Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Missing Peace: The Inside Story of the Fight for Middle East Peace Hardcover – August 9, 2004
Purchase options and add-ons
Dennis Ross, the chief Middle East peace negotiator in the presidential administrations of George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton, is that rare figure who is respected by all parties: Democrats and Republicans, Palestinians and Israelis, presidents and people on the street in Jerusalem, Ramallah, and Washington, D.C.
The Missing Peace is far and away the most candid inside account of the Middle East peace process ever published. The maneuverings of both sides, and of the United States as well, are described. For the first time, the backroom negotiations, the dramatic and often secretive nature of the process, and the reasons for its faltering are on display for all to see.
Ross recounts the peace process in detail from 1988 to the breakdown of talks in early 2001 that prompted the so-called second Intifada. It's all here: Camp David, Oslo, Geneva, Egypt, and other summits; the assassination of Yitzak Rabin; the rise and fall of Benjamin Netanyahu; the very different characters and strategies of Rabin, Yasir Arafat, and Bill Clinton; and the first steps of the Palestinian Authority.
The issues Ross explains with unmatched clarity--negotiations over borders, Israeli security, the Palestinian "right of return"--are the issues behind today's headlines. The Missing Peace explains, as no other book has, why Middle East peace is so difficult to achieve.
- Print length872 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFarrar, Straus and Giroux
- Publication dateAugust 9, 2004
- Dimensions6.5 x 2 x 9.75 inches
- ISBN-100374199736
- ISBN-13978-0374199739
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
"The Missing Peace is a brilliant behind-the-scenes account of history in the making. Only Dennis Ross could have written such a lively, provocative and insightful book. This definitive telling of a fascinating and tragic tale will be indispensable to any serious student of the Arab-Israeli dispute." --Madeleine Albright, former U.S. Secretary of State
"I've never known anyone so deeply committed to the cause of peace in the Middle East as Dennis Ross. This book reflects not only that dedication but his brilliance in writing about it in a colorful and comprehensive way." --Warren Christopher, former U.S. Secretary of State
"The Missing Peace is amazing narrative. Ross, who knows Mideast diplomacy better than any other American, does something essential if there is ever to be peace: quite simply, he tells the truth. In doing so, he dispells the myths that block a deal. This is the one essential book that should be read by everyone who cares about this crucial topic." --Walter Isaacson, President of the Aspen Institute and author of Benjamin Franklin: An American Life
"Few Americans have had a more intimate involvement with the complex issues that divide the Middle East than Dennis Ross, as U.S. envoy and chief negotiator under two Presidents. The Missing Peace presents a candid, thoughtful and detailed picture of the process and the participants." --Dr. Henry Kissinger, former U.S. Secretary of State
"Dennis Ross was at the heart of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations for twelve momentous and tumultuous years. He provides in fascinating detail his account of what happened and his reasoning as events transpired. He rendered a great public service as tireless negotiator and has done so again with this well-written and instructive book--a classic must-read for anyone interested in the Middle East." --George Shultz, former U.S. Secretary of State
"The Missing Peace is imbued with wisdom, and it analytical content is vital in helping understand the complex facets of the Middle East. It is written with a mix of empathy and sadness, in character with the conflicting nature of the region." --Shimon Peres, former Israeli Prime Minister
About the Author
From The Washington Post
The Israeli death toll is around 1,000 people, many of them victims of suicide bombers who have targeted civilian buses, cafés and shops. Israel's army has stormed through Palestinian cities to root out militants, weapons and bomb factories; launched a campaign of targeted assassinations against leaders; and sealed off the Gaza Strip and West Bank with barriers that gouge their way through Palestinian land, strangling the uprising but killing many innocents as well and sowing the seeds of hatred and vengeance in a new generation. The two peoples remain locked in a fatal embrace.
It's hard to recall that just days before the uprising began, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat clasped hands with then-prime minister Ehud Barak of Israel during a warm and glowing meeting at Barak's official residence in Jerusalem. The two leaders dedicated themselves that evening to completing a final settlement of the conflict. History's rear-view mirror is cruel: Peace, which once seemed close enough to touch, now looks thousands of miles and deaths away.
For a dozen years, Dennis Ross was the American diplomat in charge of making peace happen. He served as midwife, babysitter, taskmaster and father confessor to a generation of Israeli and Palestinian leaders and negotiators. Ross -- and they -- struggled, exhaustively and sometimes nobly, and ultimately they failed. Now he has written an equally noble, exhaustive and, at times, exhausting 800-page account of the people and the process.
