Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$23.00$23.00
FREE delivery: Saturday, Aug 19 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Payment
Secure transaction
Ships from
Amazon
Sold by
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Buy used: $9.11
Other Sellers on Amazon
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
94% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.97 shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Metaphysical Club : A Story of Ideas in America Hardcover – May 30, 2001
Purchase options and add-ons
A riveting, original book about the creation of modern American thought.
The Metaphysical Club was an informal group that met in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1872, to talk about ideas. Its members included Oliver Well Holmes, Jr., future associate justice of the United States Supreme Court; William James, the father of modern American psychology; and Charles Sanders Peirce, logician, scientist, and the founder of semiotics. The Club was probably in existence for about nine months. No records were kept. The one thing we know that came out of it was an idea -- an idea about ideas. This book is the story of that idea. Holmes, James, and Peirce all believed that ideas are not things "out there" waiting to be discovered but are tools people invent -- like knives and forks and microchips -- to make their way in the world. They thought that ideas are produced not by individuals, but by groups of individuals -- that ideas are social. They do not develop according to some inner logic of their own but are entirely depent -- like germs -- on their human carriers and environment. And they thought that the survival of any idea deps not on its immutability but on its adaptability. The Metaphysical Club is written in the spirit of this idea about ideas. It is not a history of philosophy but an absorbing narrative about personalities and social history, a story about America. It begins with the Civil War and s in 1919 with Justice Holmes's dissenting opinion in the case of U.S. v. Abrams-the basis for the constitutional law of free speech. The first four sections of the book focus on Holmes, James, Peirce, and their intellectual heir, John Dewey. The last section discusses some of the fundamental twentieth-century ideas they are associated with. This is a book about a way of thinking that changed American life.
- Print length384 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFarrar, Straus and Giroux
- Publication dateMay 30, 2001
- Dimensions6.5 x 1.5 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-100374199639
- ISBN-13978-0374199630
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
The lesson Holmes took from the war can be put in a sentence. It is that certitude leads to violence.Highlighted by 799 Kindle readers
The belief that ideas should never become ideologies—either justifying the status quo, or dictating some transcendent imperative for renouncing it—was the essence of what they taught.Highlighted by 749 Kindle readers
Truth, Holmes said many times, is just the name for what it is impossible for a person to doubt.Highlighted by 621 Kindle readers
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
Despite this potentially forbidding theme, The Metaphysical Club is not a dry tome for academics. Instead, it is a quadruple biography, a wonderfully told story of ideas that advances by turning these thinkers into characters and bringing them to life. Menand links them through the Metaphysical Club, a conversational club formed in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1872. It lasted but a few months, and references to it appear only in Peirce's writings (its real significance seems rather limited), though Holmes and James were both members. (Dewey was much younger than these three, and more an heir than a contemporary.) It is difficult to describe in a sentence or two what they accomplished, though Menand takes a stab at it: "They helped put an end to the idea that the universe is an idea, that beyond the mundane business of making our way as best we can in a world shot through with contingency, there exists some order, invisible to us, whose logic we transgress at our peril." Academic freedom and cultural pluralism are just two of their legacies, and they are linchpins of democracy in a nonideological age, says Menand.
A book like this is necessarily idiosyncratic, yet at the same time this one is sweeping. It presents an accessible survey of intellectual life from roughly the end of the Civil War to the start of the cold war. Dozens of figures receive fascinating thumbnail sketches, from Ralph Waldo Emerson and Charles Darwin to Jane Addams and Eugene Debs. The result is a grand portrait of an age that will appeal to anyone with even a modest interest in the history of philosophy and ideas. --John Miller
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
- Leon H. Brody, U.S. Office of Personnel Mgt. Lib., Washington, DC
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
What makes Menand’s story “old” is not simply that the careers of his leading characters—John Dewey, William James, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., and Charles Peirce—are familiar. Menand’s sense of what makes them important is more or less standard. These men differed from most American and European thinkers of their time by accepting a large measure of uncertainty in the foundations for moral and cognitive judgments, and by treating ideas not as mirrors of a stable reality but instead as flexible tools for engaging a truly contingent world. Menand’s basic explanation for the emergence of this way of thinking, moreover, tracks a number of earlier studies. That the 1870s in New England should be the time and place in which these tendencies were the most vigorously pioneered owed much to the virtually simultaneous experience of the Civil War and the Darwinian revolution in an atmosphere of capitalist expansion and of an intensely Protestant moral and metaphysical idealism.
