Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$37.95$37.95
FREE delivery:
Friday, March 1
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $18.51
Other Sellers on Amazon
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Midas Paradox: Financial Markets, Government Policy Shocks, and the Great Depression Illustrated Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
- ISBN-101598131508
- ISBN-13978-1598131505
- EditionIllustrated
- PublisherIndependent Institute
- Publication dateDecember 1, 2015
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6 x 1.6 x 9 inches
- Print length528 pages
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Scott Sumner is one of the preeminent monetary thinkers today. The Midas Paradox represents his twenty years' study of the Great Depression, one of the most important economic events of the twentieth century. Highly recommended." —Tyler Cowen, Holbert C. Harris Chair of Economics, George Mason University
"In The Midas Paradox, Scott Sumner provides a fascinating account of how monetary policy under the gold standard got us into the Great Depression and how wage policies under the New Deal slowed the subsequent recovery. The book is deep and rich and has important lessons for today—a must-read for anyone interested in monetary policy and history and the errors of government policy." —Douglas A. Irwin, Robert E. Maxwell ’23 Professor of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics, Dartmouth College
"Explaining the Great Depression is the ‘holy grail’ of macroeconomics, in the words of none other than Ben Bernanke. By combining economic theory with economic history and the history of economic thought, Scott Sumner shows how it is possible to make substantial progress on this ambitious project. Sumner may not explain everything, but he explains a lot. The Midas Paradox deserves a place on that short shelf of essential books on the Depression." —Barry J. Eichengreen, George C. Pardee and Helen N. Pardee Professor of Economics and Political Science, University of California, Berkeley
"Having done some recent research myself on the causes of the Great Depression, I have found Scott Sumner’s book The Midas Paradox a source of new insights on that subject. In particular, he sheds light on why deflation proved to be such an important factor in disrupting economic activity after the 1929 Crash. He makes a properly global appraisal of monetary policy and concludes that central banks, on balance, were actually tightening the money supply when they should have been easing to offset the loss of liquidity in the financial sector from the 1929 crash. The Midas Paradox is an important contribution to the study of the Great Depression, because it adds another explanation to such known factors as ill-timed protectionism of why producer prices dropped so sharply from 1929 to 1933, causing much distress in a heavily agrarian economy." —George Melloan, former Deputy Editor, The Wall Street Journal; author, The Great Money Binge: Spending Our Way to Socialism
"In The Midas Paradox, Scott Sumner adopts an ideal method (for my taste) of writing economic history. He presents plenty of details on episodes, including pending and enacted legislation, and on contemporary consensus or disagreement on explanations and recommendations.Sumner also presents judicious amounts of statistical and econometric evidence. I find all this a gripping story." —Leland B. Yeager, Professor Emeritus of Economics, Auburn University and University of Virginia
"The Midas Paradox fills a gap in our understanding of the Great Depression. The author continues the work of a long and distinguished line of scholarship that goes back to Rueff and Mundell in pinpointing the role of the gold market and the price of gold as a key factor in some of the salient episodes of the period." —Michael D. Bordo, Board of Governors Professor of Economics and Director of the Center for Monetary and Financial History, Rutgers University
"With special attention to gold and labor market legislation, Sumner’s book The Midas Paradox provides an enlightening blend of detailed, warm-bodied financial and economic history of the 1930s with its broad-based statistical counterpart, using both national income accounts and financial data. His perspective will be seen as a unique contribution to the large and still growing literature on the Great Depression." —Roger W. Garrison, Professor Emeritus of Economics, Auburn University
"Scott Sumner's wonderful book The Midas Paradox provides a thought-provoking reinterpretation of the Great Depression: it combines a monetary approach based on shocks to the gold market with a supply-side approach based on legislated real-wage shocks that fits the evidence for the entire interwar period. Sumner's insights into the Great Depression are also highly relevant to the global financial crisis. The Midas Paradox is a major contribution both to economic history and to contemporary economic policy issues." —Kevin Dowd, Professor of Finance and Economics at Durham University and Professor Emeritus of Financial Risk Management at the University of Nottingham, England
"Scott Sumner offers a unified view of the Great Depression as seen through the lens of how financial markets’ expectations of future monetary policy appeared in the price of gold especially but also in other asset markets like the stock market.In addition, the detailed, rich historical narrative is full of insights about the causal nature of policy (monetary, fiscal, and regulatory) not captured in a single, abstract model. Unlike the gold standard at the time, The Midas Paradox is not orthodox, but it certainly forces the reader to examine critically his or her prior views about the Depression." —Robert L. Hetzel, Staff Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