The Missing Peace tells an epic and tragic tale. Ross recounts how, in the aftermath of the Cold War and the first Gulf War triumph over Iraq, his first boss, then-Secretary of State James A. Baker, cajoled, teased and bludgeoned Arab and Israeli leaders into attending a Middle East peace conference in Madrid in the fall of 1991. The book goes on to record Yitzhak Shamir's political demise; the return to power of Yitzhak Rabin; the extraordinary backroom maneuverings that resulted in the 1993 Oslo accords between Israel and the Palestinians; Rabin's assassination by a Jewish extremist; and the brief promise of a breakthrough under his even more dovish successor, Shimon Peres. Ross chronicles the years of halting progress and stalemate under Peres's right-wing successor, Binyamin Netanyahu, and the near-breakthrough and ultimate failure of Ehud Barak's meteoric premiership. Ross also provides a painstaking account of the failed attempts of Rabin, Peres, Netanyahu and Barak to reach agreement with Syrian strongman Hafez Asad.
Along the way, Ross offers revealing and, occasionally, surprising portraits of various Israeli and Palestinian leaders. He depicts Netanyahu, a relative novice in the treacherous world of Israeli politics, as weak, hesitant and mistrustful, always looking over his shoulder to see what his right-wing critics back home were thinking and plotting. Yet at times Netanyahu showed a surprising willingness to go the extra mile, make a small but meaningful concession and pull an all-nighter to try to make progress. Barak, by contrast, comes across as childish, petulant and arrogant, a leader in love with his own immaculate conceptions and unwilling to listen to others. His penchant for grandiose, dramatic gestures, coupled with an almost crippling hesitation at critical moments, in Ross's view, probably cost Israel a chance to get a peace deal with Syria's Asad, who concluded that Barak wasn't serious or reliable.
Then there is Yasser Arafat, the wily, stubborn, recalcitrant, supremely self-serving leader of the Palestinians, who eagerly pocketed every Israeli concession while consistently failing to offer any of his own. As with many tribal chieftains, Arafat's main concerns were maintaining unity among the various Palestinian factions and preserving his own power. Still, Ross points out, no other Palestinian wielded the moral authority to compromise on issues such as the fate of Jerusalem and of Palestinian refugees. Arafat may have been crude and dishonest, Ross concludes, but he was the only game in town.
Ross himself comes across as dedicated, tenacious and single-minded. He's constantly breaking off early from family holidays to take a phone call, hold some anxious official's hand or throw a calculated temper tantrum. It's a polished performance, and The Missing Peace sometimes reads like a working manual for diplomats. "Every negotiation is about manipulation," he explains. He might have added: Be prepared to seize even the most dreadful of opportunities. When Ross heard of Rabin's assassination, he first broke down and cried. But minutes later he was calculating how best to exploit this terrible moment to further the peace process by making sure the maximum number of Arab leaders would attend Rabin's funeral in Jerusalem.
Ross's narrative climaxes with the diplomatic showdown at Camp David, where both sides' willingness to reach a solution ran up against the imperatives of their bloodstained history and the limits of their imagination. Each side now sees Camp David as the final exam that the other side failed. In the Israeli version, Arafat brazenly turned his back on a deal that would have given Palestinians sovereignty over all of the Gaza Strip and 95 percent of the West Bank, as well as control over Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem. In the Palestinian view, Israel's final proposals were suspiciously vague and presented in a belligerent take-it-or-leave-it manner that made them impossible to swallow.
While Ross is withering in recounting the miscalculations and tantrums on both sides, he holds Arafat most responsible for the failure: "Only one leader was unable or unwilling to confront history and mythology: Yasser Arafat."
Still, when Ross steps back and reviews the trail of tears that the peace process became, he argues that both sides failed to live up to their commitments. Palestinian leaders failed to stop, and even gave support to, the suicide bombers, while Israelis never really eased the grip of their military occupation or stopped building and expanding Jewish settlements in the West Bank and Gaza.
Ross saves some of his toughest criticism for the second Bush administration's failure to engage in the peace process. From the beginning, Ross argues, President Bush and his advisers mistakenly believed that because nothing could be done to improve the situation, it was better to do nothing. But Ross says Bush denied to Israelis and Palestinians America's most important gifts: its energy and its sense of optimism. When things are going badly, American involvement becomes even more crucial, he argues, because it can help prevent a bad situation from becoming worse. And he coolly picks apart the fallacies and lackluster execution of Bush's subsequent diplomatic initiative, the so-called Roadmap for Peace, that have made this effort a source of derision in Washington, Jerusalem and capitals throughout Europe and the Middle East.