What most makes Menand’s telling of this story “new” is his success in integrating the personal lives of Dewey, James, Holmes and Peirce, and in showing precisely the intellectual continuities that justify our remembering them as a group. The Metaphysical Club is an exercise in dialectical intellectual biography. Menand demonstrates that the thinking of each of his four central characters developed in relation to each other’s ideas and personalities throughout their lifetimes, in relation to each other’s teachers and students, and in relation to features of New England culture that all four experienced. Other books address the three philosophers but omit the jurist, Holmes, or deal with the worldly Dewey and Holmes and not with the more cloistered Peirce and James (or vice versa). Many studies take up any one or more of these four giants in relation to some larger cluster. But no one has done a better job than Menand in showing the social and psychological process of thinking on the part of this exceptionally influential quartet of closely related intellectuals.
Menand’s title refers to a small discussion group in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in the early 1870s in which James, Holmes and Peirce were occasional participants, but the title threatens to obscure the breadth of Menand’s research and analysis. Menand offers cogent and persuasive accounts of how a range of other thinkers inspired or were inspired by The Four. His discussion of the cultural pluralists Horace Kallen, Alain Locke and Randolph Bourne is nuanced, and he does a good, if brief, job with Jane Addams, Arthur Bentley, W.E.B. Du Bois and Franz Boas. Surprisingly, Menand pays almost no attention to Josiah Royce, the popular Harvard philosopher deeply influenced by Peirce, and in dialogue with whom James developed many of his most important ideas, especially those defended in his great book of 1907, Pragmatism.
Along the way, Menand provides a crisp and informative portrait of Louis Agassiz, the luminous anti-Darwinian who dominated the American scientific community during the middle decades of the 19th century. Agassiz epitomized the dogmatic certainty that the pragmatists eventually rejected. Convinced that species were fixed ideas in the mind of the Creator, and long a defender of the view that Negroes were a species distinct from, and decidedly inferior to, Caucasians, Agassiz was the darling of creationists and proslavery theorists. Hence he proved to be on the wrong side of the great scientific and moral issues of the era defined by the Civil War and the Darwinian revolution in natural history. Yet he was prominent along with the fathers of Peirce, James and Holmes in the social and intellectual elite of Boston-Cambridge, and it was natural that the young William James began his career as Agassiz’s protégé. How James became increasingly repelled by Agassiz while on an expedition to Brazil under Agassiz’s leadership is the substance of one of Menand’s most engaging chapters.
What James, Peirce, Holmes and Dewey accomplished was to gain wider acceptance for what Menand regards as a distinctly modern “idea about ideas”: that ideas themselves are socially produced devices—“like forks and knives and microchips”—for coping with experience, and thus are not primarily individually housed, internal constructions of some fixed, external reality. “The belief that ideas should never become ideologies—either justifying the status quo, or dictating some transcendent imperative for renouncing it—was the essence of what they taught,” explains Menand. Agassiz and the extreme abolitionists had exemplified this old way of thinking, as Menand shows. Agassiz’s deployment of scientific ideas to undermine the Lincoln administration’s efforts to protect liberated slaves in 1863 serves Menand as an emblem for the attitude toward ideas that “a new kind of skepticism” renounced. The new outlook taught by James, Peirce, Holmes and Dewey could help people deal with “a heterogeneous, industrialized, mass-market society . . . in which older human bonds of custom and community seemed to have been attenuated, and to have been replaced by impersonal networks of obligation and authority.” This attitude “permits the continual state of upheaval that capitalism thrives on,” and could “free thought from thralldom to official ideologies of the church, or the state or even the academy.”
This understanding of the contributions of the pragmatist intellectuals was widespread in the 1950s and 1960s, but Menand curiously argues that the Cold War put pragmatism into a remission that lasted until the end of the Cold War. It is true that the writings of the old pragmatists won renewed attention in the 1990s. But the explicitly antipragmatist argumentation Menand appears to have in mind was largely a phenomenon of the late 1960s and early 1970s, and it was directed against what was seen as the excessively pragmatic attitude of go-slow-on-civil-rights politicians and those intellectuals who supported the Vietnam War. Beyond politics, moreover, W. V. O. Quine, Thomas Kuhn and a number of other American thinkers of the Cold War years worked within the pragmatist tradition. Reinhold Niebuhr, whom Menand cites as an example of an antipragmatic sensibility, smuggled vast amounts of pragmatism into his Christ-affirming political theory and was close to Dewey on many crucial issues.