"Scott Sumner has provided a tour de force of the Great Depression in The Midas Paradox. He convincingly shows in this accessible but thorough retelling of the Great Depression that policy errors were behind the long economic slump. In particular, Sumner demonstrates that the combination of contractionary monetary policy working through the gold market and supply-side disruptions arising from New Deal policies created a large drag on economic activity. This is a must read for anyone wanting to better understand the Great Depression and its implications for policy today." —David Beckworth, Assistant Professor of Economics, Western Kentucky University; Editor, Boom & Bust Banking: The Causes and Consequences of the Great Recession
"Whatever you know, or think you know, about the Great Depression, The Midas Paradox will teach you something new. And as Scott Sumner points out, properly understanding what happened in the 1930s matters a great deal for getting policy right in our own time." —Ramesh Ponnuru, Senior Editor, National Review
"Scott Summer offers readers of The Midas Paradox a bountiful harvest of new nuggets about the ‘gold standard view’ of the Great Depression. This rewarding read begins with Summer’s excellent preface—an important element that allows the author to review his own book, a privilege usually denied by journals." —Steve H. Hanke, Professor of Applied Economics, Johns Hopkins University
"Just over 50 years ago, the publication of A Monetary History of the United States, by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz, was a crucial episode in the monetarist counterrevolution that overturned the Keynesian dominance over postwar macroeconomics, gradually persuading most of the economics profession that the Great Depression was largely caused by the monumental ineptitude of the Federal Reserve. However, the account of the Great Depression provided by A Monetary History, its many virtues notwithstanding, was defective in a number of respects, the most important of which being that its strictly quantity-theoretic focus on the behavior of the monetary aggregates was inconsistent with the workings of the international gold standard that was in operation for much of the Great Depression. A number of subsequent researchers have since pointed out that the gold standard was a critical factor in causing and propagating the Great Depression. Now in The Midas Paradox, Scott Sumner has, with great theoretical and empirical insight and ingenuity, provided a masterly narrative account of the onset and propagation of the Great Depression, and of its decade-long duration, buttressed by striking quantitative and statistical evidence of the pivotal role played by the international gold standard in the Great Depression. It is no exaggeration to say that The Midas Paradox has completely eclipsed all previous accounts of the Great Depression, and I have little doubt that a half century from now The Midas Paradox will remain the definitive account of that catastrophe." —David Glasner, author, Free Banking and Monetary Reform; Economist, Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission
"The Great Depression is the biggest puzzle in the history of modern capitalism. How could millions of people be prospering one year, then out of work the next? Building on the work of previous scholars and adding fresh insights, Scott Sumner’s book, The Midas Paradox,offers perhaps the most ambitious analysis of the Depression yet, which seeks to explain its major ups and downs as well as how it got started. Sumner’s book has important (and worrying) implications for today. He argues that the Great Recession of 2008-09 was so severe because economists and central banks still have not fully learned the lessons of the Depression." —Kurt A. Schuler, Senior Fellow, Center for Financial Stability
"The Midas Paradox succeeds in shedding new light on the Great Depression and the gold market approach provides an effective unifying thread as the author navigates through the many shocks and policy shifts occurring over this key period.The integration of international events over this period is also the best I have seen and the connection between the 1930s policy dilemmas and those of today could not be more relevant." —Richard C. K. Burdekin, Jonathan B. Lovelace Professor of Economics, Claremont McKenna College
"Think you know what caused the Great Depression? If so, be prepared to think again: The Midas Paradox bristles with well-mounted challenges to orthodox—and to many unorthodox—accounts of history’s most notorious economic crisis. Whether it manages to change your most confidently-held beliefs or not, Scott Sumner’s painstaking book is bound to improve your understanding of the deepest and longest-lasting business downturn of them all." —George A. Selgin, Director, Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives, Cato Institute
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Independent Institute; Illustrated edition (December 1, 2015)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 528 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1598131508
- ISBN-13 : 978-1598131505
- Item Weight : 2.19 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.6 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,777,647 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #933 in Macroeconomics (Books)
- #3,076 in Economic Conditions (Books)
- #3,587 in Economic History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
It also contains some valuable history of macroeconomic thought, doing a fairly good job of explaining the popularity of theories that are designed for special cases (such as monetarism and Keynes' "general" theory).
