I am not an economist. I thoroughly enjoy Milton Friedman's other works and his various discussions on economics/ politics. This book is not geared towards a popular audience like his others but is still accessible to someone like me. Some parts of the book delve into technical data and charts but you can still gain meaningful knowledge without fully grasping the technical aspects. The book covers a century of monetary history so it is understandable lengthy, but it also has numerous charts and extensive footnotes at the bottom of most pages, which makes the reading go by fairly quickly. Do not pass up this unique and intriguing opportunity because of the books length or technical discussions.
Friedman and Schwartz lay out clear, logical arguments to show the importance of monetary policy on the economy, They cover all of the panics and pay substantial attention to the great depression, offering unconventional views with logic demonstrating why the typical views are misguided. They also weave politics into the narrative and demonstrate the significance of not only what the policies are, but who is in charge. They contend the history of the US (and the world) would have been drastically different if Benjamin Strong didn't pass away as early as he did.
The writing is clear and engaging, the passion of the authors shines throughout the entire narrative. While this book would be more preferable to an educated economist, it is still more than worthwhile for anyone interested in the history of America from a unique perspective and the topics covered are still highly relevant today.
A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960 First Princeton Paperback Printing Edition
by
Milton Friedman
(Author),
Anna Jacobson Schwartz
(Author)
|
Milton Friedman
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
ISBN-13:
978-0691003542
ISBN-10:
0691003548
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Due Date: Dec 13, 2021
Rental Details
- FREE return shipping at the end of the semester.
- Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with rentals.
In Stock.
Rented from
apex_media
,
Fulfilled by Amazon
Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and .
If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you grow your business. Learn more about the program.
- List Price: $72.50
- Save:$40.37(56%)
FREE delivery:
Friday, Sep 3
Details
Fastest delivery:
Saturday, Aug 28
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
"A monumental scholarly accomplishment. . . . [sets] a new standard for the writing of monetary history." ― The Economic Journal
Start reading A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960 on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Princeton University Press; First Princeton Paperback Printing edition (November 1, 1971)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 888 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0691003548
- ISBN-13 : 978-0691003542
- Item Weight : 2.69 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.03 x 1.58 x 9.04 inches
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
75 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2018
Verified Purchase
13 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 18, 2019
Verified Purchase
Frideman/Schwatz write a detailed history with few conclusions not fully justified by the evidence. Nevertheless, their book remains one of the most controversial ever written. Political and economic scientists from all over the world know they cannot refute the evidence presented by the authors, but they are always able to simply ignore the facts by claiming to be ''scientists''.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
4.0 out of 5 stars
... started reading it but so far Freeman is an easy read. And I am not an economist
Reviewed in the United States on July 12, 2018Verified Purchase
Just started reading it but so far Freeman is an easy read. And I am not an economist. He is definitely a libertarian with minimal government ideas. Work reading since this is the foundation of where we are now.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2010
Verified Purchase
"A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960" by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz is an epic in economic literature. The authors concisely analyze nearly 100 years of monetary history and prove why monetary economics matter. Their work, originally published in 1963, offers immaculate insight into endogenous and exogenous economic variables that shaped US history.
When reviewing a classic text it is important to test it on two criteria: 1) it's ingenuity; and, 2) it's validity. In regards to ingenuity "Monetary History" paved the way towards a statistically grounded analysis of macroeconomics (in this case monetary theory). While "Monetary History" was groundbreaking it's truly memorable aspect is Ch7's "The Great Contraction". This chapter, which is now known as the money hypothesis, revolutionized the way economists thought about the Great
Deprhttp://www.amazon.com/review/R1C118WNLAM4I/ref=cm_cr_pr_cmt?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0691137943&nodeID=#wasThisHelpfulession. Ultimately, this analysis proved to be incorrect.
Why the work remains a classic, even though flawed, is because the sheer difficulty in producing such a feat. Friedman and Schwartz managed to put together a comprehensive 100 year monetary history in (a short) 700 pages. The amount of research required to take on such a project is hard to grasp. The footnotes in the "Monetary History" give a small glimpse into how much work was required to create this book. They alone are the size of a mid-sized economic text. Throughout the text the authors synthesis a wide range of evidence, often being forced to recalculate the statistics given to them, and somehow come out with a fairly consistent history.