Still, The Missing Peace leavens its despair with a dash of hope. For all the failures, Israelis met, talked and came achingly close to agreement for the first time with their Palestinian and Syrian counterparts. Everything was put on the table, and the outlines of the final deal became clear to all. "I am afraid it may take another 50 years to settle this now," Palestinian negotiator (and now prime minister) Ahmed Qurei told Ross after the Camp David collapse. Peace is either 50 years away, or it is just on the other side of a locked door to which both sides hold the key.
Reviewed by Glenn Frankel
Copyright 2004, The Washington Post Co. All Rights Reserved.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
PROLOGUE
The End
IT WAS JANUARY 2, 2001. Yasir Arafat was due at the White House in thirty minutes, and I was about to go into the Oval Office to brief the President. No matter how many times I had done this, no matter how many times Arafat had come, there was always a sense of anticipation. Each time the objective had been to advance the process, to move the ball down the field.
But it was different this time. This time we faced the moment of truth. It was too late to think in terms of process. President Clinton had seventeen days left in office. Now we had to know: Could Yasir Arafat end this conflict? Could he accept the ideas, the proposals, the President had presented ten days ago?
Already he had missed the deadline we had sought to impose on both sides for a response to the President's ideas. As usual, Chairman Arafat had equivocated. He had questions. He sought clarification. He wanted further discussions. He hoped that I would meet with the negotiators on each side and clear up misunderstandings, and he even succeeded in getting President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt to make this request to President Clinton.
All this in response to an unprecedented set of ideas that would have produced a Palestinian state in all of Gaza and nearly all of the West Bank; a capital for that state in Arab East Jerusalem; security arrangements that would be built around an international presence; and an unlimited right of return for Palestinian refugees to their own state, but not to Israel.
The ideas represented the culmination of an extraordinary effort to reach a final Israeli-Palestinian peace deal. Thousands of miles had been covered, figuratively and literally. Thousands of hours of discussions had taken place. And, without exaggeration, thousands of arguments had been made, dissected, and examined in trying to understand what each side could and could not live with. The Clinton ideas were not about what each side wanted; they were about what each side needed.
The Clinton ideas were a "first" and a "last." Never before had the United States put a comprehensive set of proposals on the table designed to end the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians--or at least shrink the differences on all the core issues to a point where a final deal could be hammered out quickly. We had come close to doing so in July five months earlier at the Camp David summit. But there, our ideas were not comprehensive--as we presented proposals neither on security arrangements nor on Palestinian refugees. Moreover, the ideas at Camp David were a mix of what Ehud Barak told us he could accept on withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza and what we thought might resolve the sensitive issue of Jerusalem.
Now, while our ideas should have come as no surprise to either side, they represented our best judgment of what each side could accept in the end. We could not do better. Painful concessions were required on each side. Historic myths would have to give way to political necessity and reality on each side--with Israel giving up two core beliefs: that all of Jerusalem, including the Arab neighborhoods of East Jerusalem, would be Israeli, and that the Jordan Valley must never be surrendered. For their part, the Palestinians had to give up the myth of "right of return" to Israel--the animating belief of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian diaspora throughout their history.
There could be no more haggling. Discussion within the parameters of the President's ideas was acceptable; trying to redefine these parameters was not.
That is what President Clinton had told both Israeli and Palestinian negotiators on December 23, 2000, when he presented the ideas to them. He told them if either side could not accept the ideas, they would be withdrawn and would leave with him when he left office. By December 27, he needed to know whether they were prepared to accept his ideas.
Yet here we were on January 2, 2001, having received Barak's affirmative answer on the twenty-seventh, but still not having heard anything but evasions from Arafat. Notwithstanding Arafat's efforts to engage us on "clarifying" the ideas, we had held firm and not done so. But we had also not withdrawn the President's proposal. We had not pulled back from this process, fearing, as we had so often during the Clinton years, that to do so would trigger a crisis, or an explosion, or a serious deterioration into violence. By not pulling back, we continued to keep alive the hope that a final agreement might yet be possible by January 20.
By this time, however, I had grave doubts that an agreement remained possible. After all, Arafat was equivocating in circumstances in which there was no more time, at least for Clinton; in which he had the backing for accepting the Clinton proposal from nearly every significant Arab leader, President Mubarak of Egypt, Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, King Abdullah of Jordan, President Ben Ali of Tunisia, and King Mohammad of Morocco; and in which Barak's acceptance of the Clinton ideas would disappear in the near certainty of his looming electoral defeat--a defeat that might only be averted by Palestinian acceptance of the President's ideas and the conclusion of a peace agreement. The stakes were clear and the choices stark, or so they should have been to Yasir Arafat.
