The Much Too Promised Land: America's Elusive Search for Arab-Israeli Peace

Comprar nuevo
-41% US$15.29US$15.29
Enviado por: Amazon Vendido por: EpiCommerce
Más información
Devolver gratis este producto
Ofrecemos retornos fáciles y prácticos con al menos una opción de retorno gratuito: sin gastos de envío. Todos los retornos deben cumplir con nuestra política de retornos.
Más información sobre las devoluciones gratis.- Ve a tus pedidos y empieza el proceso de devolución
- Seleccione su opción de envío gratis preferida
- Entregar y marcharse
Ahorra con Usado - Bueno
US$8.11US$8.11
Enviado por: Amazon Vendido por: 123 Books Central
Devolver gratis este producto
Ofrecemos retornos fáciles y prácticos con al menos una opción de retorno gratuito: sin gastos de envío. Todos los retornos deben cumplir con nuestra política de retornos.
Más información sobre las devoluciones gratis.- Ve a tus pedidos y empieza el proceso de devolución
- Seleccione su opción de envío gratis preferida
- Entregar y marcharse
Más información
Devolver gratis este producto
Ofrecemos retornos fáciles y prácticos con al menos una opción de retorno gratuito: sin gastos de envío. Todos los retornos deben cumplir con nuestra política de retornos.
Más información sobre las devoluciones gratis.- Ve a tus pedidos y empieza el proceso de devolución
- Seleccione su opción de envío gratis preferida
- Entregar y marcharse
Otros vendedores en Amazon
Detalles del libro
- Número de páginas416 páginas
- IdiomaInglés
- EditorialBantam
- Fecha de publicación25 Marzo 2008
- Dimensiones6.35 x 1.35 x 9.35 pulgadas
- ISBN-100553804901
- ISBN-13978-0553804904
As a historian, analyst, and negotiator, perhaps no one is more qualified to answer these questions than Aaron David Miller. Without partisanship or finger-pointing, Miller lucidly and honestly records what went right, what went wrong, and how we got where we are today. Here is an insider’s view of the peace process from a place at the negotiating table, filled with unforgettable stories and colorful behind-the-scenes anecdotes. Here, too, are new interviews with all the key players, including Presidents Carter, Ford, Bush forty-one, all nine U.S. secretaries of state, as well Arab and Israeli leaders, who disclose the inner thoughts and strategies that motivated them. The result is a book that shatters all preconceived notions to tackle the complicated issues of culture, religion, domestic politics, and national security that have defined—and often derailed—a half century of diplomacy.
Honest, critical, and certain to be controversial, this insightful first-person account offers a brilliant new analysis of the problem of Arab-Israeli peace and how, against all odds, it still might be solved.
De Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Críticas
"Aaron Miller has written the most definitive and insightful work on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the attempts to mediate it. He possesses a depth of experience and understanding of this complex situation that is unmatched by anybody else who has participated in this process. His passion, intellect, knowledge, and common sense were invaluable in our tenure as mediators. The Much Too Promised Land is a must read for those who desire a true understanding of the most critical peace issue of our time."—General Anthony C. Zinni USMC (Retired)
“This book is absolutely necessary reading for anyone who cares about a Middle East peace. Aaron David Miller recounts the history of negotiations based on his deep personal involvement. Not only is it a fascinating tale, it helps us better understand the solution that someday will be possible.”–Walter Isaacson, author of Einstein: His Life and Universe
“Aaron David Miller presents a candid insight into the Middle East peace process. His storytelling gifts make the pages difficult to resist as he moves from anecdote to analysis, and offers an intimate portrayal of the minds and personalities of the major players. This is an unpredictable and challenging book.” —George J. Mitchell
“Aaron David Miller shines a floodlight on the workings of America's Middle East policy. He has written the rarest kind of diplomatic history—both knowing and accessible. This is a book peopled by large, historic figures—Arabs, Israelis, and Americans, and Aaron Miller renders them with artistry. He was there as this diplomatic history was made, and he distills it for his readers with honesty and wisdom and no small measure of irreverence. A superb and exquisitely rendered book.”—Fouad Ajami, Majid Khadduri Professor of Middle East Studies, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies
"In this absorbing volume, as one who participated in numerous high level negotiations on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Aaron Miller offers both information and insight to interested and concerned readers."—Elie Wiesel
“Illuminating... the value of the book is its rich and colorful history of past negotiations, and Miller's sharp-edged analysis of what went wrong and right. Memo to the secretary of state: The next time you head off to Jerusalem, throw out some of those briefing papers to make room for this book in your briefcase.”—Washington Post
