Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
+ $4.54 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
-
-
VIDEO
My Kid Could Paint That
| Was: | $11.57 Details |
| Price: | $8.99 |
| You Save: | $2.58 (22%) |
| Additional DVD options | Edition | Discs |
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
DVD
May 19, 2008
"Please retry"
|
— |
1
|
—
|
— | $12.98 |
Watch Instantly with
|
Rent | Buy |
Enhance your purchase
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Product Description
An Official Selection of both the 2007 Toronto Film Festival and the 2007 Sundance Film Festival, My Kid Could Paint That arrives on DVD March 4, 2008. Documenting the rise and fall of four-year old artist Marla Olmstead, Amir Bar-Lev' as well as an audio commentary track.
Amazon.com
Suitable for framing, Amir Bar-Lev's "family human interest story" indelibly captures the media maelstrom that engulfed the Olmsteads of Binghamton, N.Y. when their daughter, Marla, age 4, became the darling of the art world with her abstract paintings. As a gallery owner tells Bar-Lev, the situation is "perfect": The family is charismatic, and Marla is, indeed, "a doll" and her paintings, "unbelievable." More on that later. Bar-Lev chronicles how a community newspaper article about Marla was picked up by the New York Times, leading to more newspaper articles, sold out gallery showings, and media throngs. Marla's paintings sold upward of $25,000 (the owner of the Houston Rockets bought one), and talk-show hosts (Conan, Dave, Oprah) wanted Marla on their shows. "You're in for a wild ride, I hope you're prepared for this," the gallery owner says he told Mark Olmstead, Marla's father, a Frito Lay factory worker who also dabbles as an artist. But no one is prepared when Charlie Rose, during a 60 Minutes Wednesday broadcast, raises questions on whether Marla is the sole artist. Was she coached? Were the paintings doctored, or even painted by someone else? Could she even be called a prodigy? Bar-Lev's canvas expands to consider the nature of art and media culture. It also becomes something of a self-portrait as he struggles with his own growing suspicions about Marla's paintings after he has befriended the family and earned their trust. My Kid Could Paint That is not a masterpiece, but it will resonate especially for everyone who says they don't know art, but they know what they like. It would be an excellent companion to Who the #%&% is Jackson Pollock? --Donald Liebenson
Stills from My Kid Could Paint That (click for larger image)
![]() | ![]()
|
![]()
| ![]() |
More Sony Pictures Classics Documentaries
![]() Who Killed the Electric Car? | ![]() Winged Migration | ![]() Why We Fight |
Product details
- Aspect Ratio : 1.78:1
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- MPAA rating : PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned)
- Product Dimensions : 7.5 x 5.5 x 0.25 inches; 2.92 Ounces
- Director : Amir Bar-Lev
- Media Format : AC-3, Dolby, NTSC, Subtitled, Widescreen
- Run time : 1 hour and 23 minutes
- Release date : March 4, 2008
- Actors : Amir Bar-Lev, Anthony Brunelli, Elizabeth Cohen
- Subtitles: : English, Spanish, French, Thai
- Producers : Amir Bar-Lev
- Language : English (Dolby Digital 5.1), Unqualified
- Studio : Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
- ASIN : B0011IR2R4
- Number of discs : 1
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#145,434 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #14,293 in Kids & Family DVDs
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
PARENTS, JOURNALIST, GALLERY OWNERS, ART CRITICS, CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST:
LET'S GET REAL HERE.
GOOD GUYS:
1. PARENTS ARE INNOCENT: They are buying student grade paint. Encouraging your child to paint and assembling all the materials for them is no more than what a spouse, roommate or artist assistant would do, it is not part of a premeditated plot! The fact that they started hanging her artwork in a neighborhood eatery with no name or price tag is about as innocent as you can get. Local non-gallery venues in a neighborhood is how some artist start out getting hung but with names for their work AND a price tag. IT DOES NOT MATTER THAT AN ADULT NAMED HER ARTWORK SINCE THAT IS MOSTLY FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ANYWAY.
2. BUYERS ARE NOT IDIOTS, whether we buy a postcard, greeting card, poster, cheap piece of art at an art fair, gallery or Sothebys. People ARE NOT buying because she is a prodigy or because she is 4, they BUY WHAT THEY LIKE AND CAN AFFORD ON IT'S MERITS (OR REALISTICALLY BECAUSE IT MATCHES THEIR SOFA, LOL).
3. MARLA is an authentic artist, just watch her process. If her father had done the artwork he could have taken his paintings to a gallery and does not need to hide behind a child.
4. NEW YORK TIMES ART CRITIC: He was the only intelligent professional in his overview of the art world, artist and collectors.
BAD GUYS:
1. JOURNALIST/DOCUMENTARY FILM MAKER- "If it bleeds it leads." "Sex sells." Sensationalism and conspiracy theories. They and they alone created the false narrative that Marla was a child prodigy, the parents NEVER claimed that! So they were all debunking their own false assumption. EVERYONE ACTS DIFFERENT ON CAMERA.
Need I say more?
2. CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST: Basicly called the journalist liars with the child prodigy theory. That woman knows nothing about art. Saying that Marla is no more talented than any other child doing artwork is false. Any child can show more talent than another child doing anything WITHOUT being a prodigy. Her color palette alone is exceptional. All you have to do is watch MARLA'S PROCESS, look at her eyes, look at her selecting the brush/paints, her use of the spatula, her color selection, telling her father to paint because SHE WILL TELL HIM what to do. People are not buying the art because she is a prodigy.
3. GALLERY OWNER: Is 2-faced, who praises her work when it sells and berates it when the media is critical. How can any artist or gallery owner NOT UNDERSTAND why art sells? How can he equate photo realism (his artwork) with abstract art? It is NOT ABOUT REALISM OR TIME SPENT CREATING OR THE AMOUNT OF LABOR OR SKILL! It is about appeal, a composition of color and form. Just because a horse looks like a horse does not make it a greater piece of artwork than blobs of brown paint. Buyers see what they want to see anyway based on their own perception regardless of what even the artist intended. This gallery owner and any other critic should look at the full range of Picasso's artwork over his whole career, as well as art by Basquiat and Giacometti for starters before criticizing or being skeptical of abstract art.
Top reviews from other countries
The film is compelling viewing from start to finish, offering a wealth of insights into the whole Marla Olmstead controversy without taking a position either way but allowing the viewer to ultimately decide. It's a wonderful film and a must see for anyone who enjoys intelligent film making.









