Buy new:
-44% $10.59$10.59
Delivery Friday, November 22
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$7.53$7.53
Delivery November 27 - December 11
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why Paperback – February 5, 2007
Purchase options and add-ons
For almost 1,500 years, the New Testament manuscripts were copied by hand––and mistakes and intentional changes abound in the competing manuscript versions. Religious and biblical scholar Bart Ehrman makes the provocative case that many of our widely held beliefs concerning the divinity of Jesus, the Trinity, and the divine origins of the Bible itself are the results of both intentional and accidental alterations by scribes.
In this compelling and fascinating book, Ehrman shows where and why changes were made in our earliest surviving manuscripts, explaining for the first time how the many variations of our cherished biblical stories came to be, and why only certain versions of the stories qualify for publication in the Bibles we read today. Ehrman frames his account with personal reflections on how his study of the Greek manuscripts made him abandon his once ultra–conservative views of the Bible.
- Print length242 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHarperOne
- Publication dateFebruary 5, 2007
- Dimensions5.31 x 0.61 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100060859512
- ISBN-13978-0060859510
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together

Similar items that ship from close to you
Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them)Hardcover$6.99 shippingOnly 1 left in stock - order soon.
The Other Gospels: Accounts of Jesus from Outside the New TestamentPaperback$6.99 shippingOnly 6 left in stock - order soon.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book highly accessible, engaging, and helpful for general readers. They appreciate the scholarly content, accuracy, and introduction. Opinions differ on the error rate, with some finding it admirable and respectful, while others say it's problematic and contradictory.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book highly accessible, sensational, and well-written. They say it's engaging and helpful for the general reader. Readers also mention that the author is compelling and thoughtful.
"..."Misquoting Jesus" is a short, fast read which intentionally doesn't attempt to cover all the questions scholars actively research and analyze..." Read more
"...Ehrman's presentation of his material is lucid, in spite of some neatly hidden scholarly accessories...." Read more
"A well written book about the evolution of the Bible, particularly the New Testament, and how our present text came to be in all its various forms...." Read more
"...The rest is very excellent, well researched history (and well written, I might add)...." Read more
Customers find the book scholarly, with crucial information. They say the research is impeccable and the conclusions are interesting. Readers mention the book is a good introduction to the history of the development of the New Testament canonical text, revealing an unbiased approach. Additionally, they say Ehrman is one of the best scholars working with scripture and other early Greek texts.
"I was very impressed with all the information Bart gives in this book...." Read more
"...read it and not dismiss it out of hand, because the argument Ehrman puts forth is unbiased, well-researched, and most importantly, extremely logical...." Read more
"This book is a very good introduction to the history of the development of NT canonical text...." Read more
"...not obscure the fact that Ehrman is also one of the very best scholars working with scripture and other early Greek texts...." Read more
Customers find the book accurate, filled with facts, and thought-provoking. They also describe it as believable, honest, and a good detective story.
"This is a fascinating account of what is presently known of the history of the Christian scriptures...." Read more
"...In a fascinating account Bart Ehrman takes you from the beginning of his born again experience through his need to know what the original documents..." Read more
"...I have always found books like this fascinating and factual...." Read more
"...The information conveyed in this book comes across with passion, truth, and a complete lack of malice towards the bible...." Read more
Customers find the introduction of the book very good. They say it provides a pleasant introductory survey of critical differences between manuscripts. Readers also mention the book is interesting if tedious for anyone who wants to learn about the actual Bible. They say it's essential for any serious student of the Bible and the best basic, popular, easy-to-read book on Christianity.
"...Another reason this is a good introduction to the study of early Christianity is that Ehrman avoids most of the controversies within scholarly..." Read more
"...He expounds the course with mastery, humour, and intellectual rigour...." Read more
"...and nonbeliever will enjoy the clarity of his writing, and learn a lot in the process." Read more
"...a willingness to wade through some difficult passages, but the effort is worth it. I highly recommend this book." Read more
Customers find the scholarship excellent, substantial, and accessible. They also say the author is scrupulous about his scholarship.
"...Ehrman writes remarkable and helpful history. His scholarship is apparent (with 9 pages of endnotes)...." Read more
"...some insight into his possible bias, but he is also scrupulous about his scholarship...." Read more
"Excellent scholarship! This book is very educational...." Read more
"...Ehrman is clear and concise and adds a great amount of scholarship to the many translations of the Bible...." Read more
Customers find the book well worth twice the price and mention it has immense value beyond its immediate topic.