“Extraordinary…. Miller evinces genuine compassion for both sides in the conflict … while maintaining a detachment that allows him to draw hard conclusions…. Miller’s writing is both approachable and deeply smart.”–Publishers Weekly, starred review
“Combines memoir with what might be called a primer on diplomacy…. Recommended reading for the next administration, if not this one.”–Kirkus Reviews
“A book of great significance, owing to its breadth, objectivity, and judgment.”—Library Journal, starred review
"Insightful.... [Including] a nuanced meditation on the interface between U.S. domestic politics and the situation in the middle East…. A spirited and intimate account."—Foreign Affairs
Biografía del autor
For the prior two decades, he served at the Department of State as an advisor to six secretaries of state, where he helped formulate U.S. policy on the Middle East and the Arab-Israel peace process, most recently as the Senior Advisor for Arab-Israeli Negotiations. He also served as the Deputy Special Middle East Coordinator for Arab-Israeli Negotiations, Senior Member of the State Department's Policy Planning Staff, in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, and in the Office of the Historian. He has received the department's Distinguished, Superior, and Meritorious Honor Awards.
Mr. Miller received his Ph.D. in American Diplomatic and Middle East History from the University of Michigan in 1977 and joined the State Department the following year. During 1982 and 1983, he was a Council on Foreign Relations fellow and a resident scholar at the Georgetown Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 1984 he served a temporary tour at the American Embassy in Amman, Jordan. Between 1998 and 2000, Mr. Miller served on the United States Holocaust Memorial Council. After leaving the state department, Mr. Miller served as president of Seeds of Peace from January 2003 until January 2006. Seeds of Peace is a nonprofit organization dedicated to empowering young leaders from regions of conflict with the leadership skills required to advance reconciliation and coexistence (www.seedsofpeace.org).
His media and speaking appearances include CNN (including “American Morning,” “Wolf Blitzer Reports,”), “The Newshour with Jim Lehrer,” FOX News, “The NBC Nightly News,” “CBS Evening News,” National Public Radio, the BBC, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Al Arabiya, and Al Jazeera. Mr. Miller has also been a featured presenter for the World Economic Forum in Davos and Amman, Harvard University, Columbia University, New York University, University of California at Berkeley, The City Club of Cleveland, Chatham House, and The International Institute for Strategic Studies. He has written three prior books on the Middle East and his articles have appeared in newspapers, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and The International Herald Tribune.
Mr. Miller lives in Chevy Chase, Maryland, with his wife, Lindsay. They have two children: a daughter, Jennifer, and a son, Daniel.
Extracto. © Reimpreso con autorización. Reservados todos los derechos.
A Negotiator's Tale
The room was packed. Secretary Baker's press secretary and close advisor, Margaret Tutwiler, had seen to that. Late Friday afternoon in Jerusalem-usually a time of quiet preparation for the Jewish Sabbath-had suddenly seen a frenzy of excitement. As scores of journalists had gathered in the banquet hall of the King David Hotel to await the arrival of the American secretary of state and the Russian foreign minister, anticipation was high.
The two men now entering the hall could not have represented a greater contrast in style or power. Boris Pankin, clad in a dark boxy Soviet-era suit out of the 1950s, embodied a once great empire in decline. Hungry for prestige and respectability, the Russians seemed not to care that they were being used as a decorative ornament in a ceremony orchestrated by the United States. And if they did care, they weren't complaining.
By contrast, Secretary of State James Addison Baker III was riding high. Tall and self-assured, he wore a dark suit, a crisp white shirt, and a trademark boldly colored tie. He had reason to be confident. Baker represented a country that was enjoying unprecedented influence in a region still shaken by America's lightning military victory over Iraq's Saddam Hussein.
On that late Friday afternoon, October 18, 1991, Baker and Pankin, on behalf of their presidents, Bush and Gorbachev, announced that formal invitations would be sent to Israel and to the Arabs to attend a historic peace conference in Madrid. That fall the United States was the only great power in an arc of small ones that stretched from Rabat to Karachi. If there was to be an American moment in the Middle East, this was surely it. And Baker knew that the moment might not last long. Later that day in Jerusalem he would quip with characteristic caution, "Boys, if you want to get off the train, now might be a good time because it could all be downhill from here."
