- Series: Feedback (Book 1)
- Paperback: 300 pages
- Publisher: Open Court Publishing Company (November 1, 1996)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 9780812693331
- ISBN-13: 978-0812693331
- ASIN: 0812693337
- Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.7 x 9 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 17 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,396,146 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ Free Shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Music of Yes: Structure and Vision in Progressive Rock (Feedback: The Series in Contemporary Music, Vol. 1) Paperback – November 1, 1996
|New from||Used from|
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
From Library Journal
"Long-winded" and "pompous" are derisions routinely leveled against Yes, the kings of "avant-rock," and they often apply to this examination of the band's music by social theorist Martin (philosophy, DePaul Univ.). The author fulfills the dream of any Yes-fanatic by waxing philosophic about the group's entire recorded output, focusing on their "main sequence" of albums from The Yes Album (1971) through Going for the One (1977). Martin goes to great pains to explain the importance of Yes's "vision" and argues his own interpretations of their music and lyrics in excruciating detail. Unfortunately, he offers little external evidence to support his musings; nor is the coverage broad enough to be a useful work on the progressive rock movement as a whole. Having little appeal to those not Yes-obsessed, this book is unnecessary for all but the largest popular music collections. General readers may be more tempted by Yesstories: Yes in Their Own Words (St. Martin's, 1996).?Lloyd Jansen, Stockton-San Joaquin Cty. P.L., Cal.
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Yes fans (Yes-persons?) will flock to this paean to the world of 1960s "art rock." Yes always engendered extreme reactions: either devotion because of the group's lofty aesthetic standards or dismissal as a band of musically flatulent poseurs. Philosopher and semiotician Martin displays an affinity for Yes and tends to overanalyze pop-cultural minutiae but valuably assesses a time when capital-R Rock music was thought to matter deeply in the ultimate scheme of the universe. This makes for some tedium, but Martin's points about the artistic aspirations of '60s and '70s "progressive" music are thought-provoking. Perhaps Martin fails to adequately factor in that "what it was about Yes that allowed it to be such a force for the people who experienced the music" may have been simply the fact that its fans were teenagers when that music was new. After all, to some, the music of Little Richard ("A-wop-bop-a-loo-bop-a-wop-bam-boom") is deeply moving and fraught with metaphysical portent. For serious rockers only. Mike Tribby
Try the Kindle edition and experience these great reading features:
Showing 1-5 of 17 reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The problem with Martin's book is he apparently has little or no comprehension of the messages that Yes music has projected through most of their life as a band: the outlook being communicated to the listeners besides the presentation of sound itself in what YES did. To make up for this, or perhaps because he has no other way of doing it, Martin looks at the lyrical product of Yes through the eyes of a Marxist economic philosopher. Viewing the Yes message of positive spiritual seeking in terms of such a materialistic and political philosophy is just not a compatible enterprise. And so it becomes apparent that Martin has never understood what Jon Anderson or Steve Howe or Chris Squire were talking about when they put pen to paper. He does seem to show a dim notion of things when discussing Anderson's "We Have Heaven" from the Fragile album. But only a dim notion, as he has to relate it to philosophical/religious literature he has been exposed to, but this only reveals his lack of understanding of the substance of what is going on. For example, it is one thing to recognize the influence of Paramahansa Yogananda on YES lyrics at a certain point in their career, it is another thing to understand concepts Yogananda describes in his work which one can relate to things said in YES's lyrics. As part and parcel of this we get Martin's predictable (it is predictable once one understands he is a Marxist) view that the music industry is criminally dominated by "market forces" which are evil and poisonous to music. (Martin also indulges us with his own view of the Vietnam War, a view in which he is no doubt not alone, especially in his world of academia; and he concedes that he has no idea if YES would see it his way; nevertheless, he goes ahead and serves his readers this view anyway as his interpretation of "Yours is No Disgrace").
In Martin's summary, then, Yes and other groups like Genesis attained success by virtue of a fluke atmosphere which prevailed in the late 60s and early 70s (almost like Yes 'fell through the cracks' of the market forces' roadblock to popular acclaim) and they have been fighting against those forces ever since 1973 or so. (When Actually, the cross which Yes has been bearing is that of getting reviewed constantly by rock and pop critics who should not be reviewing anything that has a musical validity beyond 12 bars or three chords).
But for a Yes fan, the book is worth it, because when Martin does confine himself to the substance of the music sound and the performance of it he has some good insights.
So one could hope to understand the veritable desert that existed when Martin's book hit the scene. This would - I think - explain the rather puzzling praise "Music of Yes" has garnered in certain circles: finally, Yes fans had something - anything - to read about their favorite band. Fans somehow were able to forgive the obvious flaws of this book.
Those flaws are glaring, and have succeeded in making "Music of Yes" practically unreadable.
Let's start with the prose. Martin is a cloistered academic, vehemently pro-Marxist, and his writing style is more suited to the stuffy papers with which like-minded folks regale themselves in the name of "research". Unless one is familiar with this style of writing - pedantic, halting, self-indulgent - it is very difficult to figure out where Martin is heading in his work; even within the confines of a single paragraph! One comes away with the impression that Martin himself doesn't know his path, and often founders for something coherent to say.
Reading is therefore a chore: you have to force yourself through the book with a will. As you do so, you notice three things: 1. "Music of Yes" is entirely subjective and offers no new information about Yes - only Martin's opinion, 2. Martin has very little knowledge of music theory on which to pin his conclusions (he talks a great deal about counterpoint, but very little about anything else), and 3. His pro-Marxist leanings often get in the way and color his conclusions.
This book seems to be more a polemic about Marxism than about Yes. Martin takes every opportunity he can to not only trash capitalism, but to equate Yes' ideology with his dogma in the process (he desperately wants Yes to be about Marxism, but no matter how hard he tries to wedge them into that box, they just don't fit). Talking about the "jaded, cynical world of post-modern capitalism," he often digresses wildly from the topic at hand to deliver a whining broadside to western culture; a broadside that usually misses its mark.
He even manages to drag the Gulf War into the book! I had a difficult time figuring out what that had to do with Yes, but Martin never expostulates: his political ideals, which litter the book like cast-off socks, often hang without any visible means of support.
One comes away from this book with the impression that Martin is out of his depth in writing about music. It's too bad this attempt had to be made in the name of Yes.