Buy used:
$15.83
Delivery Tuesday, November 19
Or fastest delivery Thursday, November 7. Order within 15 hrs 6 mins
Used: Good | Details
Sold by Zoom Books Company
Fulfilled by Amazon
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Book is in good condition and may include underlining highlighting and minimal wear. The book can also include "From the library of" labels. May not contain miscellaneous items toys, dvds, etc. . We offer 100% money back guarantee and 24 7 customer service. Free 2-day shipping with Amazon Prime!

Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and Amazon Prime.

If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you grow your business. Learn more about the program.

Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

David M. Buss
Follow
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The Murderer Next Door: Why the Mind Is Designed to Kill Hardcover – May 19, 2005

by David M. Buss (Author)
4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 168 ratings
See all formats and editions
A controversial analysis of the psyche of murderers draws on the author's investigations into their underlying motives and circumstances, theorizing that the human psyche has evolved special adaptations that enable murder to become a logical option, and identifying at which point people are most vulnerable to being killed or becoming killers. 25,000 first printing.
Previous slide of product details
  1. Print length
    288 pages
  2. Language
    English
  3. Publisher
    Penguin Press HC, The
  4. Publication date
    May 19, 2005
  5. Reading age
    18 years and up
  6. Dimensions
    6.36 x 1.02 x 9.54 inches
  7. ISBN-10
    1594200432
  8. ISBN-13
    978-1594200434
  9. See all details
Next slide of product details
The%20Amazon%20Book%20Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now

Customer reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
168 global ratings
FASCINATING
5 out of 5 stars
FASCINATING
What about YOUR neighbors? Co-workers? Lovers?What about YOU!???
Hide
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Derrick De La Rosa
5.0 out of 5 stars Changed my entire perspective on my parents murder suicide
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2024
Verified Purchase
This book really opened my eyes to the evolutionary psychology behind how my father, a Marine, special education teacher, girls volleyball coach, and finally law student could murder my mother in cold blood then hang himself in our family home. I always felt like he lost control of his emotions. Now I believe he planned to commit this atrocious act. The day of the murder suicide my parents drive me from Columbia mo to Joplin Missouri so I could stay with my aunt while they went back to our home in Columbia to discuss the issues of my mother's indefinitely. After killing her my father called my aunt and asked her to take care of me telling her what he done to my mother and what he was about to do to himself. He then called the police and explained the sane situation to them, hung the phone up, made a noose, put his bible in his mouth and hung himself on an inside door knob just 3.5 feet off the ground. I believed that he just lost control of his emotions during an argument. But I now believe he premeditated this and wanted to keep me from harms way as he was in able to live with the public shame and humility of years of infidelity. Thank you for opening my eyes David through your rigorous research and dedication to the truth about our natural murderous circuitry..
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
Rachel
5.0 out of 5 stars Super fascinating
Reviewed in the United States on August 2, 2024
Verified Purchase
What really fascinated me was all the scenarios of people that killed but weren’t serial killers. They were overall normal people that snapped.
Helpful
 Report
L. Miller
4.0 out of 5 stars Ever Been Mad Enough to Kill?
Reviewed in the United States on October 16, 2009
Verified Purchase
Fascinating. Buss has undertaken the largest study of murder ever using data from FBI files and police records to examine the psychological underpinnings of the desire to kill. We've all heard the statistic of how a person is more likely to be killed by someone he knows. . . now you'll find out why.

You won't find much about serial killers here as they account for only a tiny percentage of all murders. What you will find is lots of insight into the type of murders that happen every day--many of them involving love triangles. And since for every murder that is actually carried out dozens or hundreds more are fantasized about, you'll learn about the ancient fears, desires, and passions that make all of us want to kill.

Ask yourself, "Have you ever gotten so upset with someone that you wanted to kill them?" If the answer is yes, read this book.
7 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
Kofi P. Mensah
5.0 out of 5 stars What a great book.
Reviewed in the United States on October 8, 2023
Verified Purchase
This book spells out that the reasons people kill are for things we consider the most important. Securing resources,elevating status, sexual competition, defending honor and protecting loved ones It’s scary but anyone can be a killer.
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
ruby crum
5.0 out of 5 stars The Murder Next Door
Reviewed in the United States on January 28, 2024
Verified Purchase
My daughter liked it
Helpful
 Report
MaxAndMe
5.0 out of 5 stars Enjoyed this book immensely
Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2017
Verified Purchase
This book is much more clinical than the description makes it sound. I really enjoyed the heavy emphasis on statistical analysis. I found myself mentioning the the book to friends on several occasions because the content makes for such interesting conversation. Of course, not everyone agreed with the theories proposed, but what a boring world it would be if we all agreed and knew everything.

