Buy new:
$15.40$15.40
$4.69
delivery:
May 26 - 31
Ships from: oceanwavebooks Sold by: oceanwavebooks
Buy used: $11.33
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $4.09 shipping
93% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
82% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
92% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice Paperback – April 17, 1997
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $16.03 | $16.02 |
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length98 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherVerso
- Publication dateApril 17, 1997
- Dimensions0.53 x 0.04 x 0.84 inches
- ISBN-10185984054X
- ISBN-13978-1859840542
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Most purchased | Highest ratedin this set of products
God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons EverythingPaperback
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 1998 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Review
Veteran lefty kicks old nun; old nun forgives; lefty doesn't want to be forgiven. -- Sunday Times [London]
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Verso (April 17, 1997)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 98 pages
- ISBN-10 : 185984054X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1859840542
- Item Weight : 5.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 0.53 x 0.04 x 0.84 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,855,734 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #9,883 in Religious Leader Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Christopher Hitchens (1949-2011) was the author of Letters to a Young Contrarian, and the bestseller No One Left to Lie To: The Values of the Worst Family. A regular contributor to Vanity Fair, The Atlantic Monthly and Slate, Hitchens also wrote for The Weekly Standard, The National Review, and The Independent, and appeared on The Daily Show, Charlie Rose, The Chris Matthew's Show, Real Time with Bill Maher, and C-Span's Washington Journal. He was named one of the world's "Top 100 Public Intellectuals" by Foreign Policy and Britain's Prospect.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Contrary to the widely-publicised image of Mother Teresa as a compassionate nun saving countless number of poor Indians from dying, Hitchens demonstrates the following to be the truth:
1. That the Calcutta charity did not like to spend its vast wealth in providing care to save the sick and dying. It rather spent the money on establishing more convents across the world, all doing similar dubious work.
2. That it was a Catholic cult based on glorifying poverty, suffering, subjection and death. The cult was focused on prosyletization above saving lives. The dying poor were allowed to die, but die as Christians, because then only Jesus would save them. Towards this end, sick and dying Indians of other faiths would be brought to the charity and baptized, often without their knowledge, as they lay awaiting death.
3. That the conditions in the so-called 'hospital' of the Calcutta charity were often unhygienic and the staff poorly trained. They re-used needles over and over and washed them in cold, tap water instead of sterilizing them. Many inmates died not because they were incurable but because the charity wouldn't spend the money necessary to save them.
4. That Mother Teresa took multi-million dollar donations from shady and dubious characters like Charles Keating, Papa doc Duvalier and others and repaid the debt by interceding on their behalf. For example, she wrote to Judge Lance Ito in support of Charles Keating, who cheated ordinary hard-working Americans to the tune of $250 million.
5. That she was just a reactionary figure who advocated the rights of the unborn child even as she let adults and children under her care die for lack of desire to spend money to save them; that she glorified poverty and suffering and denounced materialism even as she sought and accepted millions of dollars as donations.
There is a thread that links people like Mother Teresa and the other high-profile Gurus and Swamis in India. It is not a surprise that they all tend to be reactionary, have outmoded views and are mostly out of touch with the pulse of society. Most of the Gurus tend to be people who grew up in rural parts of India in the 1930s and 1940s, when the social mores were highly repressive compared to today. Women were terribly discriminated against and constrained, caste oppression was pervasive and illiteracy was rampant. These gurus would have often only had a few years of religious education which mostly reinforced such prejudices. They were often un-exposed to secular science based education. Much later, when they get anointed as Swamis by some vested interests in urban India, they bring all their baggage into their 'liberating' Ashrams. Often, men and women are severely segregated in these ashrams because that is what the gurus know society to be. They are often against women's education and empowerment. They often patronize the rich and powerful and practise caste discrimination. In a similar way, Mother Teresa grew up in a rural Albanian/Macedonian region in the 1930s and had only church-influenced education. She also never had any exposure to the enlightened European education. So, it is not a surprise that she is against contraception in an India that sought to reduce population growth. It is not a surprise that she thought that abortion is the biggest crime. It is not a surprise that she patronized frauds like Duvalier and Keating because they gave her big donations and professed themselves to be good Christians.
Christopher Hitchens has done a great service by tearing the mask of such people who think that they have a hotline to God.
The book is written in Hitchens' trade-mark style of hard-hitiing prose. One can see it even in the choice of the title. As an example, I would cite the following:
Commenting upon the decision of advice columnist Ann Landers to share one of Mother Teresa's prescriptions for improving the world ("smile more"), Hitchens writes," ...it is doubtful whether a fortune-cookie maxim of such cretinous condescension would have been chosen by even Ann Landers unless it bore the imprimateur of Mother Teresa, one of the few untouchables in the mental universe of the mediocre and the credulous".
This is vintage Christorpher Hitchens!
The book is not a polemic but a well-argued, rational critique. In fact, the foreword to the twelfth edition by Thomas Mellon sums up the book so well that one can hardly do better in a review. I loved it.
Written from the perspective of one who clearly is not a Christian, this book has been likened to a cruise missle. It is narrow in scope, yet devastatingly effective, for it strikes right to the heart of the matter. How are we to reconcile Mother Teresa, who cares for the sick and destitute, and Mother Teresa who holds hands and laughs with the wife of a brutal and notorious dictator? How are we to reconcile her desire to live out Christianity when she accepts million-dollar donations from the likes of Charles Keating?