This was my message to the President as I entered the Oval Office. If Arafat was posturing to try to get more, he had to be told that he was in danger of losing everything, and, I told the President, he must "hear that from you...and he must have no doubts that you have taken it to the limit and this is it." He must hear from you that "you worked your ass off" and presented something that no other U.S. president had ever been willing to propose--namely, a balanced package designed to end the conflict that tilted toward the Palestinians on territory and Jerusalem and tilted toward the Israelis on security and refugees. You had done your best, and there was nothing more you could do. It was now time for the Chairman to decide.
In closing, I reminded the President that Arafat never made a decision before he had to. He always waited until one minute to midnight. Unfortunately, I said, it was now three in the morning, and you need an answer in this meeting: Is it yes or no? Anything else, and Arafat was telling you he could not do a final deal, and he must know that is the conclusion you will draw.
"I got it," the President said.
Product details
- Publisher : Farrar, Straus and Giroux; First Edition (August 9, 2004)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 872 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0374199736
- ISBN-13 : 978-0374199739
- Item Weight : 2.85 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 2 x 9.75 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,099,895 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #708 in African Politics
- #1,411 in Middle Eastern Politics
- #1,422 in Israel & Palestine History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book's content in-depth, comprehensive, objective, and informative. They also describe the reading experience as precise, in- depth, and well read.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book's content in-depth, comprehensive, and informative. They also say it's objective and interesting.
"...chosen a manner of presenting her material in an easily readable, objective, and often gripping way...." Read more
"...with any interest in the region or the conflict, its in-depth and comprehensive style is indicative of Ross's command of the subject, and the fact..." Read more
"...The detail is excellent...." Read more
"...Detailed and entertaining throughout the whole structure." Read more
Customers find the book entertaining.
"...The Missing Peace is a wonderfully complete, entertaining, and honest tale of both the history of the regions and peoples involved eith the conflicts..." Read more
"...The book is unnecessarily long (872 pages), but is entertaining as it includes anecdotal details and some other less important details about how..." Read more
"...Detailed and entertaining throughout the whole structure." Read more
"Outstandingly Interesting, objective, and informative..." Read more
Customers find the book precise, in-depth, and well-read. They also say it's one of the clearest and most well-balanced books they've read.
"...She has chosen a manner of presenting her material in an easily readable, objective, and often gripping way...." Read more
"...'s command of the subject, and the fact that it remains fun and interesting to read the whole way through is a tribute to Ross as a writer." Read more
"...almost 900 pages, with very little citations for anything, but is not a hard read, or as dry as others make it out to be...." Read more
"Precise, in-depth, and well read..." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Isabel Kershner, the author, is a highly acclaimed journalist who lives in Israel and has an outstanding understanding of her subject matter and more. She has chosen a manner of presenting her material in an easily readable, objective, and often gripping way. To do this she weaves in stories of real people that make us care about them as individuals—and thus about the subject matter and the nuances, contradictions, and complexities she presents.
Published in the spring of 2023, months before the current war, the book provides a well-balanced and clear-headed background that make events that have occurred after its publication easier to see in context from multiple angles.
One caveat: at times near the beginning of the book, as I was getting my bearings, she seemed almost harshly critical of Israel, but that perception quickly faded as her method of presentation became clearer. In my mind this is one of the clearest and most well balanced of books.
"Ok," Netanyahu says, "I'll agree to release 300 prisoners in exchange for the Palestinians giving up terror."
"Ok, great!" say the Americans.
"But wait," says Netanyahu. "When I said 'release', I didn't mean they'd actually get 'released' and be completely free. I meant they'd be on probation for the rest of their lives and if they get a speeding ticket they automatically forfeit all rights and will be jailed for the rest of their lives."
"Um, ok," say the Americans.
"And when I said '300', I didn't mean 300 people would actually get let out," says Netanyahu. "I meant we'll review 300 cases, with the understanding that only 7 or 8 will actually get let out."
"7 or 8 isn't a lot. Can't you go higher than that?" ask the Americans.
"Ok, 10," says Netanyahu.
"Also," says Netanyahu, "when I said 'prisoners', obviously I didn't mean anyone who was convicted of any kind of terror incident or attack on Israeli people."
"Well ok, we'll try to sell this to the Palestinians," say the Americans.
Then there's a terror incident where some Palestinian with a knife stabs 3 people on a bus.
"Ok," says Netanyahu, "the agreement is totally off until Yasser Arafat agrees to come on national tv here and publicly bow down and apologize to me, Israel, and the victims, and personally hands over the terrorist and agrees to pay for treble damages to all the victim."