The work is so encompassing it is impossible in an Amazon book review to point out all of the prescient ideas presented in a "Monetary History". Here is a short list off the top of my head: 1) money matters in the short-run; 2) active gov't policy can prevent bank panics if correctly implemented; 3) Consistent misperception regarding economics have OFTEN created bad policy (both in the private and public sphere); 4) the gold standard was never good (and we never had anything near an ACTUAL gold standard); 5) An excellent review of business cycle contractions between 1844-1960; 6)Everything you wanted to know about the composition of banking mechanisms from 1867-1960. There are many, many more...
Friedman's "Monetary History" analysis does occasionally feel awkward (this tends to happen when his quantitative analysis does not account for history and he is forced to make qualitative assumptions). 1) The entire Great Contraction rested on the qualitative factor of not having a 'Great Man' running the Federal Reserve; 2) Deflation existed side by side with rapid economic expansion in the 1880's, which Friedman finds interesting, but no attempt is made to ascertain whether monetary issues had any recessionary effects on potential growth; 3) The entire 48-60' analysis exerts a strong ideological stance that did not seem to exist in the earlier chapters. (many more minor hiccups exist and for the most part Friedman is willing to admit when he cannot reasonably prove causation).
However, two major problems exist in the "Monetary History".
1) The assumption that money does not matter in the long-run is unsupported through their analysis. Friedman and Schwartz fail to find any long lasting effects regarding changes in the price level and money stock to changes in economic activity. This view, which is a very simple look at correlations, is essentially embracing a negation. They fail to find a connection between monetary economics and business cycles so it must not exist. Though this view has little empirical evidence it is made several times throughout the work (and in almost every case the statement seems to be completely out of place). The claim that money is 'neutral' has forever changed economics by being included in the Neoclassical Synthesis.
2) Friedman's chapter on the velocity of money is by far the weakest part of his text. After going on for ~700 pages with precise attention to quantitative analysis Friedman is forced to argue, in a mere 3 pages, that changes in velocity must be due to rational expectations (with little empirical evidence). Friedman's assumption that Velocity exhibits a secular decline with rising income is CRUCIAL when analyzing Monetarism. The Quantity Theory of Money states: Money*Velocity=Price*Output --- M*V=P*Y (this is a rearrangement of Fisher's equation -- See Michael Emmett Bradely's review for a far superior theoretical analysis of this equation). If Velocity can be considered constant then changes in M = changes in P*Y. This means all that is needed to have stable business cycles is an unchanging, or better yet a slightly increasing, money supply. HOWEVER, this flawed assumption is why Monetarism is so difficult to implement into policy. Friedman's tentative assumption in his "Monetary History" became the dogma of Monetarism.
"A Monetary History of the US, 1867-1960" is a revolutionary, albeit flawed, canon in economic literature.
When reviewing a classic text it is important to test it on two criteria: 1) it's ingenuity; and, 2) it's validity. In regards to ingenuity "Monetary History" paved the way towards a statistically grounded analysis of macroeconomics (in this case monetary theory). While "Monetary History" was groundbreaking it's truly memorable aspect is Ch7's "The Great Contraction". This chapter, which is now known as the money hypothesis, revolutionized the way economists thought about the Great
Deprhttp://www.amazon.com/review/R1C118WNLAM4I/ref=cm_cr_pr_cmt?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0691137943&nodeID=#wasThisHelpfulession. Ultimately, this analysis proved to be incorrect.
Why the work remains a classic, even though flawed, is because the sheer difficulty in producing such a feat. Friedman and Schwartz managed to put together a comprehensive 100 year monetary history in (a short) 700 pages. The amount of research required to take on such a project is hard to grasp. The footnotes in the "Monetary History" give a small glimpse into how much work was required to create this book. They alone are the size of a mid-sized economic text. Throughout the text the authors synthesis a wide range of evidence, often being forced to recalculate the statistics given to them, and somehow come out with a fairly consistent history.