I had no intention of getting off the train. For me the ride was only just beginning. The nine-month period of nonstop diplomacy in the run-up to the Madrid conference had been the most exciting time of my professional life. A dozen years had passed since Jimmy Carter's heroic success in bringing Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin to a peace agreement. And while holding a peace conference of procedures like Madrid was certainly not the same as achieving a peace treaty of consequence between Egypt and Israel, it was still the most important breakthrough in Arab-Israeli peacemaking in more than a decade. To me, Madrid was reason enough to believe that with enough will and determination, American diplomacy could fashion something positive and hopeful from the raw material of a turbulent changing region. And I could become part of it. I had become a believer.
Banking on No
As I look back now, it astonishes me that I ever got into the business of negotiations and diplomacy. Changing the world was definitely part of my family's history, but while I was growing up, it wasn’t part of my personal temperament or interest. Born into an affluent Cleveland real estate family, I had parents and grandparents who were leaders in both the Jewish and the secular communities. During the 1950s my grandfather Leonard Ratner had been active in Zionist politics and philanthropy and would count Israel's first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, and its fourth, Golda Meir, as personal friends. Leonard was an extraordinary man, an immigrant from Poland, one of nine brothers and sisters, who with piety, love of family, and an uncanny business acumen had sought his fortune in America, made one in the lumber and later the real estate business. My grandfather's love of Judaism and family was rivaled only by his passion for service to the community. He would talk to me endlessly about the importance of the Talmudic concept of tikkun olam, or "fixing the world." I'd listen respectfully, wondering most of the time what it had to do with me.
My father, Sam, a brilliant, driven man, was as tough, smart, and intimidating as anyone I'd ever known. Born to Russian immigrant parents, he'd served in the navy at Guadalcanal, then went to Harvard, married my mother, and entered the family real estate business, where his toughness and smarts made him an indispensable asset in dealing with the unions and zoning boards. Like so many second-generation American Jews, he was captivated by Israel's stunning military victory in 1967. Unlike most, he struck up close personal ties with Israeli prime ministers Begin and Rabin. A masterful fund-raiser for Cleveland's Jewish community and for Israel, he used persuasion, and, when needed, pressure. According to one story, he camped all night long outside the hotel room of a reluctant donor until the guy came up with an appropriate pledge for the United Jewish Appeal.
My father's view of the world was a grim one. And while he was tied deeply to America and its promise of success, his Jewish identity also ran deep. For him, the dark cloud of anti-Semitism and the Holocaust were ever present. He once challenged my brothers, sister, and me to name three of our non-Jewish friends who would hide us in the event the Nazis took over America. No matter how hard we tried, we could never win this game. To my father, Israel and the Jews were constantly in jeopardy, and in the end they could rely only on themselves. That in his later years he has emerged as a key philanthropist in both the Catholic and the black communities is a testament to a broader worldview not evident then. But growing up I remember him as a guy for whom the glass, at least when it came to what non-Jews would do for Jews, was half empty at best.
If my father's view of the world was based on what was probable, my mother Ruth's was based on its possibilities. She was a remarkable woman, way ahead of her time. Having never finished college, she went back for a Ph.D. in educational psychology. Active in Cleveland city politics as health director and community development director, she ran unsuccessfully for Congress in 1980 and was active at the national level in Republican Party politics, representing the United States abroad on women's issues and serving on the United States Holocaust Memorial Council. She later went on to represent the family's real estate interests in Washington and to lead its development of downtown Cleveland.
For my mother, nothing was impossible. She saw life as a glass neither half full nor half empty but filling every day with new challenges, setbacks, and opportunities. What mattered in life, according to my mother, was how you handled these challenges. She taught me to look for the good in people, to accept their imperfections, and to believe in the capacity of human beings to change for the better.
