Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why Paperback – February 6, 2007
|New from||Used from|
All Books, All the Time
Read author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more at the Amazon Book Review. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
The popular perception of the Bible as a divinely perfect book receives scant support from Ehrman, who sees in Holy Writ ample evidence of human fallibility and ecclesiastical politics. Though himself schooled in evangelical literalism, Ehrman has come to regard his earlier faith in the inerrant inspiration of the Bible as misguided, given that the original texts have disappeared and that the extant texts available do not agree with one another. Most of the textual discrepancies, Ehrman acknowledges, matter little, but some do profoundly affect religious doctrine. To assess how ignorant or theologically manipulative scribes may have changed the biblical text, modern scholars have developed procedures for comparing diverging texts. And in language accessible to nonspecialists, Ehrman explains these procedures and their results. He further explains why textual criticism has frequently sparked intense controversy, especially among scripture-alone Protestants. In discounting not only the authenticity of existing manuscripts but also the inspiration of the original writers, Ehrman will deeply divide his readers. Although he addresses a popular audience, he undercuts the very religious attitudes that have made the Bible a popular book. Still, this is a useful overview for biblical history collections. Bryce Christensen
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.
“Offers a fascinating look into the field of textual criticism and evidence that Scriptures have been altered.” (Charleston Post & Courier)
“Whichever side you sit on regarding Biblical inerrancy, this is a rewarding read.” (Dallas Morning News)
“One of the unlikeliest bestsellers of the year.” (Washington Post)
“Misquoting Jesus is a godsend.” (Philadelphia Inquirer)
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
I do think Ehrman paints a worse picture than what is truly the case. In reading the book, it seems like he is trying to build the case that the Bible can't be trusted at all. I fear that will be the conclusion many of his readers will reach after reading the book. I don't think Ehrman is trying to shatter anyone's faith, but I'm afraid that will be the result for at least a few.
There is no doubt in my eyes that much of what he writes is factual. For instance there are thousands of textural variants and some of those variants were intentional intentional. However, I don't believe the biblical text should be disregarded as a complete fabrication either. Even though there are many variants, there are few significant ones, and I believe Ehrman has highlighted all the significant ones that I know about it.
I also believe those who turn to the biblical text as the authority for their faith need to face some obvious facts. First of all, the way in which the New Testament was canonized leaves a lot of room for human error. It is pretty far from miraculous. There is merit in recognizing the fact that we can all be wrong. This shouldn't lead us to the conclusion that seeking God's will is a futile task. I think God wants us to seek him and I still maintain the biblical text is the most reliable way of learning about God and Jesus.
I found it disturbing that when he finished his research he chose to become an agnostic. I was aware without being told that the Bible text was subject to all these things, but have not lost faith in its content because of that.