The work is so encompassing it is impossible in an Amazon book review to point out all of the prescient ideas presented in a "Monetary History". Here is a short list off the top of my head: 1) money matters in the short-run; 2) active gov't policy can prevent bank panics if correctly implemented; 3) Consistent misperception regarding economics have OFTEN created bad policy (both in the private and public sphere); 4) the gold standard was never good (and we never had anything near an ACTUAL gold standard); 5) An excellent review of business cycle contractions between 1844-1960; 6)Everything you wanted to know about the composition of banking mechanisms from 1867-1960. There are many, many more...
Friedman's "Monetary History" analysis does occasionally feel awkward (this tends to happen when his quantitative analysis does not account for history and he is forced to make qualitative assumptions). 1) The entire Great Contraction rested on the qualitative factor of not having a 'Great Man' running the Federal Reserve; 2) Deflation existed side by side with rapid economic expansion in the 1880's, which Friedman finds interesting, but no attempt is made to ascertain whether monetary issues had any recessionary effects on potential growth; 3) The entire 48-60' analysis exerts a strong ideological stance that did not seem to exist in the earlier chapters. (many more minor hiccups exist and for the most part Friedman is willing to admit when he cannot reasonably prove causation).
However, two major problems exist in the "Monetary History".
1) The assumption that money does not matter in the long-run is unsupported through their analysis. Friedman and Schwartz fail to find any long lasting effects regarding changes in the price level and money stock to changes in economic activity. This view, which is a very simple look at correlations, is essentially embracing a negation. They fail to find a connection between monetary economics and business cycles so it must not exist. Though this view has little empirical evidence it is made several times throughout the work (and in almost every case the statement seems to be completely out of place). The claim that money is 'neutral' has forever changed economics by being included in the Neoclassical Synthesis.
2) Friedman's chapter on the velocity of money is by far the weakest part of his text. After going on for ~700 pages with precise attention to quantitative analysis Friedman is forced to argue, in a mere 3 pages, that changes in velocity must be due to rational expectations (with little empirical evidence). Friedman's assumption that Velocity exhibits a secular decline with rising income is CRUCIAL when analyzing Monetarism. The Quantity Theory of Money states: Money*Velocity=Price*Output --- M*V=P*Y (this is a rearrangement of Fisher's equation -- See Michael Emmett Bradely's review for a far superior theoretical analysis of this equation). If Velocity can be considered constant then changes in M = changes in P*Y. This means all that is needed to have stable business cycles is an unchanging, or better yet a slightly increasing, money supply. HOWEVER, this flawed assumption is why Monetarism is so difficult to implement into policy. Friedman's tentative assumption in his "Monetary History" became the dogma of Monetarism.
"A Monetary History of the US, 1867-1960" is a revolutionary, albeit flawed, canon in economic literature.
36 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 5, 2020
Verified Purchase
The book came with the first 68 pages ripped out of it.
Reviewed in the United States on August 15, 2019
Verified Purchase
good to know!
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2017
Verified Purchase
Great!!! A true work of art!
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2014
Verified Purchase
This book (and Golden Fetters) are two seminal works that, had they been read by the top economists in the nation when the Too Big to Fail catastrophe hit, might have found ways to avoid it sooner.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Greg
5.0 out of 5 stars
Must read
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 13, 2020Verified Purchase
Excellent source material
N M Stephens
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Gospel According to Milton
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 26, 2013Verified Purchase
Still one of the great required economics texts. Required reading for all politicians and other "policy makers" - fat chance!
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Nemo
2.0 out of 5 stars
nn perfetta
Reviewed in Italy on November 24, 2020Verified Purchase
Nn aderisce perfettamente...spesso il touch non funziona...protegge ma nn è il massimo
SabRB
3.0 out of 5 stars
Pages are Falling Out Already!
Reviewed in Canada on April 11, 2013Verified Purchase
Content is amazing but the binding of the book sucks! I've had the book for about 2 weeks and 4 pages have already fallen out. Super annoying.
Fischerfan
5.0 out of 5 stars
Heavy Reading
Reviewed in Japan on May 14, 2013Verified Purchase
Don't read this without an Economics dictionary. It's a very technical and at times heavy going book. It's a classic however. It brilliantly explains The Great Depression. It definitely shows , in my opinion, that monetary policy is far more important than fiscal policy. I also recommend, by Milton and Rose Friedman "Free to Choose".
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Deals related to this item
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: accounting theory, business history, crisis management