Since I had powerful parents and grandparents who had a history of doing something about the world's problems rather than just talking about them, I of course shied away from anything to do with such aims. When I was thirteen, I made an obligatory bar mitzvah trip to Israel, and I made another with friends as part of a European excursion at twenty-one. My parents even created opportunities for me to meet important Israelis. During that second trip to Israel I attended a Druze wedding party in the hills near Haifa as the guest of my parents' friend Avraham Yoffe, one of Israel's storied military heroes in the 1956 Suez campaign. One of the other invitees was a slim and energetic Ariel Sharon, then commander of Israel's Southern Front, who arrived by jeep and within minutes was hugging and kissing the relatives as if he were a member of the family. At lunch I watched our Druze hosts crack the skull of a young lamb and offer its brains to the special guests. Sharon and Yoffe were eating and appeared to be enjoying themselves, so I had no choice. It was my first but not my last culinary adventure in the Holy Land.
Nonetheless I steered clear of anything that was either serious or political in nature, or that required a commitment. In fact, my parents nicknamed me Hamlet because they saw me as indecisive, contemplative, and rarely engaged. Growing up, I cared about only two things: playing tennis and reading history-in that order. Instead of doing something useful or educational during the summers, I played tournaments, taught tennis, or just goofed off. When my hope to compete in tennis at the college level went bust, I fell back on academics, specifically the pursuit of a Ph.D. in American history.
To this day, the exact reason for my professional interest in the Middle East is still not clear. I was Jewish and had been to Israel a couple of times, but I was by no means active or interested in Jewish or Zionist politics. My entry point into the Middle East was undoubtedly my Jewish upbringing and family connections. But I knew that mine was a narrow view of the region, seen from a highly skewed perspective. When it came to Israel, I had never been all that comfortable with the insular and exclusive Jewish vantage points of much of the Jewish community and of my parents. I saw myself as an American who happened to be Jewish, not the other way around. Nor did I like the tendency to divide the world into Jews and non-Jews and to assume the worst about the latter. Intellectually and emotionally pulled by the secular non-Jewish world, I was open to a vantage point that was broader and more complex. A fair amount of my discontent was the natural rebellious soul-searching of a twenty-something acting out against parental controls and values. But it felt good, and it was something I owned.
As an undergraduate at the University of Michigan, I had taken a couple of Middle East history courses from Richard Mitchell, a former Foreign Service officer who had written the authoritative study on the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. I'm sure it's still true for college kids today: there are people whom you meet along the way, outside friends and family, who can have a real impact on you and who, at the risk of sounding dramatic, can change yo...
Sobre el autor
Sigue a los autores para recibir notificaciones de sus nuevas obras, así como recomendaciones mejoradas.Comprados juntos habitualmente
Comprados juntos habitualmente

También podría interesarte
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
Funciones y detalles
Características
- Subrayar, tomar notas, y buscar en el libro
Información de producto
| Editorial | Bantam; Primera edición (25 Marzo 2008) |
|---|---|
| Idioma | Inglés |
| Tapa dura | 416 páginas |
| ISBN-10 | 0553804901 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-0553804904 |
| Dimensiones | 6.35 x 1.35 x 9.35 pulgadas |
| Clasificación en los más vendidos de Amazon |
nº1,094,021 en Libros (Ver el Top 100 en Libros)
nº705 en Política Africana
nº1,445 en Política de Medio Oriente
nº1,461 en Historia de Israel (Libros)
|
| Opinión media de los clientes | 4.5 de 5 estrellas 57Opiniones |
Los clientes que compraron este producto también compraron
También podría interesarte
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
-  
Opiniones destacadas de los Estados Unidos
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaForthrightCalificado en Estados Unidos el 1 de julio de 2009I feel that this title is quite appropriate for this work. I found Aaron Miller's book to be a forthright and honest attempt at a historical analysis. What I found so refreshing though was the author's level of honesty. It is hard enough to find books that... Ver másI feel that this title is quite appropriate for this work. I found Aaron Miller's book to be a forthright and honest attempt at a historical analysis. What I found so refreshing though was the author's level of honesty. It is hard enough to find books that attempt a balanced view of these issues without adding to it the fact that the writer was very much an active participant in the very history they are attempting to analyze. I felt as if there were no attempt to whitewash or to put a better face on his or the US's role in this history, and so that makes this a very important book. While I may not always agree with his analysis, this disagreement is due to my interpreting the facts differently rather than over how the author has laid out the facts.
The book has a colloquial and anecdotal style that I normally cannot stand, but I think Miller did an excellent job mixing the anecdotal with the scholarly. I didn't find that the style detracted from the substance at all which is the usual problem I have with such works. Instead the style gives the reader a greater feel for how diplomacy works. The interviews and anecdotes bring US diplomacy down from the ethereal plains back down to the human level. Readers get the opportunity to see just how difficult these negotiations really are. It isn't this abstract chess board were large pieces are moved, but rather it is on the personal level where participants thrash out differences face to face. One gets to see just how much personalities play in diplomacy, and we get to see that this diplomacy is the work of hundreds of people and it evolves over time. Today's failure may be the ground work for tomorrow's breakthrough.
I really liked his look into the role of pro-Israel lobbying groups in the US. I think his analysis is very important. These lobbyists are neither all-powerful hands guiding US policy but neither are they completely benign. They are nothing nefarious though. These groups are doing nothing but using the US system to advocate for their policies. This is perfectly legal, and it is essentially the American way of doing politics. My only problem is that I feel these groups have a certain negative impact on US policy in that they have the affect of making the Israeli perspective the default position of US governments. This does affect our balance, and our ability to be honest arbiters in this conflict. This doesn't mean that the US policy can't be affective or that it is forever tilted to the Israelis, but it does mean that more often than not the US is looking at any problems that arise from the Israeli viewpoint rather than from a balanced perspective. The author explains this very well, and also shows how this tilt towards Israel can have benefits as well.
My one fundamental disagreement with this author's analysis is on the Camp David summit under Clinton. The author asserts that the US's unpreparedness was not a critical error that ensured the failure of these negotiations. The author explains that there were still huge gaps between the two sides along with big problems with trust between the sides and constituencies in Israel and the Arab world. While all of this is true, and the possibility of getting substantive agreements from both sides was remote, the fact that the US was unprepared and scrambling during these talks ensured that the two sides would fail to bridge the gap. The US gave too much deference to Israeli political constraints and this sullied the US negotiators from the outset. The US team should have come into these talks armed with a working paper that would have had both sides screaming and threatening to walk out, but instead they allowed the Israelis to have a hand in the drafting of the US starting position. In the end these talks were probably doomed to failure before they ever began, but the US team ensured that failure by not being prepared. Both the Israelis and Palestinians needed a tough and robust arbiter at Camp David to push, cajole and extort the two sides into bridging gaps instead they were largely lead by unfolding events.
All in all this is a great book that will inform all readers. The author takes a very balanced approach that offers readers a valuable perspective. I highly recommend this work.
I feel that this title is quite appropriate for this work. I found Aaron Miller's book to be a forthright and honest attempt at a historical analysis. What I found so refreshing though was the author's level of honesty. It is hard enough to find books that attempt a balanced view of these issues without adding to it the fact that the writer was very much an active participant in the very history they are attempting to analyze. I felt as if there were no attempt to whitewash or to put a better face on his or the US's role in this history, and so that makes this a very important book. While I may not always agree with his analysis, this disagreement is due to my interpreting the facts differently rather than over how the author has laid out the facts.
The book has a colloquial and anecdotal style that I normally cannot stand, but I think Miller did an excellent job mixing the anecdotal with the scholarly. I didn't find that the style detracted from the substance at all which is the usual problem I have with such works. Instead the style gives the reader a greater feel for how diplomacy works. The interviews and anecdotes bring US diplomacy down from the ethereal plains back down to the human level. Readers get the opportunity to see just how difficult these negotiations really are. It isn't this abstract chess board were large pieces are moved, but rather it is on the personal level where participants thrash out differences face to face. One gets to see just how much personalities play in diplomacy, and we get to see that this diplomacy is the work of hundreds of people and it evolves over time. Today's failure may be the ground work for tomorrow's breakthrough.
I really liked his look into the role of pro-Israel lobbying groups in the US. I think his analysis is very important. These lobbyists are neither all-powerful hands guiding US policy but neither are they completely benign. They are nothing nefarious though. These groups are doing nothing but using the US system to advocate for their policies. This is perfectly legal, and it is essentially the American way of doing politics. My only problem is that I feel these groups have a certain negative impact on US policy in that they have the affect of making the Israeli perspective the default position of US governments. This does affect our balance, and our ability to be honest arbiters in this conflict. This doesn't mean that the US policy can't be affective or that it is forever tilted to the Israelis, but it does mean that more often than not the US is looking at any problems that arise from the Israeli viewpoint rather than from a balanced perspective. The author explains this very well, and also shows how this tilt towards Israel can have benefits as well.