The most significant chapter in this book is one which displays Mother Teresa's overwhelming hypocrisy. The author reproduces a letter that was sent from Mother Teresa to Judge Lance Ito, seeking clemency on his behalf. She suggests that while she knows nothing of his business dealings (in which he defrauded people of $250,000,000) what is more important is the service he has rendered to the poor. She asks that the judge to do what Jesus would do, which she evidently believes would be to let him free. Los Angeles deputy D.A., Paul Turley wrote a response to Mother Teresa, suggested that she should return the $1.25 million dollars given to her by Keating, promising he would return it to the rightful owner. He received no response.
Many others have written about Mother Teresa and have chastised her for this type of hypocrisy. Many have validated the claims that her care for the poor was more in providing a comfortable place for people to die than in seeking to heal them. Many have shown that she hoarded tens or hundreds of millions of dollars for no apparent purpose when these funds could have gone to build the finest hospitals and orphanages in India. And many Christian writers have shown that her faith bore only a passing resemblance to Christianity. But, as far as I know, this is the most significant (and only book-length treatment) of the subject, though at a mere 98 pages it reads more like an essay than a book.
As one who reads primarily books written by professed Christians, I was taken aback by Hitchens' prevailing attitude. "Given how much this Church allows the fanatic Mother Teresa to preach, it might be added that the call to go forth and multiply, and to take no thought for the morrow, sounds grotesque when uttered by an elderly virgin whose chief claim to reverence is that she ministers to the inevitable losers in this very lottery" (page 59). He is cynical, angry, hateful and sarcastic all at once. He despises the hypocrisy he sees in Mother Teresa and seems happy to extend his disillusionment to religion in general. He attacks not only Mother Teresa, but also Roman Catholic doctrine and practice, and even further, extends his attacks to Christianity and the Bible, especially Christian teaching on the sanctity of human life. And throughout, he uses only four footnotes, providing little evidence to support his claims. Despite all that, he argues effectively and some may even say, devastatingly.
In some ways this subject hardly seems to matter anymore, now that Mother Teresa has long since died. Yet her legacy lives on. Mother Teresa is still lauded as a hero by Catholics, Protestants and people of every other creed. It seems amply clear to those who are willing to look that her legacy is largely ficticious.
Top reviews from other countries
And a name that rode high in that balance of accepting necessary evils was that of Mother Teresa. In fact, I believed that whilst churches and their leaders were morally bankrupt exploiters of the poor and the weak, she was somehow above that.
Short as it is, this book is going to be a tough read for many; if I as an aethiest found my view challenged by it, imagine how hard it is to accept if you actually believe that Mother Teresa was actually some sort of embodiment of God.
But because of this it is an essential read for both believers and non-believers; it's amazing how we have all been manipulated by this seemingly innocent individual.
It is a short book, and to be honest, I didn't enjoy the writing style. I also had issues with the title at the outset, feeling it to be unesseserily crass, but by the end, if that's what worries you, you really need to have a long hard think.
But above all, it is essential; an exposé of an individual who has painted themself as saintly, whilst supporting murderous regimes. Who has promoted themself as humanitarian, whilst denying the poorest in the world, basic pain management and the ability to control their own destinies so that she and her ilk can maintain their positions as saviours, whilst doing nothing of the sort.
Two glaring errors leap out at anybody who has even a passing knowledge of Holy Writ, which suggest that the writer's methods of research were not particularly extensive. The first appears on page 24 (of the Kindle version). He declares that when he was visiting the Missionaries of Charity "I received something of a shock. First was the inscription over the door which read "He that loveth correction loveth knowledge". I don't know the provenance of that quotation but it had something of the workhouse about it". Clearly he could not be bothered to discover its provenance before wading in with his highly distorted interpretation. In fact it comes from Proverbs 12:1 and is concerned with the instruction and acquisition of wisdom and therefore with learning and bears no connection whatsoever to the horrors of the workhouse. Asking a local cleric, or even Mother Teresa herself, where this quotation originated from was clearly beyond his capacity.
The second is even more jarring and appears on page 29 where he proclaims sanctimoniously "This is the passage in which Jesus breaks a costly box of unguent exclusively on his own feet". In fact, and unsurprisingly, this story appears in all four Gospels and as these can hardly be described as lengthy documents it would not be an onerous task to check any quotation from them. In Matthew 26:7 and Mark 14: 3 an unnamed woman poured the ointment over his head, in Luke 7: 37/38 an unnamed woman identified as a sinner poured the ointment over his feet and in John 12:3 Mary the sister of Martha and Lazarus poured the ointment over his feet. The writer had four different versions to choose from upon which he could expound, instead he supplied a fifth version contributed either by an extremely faulty memory or a fertile imagination. And if he has highlighted his own apocryphal tale that Jesus supposedly poured "a costly box of unguent exclusively over his own feet" how much of the rest of his diatribe can be relied upon as an impartial analysis of accurate information?
I was slightly surprised that it was so short considering Christopher's love for the written word but leading on from my earlier point, to make this book longer may have been to add pointless filler.
I suppose I am more disappointed with the tone of virtually all of the negative reviews I read. Most have something to say along the lines of: "I bet Christopher Hitchens has never done X for charity/the homeless" etc. Well to those people: Christopher Hitchens never claimed otherwise. To say that because he hasn't done these things makes his book bad, simply comes across as a way of avoiding the uncomfortable truths that are revealed in this book.
Overall, this book showed me new facts that I did not know before and after my own research I have come to a conclusion in agreement with that of Christopher Hitchens.














