Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Missing Gene: Psychiatry, Heredity, and the Fruitless Search for Genes Paperback – December 1, 2005
Purchase options and add-ons
This timely, challenging book provides a much-needed critical appraisal of the evidence cited in support of genetic theories of psychiatric disorders, which hold that these disorders are caused by an inherited genetic predisposition in combination with environmental agents or events. In fact, the field of psychiatric genetics is approaching the crisis stage due to the continuing failure, despite years of concerted worldwide efforts, to identify genes presumed to underlie most mental disorders.
The belief that such genes exist is based on studies of families, twins, and adoptees. However, the author shows that these studies provide little if any scientifically acceptable evidence in support of genetics. In fact, researchers initial "discoveries" are rarely replicated. As this becomes more understood, and as fruitless gene finding efforts continue to pile up, we may well be headed towards a paradigm shift in psychiatry away from genetic and biological explanations of mental disorders, and towards a greater understanding of how family, social, and political environments contribute to human psychological distress. Indeed, Kenneth Kendler, a leading twin researcher and psychiatric geneticist for over two decades, wrote in a 2005 edition of The American Journal of Psychiatry that the "strong, clear, and direct causal relationship implied by the concept of a gene for ... does not exist for psychiatric disorders. Although we may wish it to be true, we do not have and are not likely to ever discover genes for psychiatric illness."
The author devotes individual chapters to ADHD, autism, and bipolar disorder. Looking specifically at autism, despite the near-unanimous opinion that it has an important genetic component, the evidence cited in support of this position is stunningly weak. It consists mainly of family studies, which cannot disentangle the potential influences of genes and environment, and four small methodologically flawed twin studies whose results can be explained by non-genetic factors. Not surprisingly, then, years of efforts to find "autism genes" have come up empty.
This is an important book because theories based on genetic research are having a profound impact on both scientific and public thinking, as well as on social policy decisions. In addition, genetic theories influence the types of clinical treatments received by people diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. Yet, as the author demonstrates, these theories do not stand up to critical examination.
- Print length332 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherAlgora Publishing
- Publication dateDecember 1, 2005
- Dimensions6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100875864104
- ISBN-13978-0875864105
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Editorial Reviews
Review
THEORIES based on genetic research are having a profound impact on both scientific and public thinking, as well as on policy decisions and the treatments received by people diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. Joseph s last book, The Gene Illusion, challenged the evidence for a genetic basis for schizophrenia. In this new book, he extends his scope from schizophrenia to ADHD, autism and bipolar disorder, challenging positions viewed by mainstream psychiatry and psychology as established facts and calling for greater emphasis on how family, social and political environments contribute to human psychological distress. --Human Givens Journal Volume 13, No. 3 2006
The genetics revolution, if you can call it that, has been going on now for about twenty years. Great advances have been made in connecting genetic defects to physical illnesses, or more specifically to vulnerability to illnesses. There has been a great deal of effort expended to try to find a genetic component to the mental illnesses. In this book Dr. Joseph reports that any evidence relating to the genetic basis of mental disorders is stunningly weak. The author claims, that 'it is very possible that genes for diagnoses such as schizophrenia, ADHD, autism, and bipolar disorder are not, as researchers often write, elusive, but that they are non existent.' The trouble with this book is that it is theoretically impossible to prove a negative. And there is just enough evidence that some of these mental illnesses tend to occur more frequently in some families than in others. Some forms seem to have genetic components, but researchers still know very little why this occurs. The book makes good sense, but could be overturned immediately by the next announcement. The good points about this book are that it is very readable and opens the subject up to we interested laymen. It gives a good analysis of Dr. Joseph's opinions, and he knows a lot more about this than I do. Still, he is a clinical psychologist, not a research scientist. If you do a search on Amazon for 'Genetics Mental Illness' you'll get a lot of entries. Most of these are quite expensive and clearly relate to ongoing or even proposed research. --Books-On-Line
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Around the same time, Ronald Kessler and his colleagues published a study in the prestigious Archives of General Psychiatry in which they concluded that "about half of Americans will meet the criteria for a DSM-IV disorder [Fourth Edition of the American Psychiatric Association s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders] sometime in their life, with first onset usually in childhood or early adolescence." Critics, of course, could explain this finding on the basis of the DSM s tendency to label a wide range of subjective states and deviant behavior as "mental disorders." The authors of the DSM-IV seem to be saying to us (with apologies to comedian George Carlin), "You are all diseased."
But suppose that Kessler, et al., despite whatever flaws their study may have contained, did show that a sizable portion of Americans will experience some level of chronic or acute psychological dysfunction or distress during their lifetimes. Having established this, the question remains open whether the causes are mainly biological, or whether they reflect the impact of a wide range of psychologically harmful environmental influences that people experience in American society.