My one fundamental disagreement with this author's analysis is on the Camp David summit under Clinton. The author asserts that the US's unpreparedness was not a critical error that ensured the failure of these negotiations. The author explains that there were still huge gaps between the two sides along with big problems with trust between the sides and constituencies in Israel and the Arab world. While all of this is true, and the possibility of getting substantive agreements from both sides was remote, the fact that the US was unprepared and scrambling during these talks ensured that the two sides would fail to bridge the gap. The US gave too much deference to Israeli political constraints and this sullied the US negotiators from the outset. The US team should have come into these talks armed with a working paper that would have had both sides screaming and threatening to walk out, but instead they allowed the Israelis to have a hand in the drafting of the US starting position. In the end these talks were probably doomed to failure before they ever began, but the US team ensured that failure by not being prepared. Both the Israelis and Palestinians needed a tough and robust arbiter at Camp David to push, cajole and extort the two sides into bridging gaps instead they were largely lead by unfolding events.
All in all this is a great book that will inform all readers. The author takes a very balanced approach that offers readers a valuable perspective. I highly recommend this work.
- 4.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaA much too personal bookCalificado en Estados Unidos el 21 de junio de 2008I bought the audio cd version of this book, which I heard on a 500 mile drive. The book is a combination of history and insight, with the author's perspective. It was much more personal than detached. He is positive about both Democratic and Republican President for... Ver másI bought the audio cd version of this book, which I heard on a 500 mile drive. The book is a combination of history and insight, with the author's perspective. It was much more personal than detached. He is positive about both Democratic and Republican President for whom he has worked, but not afraid to discuss their shortcomings. He was there, on the front lines, as a negotiator.
I enjoyed the books, and would recommend it, but would have bought an abridged edition had it been available.
I bought the audio cd version of this book, which I heard on a 500 mile drive. The book is a combination of history and insight, with the author's perspective. It was much more personal than detached. He is positive about both Democratic and Republican President for whom he has worked, but not afraid to discuss their shortcomings. He was there, on the front lines, as a negotiator.
I enjoyed the books, and would recommend it, but would have bought an abridged edition had it been available.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaA realistic look at the Middle East situationCalificado en Estados Unidos el 22 de julio de 2014Americans who think this nation can put an immediate halt to the conflicts of the Middle East by simply waving our power around need to read this book and seriously think about what it says. Aaron David Miller has spent much of his life trying to bring some kind of peace to... Ver másAmericans who think this nation can put an immediate halt to the conflicts of the Middle East by simply waving our power around need to read this book and seriously think about what it says. Aaron David Miller has spent much of his life trying to bring some kind of peace to the region, and knows the difficulties the task entails. He makes an important point that most Americans do not think of: there is the Palestinian view of the conflict, the Israeli view of the conflict, and the American view of the conflict -- and none of them are the same. The successes American diplomacy has enjoyed have largely come about because the diplomats involved -- and Miller is specific about three of them -- found issues that could be resolved because the Palestinians and the Israelis and other nations in the region felt they benefited from them. All of these successes were limited in nature, but they have stood the test of time. Miller's retirement from the government diplomatic corps is a loss to the corps, but this book provides a much-needed look at the Middle East, and particularly the Palestinian-Israeli situation, that we could not possibly of had if Miller were still with the government.
Americans who think this nation can put an immediate halt to the conflicts of the Middle East by simply waving our power around need to read this book and seriously think about what it says. Aaron David Miller has spent much of his life trying to bring some kind of peace to the region, and knows the difficulties the task entails. He makes an important point that most Americans do not think of: there is the Palestinian view of the conflict, the Israeli view of the conflict, and the American view of the conflict -- and none of them are the same. The successes American diplomacy has enjoyed have largely come about because the diplomats involved -- and Miller is specific about three of them -- found issues that could be resolved because the Palestinians and the Israelis and other nations in the region felt they benefited from them. All of these successes were limited in nature, but they have stood the test of time. Miller's retirement from the government diplomatic corps is a loss to the corps, but this book provides a much-needed look at the Middle East, and particularly the Palestinian-Israeli situation, that we could not possibly of had if Miller were still with the government.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaImperative to read this bookCalificado en Estados Unidos el 9 de mayo de 2008Arron David Brown's The Much Too Promised Land presents a well written history of the Arab - Israeli conflict since its inception in 1948. Brown, who served in the State Department for over 25 years, and served under both Democratic and Republican administrations,... Ver másArron David Brown's The Much Too Promised Land presents a well written history of the Arab - Israeli conflict since its inception in 1948. Brown, who served in the State Department for over 25 years, and served under both Democratic and Republican administrations, maintains a nonpartisan approach in his analysis. No one will deny Israel's right to exist, especially as it is presently celebrating its 60th year of independence. Yet, the plight of the Palestinians is a real one, and they are under the occupation of the Israelis. I would hope that the 2008 presidential candidates read this book, along with anyone else who would like to see peace in this volatile region of the world.
