- Hardcover: 560 pages
- Publisher: Henry Holt and Co.; F First Edition edition (January 20, 2015)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0805096914
- ISBN-13: 978-0805096910
- Product Dimensions: 6.3 x 1.7 x 9.5 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.7 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (129 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #399,674 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Moral Arc: How Science Makes Us Better People F First Edition Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Make your day Incredibly Easy
Explore these featured medical titles. Learn more
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
From the Publisher
Steven Pinker; Photo Credit: Rebecca Goldstein
Steven Pinker is Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology at Harvard University and the author of The Language Instinct, How the Mind Works, The Blank Slate, The Stuff of Thought, and The Better Angels of Our Nature. His latest book is The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person’s Guide to Writing in the 21st Century. He was named by TIME magazine as one of the top 100 thinkers in the world.
Guest Review of The Moral Arc
Guest review by Steven Pinker
I decided to write The Better Angels of Our Nature when I discovered that violence had declined across many scales of time and magnitude: everything from war and genocide to homicide, infanticide, domestic abuse, and cruelty to animals. The more I looked into the past the more hopeful I became for the future. We have been doing something right, and I tried to figure out what it is and how we can do more of it.
If you wanted a sequel to The Better Angels of Our Nature—one which explores all our spheres of moral progress, not just the decline of violence—Michael Shermer’s The Moral Arc is it. Shermer has engaged the full mantle of moral progress and considered how far we have come and how much farther that arc can be bent toward truth, justice, and freedom. The Moral Arc is a thrilling book, one which could change your view of human history and human destiny. Through copious data and compelling examples Shermer shows how the arc of the moral universe, seen from a historical vantage point, bends toward civil rights and civil liberties, the spread of liberal democracy and market economies, and the expansion of women’s rights, gay rights, and even animal rights. Never in history has such a large percentage of the world’s population enjoyed so much freedom, autonomy, and prosperity.
Shermer also engages the conundrum of free will and responsibility. Though a thoroughgoing materialist, allowing no room for a soul to push our neurons around, he argues that we are volitional beings who must be held accountable for our actions. He explores the implications of this notion of culpability for justice, arguing that the criminal justice system must be reformed to reflect a rational and scientific understanding of human nature, in particular by adding restorative justice to a system that currently is based on retribution.
The themes of The Moral Arc are not just historical but in the headlines. The steadily unfolding revolution of gay marriage gives Shermer the opportunity to show how rights revolutions of many different kinds come about. Shermer devotes two chapters to showing that it is not religion that has been the driver of moral progress, but Enlightenment-inspired emphasis on science and reason. Gay rights and same-sex marriage have been opposed by most religions (the exception are the avowedly liberal religions); the expansion of the moral sphere to include homosexuals is a modern manifestation of the Enlightenment ideals of equal rights and equal treatment under the law.
Finally, Shermer debunks the lazy assumption that science has nothing to say about morals and values. Values we take for granted, such as civil rights and civil liberties, were explored and popularized by Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin, who consciously modeled their reasoning on the greatest scientists of their ages. They considered the project of constructing a liberal democracy and a market economy as a kind of scientific experiment.
The Moral Arc will give any reason-loving, evidence-respecting, scientifically minded reader hope for humanity. It shows that our deepest problems of the past, present, and future may been solved by our ability to reason our way to solutions and persuade our peers that they can be successfully implemented.
