Buying Options
| Kindle Price: | $1.99 |
| Sold by: | Hachette Book Group Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Mud, Blood and Poppycock: Britain and the Great War (Cassell Military Paperbacks) Kindle Edition
| Gordon Corrigan (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
The true story of how Britain won the First World War.
The popular view of the First World War remains that of BLACKADDER: incompetent generals sending brave soldiers to their deaths. Alan Clark quoted a German general's remark that the British soldiers were 'lions led by donkeys'. But he made it up.
Indeed, many established 'facts' about 1914-18 turn out to be myths woven in the 1960s by young historians on the make. Gordon Corrigan's brilliant, witty history reveals how out of touch we have become with the soldiers of 1914-18. They simply would not recognize the way their generation is depicted on TV or in Pat Barker's novels.
Laced with dry humour, this will overturn everything you thought you knew about Britain and the First World War. Gordon Corrigan reveals how the British embraced technology, and developed the weapons and tactics to break through the enemy trenches.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherWeidenfeld & Nicolson
- Publication dateDecember 20, 2012
- File size3202 KB
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B00GU32XSS
- Publisher : Weidenfeld & Nicolson (December 20, 2012)
- Publication date : December 20, 2012
- Language : English
- File size : 3202 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 432 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #739,902 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #487 in World War I History (Kindle Store)
- #1,369 in World War I History (Books)
- #1,409 in History of United Kingdom
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Major JGH Corrigan MBE FRHistS. Gordon Corrigan was commissioned from the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst in 1962 and was an officer of the permanent cadre of the Royal Gurkha Rifles before leaving the army in 1998. He served mainly in the Far East but also in Cyprus, Berlin, Belize and N Ireland. He was awarded the MBE (military) for setting up and commanding the first Brigade of Gurkhas depot in the UK. He is now a professional historian. He is the author of Sepoys in the Trenches, The Indian Corps on the Western Front 1914 – 1915, (Spellmount, 1999); Wellington, A Military Life, (Hambledon & London, 2001); Mud, Blood and Poppycock: Britain and the First World War (Cassell & Co, 2003); Loos 1915, The Unwanted Battle (Spellmount, 2006); Blood, Sweat and Arrogance – And The Myths of Churchill’s War (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2006); The Second World War – A Military History (Atlantic Books 2010); A Great and Glorious Adventure – A Military History of the Hundred Years War (Atlantic Books 2013) and Waterloo – A New History of the Battle and its Armies (Atlantic Books 2014) and numerous E books. His television appearances include The Gurkhas, Napoleon’s Waterloo and Battlefield Detectives, and so far he has presented five series on various aspects of military history. He has conducted military history study tours in Europe, N Africa and Asia and is a regular lecturer on cruises with Noble Caledonia and on rail journeys in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and China with Golden Eagle Luxury Trains. He has lectured in the United States and Canada and is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, an Honorary Research Fellow of the Universities of Birmingham and Kent, a Member of the British Commission for Military History, a Freeman of the City of London and a Liveryman of the Worshipful Company of Farriers. His interests include horses, long lunches and the Times crossword, not necessarily in that order. He is married to Imogen, herself an Anglo-Saxon and Medieval historian, and lives in Kent.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Among the "myths" Mr Corrigan tackles is that Great Britain lost an entire generation to the war; that calvary was an oversized, worthless fighting component in WW I; that British generals were generally incompetent and uncaring; and that the United States' contribution to the war was insignificant.
All of his arguments are well reasoned and supported, and often contains some sly British humor. I agreed with most (although not all) of his points and conclusions. For example, Mr Coorigan debunks the lost generation myth by pointing out that Great Britain's losses for the war were significantly less than France and Germany's, but the impact on the British psyche was proportionately greater because of the facts that: 1) Great Britain was not historically used to raising extremely large armies and sending them off to war, unlike their allies and foes on the continent and seeing large casualty lists, and 2) because of recruitment of "Pals" battalions, where people from one area or trade signed up and served in the same unit. If a Pals battalion took heavy casualties, the impact was devastating on the area they came from, and would be widely publicized, even though most areas took far, far fewer casualties.