"...fair, Ehrman does present much information in this book that is highly valuable...." Read more
"...accessible primer of textual criticism that is of immense value beyond its immediate topic, i.e., categorizing the textual differences among the..." Read more
"...My impression overall is that it is of great value for the layman yet it is a book in which I could not help but feel the author had an agenda...." Read more
"Condition even better than advertised. The price was excellent, and the delivery timely. Five stars!" Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the error rate of the book. Some mention the author does an admirable job explaining the processes of ancient religion in a clear and methodical manner. However, others say the true word of God is vague, problematic, and contradictory. They also mention the system is highly error-prone and untenable.
"...many examples of the misquoting of Jesus' words, he provides plenty of examples of errors in the text as it was copied down from the first century...." Read more
"...The mark of a good teacher! Looking forward to his other works!" Read more
"...This is, quite simply, untenable...." Read more
"...The work is respectful and, despite the author's stated conversion to athiesm, very reverent...." Read more
Customers find the Bible full of errors and not reliable. They also mention it's not perfect and contains various contradictions. Readers also say the verse seems out of context and there is some inconsistency between the two passages.
"...There is some inconsistency between these two passages, and young Bart worked up an elaborate explanation attempting to preserve the veracity of Mark..." Read more
"...This verse seems out of context, it was placed elsewhere in some manuscripts, and it conflicts with other things Paul wrote in the same book...." Read more
"...There are very few citations for a book of this depth and potential magnitude...." Read more
"...it seems like he is trying to build the case that the Bible can't be trusted at all...." Read more
Reviews with images
Great book, erroneous implications.
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
While no examples are given of variants that threaten an article of faith - although the reference to the Johannine Comma and its affirmation of the Trinity might come close for some - the evidence he presents makes a very, very compelling case that the text has been tampered with. The argument is also a very logical one and I have often worried about it prior to reading this. The argument also threatens the Protestant foundation of sola scriptura. Post-Reformationists worried that textual criticism strengthened Papist claims of Church authority, and rightly so. It sure seems irrational to base one's faith solely around a set of written words so poorly handled and preserved.
While Ehrman does not say this in the book, if you have followed his interviews and other writings, you know he has fallen from fundamentalist to atheist/agnostic. He does not make the argument for atheism, but deals a painful blow to the concept of inerrancy, for "even if God had inspired the original words, we don't have the original words." Ehrman further ventures towards a disturbing conclusion about divine inspiration:
"For the only reason (I came to think) for God to inspire the Bible would be so his people would have his actual words; but if he really wanted people to have his actual words, surely he would have miraculously preserved those words, just has he had miraculously inspired them in the first place. Given the circumstance he didn't preserve the words, the conclusion seemed inescapable to me that he hadn't gone to the trouble of inspiring them."
While the book does not prove this conclusion, it certainly makes it arguable.
"Misquoting Jesus" may shake some fundamentalists and literalists to the core, but they should read it and not dismiss it out of hand, because the argument Ehrman puts forth is unbiased, well-researched, and most importantly, extremely logical. His revelations are not new, but you certainly do not hear much about these things from Bible study teachers or mainstream Christian authors.
Although I like Ehrman and have read and will continue to read his other works, I expected a bit more from "Misquoting Jesus" and was left wanting. I found it too short, too belaboring, and too repetitive with its constant recapping. Yet the author was very clear in his Introduction that this book was for the layman who knew nothing about textual criticism. Given that as his goal, I have to give Four Stars and recommend that all Fundamentalists/Literalists/Evangelicals and anyone without knowledge of textual criticism read it.
Ehrman stays away from theological arguments and exegesis of some of the more topical controversies (e.g., Paul's perception of the life of Christ prior to his crucifixion is not covered, nor are textual criticism methods to test the veracity of claims covered, like the criterion of dissimilarity test that would dismiss the Jesus counting fishes miracle since it's the same story as a much earlier Pythagoras story - even down to the fish count). Instead Ehrman focuses on what the manuscripts say, and how we know that some parts have changed over time by comparing texts. Ehrman does cover theories on why they were changed though he does so briefly without getting bogged down in any dense analysis to prove his point.