“This is one of the best recent books that I have read, and it's the one that I expect to re-read most often. It's an honest, clear account of morality and justice that makes those theoretical concepts come alive as ubiquitous real-life choices. In the process of reading it, you'll learn about wrenching moral dilemmas such as paying ransoms to Somali pirates, maintaining nuclear weapons as deterrents, good people becoming Nazis, and the immorality of the Bible and of the Ten Commandments.” ―Jared Diamond, Pulitzer-prize-winning author of the best-selling books Guns, Germs, and Steel, Collapse, and The World until Yesterday
“I suspect that people will be arguing with Michael Shermer's premise before they read a page: ‘The moral arc is bending toward truth, justice, and freedom? Is he hallucinating? Just look at...' In these cynical times, where right and left foresee disaster and despair (albeit for different reasons), Shermer's monumental opus, spanning centuries, nations, and cultures, is bound to provoke debate and open minds. Exactly what an important work of skepticism, science, and reason should do.” ―Carol Tavris, Ph.D., social psychologist and author of The Mismeasure of Woman and coauthor of Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me)
“A thrilling and fascinating book, which could change your view of human history and human destiny. If you wanted a sequel to The Better Angels of Our Nature, one which explored all of our spheres of moral progress, not just the decline of violence, this is it.” ―Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology at Harvard University and author of The Blank Slate and The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person's Guide to Writing in the 21st Century
“It is difficult to imagine how the arc of morality can bend toward justice without rational examination of the consequences of one's actions. As Michael Shermer passionately describes in this ambitious, thoroughly researched, yet remarkably accessible work of scholarship, the fabric of modern morality derives not from religion, but in large part from secular notions of rational empiricism. This message needs to be shared more broadly for the good our society, and hopefully this book will do just that.” ―Lawrence M. Krauss, Foundation Professor and Director of the Origins Project at Arizona State University, and bestselling author of A Universe from Nothing and The Physics of Star Trek
“Michael Shermer makes the astonishing claim that science, precisely because of its rational, dispassionate, and enlightened attitude towards revealing the truth, has helped to lay the moral groundwork for modern society, pointing the way to a more just and moral world. Instead of being a passive observer to the dance of history and the evolution of ethics, Shermer makes the outrageous claim that science has in fact been one of the principle actors. Bravo, I say.” ―Michio Kaku, theoretical physicist, author of the best seller The Future of the Mind, and Physics of the Future
“Michael Shermer argues that science, reason, and critical thinking come first; these are the ideas that produce stable, peaceful democracies. He documents and assesses society's successes and failures through the troubled history of humankind--and he's relentless. He connects the arc of the rise of reason and science with a country's economic success, and the overall worldwide decline in violence and suppression of our fellow humans, especially women. If you are religious, have a look. Shermer takes your faith to task and celebrates science as a path to the better moral future that citizens everywhere long for.” ―Bill Nye, The Science Guy, CEO, The Planetary Society
“The Moral Arc displays the impressive depth of Michael Shermer's scholarship, wisdom and empathetic humanity, and it climaxes in a visionary flight of futuristic optimism. A memorable book, a book to recommend and discuss late into the night.” ―Richard Dawkins, author of The Selfish Gene and The God Delusion
“Michael Shermer is a beacon of reason in an ocean of irrationality.” ―Neil deGrasse Tyson
About the Author
Michael Shermer is the author of Why People Believe Weird Things, The Believing Brain, and eight other books on the evolution of human beliefs and behavior. He is the founding publisher of Skeptic magazine, the editor of Skeptic.com, a monthly columnist for Scientific American, and an adjunct professor at Claremont Graduate University. He lives in Southern California.
Browse award-winning titles. See more
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
It brings me no joy therefore, to have come to the conclusion that "The Moral Arc" is, if considered as a work promoting a specific thesis, profoundly disjointed and unconvincing. The basic idea, as it were, is that as man becomes more scientific and rational he also necessarily becomes more moral. This is a "grand thesis" that encompasses virtually every aspect of human endeavor, so Shermer's building it up with what are in effect disconnected cherry-picked "data set" (the abolition of slavery over time, enfranchisement, acceptance of gay marriage) building blocks to me is completely unconvincing even if I am inherently sympathetic to the underlying ideas. In many ways, Shermer's anecdotally evidenced thesis embarrassingly mirrors the same sort of flim-flammery that he has elsewhere exposed as the hallmarks of charlatans from astrologers to homeopaths and beyond. Were Shermer's philosophical theorizing more taught and insightful, the whole thing might pass my smell test as an "inductive and reasoned argument towards a semi-important proposition", but, alas, it just doesn't.
At some point in this book, perhaps about where Shermer spends the better part of a page discussing how elephants have been shown to be able to understand human pointing gestures (to a much higher degree of generality than chimpanzees and dogs can), I had to re-look at the cover and ask myself "what, exactly, am I reading here?" The conclusion I came to is this: "The Moral Arc" is a hodgepodge of the well-travelled Shermer's notes from and summaries of a selection of the doubtlessly fascinating lectures, conversations, papers, and books that his hard work and fame have made him privy to over the years. And, even though most adult readers will already be familiar with some of the examples and stories (for example, who of us is not at this point familiar with the Milgram experiment?), others will doubtlessly be new to us. In this newness lies the real value of the book. The "moral arc" theory by contrast seems almost like an afterthought meant to string the examples together. Let me be clear - there very much is good value and good reading in many of the examples. In fact, you can almost pick up the book and start reading at any point to find one.
