Taser - Shop now
Buy used:
$150.18
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Book is in standard used condition. The binding is tight, but the cover and edges may have significant wear. Supplemental materials may not be valid. 100% Money Back Guarantee. Ships fast from Amazon! UNMARKED copy.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
In Stock
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The National Labs: Science in an American System, 1947-1974 First Edition

5.0 out of 5 stars 3 ratings

The national laboratories--Livermore, Berkeley, Los Alamos, Argonne, Oak Ridge, and Brookhaven--have occupied a central place in the landscape of American science for more than fifty years. Responsible for the development of nuclear weapons, reactors, and other technologies that shaped American policy and culture in the Cold War, scientists from these labs also pursued physical and biomedical research that fundamentally changed our understanding of nature. But all of this has come at great cost, in terms of finance, facilities, and manpower, and has forced major adjustments in the framework of American science.

Deeply researched and lucidly written, The National Labs is the first book to trace the confluence of diverse interests that created and sustained this extensive enterprise. Peter J. Westwick takes us from the origins of the labs in the Manhattan Project to their role in building the hydrogen bomb, nuclear power reactors, and high-energy accelerators, to their subsequent entry into such fields as computers, meteorology, space science, molecular biology, environmental science, and alternative energy sources. By showing us that the national laboratory system developed as a reflection of American ideals of competition and decentralization in the Cold War, Westwick also demonstrates how scientific institutions reflect the values of their surrounding political system and culture.

Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more

Editorial Reviews

Review

As parts of a centrally controlled research effort directed largely to national security, the national laboratories run by the Atomic Energy Commission might have seemed more appropriate to the Soviet Union than to the United States. Peter Westwick resolves the paradox by treating the labs as linked elements in a typically American competitive-cooperative system. He uses the same concept to explain the labs' increasing diversification and their apparent redundancy. Westwick's lively analysis of the national labs as a system is a significant contribution to U.S. history and a model for the historian of modern scientific institutions. (John L. Heilbron, author of The Sun in the Church (Harvard))

Oak Ridge, Hanford, Los Alamos, Lawrence Berkeley, Livermore--all were laboratories to conjure with in the heyday of the Cold War. Westwick's book is the first to treat them together, as elements in the integrated national laboratory system that sprang up in the aftermath of World War II. He masterfully addresses their relationships to the larger Cold War culture and to each other. Deeply researched and clearly written, his book provides a rare close-up of the interplay of science, defense, and bureaucratic interest during a crucial period in the national labs' history. (Daniel Kevles, Stanley Woodward Professor of History, Yale University)

A rich institutional history of the Atomic Energy Commission's laboratory system. It shows scientists and government officials working together creatively to produce the knowledge, skills, and technologies required by the national security state. (John Krige, Kranzberg Professor, School of History, Technology and Society, Georgia Institute of Technology)

The system of national laboratories is the main American contribution to the transformation of science in the twentieth century. The labs were a major force in developments from radar to reactors, from computers to quarks. It is high time for a study of the system as a whole. Westwick's book, thoroughly researched and intelligently argued, will surely become the standard work on the subject, valuable to everyone who wants to understand how our scientific community took on its present shape. (Spencer Weart, Director of the Center for History of Physics, American Institute of Physics)

The book is an almost encyclopedic review of the history and function of the national laboratories and therefore will be a very useful reference to the many scientists and historians interested in the subject. (Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky, Director Emeritus, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University)

The National Labs is a fine addition to this extensive and sophisticated literature. It works best as a synthesis of previous arguments about the role of the weapons labs in recent American history and as a vehicle for understanding the relationship between American science and the modern federal establishment. Peter J. Westwick coins a new term, systemicity, as a unifying theme in this study, in the process emphasizing his contention that these facilities may only be understood as a diverse collection unified by a common goal and head but with significant centrifugal tendencies The National Labs makes an important contribution to knowledge about the evolution of this set of research institutions between 1947, when the AEC began operation, and 1974, when the DOE took over responsibility for overseeing them Westwick's synthesis is a valuable entrée into how these scientific institutions both altered and reflected the values of the United States during the Cold War. (Roger D. Launius Journal of American History)

