- Hardcover: 768 pages
- Publisher: Prentice Hall; 7 edition (June 21, 2008)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0132080230
- ISBN-13: 978-0132080231
- Product Dimensions: 7.7 x 1.1 x 9.2 inches
- Shipping Weight: 3.5 pounds
- Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars See all reviews (58 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #10,123 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Microeconomics (7th Edition) 7th Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
There is a newer edition of this item:
ITPro.TV Video Training
Take advantage of IT courses online anywhere, anytime with ITPro.TV. Learn more.
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Top Customer Reviews
But what annoys me is the absence of conceptual rigor/detail and the sudden jumps in explanation. I want my students to be able to see what is going on and appreciate the simple elegant logic of microeconomic theory. Instead the book reads like it's delivering information to you, but isn't really explaining why it makes sense.
Here's an example. In Section 4.2 on Income and Substitution Effects, the effect of a price change is decomposed into income and substitution effects using constant utility. But as many of us know, there's an alternative way to do this too, which is holding purchasing power constant. For some reason that approach isn't mentioned. Instead, the text reads as though we were interested in the constant purchasing power approach, but then suddenly switches to a constant utility approach by saying "This substitution is marked by a movement along an indifference curve." But why? Wouldn't any intelligent student at this point start wondering how we went from purchasing power to utility? Flip back to Section 4.1 and find that the word utility has been quietly introduced there in a sentence that's in parentheses: "(Because the price of food has risen, the consumer's purchasing power -- and thus attainable utility -- has fallen.)"
Pooh. I don't like books that sneak important ideas into parentheses in order to avoid answering the all important question -- i.e. "Why?"
Also, some of the notation is different (ex. rupees instead of dollars) and some of the examples are different.
If you don't have problems assigned from the book, the international version will work fine.
Many sellers claim that the editions are exactly the same, but they are not!
It's an excellent, thorough text. The writing is not as engaging as Mankiw and Pindyck is more math-intensive (which I think is a good thing). Pindyck is, I think, more thorough than Mankiw. And Mankiw most definitely has a distinctly conservative political bent. Most of the excerpt writers in the book are very conservative (George Will, Jeff Jacoby). A handful of liberals are offered -- just a handful (Krugman). And Mankiw's characterization of a number of issues is conservative.
By contrast, Pindyck/Rubenfeld is far better balanced and far more rigorous.
The catch with the Kindle edition is that nearly all of the great layout and typesetting of the print edition is gone. Simple things like paragraph indents are gone, making straight reading more difficult. Type treatment (head/subhead, sans-serif, serif) is mostly gone. Color treatments to aid navigation of the text is gone.
So why does the Kindle edition cost $90 when the full print edition costs $135? 67% of the cost for 45% of the quality? $90 is a lot to spend just for the convenience of not carrying a large physical book. There are points where the absence of the print edition's formatting several hampers reading and clarity. Why? File size? And the fact that the Kindle is black and white?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Exactly what I expected ! I ordered it and I got just as a new book. ThanksPublished 12 months ago by rahmah
The book is convenient to take with you because it's loose leaf, but also easy to be disordered. Be careful when read.Published 13 months ago by Xiaoyang W.
Must-have book! I would prefer a more mathematical approach on the subject, still I guess I am the only one asking for this.Published 21 months ago by cv97035