I always appreciate a book that leads me to ask more questions, and this is one of those books.
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
Carmi Turchick
3.0 out of 5 stars Good Idea, but poor scholarship and sloppy thinking.
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2005
I wanted to like this book. I just returned from the Human Behavior and Evolution Society conference in Austin, effectively hosted by Buss's department at UT Austin.

Buss spoke at the conference, and I had some big problems with what he said, but I thought I would give benefit of the doubt until I had the book in my hands.

My first big problem is the conflation of murder and war. While we can of course say that both entail violence, and that both seem to be behaviors selected for by evolution, that is all we can say. In most other aspects these behaviors are widely divergent in motivations and psychologies. Sure, sometimes men kill over women on the individual level and sometimes they take women as the spoils of war, but they also often kill all the women along with the men. While leaders may gloat about taking enemy women (as he notes), the rank and file have little choice about going to war. It is that or be exiled from the group, or see the group overrun and die with your family. Certainly over evolutionary time the choices in war were often win or die, and so women are not exactly central to the matter. One also should note that there is a huge psychological difference between killing over a woman one is, or has been, close to and killing with the hope of capturing women from an enemy group. Most critically, men go to war most often out of pro-social altruistic motives and group commitments, while many murders are anti-social selfish acts. One might just as well conflate love and lust too, if we are after confusion instead of insight.

And if Buss wants to use the term "murder" in the all-inclusive way he does throughout the book, then he must be consistent in that usage. He is not. On page 27 he states that "...the evolutionary war theory does not explain...the majority of murders..." Hmmm, do we have any evidence offered or cited that more people are murdered by individuals than die in wars? None, and I strongly doubt that it is even close to true. Certainly there is no evidence from archeology; one cannot determine if an arrowhead in a skeleton came from an external or internal foe. Again, I fail to see how conflating murder and war does anything but confuse and muddy the water, and it certainly does not help when one seems to be confused already, as Buss is.

Where else is he confused? Well, he seems to have also confused himself with someone who knows history and world events. His assertions about Saddam and Pol Pot are just wrong; Saddam was effectively in charge well before 1979, and he killed his friends, as well as enemies, in order to instil fear (inspired by Stalin's example), not to rise to power. Pol Pot never killed to rise in the ranks either, as he asserts, but was the Khemer leader from quite early on. And he did not kill to maintain control, but rather from a horribly misguided desire to create a peasant utopia (see the excellent Phillip Short effort, "Pol Pot: The History of a Nightmare").

But that is a minor issue compared to his assertion on page 63, "This is one good explanation for why, throughout human history, warriors, adventurers, and explorers come disproportionately from the ranks of men who had few alternative strategies for acquiring the perquisites of status and resources." Buss cites Daly and Wilson 2001 here, which is almost correct, except that the only Daly and Wilson 2001 he includes in his bibliography is the paper about nepotism, not the one that includes this assertion, and the real source does not go nearly as far as Buss claims. Daly and Wilson merely assert that history provides evidence that the above is true, and they say "often" where Buss claims "disproportionate." It is quite different to claim "throughout" and "disproportionate," and given that the original claims by Daly and Wilson are hardly supported, just a few historical examples given and no empirical evidence at all, it is beyond sloppy to extend this very little, literally two examples, to make such a large claim. Worse still is the fact that this assertion is just plain wrong, and in evolutionary terms it is gibberish. During the course of our evolution nearly all men must have been warriors, not just those lacking good prospects, and the book claims to be concerned with how our behaviors evolved, not with what happened in Spain in the 1500's (which is the main example Daly and Wilson give). Never mind that high status are universally expected to lead in war in band and tribal societies, and that there is a mountain of evidence from complex societies of high status being warriors throughout history. "Often" is a true statement, but we can also say that high status were "often" in these roles. "Disproportionately" "throughout" history is just plain false and baseless.

Buss's very next sentence on pg 63 is also a big problem, "And it explains why men occupying the bottom rungs of the reproductive ladder more often resort to violence." Here he cites Daly and Wilson again, this time their book "Homicide" from 1988. The problem is that this is very much not what the book says at all. In their section on status, pg 126-131, they in fact make the opposite case, showing that those who are least violent become the lowest status because of it, and are likely not to have wives, in band and tribal societies, which we commonly assume to be similar enough to how we lived during much of our evolution that we can usefully extrapolate. We do know empirically that low status are more prone to violence in highly stratified societies where the difference in incomes is great, but again the question is an evolutionary one and we know from Boehm (Hierarchy in the Forest, 1999) that it is likely we evolved in egalitarian societies and not stratified ones. Richard Wrangham has shown that the very lowest status chimps can be prone to lashing out randomly, but also that higher status chimps make them frequent objects of their aggression. If Buss's argument is that violence can increase ones status, and that this is partly why it evolved (and that is his argument), then how can it be that the lowest status are most violent? If his assertion is true, it contradicts his main hypothesis. And again, since he wants to lump war in there too, when do low status ever lead a group or nation to war? It is true that low status men are cheated on more frequently, and that men who are cheated on often become violent, but when we put all types of violence in the pot I strongly doubt that anyone has the empirical data to support this assertion, or that if the data were compiled the assertion would prove to be true. For one thing it can be quite difficult to assertain status and ones place on the reproductive ladder, a person can easily be high status within a sub-group and low status in a larger context (for example, gang leaders). And such men usually have greater reproductive success than even doctors and lawyers, at least in our society. Does that mean that doctors and lawyers are more likely to be violent than gang leaders? I would like to see that case made...

He also makes a series of wrong assertions on page 61 which I will skip going into most of. Let me just note that recent studies showed women in fact are not more attracted to men who take pointless risks, and that other empirical work has shown some of the biological reasons why men die earlier, which is unrelated to risk taking. It is absolutely not a "...cumulative consequence of dangerous competitive activities originally engaged in to show off their physical prowess." And that assertion makes no evolutionary sense; we would have plenty of opportunities to take risks for very good reasons, like getting food and going to war and so on, so the need for showing off seems to be lacking. I suggest that in fact what is happening is ritualized dominance contests between men, and the evidence is that men are the ones impressed by such actions, and they are more likely to want to be around those who engage in them.

To summarize, Buss seems not to know what he does not know. And he does not know a lot. He shows a lack of critical thinking, which is his most important task, and sloppy scholarship at best. At worst he might be making stuff up, but I tend to think that he is just getting it wrong and does not think things through very well. His basic hypothesis might be correct, it probably is, but in order to make this case convincingly we will have to continue to wait for someone with a more precise mind and a greater grasp of the material. I see absolutely no profit in tossing war in with murder, and the confusion it has caused Buss is quite visible. If this is not your field, take his assertions with a huge grain of salt. Some are right, others simply are not.
139 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report
Andrea Rodriguez
5.0 out of 5 stars Incredibly interesting, easy to read
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2019
Verified Purchase
Has to buy this book for my Evolutionary Psychology course. I never read, I friking LOVED this book. I read it last May and I still think and talk about it sometimes. Maybe not the best read for some people but I consider it contains amazing facts and bizarre stories about murder of all types. It’s very eye-opening.
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
 Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Davide F.
5.0 out of 5 stars Bel libro
Reviewed in Italy on May 16, 2022
Verified Purchase
Bel libro
Report
Heike
5.0 out of 5 stars absolut genial
Reviewed in Germany on June 2, 2017
Verified Purchase
dieses Buch ist natürlich auf englisch, aber wer das irgendwie lesen kann, sollte das Buch lesen. Es erklärt nicht nur, warum ganz normale Menschen dazu kommen können, jemand anderen zu töten, sondern viele andere Verhaltensweisen zwischen Mann und Frau und Mann und Mann und auch zu den Kindern. Das Ganze wird unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Evolutionspsychologie erklärt, etwas was mir vorher völlig unbekannt war und was trotzdem extrem viel Sinn ergibt und auch von den Daten der Versuche gestützt wird.
Report
Rahul
5.0 out of 5 stars Insightful
Reviewed in India on February 27, 2015
Verified Purchase
A scary book. Very insightful. I read it because I have an interest in Evolutionary Psychology.
Report
Aleksandra
5.0 out of 5 stars Amazing book
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 11, 2015
Verified Purchase
Amazing book, would definitely recommend it to anyone who has studied Criminology before or who has a general interest in this area. Bought this item as used - quality as advised; general sight of use but this does not effect the quality of content. Great price and quick international delivery.
Report
degpargad
1.0 out of 5 stars Old used book instead of brand new. Book printing is not well centered.
Reviewed in Italy on April 30, 2022
Verified Purchase
Recently bought this book to put in my personal library. Purchased it as brand new and, instead, an old used book has arrived.
Pages are printed way above than the center of the page.
Customer image
degpargad
1.0 out of 5 stars Old used book instead of brand new. Book printing is not well centered.
Reviewed in Italy on April 30, 2022
Recently bought this book to put in my personal library. Purchased it as brand new and, instead, an old used book has arrived.
Pages are printed way above than the center of the page.
Images in this review
Customer image Customer image
Customer imageCustomer image
Report