Much of what scholars of the 1950s said about pragmatism itself is remarkably similar to what Menand now affirms. They said it in a series of widely disseminated books missing from Menand’s imposing bibliography. Morton White’s Social Thought in America: The Revolt Against Formalism, first published in 1949 and reissued with important new material in 1957, did more than any other book to popularize the understanding that Dewey, Holmes and many of their contemporaries developed an instrumentalist view of ideas conducive to the same anti-ideological cast of mind that Menand now appreciates. Indeed, The Metaphysical Club is a brilliant updating and critical revision of what could fairly be called a “1950s American Studies approach” to pragmatism.
Central to this approach is an emphasis on the peculiarly American context for the generation of “modern” ideas about ideas. Yet the direction of more recent scholarship has been comparative and has uncovered striking parallels in the intellectual histories of Germany, France, England and the United States. The most formidable challenge to the traditional “American exceptionalist” interpretation of the emergence of “uncertainty” is James T. Kloppenberg’s Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920, which argues that a host of different locales with the industrialized, post-Kantian West proved conducive to the generating of what Menand would call the “modern” way of thinking.
To be sure, Menand’s telling of the story can be made largely compatible with Kloppenberg’s. One can sharpen the various national versions of the movement to accept cognitive and moral uncertainty, emphasize the distinctness of the formulations generated by the Americans and specify the local contexts in which the varieties of uncertainty-acceptance flourished. One could then insist that Menand’s emphasis on the eagerness of Holmes the army veteran and his contemporaries to avoid the intellectual dogmatism that leads to violence simply points us to one of many local contexts in which “modernity” could emerge. But Menand does not perform this analysis. He does not even acknowledge the existence of the major book that calls into question his Americo-centric, Civil War–intensive explanation for the emergence of the modern understanding of ideas.
Yet what Menand does, he does extremely well. The Metaphysical Club shows how four exceptionally creative lives were entangled with each other and with each other’s specific reactions to abolitionism, war, capitalism, Kant, Hegel, Darwin and God. It conveys much more of the intellectual history of the United States than do the many conventional books that devote one chapter to one thinker and another chapter to the next, and so on. Menand puts it all together. If you can read only one book about pragmatism and American culture, this is the book to read."
...
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Farrar, Straus and Giroux; First Edition (May 30, 2001)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 384 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0374199639
- ISBN-13 : 978-0374199630
- Item Weight : 1.1 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1.5 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #440,719 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #39 in Pragmatist Philosophy
- #677 in Philosophy Metaphysics
- #3,469 in United States Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Louis Menand, professor of English at Harvard University, is the author of "The Metaphysical Club," which won the 2002 Pulitzer Prize in History. A longtime staff writer for The New Yorker, he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviewed in the United States on December 25, 2021
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
'The Metaphysical Club' is the biography of four men and an idea. The four men are the legal scholar Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (who would later become one of the most celebrated justices ever to sit on the United States Supreme Court), the psychologist and philosopher William James, the polymath Charles Sanders Peirce (pronounced "purse"), and the philosopher and social reformer John Dewey. The idea, of course, is Pragmatism.
Pragmatism is an innovative approach to doing philosophy that was developed by Holmes, James, Peirce, and Dewey (with contributions from numerous others, of course) in the period between the American Civil War and the First World War. Pragmatism is by far the most influential school of philosophical thought ever to come out of the United States, and it has been argued that Pragmatism reflects the American way of thinking better than any other philosophical movement. This is why Pragmatism has come to be treated as virtually synonymous with "American philosophy."
Pragmatism is often misunderstood, in large part because we tend to use the word "pragmatism" to mean practical-mindedness or expediency. Well, Pragmatism can certainly be seen as a practical-minded or expedient approach to doing philosophy, but it is important to keep in mind that Pragmatism (at least in the philosophical sense of the word) is specifically an approach to doing philosophy—it is not really about practical-mindedness or expediency in everyday affairs. In other words, the goal of Pragmatist philosophers is not to preach the virtues of practical living; it is to do philosophy in a particular way. (Here, I am using the word "philosophy" in a fairly broad sense to mean the serious, reasoned contemplation of ideas and their implications; so this would include not only the academic discipline of philosophy, but most other fields of scholarship as well, plus at least a few professions outside of academia, the most notable being the field of law.) Pragmatism is about taking a particular approach to the contemplation of ideas—an approach that Pragmatists consider to be more practical-minded than most of the alternative approaches that have been tried over the centuries.