I was surprised at how much Sumner makes the other books on this subject that I've read seem inadequate.
Sumner presents a good argument that previous attempts at analyzing monetary causes of the depression failed because they looked at the wrong evidence. The existence of a gold exchange standard means that looking at money supply figures from one or two countries can miss important changes in the supply of and demand for money. France's increase in gold holdings was large enough to create significant deflation in gold standard countries. Other histories have little more than obscure hints about that problem.
Now that I've absorbed Sumner's evidence, it's pretty clear that the depression originated in a combination of (1) stress on the gold exchange standard from WWI-related inflation, (2) ordinary business fluctuations, and (3) a moderate amount of mismanagement by central banks.
Sumner is rather hostile to a pure gold standard, but doesn't say much about it. He argues fairly convincingly that the gold exchange standard which the world had in the 1920s was less stable (and therefore more harmful) than a pure gold standard.
Sumner sheds some light on the mystery of what causes people to believe in liquidity traps, but still leaves me somewhat puzzled.
Part of the explanation is that people have developed a habit of measuring Fed policy by looking at interest rates. If your One True Equation of macroeconomics says the Fed can only affect the economy via altering interest rates, then it follows that the Fed can't do more to inflate than to force interest rates to zero [1] [2].
Another problem is that when the Fed is constrained by a gold standard, it can't produce as much inflation as it sometimes wants. (That's the point of holding an unreliable central bank to a supposedly rigid standard). Were economists careless enough that they effectively didn't notice that we abandoned the gold standard?
Another strange factor dates back to 1933, when the US temporarily left the gold standard in order to inflate back to conditions of the mid 1920s. Historians looking at quarterly (or less frequent) data see that as a failure. Sumner looked instead at monthly data [4], and saw a 3-4 month period of inflation in which economic activity recovered more than half of what it lost in the prior 3.5 years (probably the most dramatic expansion in US history).
A second reason that most historians see a liquidity trap where Sumner sees a dramatic recovery is that the recovery suddenly stopped in July 1933. Sumner provides evidence that this coincides with when markets realized the extent to which wages would be forced up by the NRA.
Many commentators have noted that the NRA was harmful, but Sumner is the first [5] to argue that the harm was large enough to halt a recovery that would have otherwise been complete by the end of 1934!
Sumner has some moderately good reasons for that claim, including a good comparison to the 1921 downturn. But I'm disappointed at how little evidence he uses. He glosses over evidence that the end of the NRA in 1935 caused only a mild improvement. And he hardly says anything about the international comparisons that should confirm his guess [6].
The Friedman and Schwartz history had led me to think that high real interest rates were an important problem. I was quite surprised when Sumner caused me to doubt that real interest rates were high in any relevant sense. He claims, quite plausibly, that (under a gold exchange standard) inflation was not predictably different from zero. It is only hindsight bias that makes us think deflation could have been predicted to continue at any stage of the depression. That means that interest rates weren't much of a deterrent to economic activity.
I find it refreshing that Sumner takes the efficient market hypothesis seriously, and puts more weight than other historians on evidence of how markets reacted to relevant news. He may go slightly overboard about rejecting the long and variable lags that other authors see, but it seems safer to err in that direction (authors who err in the other direction seem more able to rationalize away evidence that doesn't support their theory).
