Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
A Moment on the Earth: The Coming Age of Environmental Optimism Paperback – March 1, 1996
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
This is a well-documented examination of the effects of human society on the global environment. Easterbrook's conclusion: Things are getting better, not worse. Not surprisingly, this book has generated considerable controversy in many circles of environmentalists and ecologists, and many of his arguments only apply to overly-developed nations. For example, he stumbles badly when dealing with tropical rainforests, completely ignoring the fact that clearcutting in tropical environments leads to essentially irreversible loss of soils and a sterile clay pan. But all in all, I recommend this book highly to everyone interested in the proper interpretation of long-term ecological trends. In my opinion, he is as often right as wrong, and habitual doomsday-sayers would do well to seriously consider and possibly adopt some of his positions on ecorealism.
From Publishers Weekly
Journalist Easterbrook's optimistic account of humanity's impact on the environment, in which he argues against ecological doomsayers.
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
But this is doesn't really injure his main point, which is that the environmental movement needs to stop crying wolf. Since the 1960s they have managed to win over the majority of the American public (perhaps even more so in western Europe), and Easterbrook feels that the public no longer needs to be frightened into supporting further environmental regulations. The battle is won; enough people see the wisdom of regulating industry and land use so that describing the real consequences of not protecting the environment is a better approach.
When he wrote this book in the mid 1990s Easterbrook was a climate change doubter. He has since revised his opinion; the evidence has won him over. His doubter stance is one of the many anachronisms in this book, but it also interesting to see how many of his predictions have been borne out. He was confident that renewable energy technologies would become cheap enough for wide adoption. That is more true with each passing month. That, in fact, is his main point: that technological fixes have ameliorated a lot of environment-damaging practices and environmentalists don't acknowledge this often enough. Instead they go on to the next "sky is falling" scenario. He wishes they would cut that out, and they haven't yet.
But whether you agree with his perspective or not, the simple fact is he gets many facts completely wrong, and his arguments are logically flawed. A prime example is the arguments he makes against the need for having regulations on air quality: he points out that the air has gotten cleaner in the US over the last 30 years. Well, yes it has, but BECAUSE of the clean air act, not in spite of it.
There is no reason to be depressed about the environment, but nor is there any reason -- as Easterbrook would have us do -- to ignore it. If you want a balanced view, read the scientific literature, not the quasi-science of an naive journalist.
"A Moment on earth contains so many serious errors that it has spawned a virtual cottage industry among scientists trying to correct them. Typical were the comments of entomologist Jack Schultz of Pennsylvania State University: A Moment on the Earth "contains some of the most egregious cases of misunderstood, misstated, misinterpreted, and plainly incorrect 'science' writing I've ever encountered." Ecologist Thomas Lovejoy, Undersecretary for External Affairs at the Smithsonian Institution, wrote: "I was stunningly disappointed by the book's rambling prose and profusion of inconsistency and error." Physicist-ecologist John Harte of the Energy and Resources Group at the University of California, Berkeley, stated, "On far too many pages of this vexing book, I found examples of . . . misquoted and misinterpreted segments of scientists' writings, and of illogical thinking."
From Erhlich, Paul and Anne. Betrayal of Science and Reason: How Anti-Environmental Rhetoric Threatens Our Future. (Island Press: Washington, DC, 1996) Page 40.