About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
I first heard the term Munchausens syndrome by proxy (MSBP) about ten years ago, when I sat in on a panel discussion of the syndrome at an American Psychological Association convention. I gave the matter no more thought until a few years ago, when a defense attorney approached me to review a local child abuse case in which MSBP was suspected.
I had no particular expertise in this form of child abuse, but neither did anyone else involved with the case. In preparing to review the documentation and reports in the case, I spent time at the local university libraries and read as much material as I could find (which was a surprisingly large amount) on the subject of MSBP. I was appalled by what I read. There appeared to be only one or two articles in the professional literature which might have been considered hard research, and in these the research had been done only in the most rudimentary way. The rest of the literature consisted of case studies in which medical and psychological professionals identified what they believed to be MSBP cases and then discussed how closely they corresponded to or deviated from the behavioral profile and clinical features of the hypothetical archetypal case. Much of the science in this literature, which had been published in prestigious journals, would not have passed serious scrutiny in an undergraduate research methods class. Nevertheless, despite the fact that the scientific heavy lifting of empirical research had not been done with this syndrome and its inferred dynamics, it was clear that professionals all over the United States and United Kingdom were willing to diagnose the disorder. Moreover, some of the excesses of the early child sexual abuse prosecutions were being repeated in cases of alleged MSBP.
Because of my familiarity with the issues and research in the area of child sexual abuse, in early 1998 I presented a paper on the subject of MSBP to the Eastern Psychological Association annual meeting. This paper, which discussed how problems with the conceptualization and assessment of MSBP were likely to result in many false positive diagnoses, was published the following year in expanded form in the American Journal of Forensic Psychology (Mart, 1999). As is often the case these days, the article made its way onto the internet, and before long I was deluged with requests for evaluations and testimony in MSBP cases, not just in my home state of New Hampshire but all over the United States.
Unfortunately, MSBP now appears to have become what Thomas Ryan, a well-known Arizona attorney who specializes in medical malpractice, has termed the disease du jour. It is disheartening to see families torn apart by allegations of MSBP, which are almost impossible to fight due to the looseness of the legal process in such cases, the cost of mounting an effective defense, and the fact that almost any behavior on the part of the parent suspected of MSBP is seen as a confirmation of the diagnosis. Although clearly there are cases in which parents have used medicine or the medical system to abuse children (I have seen such cases), it is also clear that many individuals, possibly most, who are given this diagnosis do not meet the diagnostic criteria for MSBP, if indeed the diagnosis itself has any validity.
This book covers a variety of topics related to my concerns about the diagnosis of MSBP and its application. The information and opinions it contains are drawn from my research and my experience in the area of child abuse generally and MSBP specifically. Those cases that I cite have been altered in certain details as necessary to protect the parents, children and professionals involved. It is my sincere hope that this book will serve to help begin a serious examination of the way in which this diagnosis is applied and frequently misapplied.