I'm a bit puzzled that Sumner is willing to describe 1936-1937 as a commodity bubble, but is reluctant to call the 1929 stock market peak a bubble. He gives plausible reasons for believing that market couldn't foresee the specific mistakes that caused the ensuing crash. But why should I believe that the market was sensible to be confident in the competence of governments?
The book is not as well organized as I'd hoped. Sumner encourages "specialists" to read the last chapter immediately after chapter 1. Anyone who has read another economic history covering that period, or a good book on macroeconomics, would be better off reading the last chapter before chapter 2.
Sumner only succeeding in making modest parts of the book readable by a wider audience. If you aren't willing to read the whole book, it's still valuable to read chapters 1 and the summaries at the ends of each chapter.
The book is a surprisingly large improvement on previous histories, and has some important criticisms of modern monetary economics.
Sumner's macroeconomic theories are somewhat more complex than those he attacks, but they better fit the details of the various downturns and recoveries.
Footnotes:
[1] - It's often assumed to be obvious that the Fed can't set interest rates below zero. I'm pretty sure the Fed can cause negative interest rates, but I expect it always has better options.
[2] - But any respected economist will apparently admit (if pressed) that the Fed can do more. Maybe there's some secret rule saying that if the Fed drops money from helicopters, it has to drop enough money to create hyperinflation [3]?
[3] - Ok, technically the Fed can't drop money from helicopters without first begging congress for permission, and the Fed doesn't know how to beg. So if you want to be picky, assume I meant buy t-bonds or gold.
[4] - Economists have a fetish for using GNP/GDP data, which is only available on a quarterly frequency. Sumner uses industrial production data instead. After seeing the difference made by monthly data, I won't have much respect for people who ignore it.
[5] - Sure, I've seen some people who complain that FDR's policies were the main reason the economy didn't recover until World War 2. But Sumner is the first author I've seen who (1) connects the timing of halts in the recovery to specific policy changes, and (2) distinguishes the good FDR policies from the bad FDR policies. Sumner is somewhat pro-FDR, noting that FDR's worst policy was popular enough that most others in his place would have tried it, and his best policies had much less popular support.
[6] - Sumner has since cited a paper [...] which (according to my quick skim) suggests, based on evidence from a similar French mistake in 1936, that Sumner is only exaggerating a little bit.
His critical variable is the gold reserve ratio of the United States individually and the collective gold ratio of the then developed world. He makes a strong case that as the gold ratio rose policy tightened and as it fell policy loosened. Unfortunately aside from a few instances there was very little in the contemporaneous press, which he quotes extensively, that discussed this issue. Thus it seems policy makers were flying blind.
Similar to most economic historians of The Great Depression the seminal event that turned the economy around was Roosevelt’s abandonment of the gold standard in 1933-34 and then revaluing gold from $20.67/oz. to $35.00/oz. It was that action that enabled the Fed to open up the monetary floodgates. In Sumner’s view had the New Deal left well enough alone the economy would have fully recovered by 1935.
However, offsetting the gold policy, the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 triggered a 22% increase in wages during the summer of 1933 that completely stalled the industrial recovery that was well underway in the spring of 1933. He then goes on to discuss, in the tradition of Cole and Ohanian the additional wage shocks that came from the Wagner Act of 1935 and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
He makes a major point in discussing why the monetary ease of early 1932 failed and it was that failure that turned Keynes away from his belief in the efficacy of monetary policy. To Sumner the Fed’s policy was not credible because under the gold standard it was not able to continue its bond buying program. Only after gold was revalued did the Fed have the greenlight to engage in quantitative easing, to use today’s term.
I wish he would have spent more time on the Treasury’s gold sterilization policy of 1935-37 which Douglas Irwin mentions as the leading cause of the 1937-38 collapse. Nevertheless there are many fascinating nuggets in this book such as the role of the Young Plan bonds issued by Germany had on the financial markets of 1931-32. To my mind Sumner has written a very important book on what made The Great Depression great.