"Um," say the Americans, "we don't think he's going to do that..."
"Well fine," says Netanyahu, "the deal is off! Here I tried to go the extra mile for peace and was so cooperative and willing to give away so much and this is what I get! The blame is totally on their side!"
That pretty much sums up the whole book. Netanyahu will never actually go along with a peace plan because he just doesn't want to.
The Missing Peace is a wonderfully complete, entertaining, and honest tale of both the history of the regions and peoples involved eith the conflicts, and the diplomacy during the time we were lucky enough to have Ross working in the region. Ross does a great job of giving you his analysis of why a leader is acting in a certain way, what events might be effecting his psychology, and what he, as a negotiator, will do about it.
The book is complete with the maps of all pertinent regions and deals, a list of all the people involved and their titles, an in depth glossary/index, and a wonderful epilogue which brings Ross's special brand of optimism to a situation in dire need of more committed people like the Ambassador.
This text is a must-read for anyone with any interest in the region or the conflict, its in-depth and comprehensive style is indicative of Ross's command of the subject, and the fact that it remains fun and interesting to read the whole way through is a tribute to Ross as a writer.
The book is unnecessarily long (872 pages), but is entertaining as it includes anecdotal details and some other less important details about how Ross boarded planes and took showers prior to his meetings.
The book also sheds light on how, on several occasions, arrogance, pride, prejudice, electoral considerations and pulling diplomatic stunts to muster further support of followers have always affected peace negotiations.
It also shows that terrorists and other anti-peace factions succeeded in so many instances in delaying peaceful efforts and in other instances completely sabotaged them.
Ross has been a witness of the diplomatic effort between Israelis and Arabs, which was interrupted in 2000. His book is certainly a reference document for all those interested in taking a deeper look into the Middle East conflict and international attempts at resolving it.
Top reviews from other countries
The reader is taken behind the scenes to witness the diplomatic disputes/stalemates and personalities seeking to negotiate over the pivotal issues pertaining to this ongoing conflict.
The book's cover carries many accolades for the author, including glowing comments from such as former US President Clinton together with those from former US Secretaries of State Kissinger, Christopher, Shultz and Albright.
The writer also being lauded as having spent more time negotiating with Yasser Arafat than anyone else.
Whether or not the reader will agree with all of these sentiments or the opinions included within this study, the individual cannot fail to be impressed with how eminently readable this rather lengthy investigation is.
Despite the realms of text and detail available, having studied these issues myself for some time, I cannot shake the feeling that many officials still have not grasped an agenda which seeks nothing less than the "eradication of the Jewish state" as detailed in the "Palestinian National Charter". Whilst the book refers to the process discussed in relation to the latter's "revocation", the Charter still remains in effect and valid.
Given such an understanding, then the reader can perhaps better understand the context of the negotations and read between the lines as to what actually constituted the refusal by Arafat and his entourage, to accept what are cited as the most far reaching concessions and offers for peace ever made by an Israeli government.
Whilst the book attaches significance to so many individual issues, I feel frustrated that the aforementioned point is apparently not understood. Others may disagree.
The full text of the offer of a peaceful settlement is included in the book's appendix. An offer cited as having been agreed to and accepted by the former Israeli PM Barak but refused by the late Palestinian Chairman Arafat.
Essentially this settlement offer is described as having revolved around an offer to provide the Palestinian side with a state of their own which included some 99% of what Arafat actually demanded.
The book describes this as being namely a deal upon settlements, refugees and Jerusalem's Temple Mount/Holy places together with the inclusion of East Jerusalem as a capital of a Palestinian state.
This "solution" is also cited to have included between 94% and 96% of "West Bank" territory inclusive of a "land-swap" of between 1% and 3%.
A number of other issues being left for negotiation, such as the degree of militarization of any future Palestinian state etc..
Perhaps the most crucial declaration and admission of all cited herein was that the agreement would result in an "end of conflict" with it's implementation putting an "end to all claims".
The book describes how Arafat refused to accept this offer and instead is cited as returning to violence and the outbreak of another "intifada" having failed to obtain 100% of what the Palestinian/Arab side had demanded.
I would consider this book to be valuable for anyone interested in studying the Middle East peace process itself where it would be a highly useful reference.
However I would also be interested in accessing the opinions of other officials involved in relation to such a highly complex and contentious subject.
For this purpose I recommend the following books;-
"The Mideast Peace Process: An Autopsy" by Neal Kozodoy
"The High Cost of Peace" by Yossef Bodansky.
Thank you.