William James, in his famous series of lectures on Pragmatism in 1906-07 (which he later published in book form), illustrated the Pragmatist approach to thinking with this amusing anecdote:
"Some years ago, being with a camping party in the mountains, I returned from a solitary ramble to find everyone engaged in a ferocious metaphysical dispute. The corpus of the dispute was a squirrel—a live squirrel supposed to be clinging to one side of a tree-trunk; while over against the tree's opposite side a human being was imagined to stand. This human witness tries to get sight of the squirrel by moving rapidly round the tree, but no matter how fast he goes, the squirrel moves as fast in the opposite direction, and always keeps the tree between himself and the man, so that never a glimpse of him is caught. The resultant metaphysical problem now is this: DOES THE MAN GO ROUND THE SQUIRREL OR NOT? He goes round the tree, sure enough, and the squirrel is on the tree; but does he go round the squirrel? In the unlimited leisure of the wilderness, discussion had been worn threadbare. Everyone had taken sides, and was obstinate; and the numbers on both sides were even. Each side, when I appeared, therefore appealed to me to make it a majority. Mindful of the scholastic adage that whenever you meet a contradiction you must make a distinction, I immediately sought and found one, as follows: 'Which party is right,' I said, 'depends on what you PRACTICALLY MEAN by "going round" the squirrel. If you mean passing from the north of him to the east, then to the south, then to the west, and then to the north of him again, obviously the man does go round him, for he occupies these successive positions. But if on the contrary you mean being first in front of him, then on the right of him, then behind him, then on his left, and finally in front again, it is quite as obvious that the man fails to go round him, for by the compensating movements the squirrel makes, he keeps his belly turned towards the man all the time, and his back turned away. Make the distinction, and there is no occasion for any farther dispute. You are both right and both wrong according as you conceive the verb "to go round" in one practical fashion or the other.' "
While this anecdote cleverly illustrates the sort of practical-minded approach that Pragmatists like to take when thinking about ideas (in this case, the rather trivial idea of what it means "to go round" a squirrel), this illustration only scratches the surface of what philosophical Pragmatism is all about, and you'll need to do quite a bit of reading on the subject (or take a course in American philosophy) in order to fully understand how Pragmatists do philosophy.
'The Metaphysical Club' is actually a pretty good place to begin. It won't teach you everything you need to know about the subject, but it will give you a pretty good sense of what Pragmatism is all about. More importantly, you will learn a great deal about how Pragmatism came to be. You will learn about the men and women who contributed, directly or indirectly, to its development—in particular, about the four men who are most directly responsible for bringing us Pragmatism: Wendell Holmes, William James, Charles Peirce, and John Dewey. You'll learn about how their lives and experiences—and the most important and controversial issues of their day—helped shape their ways of thinking. You'll learn about how the history of Pragmatism is connected to the troubled history of race relations in America as well as to the growing tension between science and religion that could be seen in the decades after the publication of Darwin's 'On the Origin of Species'. Understanding the historical context and intellectual climate in which Pragmatism developed will give you a better sense of what Pragmatism is really all about.
But this book is about so much more than just Pragmatism. Likewise, it is about so much more than just the lives and the intellectual accomplishments of Holmes, James, Peirce, and Dewey—who are arguably the four most important American thinkers of the period between the end of the Civil War the end of World War I (and in the case of Holmes and Dewey, well after the end of World War I). Yes, it is a biography of these four men and the idea they gave birth to. It is also, to a lesser extent, a biography of Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (the father of Justice Holmes), Henry James, Sr. (the father of William James—whose brother was the famous novelist Henry James), and Benjamin Peirce (the father of Charles Peirce), all of whom were well-known and highly-respected (if a bit eccentric) intellectuals of their day who had a great deal of influence on the intellectual development of their respective sons. (John Dewey's father, Archibald, on the other hand, was a storekeeper—a fairly intelligent and well-read man, it seems, but not a scholar or a public figure like Holmes, James, and Peirce, Srs. The book devotes only a few sentences to him.) And the book also includes brief biographical sketches of many other people who influenced the development of Pragmatism in some meaningful way, including a number whose main contribution was simply to argue in favor of views that the Pragmatists ultimately rejected. But this book is also, as its subtitle, 'A Story of Ideas in America,' suggests, a biography of America itself, or at least a chapter in that biography. It is the story of how the Civil War and its aftermath changed America—in particular, how it changed the way American intellectuals think about big ideas.