Another reason this is a good introduction to the study of early Christianity is that Ehrman avoids most of the controversies within scholarly circles regarding the divinity of Jesus. I assume this is because to many conservative Christians who appear to be one of Ehrman's primary target audiences, discovering the ease at which scholars have proven the Bible is errant as reported in this book will be contrary to what they've been indoctrinated into by many churches; with that being enough provocation to deal with in an introductory book. My assumption is based on Ehrman's introduction, a short memoir of his own intellectual journey from being an ignorant evangelical to enlightened historian, a "hey, if I can take this journey, so can you" essay I believe would have been more appropriate as an appendix.
I don't believe Ehrman is dishonest by avoiding the historical veracity of NT claims for a divine Jesus; most of those controversies require that readers have some foreknowledge of what we know regarding early manuscripts well beyond the scope of an introductory book along with some skills in exegesis to understand the theories presented that challenge a literal reading. However, due to the relative shortness of this book and Ehrman's narrative skills, I believe Ehrman had plenty of room to include some of the easier conceptual contradictions between manuscripts and outside source material, e.g., the corruption of the Josephus texts or some of the miracle stories and how they compared to earlier non-Christian texts. This is my one major criticism of this book; Ehrman would have made a more powerful presentation by adding additional case studies that are conceptually easy to understand for even casual readers.
Regarding the claims by some readers who were put off by this book and accuse Ehrman of bias for not better representing the fundamentalist dogma they support. There are very few instances in this book where Ehrman wades into waters where there isn't a peer-accepted theory. Those instances are ones in which Ehrman presents earlier manuscripts with less corruption of text as closer to the original author's version, but these Byzantine texts also challenge current conservative Christian beliefs which use later, more corrupt manuscripts, like the Middle Ages' Textus Receptus. Ehrman does an adequate job in this book of providing a small portion of the empirical evidence available to destroy any notion that this particular manuscript is a trust-worthy source given the lack of source material used along with the suspect quality of source material to develop the Textus Receptus, which was the subsequent primary source for the King James Version. All areas of study have their flat-earthers; ignoring the apologists who are unable or unwilling to use the scientific method as Ehrman does do not deserve attention when one is seeking truth. In fact, I would argue Ehrman bent over backwards by not delving into the more radical claims which do have some empirical evidence supporting them and are reasonable claims (Robert Price's deconstruction of Jesus or Earl Doherty's construction of Jesus from Paul's Christ being two examples).
Ehrman's objective with this book is to kick-start an intellectual journey for laymen to bring some intellectual knowledge to their beliefs beyond the traditional paradigm of indoctrination, I can't imagine anyone not appreciating the information Ehrman provides to his readers, even the flat-earthers themselves. While I appreciate his effort, I'm still waiting for Ehrman, due to his talent and skill as a writer, to let us have it with both barrels by writing a more comprehensive analysis of the status of textual criticism of the early Christian manuscripts.
Top reviews from other countries
I do recommend it. But, to those with the mental fortitude to hold on to their faith while living in the midst of the obvious contractions wrapping world religions, I encourage them to continue to do so.
In the end, God's message can still be found within the pages of the Bible.
God's message is the message behind each story and not the grammatical format of the text. Although, the text influences what the message might be.
Die Bücher von Ehrman sind alle großartig. Dieses hier ist eines seiner besten. Es beschriebt, wie das Bild von Jesus sich in den ersten Jahrhunderten entwickelt hat. Von einem einfachen Prediger zum Sohn Gottes. Spannende Geschichte. Weiterhin kann ich insbesondere das Buch "Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why" empfehlen. Auch dort wird erzählt, wie die Bibel aus theologischen Gründen geändert wurde z.B. wie die Maria zur Jungfrau wurde. Es ist eine Schande, dass die Priester/Pfarrer uns davon nichts erzählen, obwohl die Ergebnisse der Textkritischen Analyse bereits sein über 100 Jahren bekannt sind. Offenbar scheint das wissen um die Anfänge des Christentums, zu gefährlich für die Laien zu sein.
Das einzige Manko bei den Büchern von B. Ehrman ist: Hat man 3 oder 4 von ihm gelesen wird man in weitern Büchern wenig neues finden. Vieles wiederholt sich. Trotzdem, vom Inhalt sind seine Bücher extrem spannend.






