Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
94% positive over last 12 months
Follow the Author
OK
MODERN MEDEA PB Paperback – April 15, 2001
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length372 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
Publication dateApril 15, 2001
-
Dimensions5.5 x 0.84 x 8.5 inches
-
ISBN-100809069547
-
ISBN-13978-0809069545
Inspire a love of reading with Amazon Book Box for Kids
Discover delightful children's books with Amazon Book Box, a subscription that delivers new books every 1, 2, or 3 months — new Amazon Book Box Prime customers receive 15% off your first box. Learn more.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Get everything you need
A Concise History of KentuckyPaperback
The Colors of Courage: Gettysburg's Forgotten History: Immigrants, Women, and African Americans in the Civil War's Defining BattleMargaret S CreightonPaperback
Who Speaks for Margaret Garner?Paperback
The Captive's Quest for Freedom: Fugitive Slaves, the 1850 Fugitive Slave Law, and the Politics of Slavery (Slaveries since Emancipation)R. J. M. BlackettPaperback
Pocahontas and the Powhatan Dilemma: The American Portraits SeriesPaperback
Westmoreland's War: Reassessing American Strategy in VietnamGregory DaddisPaperback
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Weisenberger has told the full tragedy of the real Margaret Garner, and her life speaks to us more eloquently than any novel about the inhumanity of slavery, the spirit of freedom and the strength of the human will.” ―James C. Klotter, Lexington Herald-Leader
“Weisenburger . . . researched newspaper articles, courtroom testimony, maps and manuscripts to piece together the real and fascinating account of the institution of slavery and one slave's dramatic rebellion against it.” ―Sharon Shahid, USA Today
"Weisenburger simultaneously acknowledges the inherent bias of history and forces the reader to remember the woman at the center of the story, even though she 'tells' very little of it. . . . His very strength is in acknowledging the partial nature of 'the facts.'" - Kirkus Reviews
About the Author
Steven Weisenburger, professor of English and co-director of the Program in American Culture at the University of Kentucky, is the author of Fables of Subversion: Satire and the American Novel and A "Gravity's Rainbow" Companion.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Hill and Wang; Illustrated edition (April 15, 2001)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 372 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0809069547
- ISBN-13 : 978-0809069545
- Item Weight : 1.05 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.84 x 8.5 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,016,878 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #550 in U.S. Abolition of Slavery History
- #4,501 in Black & African American Biographies
- #5,519 in Discrimination & Racism (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The events took place in the winter 1856 in Kentucky and Ohio, Covington on one bank and Cincinnati on the other bank of the Ohio river. A family, three generations and eight people, of slaves escape from Kentucky to Ohio across the river that is frozen in the night from Sunday January27 to Monday January 28. The Garners go to some acquaintances, the Kites who try to get them to the close-by Underground Railroad Station but for unclear reasons the house is besieged by the police at 10 and they are arrested at 12. During the scuffle the Mother, Margaret kills her 3 year old daughter and tries to kill one of her sons and stuns the other. The only one she does not attack is her 9 month old infant.
The case is taken to court but it will last more than a month, though the US Fugitive Slave Laws (1793 and 1850) specifically states that the only element to check is the property right of the owners or claimant over the fugitive slaves. Kentucky is a slave state whereas Ohio is not, and that complicates things.
Two legal problems are raised by the defense.
The first one is that both Robert and Margaret (the younger generation parents) had been brought when children to Ohio by their masters on visits, but since slavery is not recognized by the Ohio Constitution, as soon as they stepped into Ohio they were freed. But the two concerned slaves were young and they were taken back to Kentucky. The question is to know whether that short sojourn in the past with their safe return to Kentucky could be considered as making the slaves free. It will be ruled that it does not.
The second is that a capital crime was committed by one of the fugitive slaves and the others were accessories. Then there is a contradiction. For the capital crime in Ohio, the people who commit such a crime are supposed to be brought to court according to the habeas corpus procedure. They are thus treated as human beings in Ohio and are de facto freed if this habeas corpus procedure is implemented. On the other hand they are slaves, hence a piece of property was destroyed by another piece of property and hence there is no capital crime, only the destruction of some property. And it is this sole question of property that has to be considered according to the Fugitive Acts. The court will finally only consider this question of property considering that the habeas corpus procedure can only apply to human beings recognized as such, in the words of the court "the slave does not possess equal rights with the free-man". This decision is finally taken on Tuesday February 26, 1856.
The captives are thus remanded to slavery and their owners on February 28. They embark on the Henry Lewis ship on March 7 but the ship Edward Howard rams into the previous one and causes its sinking. In those circumstances Margaret drowns her infant child by throwing her into the water and she tries to drown herself by jumping into the river. She is saved by the black cook of the ship who dives and brings her back. They reach their owner's plantation on March 10, full in the cotton season and are probably sent o work: the older generation of parents, the younger generation of parents and the two surviving sons, in the fields because housework is banned for escapees.
This case was heavily used in the debate leading to the Civil War on both sides.
This mother killing to of her children was shown as a monstrous un-person by slave-owners.
But on the other hand she was shown as inspired by a revolutionary spirit and that she preferred entrusting her children to the angels of God to letting them go back into slavery. She was used equally by male abolitionists and by female abolitionists and feminists to enhance the fight against slavery as well as the fight for women's rights. The feminist and abolitionist Lucy Stone testified in court and brought up three arguments. A religious argument with a quotation from the Bible, Deuteronomy 23:15 that states an escaped slave or servant does not have to be given back to his or her previous owner, escaping meaning freedom. Then the fact that Gaines, the owner of these slaves, would have promised to Lucy Stone to free Margaret when she is back in Kentucky, and Lucy Stone insists on the fact he has to hold his promise that he denies of course. The third argument is that the children have "faded faces", meaning they are mulattos born from a union imposed onto Margaret by her owner. This last element leads to the idea of some kind of vengeance against the rapist owner, though a slave-owner must not give a lot of value to the children he may get from his slaves, except that they can be sold, even if they are his own sons or daughters.
