre of rejecting Jesus as what the faithful know as Jesus, and fad of delegitimizing Christianity as True Writ, has already spawned, like Scylla and Charybdis, two masterpieces, where denunciations of Christ follow the apothegm indicating that a vigorous rejection of "Him" only engenders a vigorous affirmation. (This paradox was, of course, part of the genuine charm of Flannery O'Connor's Wise Blood.) Nor is The Messiah Matrix in the genuinely iconoclastic, apocalyptic vein of a novel like James Blish's Black Easter, where magic, working according to physical principles, is used to unleash, for one night, the entire Hosts of Hell, leading, literally, to God's death and the renascence of Dis on Earth. (Take that, Rosemary's Baby!) As in much fiction, the so-called proofs wind up relying more on manipulates than metaphysics, with whatever might be eligible for introduction as author Atchity's "apostasy" reliant, as most are, on a typically inadequate materialism.
As Blaise Pascal wrote in his Pensees:
"I wonder at the hardihood with which such persons undertake to talk about God. Proving God's works from Nature…only gives their readers grounds for thinking that the proofs of our religion are very weak…It is a remarkable fact that no canonical writer has ever used Nature to prove God."
Nevertheless, despite what a casual reader might perceive as a straightforward recit, one utilizing, notably in this instance, proversa oratoria as a stylistic fundament, not a mere flourish, another view is that Atchity has really contrived a sort of mirthful roman noir, a book that may be an inversion of the Dan Brown-type it seems to follow.
If so, The Messiah Matrix resembles some sort of explication of a heresy that really wants to make fun of heresy. In terms of the sacred, venerable Augustus' depiction of how he wished posterity to view him and the "high points of his reign" (cf. Rex Wallace's book), and any charging of religious significance because of the adjectival use of "augustus," The Messiah Matrix actually reduces the first Roman emperor back to being merely a dude named Octavian. Who was that? A canny, manipulative opportunist, favored by a Senate willing to indiscriminately convey influence and de facto tyranny. A chap for whom the cognomen Augustus was undeserved, a golden crown for someone not even deserving a dented tin fillet.
This Augustus was, then, a very base fellow. Neither the Latin version of the bronze inscriptions, Monumentum Ancyranum, nor the version installed at Ancyra (modern Turkish Ankira), the capital of Roman Galatia, dare to describe the real man, who, as a private citizen, unconstitutionally raised an army and, on gaining power, killed his political opponents, although those crimes were spun as pardons.
The Messiah Matrix is a distinguished, exceedingly rich book. Get it.
He thinks the fact that Virgil has written a passage which sounds Biblical means that the gospels are based on mythology. However, Virgil came AFTER the Old Testament prophecies of Christ, and that passage simply indicates that he was thoroughly familiar with the Hebrew scriptures. The passage could have been compiled straight out of the Old Testament. There's nothing mystical about Virgil's knowledge of the prophecies.
The author believes that because there are myths about the Dying God that Christianity is based on these myths. He does exaggerate the so-called evidence. There are many myths, I agree. However, God has been revealing truths to mankind for a long time. The Bible we have begins with the writings of Moses, and since the Exodus from Egypt occurred circa 1450 BC when Moses was 80 years old, we can date his writings within a reasonable time frame. For those of you who may be interested, the Exodus seems to have coincided with the volcanic eruption on the island of Thera, known today as Santorini, which would have made a bit of a mess in Egypt. The eruption was enormous. It packed substantially more of a punch than Krakatoa, and the prevailing winds were toward Egypt.
Years ago, scholars believed that the wandering Israelites were ignorant nomadic shepherds. However, archaeological evidence indicates that the civilization Abraham left, when he headed for the Promised Land, was a highly cultured society with the ability to write and keep records.
There are plenty of indications in the book of Genesis, the events of which predate Moses, that Moses was drawing on written records in order to compile Genesis. This isn't the place to go into detail about that.
Today historians and geologists recognize the reality of catastrophic events occurring in the earth's history. The idea of a catastrophic flood which wiped out most of mankind and changed the topography of the world is not far-fetched at all. It could well have coincided with a collision with a comet, asteroid or other heavenly body. Noah was one of the survivors, and he is described in the New Testament as a "preacher of righteousness".
God's revelation to mankind came early. God's revelation to mankind precedes the myths. The mythology of the Dying God is actually based on a distortion of God's revelation -- the actual product of verbal transmission being somewhat garbled as time passed. The myths are based on God's revelation, BUT the myths don't have it straight. In addition to that, there were many different rulers in different kingdoms who decided to claim the position of God and/or God's Son. They personally claimed to be the fulfillment of the prophecies about the coming of the Son of God.
Men who love power often have delusions of grandeur. It does boggle the mind that men who get sick and die, unable to prevent their own deaths, decide to imagine they are gods.
The author claims that Jesus of Nazareth never lived - that He was not a historical character- that the gospels are actually based on Octavian August Caesar's claims to deity. Now that is simply silly. You may or may not believe that Jesus is the Lord, but to deny His historical existence is so far removed from actual history as to be bizarre.
There is no rational way to equate the Jesus of the Gospels with Augustus Caesar. They aren't even playing on the same street. I strongly suggest that anybody who is going to swallow this wild tale should READ the gospels and see if you think that Caesar is the basis for the person of Jesus Christ.
In the meantime, this book is a standard formula thriller plot -- not a bad read, if you are able to ignore the nonsense. I'm not going to give away the plot for those of you who want to read the book.
I wasn't always a Christian. Once a long time ago, I wondered if Jesus was even a historical character - and I researched the subject to find out. I had no intention of basing my life on a lie. I picked up this book knowing it would be a direct challenge to the Christian faith. My faith is based on historical facts, and it would be totally worthless if it wasn't fact and it if couldn't hold up to challenges. It's a real knowledge about a real Person who lived, died, and rose again. And the man I know as Lord and Savior is definitely not Augustus Caesar.
Top reviews from other countries