The present book is a useful contribution to the ever growing literature on 'Big Science'. Based on extensive archival research at the U.S. National Archives and the individual national laboratories of the United States (Argonne, Brookhaven, Berkeley, Livermore, Los Alamos and Oak Ridge), the author sets out the early history of the national laboratory system in the United States describing the major programs and missions and the administrative choices and disputes in the period running from 1972-1962 In an effort to keep a lid on this diversity, the author maintains a steady eye on the overall structure of the system while covering individual programs such as the aforementioned highly bureaucratic reactor and particle accelerator programs in considerable detail. (Peter Keating
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences)

About the Author

Peter J. Westwick is a Senior Research Fellow in Humanities at the California Institute of Technology.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Harvard University Press
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 30, 2003
  • Edition ‏ : ‎ First Edition
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 416 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0674009487
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0674009486
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.6 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.75 x 1.5 x 9.5 inches
  • Best Sellers Rank: #5,426,518 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • Customer Reviews:
    5.0 out of 5 stars 3 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Peter J. Westwick
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Customer reviews

5 out of 5 stars
3 global ratings

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2013
    Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
    I did my PhD work at ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) and have worked at several of them through the years. This is a well written, accurate, and insightful volume. I commend it to your reading and believe it is an important contribution to understand how we used to get things finished and what the problems are now in making R&D progress.
    3 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2015
    Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
    Fascinating story
  • Reviewed in the United States on December 20, 2003
    Format: Hardcover
    To help win the cold war the United States created a set of research institutions throughout the nation with the mission of ensuring that cutting edge science and technology found its way into the defense establishment. This set of "National Laboratories" had become so powerful by 1961 that President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his farewell address warned the American people not only about the "military-industrial complex" but also of the "danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite." These laboratories have been under the nominal authority of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and later the Department of Energy (DoE). They included several entities associated with the Manhattan Project of World War II--Argonne, Berkeley, Brookhaven, Los Alamos, and Oak Ridge--as well as later additions, such as the Lawrence Livermore installation. Together, these facilities undertook extensive strategic weapons research and development during a forty-year cold war.
    This collection of laboratories, manufacturing plants, test sites, and think tanks possess complex origins and evolution and have attracted sustained historical inquiry. "The National Labs" is a fine addition to this extensive and sophisticated literature. It works best as a synthesis of previous arguments about the role of these weapons labs in recent American history and as a vehicle for understanding the relationship between American science and the modern federal establishment.
    Author Peter J. Westwick coins a new term, "systemicity," as a unifying theme in this study, in the process emphasizing his contention that these facilities may only be understood as a diverse collection unified by a common goal and head but with significant centrifugal tendencies. For Westwick "systemicity" involves a changing set of alliances and rivalries central to the evolution of these weapons labs, negotiations abounding among those representing the various facilities and divergent priorities. These labs jockeyed for position and specialized or diversified in various areas to ensure primacy within the system. Their competition ensured the honing of skills perhaps not possible otherwise.
    No doubt, "systemicity" as Westwick defines it has long been present, although one could question the value of advocating new jargon for what may be viewed as an obvious set of interactions. Similar interlocking themes may be seen in other distributed organizations ranging from such federal entities as NASA and the FAA, to private corporations such as General Motors and public/private entities such as the Corporation for Public Broadcasting or Intelsat.
    Regardless of Westwick's creation of jargon "The National Labs" makes an important contribution to knowledge about the evolution of this set of research institutions between 1947, when the AEC began operation, and 1974, when DoE took over responsibility for overseeing them. He traces the evolution of the labs from their origins as the developers of nuclear weapons, reactors, and other technologies of destruction to diversification into physical, biomedical, and other types of research.
    Throughout, these labs have profoundly affected ours lives and our understanding of nature. The broadness of their research, the high costs associated with operating them, and the importance of discoveries coming out of them ensures that this is an important subject of study. Westwick's synthesis is a valuable entrée into how these scientific institutions both altered and reflected the values of United States during the cold war.
    11 people found this helpful
    Report