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU
In "Modern Medea," author Steven Weisenburger uses court documents, newspaper stories and other sources from the time to examine this almost-forgotten trail that challenged the 1850 Fugitive Slave Law. We follow along with the entire trial, seeing all the tricks that both defense and prosecution lawyers used to either bring a quick end to proceedings or to protract them in order to keep the Garners on free soil. The trail also gives us an interesting look into politics, the pro-slavery mindset, abolitionism view, and the media perception and bias of the time.
What I found most interesting about this book is that the trial to determine whether or not the Garner's were still the property of Archibald Gaines took precedent over the charge of infanticide. The outcome would have a profound effect not only on state's rights but would spark a tiny flame leading up to the American Civil War. And even after the trial was concluded, the media, poets such as Elizabeth Barret Browning, and other authors used the events to add fuel to the ever-growing debate on slavery.
But, it still remains a little-known trial, falling into the dust of history in part due to public "whitening" of the events and to the events of the Dred Scott decision almost a year later. Yet author Toni Morrison helped to revive interest in this trial by modeling one of the characters in her novel "Beloved" after the ghost of Margaret's slain daughter, Mary.
The book sometimes reads more like a college text and asks many questions that are never answered. But the amount of information surrounding the trial and concerning the battle of state's rights versus federal law make this a great book to read.
Minor criticisms: Too much is devoted to courtroom battles at the expense of describing daily slave life. As the author is a professor at a late 20th Century American university, he feels it necessary from time to time to wave his little red PC book in the air and shout slogans: Slavery was evil! Racism is not nice! Well, duh. None of this adds to the book and all of it detracts from the book.
Still, this is a good read. Buy it; you won't be disappointed. (By the way, I have never read Toni Morrison's "Beloved"; one doesn't need to in order to enjoy this book.)
Top reviews from other countries
The events took place in the winter 1856 in Kentucky and Ohio, Covington on one bank and Cincinnati on the other bank of the Ohio river. A family, three generations and eight people, of slaves escape from Kentucky to Ohio across the river that is frozen in the night from Sunday January27 to Monday January 28. The Garners go to some acquaintances, the Kites who try to get them to the close-by Underground Railroad Station but for unclear reasons the house is besieged by the police at 10 and they are arrested at 12. During the scuffle the Mother, Margaret kills her 3 year old daughter and tries to kill one of her sons and stuns the other. The only one she does not attack is her 9 month old infant.
The case is taken to court but it will last more than a month, though the US Fugitive Slave Laws (1793 and 1850) specifically states that the only element to check is the property right of the owners or claimant over the fugitive slaves. Kentucky is a slave state whereas Ohio is not, and that complicates things.
Two legal problems are raised by the defense.
The first one is that both Robert and Margaret (the younger generation parents) had been brought when children to Ohio by their masters on visits, but since slavery is not recognized by the Ohio Constitution, as soon as they stepped into Ohio they were freed. But the two concerned slaves were young and they were taken back to Kentucky. The question is to know whether that short sojourn in the past with their safe return to Kentucky could be considered as making the slaves free. It will be ruled that it does not.
The second is that a capital crime was committed by one of the fugitive slaves and the others were accessories. Then there is a contradiction. For the capital crime in Ohio, the people who commit such a crime are supposed to be brought to court according to the habeas corpus procedure. They are thus treated as human beings in Ohio and are de facto freed if this habeas corpus procedure is implemented. On the other hand they are slaves, hence a piece of property was destroyed by another piece of property and hence there is no capital crime, only the destruction of some property. And it is this sole question of property that has to be considered according to the Fugitive Acts. The court will finally only consider this question of property considering that the habeas corpus procedure can only apply to human beings recognized as such, in the words of the court "the slave does not possess equal rights with the free-man". This decision is finally taken on Tuesday February 26, 1856.
The captives are thus remanded to slavery and their owners on February 28. They embark on the Henry Lewis ship on March 7 but the ship Edward Howard rams into the previous one and causes its sinking. In those circumstances Margaret drowns her infant child by throwing her into the water and she tries to drown herself by jumping into the river. She is saved by the black cook of the ship who dives and brings her back. They reach their owner's plantation on March 10, full in the cotton season and are probably sent o work: the older generation of parents, the younger generation of parents and the two surviving sons, in the fields because housework is banned for escapees.
This case was heavily used in the debate leading to the Civil War on both sides.
This mother killing to of her children was shown as a monstrous un-person by slave-owners.
But on the other hand she was shown as inspired by a revolutionary spirit and that she preferred entrusting her children to the angels of God to letting them go back into slavery. She was used equally by male abolitionists and by female abolitionists and feminists to enhance the fight against slavery as well as the fight for women's rights. The feminist and abolitionist Lucy Stone testified in court and brought up three arguments. A religious argument with a quotation from the Bible, Deuteronomy 23:15 that states an escaped slave or servant does not have to be given back to his or her previous owner, escaping meaning freedom. Then the fact that Gaines, the owner of these slaves, would have promised to Lucy Stone to free Margaret when she is back in Kentucky, and Lucy Stone insists on the fact he has to hold his promise that he denies of course. The third argument is that the children have "faded faces", meaning they are mulattos born from a union imposed onto Margaret by her owner. This last element leads to the idea of some kind of vengeance against the rapist owner, though a slave-owner must not give a lot of value to the children he may get from his slaves, except that they can be sold, even if they are his own sons or daughters.
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU


