- Series: Oxford Theology and Religion Monographs
- Hardcover: 256 pages
- Publisher: Clarendon Press; 1 edition (December 24, 1992)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0198263414
- ISBN-13: 978-0198263418
- Product Dimensions: 5.7 x 1 x 8.8 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1 pounds
- Average Customer Review: 1 customer review
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #5,513,134 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Muratorian Fragment and the Development of the Canon (Oxford Theology and Religion Monographs) 1st Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Customers who bought this item also bought
"A thorough discussion of the Muratorian fragment; it is also a discussion of the formation of both testaments of the biblical cannon."--Theology Digest
"A superlative example of scholarly research and writing. Well organized, clearly written and thorough, it deals patiently with all the relevant evidence and converses with a wide range of scholarship. This thoroughness makes the book both persuasive to other scholars and a bit tedious to non-specialists."--Bible Books
"This is an important book."--Journal for the Study of the New Testament
"[An] interesting discussion...it is good to have the question of the canon opened up afresh."--The Expository Times
"Here is a book that does just what its title promises."--Church History
About the Author
Geoffrey Mark Hahneman, Canon, the Cathedral Church of St Mark, Minneapolis.
Browse award-winning titles. See more
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Many will stand up and cheer if they hold his weak ideas of truth or when gagging on his multitudinous research and pedantic language they mindlessly adopt his conclusions.
A careful modernist scholar will note his fallacious assumptions and oversight of certain facts (as noted by Dr. E. Ferguson) and reject the volumes' implicit claim to be a monument of scholarship. Quality scholars may sympathize but must reject the conclusion for its failures to prove its case.