The author has clear favorites (Field Marshal Douglas Haig) and culprits (Prime Minister David Lloyd George), and his tone can be a bit overbearing or self-righteous at times. For example on the chapter dealing with the British military justice system in the war (a chapter whose conclusions I agree with), he has the following footnote, referring to himself and his experience on court martials: "This author, as a member, prosecuted or defended at over a hundred courts martial of British soldiers over a period of 35 years, ranging from murder to fraud. He has not infrequently known the guilty to be acquitted, but never an innocent man to be convicted." First, I would certainly hope that he would not have voted for an innocent man to be convicted. Second, since many charges come down to one man's word against another's, I would suspect that, rarely, innocent men could well have been convicted, as occasionally happens in courtrooms throughout the world, the author's strong belief notwithstanding.
I find this book to be a similar to John Mosier's book, "Myths of the Great War", although Mr Corrigan's book deals primarily with the British, and is a bit less controversial. All said, though, I think the author successfully explains and discredits most the "myth's" he tackles, and I feel that the book is well worth reading by anyone who wants to hear the other side of the story regarding how World War I was fought on the British side.
By approaching his material myth-by-myth, Corrigan has simplified his task, and made his lessons more accessable to the reader, even if it means that he somtimes retraces his own footsteps. This choice lends Mud, Blood, and Poppycock to use as a textbook as well as a volume of general history. You needn't read the entire book to gain value from it, you only need open to any specific chapter, and Corrigan's entire argument for debunking that particular myth is layed out for you in it's entirety, with no need to refer elsewhere. If, however, you *do* wish to refer elsewhere, there is a rather complete list of end notes to each chapter. This is one of the few items about which I might have any quibble: While the end notes are more useful if you're going to follow-up with additional research, a casual reader would find footnotes easier to read, without needing to flip back and forth to the end of the chapter.
Corrigan isn't infallible, and he does make the occasional error, such as asserting that no army can plan for the 'next' war, but instead *must* plan for future wars by learning from past wars, and that no army has the resources to plan speculatively for the future. This is clearly in error: While any responsible army must indeed study the lessons of past wars, a truly responsible army also studies future trends. Now I realize that that particular doctrine is relatively new, asserting that it doesn't exist at all is a mistake. He does give himself an 'out' by noting that armies of the day had little budgetary resource for studying war from a speculative approach. Still, Corrigan would've done better to explain that doctrine changes, rather than deny its existance. This is one of the very few failed analysis I can find in the entire book, and is actually a pretty minor one (as are the few other such). On the other hand, Corrigan's dry wit permiates the book, making me smile at the oddest moments. One comment that simply cracked me up was a reference to the shape of mortar pits resulting in an increase in constipation. I won't give away the entire joke (nor any of the others scatered throughout), so you'll just have to buy or borrow the book and find it yourself. In fact, I STRONGLY recommend that you do so... Not only is the wit entertaining, but the book is also a wonderful work of historical scholarship. Corrigan's conclusions are solidly based in carefully documented research, and appear to be without ulterior motivation, further reenforcing the value of this work.
READ it!
Top reviews from other countries
There is of course no getting away that appalling slaughter did take place, perhaps most notably the first day of the Somme and its 20,000 British and Empire dead. What the author (a former army officer) shows authoritatively and clearly is that while mistakes and errors of judgement were certainly made in this new (to everyone) mode of war, lessons were learned and the sacrifices were not in vain.
As well as disposing of the popular myths very effectively, the author highlights some less well known aspects of the war. For example, although the Germans started the use of gas (of various kinds), the British became masters of both its use and defence against it (but were careful not to be the first to use a new kind before the Germans did, to avoid accusations of escalating matters).
Very highly recommended for anyone wanting a depiction of this terrible conflict with the myths stripped away.
Corrigan makes well the point that Generals can only fight the previous war, being not blessed with a crystal ball, but have to learn and adapt to their present circumstances. This the British army - lead by Haig but subordinate so often to the French interest - certainly did. One trusts that the calumnies levelled at Haig and his associates will disappear.
The book is written by a senior military man, the sort I think who has a twinkle in his eye. He has examined documents from ordinary soldiers, about ordinary soldiers, about the horses they relied on for muscle-power and transport, about the General Staff, who were not the chinless nincompoops of "Oh What a Lovely War", about the public school officers who led. Still, details were included where needed in what is necessarily a broad brush approach. Excellent book.