I am an atheist not because I think that atheism leads to the best of all possible worlds but because I see no credible evidence for god or gods. I am a proponent of rational skepticism and the scientific method because of its descriptive usefulness, not because of its normative possibilities. And while I'd like Shermer's thesis to be true, I also suspect that it's only by dint of historical accident that it might be true. As an atheist, I'd ask the reader to contemplate the full extent of General Omar Bradley's often abbreviated quotation:
"We have men of science, too few men of God. We have grasped the mystery of the atom and rejected the Sermon on the Mount. The world has achieved brilliance without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know about living. If we continue to develop our technology without wisdom or prudence, our servant may prove to be our executioner."
Even as an atheist, I can say that Bradley was on to something--not because of his pushing of any particular religious claims, of course, but because he has correctly allowed for the possibility that science and morality might proceed along orthogonal paths. Shermer is not totally blind to this idea, but still the core thesis of "the Moral Arc" basically falls flat because it posits a stronger causal connection than I think the evidence really supports. We're one nuclear bomb in the hands of a madman away from Shermer's argument failing spectacularly and utterly as it won't be a more moral universe if we are all dead.
Conclusion: read it for the examples, not the thesis. For a more challenging and tautly argued thesis advocating for a new "science of morality", see Sam Harris' "the Moral Landscape."
"The Moral Arc" by Michael Shermer: Recommended, but with reservations.
At the end, I'd like to point out the few errors I came across while reading the book:
1) At location 271, Shermer states that "Reason is . . . through the application of logic and rationality, . . . . Rationality is the application of reason . . . " Isn't this a circular definition?
2) At location 925, "Figures 1-6 and 1-7 show the game matrices that favor cheating and that favor playing by the rules" should instead be, "Figures 1-6 and 1-7 show the game matrices that favor cheating and playing by the rules, respectively."
3) In the second column of Figure 1-7, the figures should be +$0.8 million & -$4.4 million instead of -$0.8 million & +$4.4 million.
4) At location 1469, ". . . although other states (England and Germany) have used them . . . " should be, ". . . although other states (England and Germany) have used it . . . " instead, referring to poison gas.
6) At location 1605, Shermer writes, "the 2013 Boston Marathon bombers were equipped with only one gun for defense and had no money and no exit strategy . . . " Although this statement is factually correct, I think it's inappropriate because it suggests to future bombers to better equip themselves with more guns, more money, and an exit strategy if they want to succeed and not face the Tsarnaev brothers' fate.
7) At location 1885, "killing ‘over a particular man’ . . . " should instead be, "killing ‘over a particular woman’ . . . "
8) At location 2558, "“the empirical findings that pairs of democratic states have a lower risk of interstate conflict than other pairs holds up, . . . " should instead be, "“the empirical findings that pairs of democratic states have a lower risk of interstate conflict than other pairs hold up, . . . "
9) At location 3761, "a total of seven years of slavery isn’t too bad" should instead be, "a total of six years of slavery isn’t too bad." And "Seven years of clubs and chains . . . " should be, "Six years of clubs and chains . . ."
10) At location 3859, "game-theory dynamics (like those we considered in chapter 1) shows . . . " should be, "game-theory dynamics (like those we considered in chapter 1) show . . . "
11) At location 4906, he writes, "millennials (those born after 1979) . . . ", but earlier (in Figure 7-3), and as well established, he declares that millennials are those born after 1981.
12) At location 5050, he writes, "Scaling average brain size across species . . . ". The more accurate comparison is to compare relative brain size to body size.
13) At location 7020, I think "These observations and experiments on conflict and resolution in primates . . . " was meant to be, "These observations and experiments on conflict resolution in primates . . ." instead.
14) At location 7212, ". . . attempts to set to rights the situation; . . . " should instead be, ". . . attempts to set to right the situation; . . ."
15) At location 7880, ". . . 2.1 children/women, . . ." should be, ". . . 2.1 children/woman, . . . " instead.
16) In footnote 80 of Chapter 12, "Bob the Banker has 10,000 shares of Apple stock, and on the same day Joe made $100 Bob netted a sweet $1 million" should instead be, "... Bob netted a sweet $100,000" since 10 x $10,000 shares = $100,000.
17) At location 8264, he writes, "Wilkinson presents an equality-inequality scale that he believes is causing countries (and states within the United States) to have higher rates of homicides, imprisonments, teen pregnancies, and infant mortality, but lower levels of life expectancy, math and literacy, trust, obesity, mental illness (including drugs and alcohol addiction), stress, and social mobility." I find this statement internally inconsistent or contradictory.