I learned so much reading this novel because I was tempted at every turn to check the truth of facts he was weaving into the story. Was Augustus Caesar the real Jesus Christ ? No he wasn't!!
He merely did what the author has done. Sought out clues from the past to create his new persona Jasius Augustus.
God in three persons was here from the beginning of time.
Before Egypt Greece Israel Rome. In the beginning was the WORD and the WORD was with GOD and the word was GOD John chapter 1 verse 1. He was the creator of heaven and earth and man has been trying to control his fellow man by interpreting God's word since the beginning of time. That is why we have so much dissension in our world today. Organised religion is man's interpretation of God's word,it is used to control our thoughts words and deeds. and confer power and status on those who administer it. Mankind needs to start looking into his own soul for the confirmation of what is right and good to do. We all have a conscience we need to start using it more with God's principles to guide us. That's what Jesus Christ did remind us of God the Father's commandments on how to live our lives. Dr Atchity has reminded all who read this novel to question everything in order to find their way in the world we live in today.

All in all, I would recommend this read to anyone who likes a good traditional adventure/conspiracy story. I found it was well written and in parts just couldn't put it down for wanting to know what happens next! there was a lot of information about ancient gods, myths and traditions and I felt I actually learnt at lot as well. I found the main characters very easy to like and their personal "demons" that come up about religion, morality and spirituality were easily related to. I would like to see them both in another adventure!

My indecisiveness was caused by the curious mixture of Mr Atchity's story telling.
At times, I felt I was reading a really good adventure story on the lines of Clive Cussler or Dan Brown.
At others, it was like a work of non-fictional ancient history. Dennis Wheatley used to insert sections like that in his excellent books & you could largely skip them if you wished.
However, somehow, you wouldn't dare skip them in this book in case you missed a vital clue to the basis of the story that the Jesus we know was in fact a Roman Emperor.
The other problem I have is that Mr Atchity delivers two distinct styles to his story telling. On one hand, he is clearly capable of Cussleresque rip roaring adventure style novel writing.
Then, suddenly, he reverts to a style which wouldn't look out of place in a dissertation. Dan Brown does this too but, in my opinion, in a much clearer way.
Not being an academic, I found some of those sections really tough to read. In fact, I re-read many in an effort to try & understand the point being made as it was likely to be important. So, I can sympathise with the less patient readers who simply gave up.
Still, overall, I really enjoyed the plot, sort of enjoyed the historic proof & I was engaged with the denouement which seems to give a hint that there may even be more to come.
The average review for this book reflects my own views: a lot will love it, some will hate it & the majority will be somewhere in between. My enjoyment was based on liking this type of plot & being unable to decide where the convincing doses of fact & fiction overlapped.


Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on January 6, 2016
My indecisiveness was caused by the curious mixture of Mr Atchity's story telling.
At times, I felt I was reading a really good adventure story on the lines of Clive Cussler or Dan Brown.
At others, it was like a work of non-fictional ancient history. Dennis Wheatley used to insert sections like that in his excellent books & you could largely skip them if you wished.
However, somehow, you wouldn't dare skip them in this book in case you missed a vital clue to the basis of the story that the Jesus we know was in fact a Roman Emperor.
The other problem I have is that Mr Atchity delivers two distinct styles to his story telling. On one hand, he is clearly capable of Cussleresque rip roaring adventure style novel writing.
Then, suddenly, he reverts to a style which wouldn't look out of place in a dissertation. Dan Brown does this too but, in my opinion, in a much clearer way.
Not being an academic, I found some of those sections really tough to read. In fact, I re-read many in an effort to try & understand the point being made as it was likely to be important. So, I can sympathise with the less patient readers who simply gave up.
Still, overall, I really enjoyed the plot, sort of enjoyed the historic proof & I was engaged with the denouement which seems to give a hint that there may even be more to come.
The average review for this book reflects my own views: a lot will love it, some will hate it & the majority will be somewhere in between. My enjoyment was based on liking this type of plot & being unable to decide where the convincing doses of fact & fiction overlapped.


I love thrillers and mysteries. Ive read a good number of them over the years and have come to appreciate the many angles that the authors take to convey their story and ideas. As such the ideas proposed in this book intrigued me and so sat down and read avidly.
To give the author his due he is certainly good at what he does and perhaps thats part of the problem for me. At times I felt he got bogged down in his material. Choosing to write long (at times seemingly unnecessary) exposition which slows the story right down to a snails pace, instead of moving it along. I even found myself commiting the cardinal sin of skipping pages (which I never ever do by the way) as I was getting bored with the text. Infact it was clear that the author was passionate about his text to the point I felt I was reading a religious tract instead of a novel. I also found that he was becoming quite repetitive in what he was saying as though he had either forgotten what he had written or wanted to drive his points home with the tact of a sledgehammer.
The characters start off very interesting and you find yourself rooting for them as they go on their voyage of discovery. However. I found myself becoming increasingly frustrated by them, particularly in the second half of the book. I am trying hard not to give any spoilers and so dont want to go into too much detail on this.
If you like thrillers, particularly ones with religious angle then certainly give it a go. Just dont expect it to set your world alight. Mind you, you may just find yourself converted, unlike me.

What does that is the common and fundamental failing of any of these supposedly apocalyptic stories in which the plot requires that the population of the world would be unable to take the earth-shattering denouement and question its entire life-construct. No. Most people don't know or care about most things most of the time. Life would go on even if...
****SPOILER ALERT*******
...it turns out that the real founder of the Christian faith was an eclectic, pagan' Roman Emperor.
Really? OK. What's for dinner? What were the sports results? What are you doing at the weekend?
I have referred to Umberto Eco's 'Focault's Pendulum' in a few reviews about books of this type, because I think he gets it right; the big world-changing plot boils down to a mis-represented grocery list. And that, I'm sure, is how the world would react if this story were true.
On the positive side, the author's knowledge and scholarship is clear and gives plenty of signposting for anyone interested in the study of comparative religion. for that, the books deserves attention.
On another positive note, I downloaded this book for free last year, but have only just read it, on holiday, unaware of the hype growing around it.
In the final analysis, if you have time to kill on holiday and aren't too fussed about the quality of the writing rather than the premise of the story, then this will take a day to read, especially when you skip all the needless exposition and travelogue detail. Ideal filler for your Kindle.