Arron David Brown's The Much Too Promised Land presents a well written history of the Arab - Israeli conflict since its inception in 1948. Brown, who served in the State Department for over 25 years, and served under both Democratic and Republican administrations, maintains a nonpartisan approach in his analysis. No one will deny Israel's right to exist, especially as it is presently celebrating its 60th year of independence. Yet, the plight of the Palestinians is a real one, and they are under the occupation of the Israelis. I would hope that the 2008 presidential candidates read this book, along with anyone else who would like to see peace in this volatile region of the world.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaA Must-ReadCalificado en Estados Unidos el 16 de diciembre de 2009This book is an absolute must-read for those interested in the Middle East, specifically the Arab-Israeli conflict. Miller's analysis is deep and thorough and his honesty about the successes and failures (including his own) of the peace process is incredibly refreshing.... Ver másThis book is an absolute must-read for those interested in the Middle East, specifically the Arab-Israeli conflict. Miller's analysis is deep and thorough and his honesty about the successes and failures (including his own) of the peace process is incredibly refreshing. Miller is upfront about his own leanings, but presents a book that is admirably well-balanced. On top of it all, Miller's writing style and anecdotes make the book quite enjoyable to read. You couldn't go wrong with this source on the Arab-Israeli conflict.
This book is an absolute must-read for those interested in the Middle East, specifically the Arab-Israeli conflict. Miller's analysis is deep and thorough and his honesty about the successes and failures (including his own) of the peace process is incredibly refreshing. Miller is upfront about his own leanings, but presents a book that is admirably well-balanced. On top of it all, Miller's writing style and anecdotes make the book quite enjoyable to read. You couldn't go wrong with this source on the Arab-Israeli conflict.
- 4.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaGreat Title, Great Insight into a very confusing and controverial topicCalificado en Estados Unidos el 24 de septiembre de 2013Miller provides a very personal and down to earth view of his experiences as well as historical information in this well written and very detailed account of his involvement in the Middle East and role as a negotiator for the US over his 20 year career.
Miller provides a very personal and down to earth view of his experiences as well as historical information in this well written and very detailed account of his involvement in the Middle East and role as a negotiator for the US over his 20 year career.
- 3.0 de 5 estrellasSomewhat enlighteningCalificado en Estados Unidos el 27 de abril de 2012I read the first 100 pages of the book, then read randomly chosen sections of later chapters. Although I find the perspective of the author to be refreshingly honest about himself, about the environment he grew up in and about his and his colleagues' short-comings as... Ver másI read the first 100 pages of the book, then read randomly chosen sections of later chapters. Although I find the perspective of the author to be refreshingly honest about himself, about the environment he grew up in and about his and his colleagues' short-comings as negotiators, analysts and advisors for USA officials, I did not find the information particularly revealing nor insightful about Israeli, Israelis, Palestine and Palestinians.
I agree with one or more of the earlier reviewers here that the book may best be described as a memoir, similar to those written by many other former officials in any government, including that of the USA. Despite the fact that Mr. Miller holds a doctorate, there is nothing scholarly about the book. It deals almost exclusively with personalities, mostly high-profile personalities, such as USA Presidents, USA Secretaries of State, Israeli prime ministers and Yasser Arafat, among other Arabs or Egyptians, with whom Mr. Miller had contact in his various roles as a USA negotiator and diplomat.
Mr. Miller was employed primarily by Republican Administrations and therefore focuses much attention on officials in those Administrations, notably the one-time Secretary of State, James Baker. Interestingly, Mr. Miller notes that the George Bush Senior Administration, in which Mr. Baker served as Secretary of State, was the most neutral towards Israel among all USA Administrations since the early 1970s. The word "neutral" is only relative in that the policies of the George Bush Senior Administration were the least fawning and accommodating to Israeli governments of all USA Administrations in the last 40 years or so.