An important pillar of the biological argument is genetic theory, which holds that most people diagnosed with psychiatric disorders are genetically predisposed to manifest these disorders. However, if 50% of Americans will develop a genetically-based mental disorder, according to genetic theory a sizable percentage of the 50% who do not develop a mental disorder nevertheless carry pathological genes. Thus, according to the logic of the American Psychiatric Association s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and currently ascendant theories of genetic causation, a sizable majority of Americans carry pathological genes predisposing them to mental disorders.
Or, perhaps not. In this book, I assess the surprisingly shaky foundations of genetic theories in psychiatry in the context of the current crisis in psychiatric molecular genetic research. It was expected that genes for the major psychiatric disorders would have been found by now. However, they have not been found. Indeed, a prominent genetic researcher could write in the July, 2005 edition of the American Journal of Psychiatry as follows: "The strong, clear, and direct causal relationship implied by the concept of a gene for does not exist for psychiatric disorders. Although we may wish it to be true, we do not have and are not likely to ever discover genes for psychiatric illness." It remains to be seen whether statements such as this will lead to the abandonment of gene searches for psychiatric disorders in the near future.
A belief in the hereditary basis of mental disorders is a very old one. In this book I will show that, following a critical reading of the scientific literature, this age-old belief has little evidence in its favor.
Product details
- Publisher : Algora Publishing (December 1, 2005)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 332 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0875864104
- ISBN-13 : 978-0875864105
- Item Weight : 1.08 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #5,157,267 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,798 in Medical Mental Illness
- #3,901 in Genetics (Books)
- #6,942 in Medical Psychology Pathologies
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Jay Joseph, Psy.D. is a clinical psychologist practicing in the San Francisco Bay Area. Since 1998, he has published peer reviewed articles and book chapters critically examining genetic theories and research in the social and behavioral sciences. He is the author of "The Gene Illusion: Genetic Research in Psychiatry and Psychology Under the Microscope" (2004), "The Missing Gene: Psychiatry, Heredity, and the Fruitless Search for Genes" (2006), "The Trouble with Twin Studies: A Reassessment of Twin Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences" (2015), and "Schizophrenia and Genetics: The End of an Illusion" (2017). His blog “The Gene Illusion” can be found at the Mad in America website.
Customer reviews
Our goal is to make sure every review is trustworthy and useful. That's why we use both technology and human investigators to block fake reviews before customers ever see them. Learn more
We block Amazon accounts that violate our community guidelines. We also block sellers who buy reviews and take legal actions against parties who provide these reviews. Learn how to report
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Is this masochism really necessary? Is this view of ourselves really demanded by current science? Concentrating on the field of psychiatric genetics, Jay Joseph argues that the genetic determinism so taken for granted in modern times is not based on sound science. This is a serious and controversial claim. Many people become angry if you even so much as suggest that a psychiatric disorder may not be genetic. Strong arguments are therefore needed. With the knowledge that he is militating against a well-entrenched orthodoxy, Joseph has written this extremely detailed, rigorously argued book, dedicating many of its chapters to lengthy critical assessments of original research papers. While some may be put off by the rather pedantic level of argumentation, it is, to my mind, absolutely necessary; and if you are willing to put the time in, occasionally exhilarating. It is too easy for genetically oriented researchers to blithely dismiss serious criticism as the work of know-nothing `armchair critics' with ideological agendas. Joseph is no armchair critic. Although he is a clinical psychologist and not a research scientist, his doctoral thesis was a critical examination of the schizophrenia twin studies literature, and the majority of his publications since then have been dedicated to this very specific, and very important, area. As the book makes clear, he is often more familiar with the foundational research of psychiatric genetics than the researchers themselves.
Joseph's scholarship is outstanding; his level of familiarity with the science and history of psychiatric genetics is immense. Primary and secondary sources are quoted often and at length, everything is thoroughly sourced, the arguments proceed clearly and logically, and his tone is measured, professional. In cases of obvious academic fraud and gross incompetence, Joseph is careful not to ascribe conscious intent, opining more generally at the `unfortunate' state of affairs. Only once does he explicitly get angry with a few modern psychiatric geneticists, and it's to call them `poor historians indeed' in a footnote. Seeing as it was in the context of their attempted absolution of the leaders of the Munich School (an early psychiatric genetic organisation) from complicity in the Nazi eugenic and extermination programs, when widely available documentary evidence suggests very strongly otherwise, one can understand Joseph's academic `outburst'. That the founder of the school is claimed by a certain psychiatric geneticist to have been disgusted by Hitler's misuse of his research, even though it is widely known that he was not only a fervent support of the Nazi government but a formal legislator of some of its most draconian eugenics policies, is enough to make one pause and consider the lengths that people will go to defend their world-view, and just how many readers they are willing to lead astray.