But it's even more than that. There are so many delightful treats in this book that it would be impossible for me to list them all. The author frequently goes off on what at first appear to be random tangents about topics ranging from the whaling industry to the Pullman strike to Laplace's and Maxwell's demons to legal battles over who gets to hire and fire professors at a university to how statistical analysis can be used to detect a forged signature on a will, but he always manages to tie all of these odd digressions back to the story of how ideas in America evolved in the decades after the Civil War, ultimately leading to the development of Pragmatism. The journey that the author takes us on has lots of twists, turns, and detours, but it is fascinating and fun—not to mention educational. I was particularly intrigued by the discussion of the various ideas about race and race relations that were being debated both before and after the Civil War. You may be surprised at some of the things you learn. (People held some pretty bizarre and appalling ideas about race in those days. Of course, most white Americans back then—on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line—were horribly racist by today's standards, and that includes a number of Abolitionists! But the sheer variety of views on race and race relations that were seriously proposed, discussed, and debated in those days is staggering. In the decades after the Civil War, many black intellectuals began to make their own contributions to this discussion. These included scholars such as W.E.B. du Bois, who had studied philosophy under William James, and Alain Locke, who was also influenced by the Pragmatist tradition. They are also discussed in this book.)
If you are interested in philosophy, American history (particularly the history of the Civil War and its aftermath), or the history of ideas, I highly recommend this book. I guarantee you will learn something interesting, and you'll probably enjoy it, too.
This is a book about the thought of James, Holmes, Dewey and Peirce (and some related figures such as Jane Addams), but it is not a ‘history of ideas’ in the tradition of Lovejoy’s THE GREAT CHAIN OF BEING (Lovejoy does appear in the book, however, principally as the founder of the AAUP). It is a biographical history of, ultimately, a key idea—the function of free speech in our democratic society. It explores the lives and experiences of four individuals associated broadly with the philosophical program of ‘pragmatism’, particularly with regard to the long shadows cast by the Civil War. It is not actually a plea for a revivified pragmatism and it points up the manner in which different individuals took different paths to its common elements. Nor is it an attempt to revivify those individuals’ actual thought, work and cultural contributions. It is rather an examination of the uncanny manner in which individual experience comes together in unanticipated and strange ways to make a substantial contribution to our culture within a particular cultural/historical moment. It is not philosophy per se; it is not biography per se and it is not in any way a polemic or instance of special pleading. It is, in a sense, pure history, the disinterested examination of prior experience in an effort to clarify it and shine light on its special elements. It does not shrink from criticism of the principal players and it acknowledges the problems created by some of their lesser but vocal followers (e.g. the depredations visited upon our system of education by those enamored of Dewey).
The writing is lovely and despite its unlikely subject matter the resulting narrative is riveting. Peirce and Holmes in particular are fascinating individuals. In some ways it is an unlikely work; this is anything but literary history done by a literary scholar and it is rigorous, empirical history done at a time when the humanities academy was beset by other, far less interesting concerns. I believe that here (as in THE FREE WORLD) LM draws upon his experience as a sophisticated, old-school, objective journalist, a pursuit that was not always in its currently-deserved disrepute, a form of journalism marked by scrupulous following of leads, writing done with a light and often witty touch and the all-so-rare ability to depict, describe and analyze complex material for a wide reading public. I cannot emphasize how rare these skills are today.
Bottom line: must reading, not just for 19thc American intellectual and cultural history students but for anyone and everyone searching for a sophisticated examination of an important subject, written with fairness, objectivity and the absence of academic pretense.
Top reviews from other countries
大著ながら、平明な名文で実に読みやすい。アメリカ思想史の中核がいかに形成されたかを描き出している。19世紀の知性史とその人的交流を描き出して、アメリカのインテリ史でもあり、アメリカ研究(大学院)大学の背景にも連関する。
膨大な注と参照文献リストも巻末に備え、もちろん索引も備える。思想史研究者には必読文献。