I decided to read this book after reading a few excellent reviews of other books by another reviewer of this book, MJ Rosenberg. Regrettably I cannot agree with MJ Rosenberg on this one. I would highly recommend to those who are interested in gaining a better understanding of Israel-Palestine and of related issues the scholarly, but very well-written, The Iron Wall, by Prof. Avi Shlaim, a Jew of Iraqi birth who is a professor at Oxford University. That book is truly superb, detailed and insightful.
I read the first 100 pages of the book, then read randomly chosen sections of later chapters. Although I find the perspective of the author to be refreshingly honest about himself, about the environment he grew up in and about his and his colleagues' short-comings as negotiators, analysts and advisors for USA officials, I did not find the information particularly revealing nor insightful about Israeli, Israelis, Palestine and Palestinians.
I agree with one or more of the earlier reviewers here that the book may best be described as a memoir, similar to those written by many other former officials in any government, including that of the USA. Despite the fact that Mr. Miller holds a doctorate, there is nothing scholarly about the book. It deals almost exclusively with personalities, mostly high-profile personalities, such as USA Presidents, USA Secretaries of State, Israeli prime ministers and Yasser Arafat, among other Arabs or Egyptians, with whom Mr. Miller had contact in his various roles as a USA negotiator and diplomat.
Mr. Miller was employed primarily by Republican Administrations and therefore focuses much attention on officials in those Administrations, notably the one-time Secretary of State, James Baker. Interestingly, Mr. Miller notes that the George Bush Senior Administration, in which Mr. Baker served as Secretary of State, was the most neutral towards Israel among all USA Administrations since the early 1970s. The word "neutral" is only relative in that the policies of the George Bush Senior Administration were the least fawning and accommodating to Israeli governments of all USA Administrations in the last 40 years or so.
I decided to read this book after reading a few excellent reviews of other books by another reviewer of this book, MJ Rosenberg. Regrettably I cannot agree with MJ Rosenberg on this one. I would highly recommend to those who are interested in gaining a better understanding of Israel-Palestine and of related issues the scholarly, but very well-written, The Iron Wall, by Prof. Avi Shlaim, a Jew of Iraqi birth who is a professor at Oxford University. That book is truly superb, detailed and insightful.
- 5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaA great book - superb dealerCalificado en Estados Unidos el 17 de abril de 2013This is a great in-depth look at the mideast. Dr. Miller's expertise along with the depth of his experience provides the listener with a superb analysis of the many facets of problems facing peace in the mideast. The dealer, as well offers fast delivery and... Ver másThis is a great in-depth look at the mideast. Dr. Miller's expertise along with the depth of his experience provides the listener with a superb analysis of the many facets of problems facing peace in the mideast. The dealer, as well offers fast delivery and professional handling. I would give this six stars.
This is a great in-depth look at the mideast. Dr. Miller's expertise along with the depth of his experience provides the listener with a superb analysis of the many facets of problems facing peace in the mideast. The dealer, as well offers fast delivery and professional handling. I would give this six stars.
Opiniones más destacadas de otros países
- Traducir todas las opiniones al Español
Leslie5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaFive StarsCalificado en Reino Unido el 2 de septiembre de 2016goodgood
Arnaud754.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaTrès intéressantCalificado en Francia el 13 de mayo de 2012L'auteur nous plonge dans les arcanes de la diplomatie américaine au Proche Orient, et révèle le dessous des négociations de Camp David. A lire pour tous ceux qui veulement comprendre la complexité du processus de Paix.L'auteur nous plonge dans les arcanes de la diplomatie américaine au Proche Orient, et révèle le dessous des négociations de Camp David. A lire pour tous ceux qui veulement comprendre la complexité du processus de Paix.
david kahn5.0 de 5 estrellasCompra verificadaFive StarsCalificado en Reino Unido el 4 de septiembre de 2014excellent quality and prompt delivery.excellent quality and prompt delivery.
Escribir una opinión
Cómo funcionan las opiniones y calificaciones de clientes
Las opiniones de clientes, incluidas las valoraciones de productos ayudan a que los clientes conozcan más acerca del producto y decidan si es el producto adecuado para ellos.Más información sobre cómo funcionan las opiniones de clientes en Amazon