Although the historical analyses in this book are fascinating, and even disturbing, the large majority of its contents are devoted to scientific analysis. This is where Joseph is at his most brilliant. His critique of the Equal Environment Assumption in all its varied and bizarre reformulations is a supreme example of logical analysis. Here Joseph cuts to the quick of psychiatric genetics, because if the EEA is invalid, as Joseph cogently argues, then the vast majority of twin studies done to date are scientifically useless. When one considers their many other, more particular, invalidating flaws (biased statistical manipulation, the post hoc redefinitions of the disorder under study to achieve statistical significance, among many others) the case for the genetic transmission of psychiatric disorders is about as scientifically compelling as phrenology.
There is much more to this book than a one thousand word review can do justice to. By the book's conclusion, I was convinced that the well-publicised claims about the genetic determination of psychiatric disorders are based more on politics, rhetoric and second-hand information than sound science. It took a book of this level of complexity and detail to convince me. Vague humanistic platitudes, while comforting for a time, are hard to sustain against a countervailing science. It is liberating to know that, in the case of psychiatric and behavioural genetics, the `countervailing science' is largely built on air, and that the evidence, in fact, supports a more open view, where human beings are genuine individuals, not shambling automata, whose psychological difficulties are not the fault of their broken genes, but caused by well-known, and repairable, psychological and environmental factors. I will end this review as I began it: with a quotation from J.R. Lucas, former president of the British Society for the Philosophy of Science. His writings on human identity and value are among the best I've ever read, and show that to be scientific does not imply belief in the brutal pessimism of reductionist science, of which psychiatric and behavioural genetics are complementary parts. I am confident that Joseph would agree with the following passage.
`Each [of us] is a definite individual, ultimately responsible for what he decides to do, while being also an indeterminate shimmering of different personalities, revealed and developed in different personal relationships. Each is unique, of infinite complexity, transcending all stereotypes and neat classification, while needing also to be a safe pair of hands, who can be relied on to do his bit when required.'
The author's analysis and logic are impeccable. However, I have one important disagreement with the author. The author suggests that the principal motive for pursuing genetic links of psychiatric disorders (even though that pursuit may be fruitless) stems from racism and eugenics programs of 1930s and 40s. Although historically that may have been the primary motive, I think the primary motive today is commercial. In other words, it is all about corporate bottom lines.
The book does make one reference to this motivation on the top of p. 253 when it quotes a paper by Silverman and Herbert, saying, "Not only does the pharmaceutical industry potentially benefit economically from such (genetic) research, ..., but the denial of environmental causes helps protect corporations from liability, exemplified by vaccinations containing mercury-laden Thimerosal."
The author also implies in the book that although genes may not exist for common psychiatric ailments, they probably do exist for common physical diseases. But I think that the same motivational and methodological issues (such as flawed family/twin/adoption studies), combined with publication bias for positive genetic findings, plague the research into the causes of physical diseases, as they do in the case of psychiatric disorders. (The one clear exception is that single gene diseases like Cystic fibrosis where the correlation between the gene and the disease is 100% are indeed genetic, but such diseases tend to be rare.)
Consider juvenile myopia for example. Contrary to widely promoted belief for nearly 100 years that myopia is inherited, my reading and research shows that it is actually caused by lifestyle and environmental factors such as too much near-work and too little time spent outdoors.
Finally, my sense is that the gene researchers will never throw in the towel as long as the economic forces that drive such research persist. As long as there are people willing to believe the oversimplified and manipulated genetic evidence and explanations, there will be companies willing to fund such researchers and media willing to mislead the public through selective publication of positive findings. Many of my friends who have graduate degrees in science and engineering do not really take the time to understand how junk science and pseudo-science are routinely packaged and sold as real science. One major problem in my opinion is that most people have a very poor understanding of statistics.
Explaining the case against genetic causes of common diseases (psychiatric or physical) is not easy. But books like this one can help. Next time I have an argument with somebody, I can at least refer them to this book.
The trouble with this book is that it is theoretically impossible to prove a negative. And there is just enough evidence that some of these mental illnesses tend to occur more frequently in some families than in others. Some forms seem to have genetic components, but researchers still know very little why this occurs. The book makes good sense, but could be overturned immediately by the next announcement.
The good points about this book are that it is very readable and opens the subject up to we interested laymen. It gives a good analysis of Dr. Joseph's opinions, and he knows a lot more about this than I do. Still, he is a clinical psychologist, not a research scientist. If you do a search on Amazon for 'Genetics Mental Illness' you'll get a lot of entries. Most of these are quite expensive and clearly relate to ongoing or even proposed research.
