
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$19.87$19.87
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Acceptable
$14.95$14.95
$3.99 delivery February 5 - 11
Ships from: Goodwill Southern California Sold by: Goodwill Southern California
0.27 mi | MANASSAS 20110
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Negroes and the Gun: The Black Tradition of Arms Paperback – January 14, 2014
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length384 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPrometheus
- Publication dateJanuary 14, 2014
- Dimensions6 x 0.96 x 9 inches
- ISBN-10161614839X
- ISBN-13978-1616148393
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Negroes with GunsPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 31
This Nonviolent Stuff'll Get You Killed: How Guns Made the Civil Rights Movement PossiblePaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 31
Negroes with GunsRobert F. WilliamsPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 31
The Second: Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal AmericaPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 31
We Will Shoot Back: Armed Resistance in the Mississippi Freedom MovementPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 31
The Deacons for Defense: Armed Resistance and the Civil Rights MovementHardcoverFREE Shipping by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 31
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
NEGROES AND THE GUN
THE BLACK TRADITION OF ARMS
By NICHOLAS JOHNSONPrometheus Books
Copyright © 2014 Nicholas JohnsonAll rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-61614-839-3
Contents
Acknowledgments, 9,Author's Note, 11,
Introduction, 13,
1. Boundary-Land, 17,
2. Foundation, 31,
3. Promise and Breach, 69,
4. Nadir, 105,
5. Crisis, 151,
6. Leonidas, 181,
7. Freedom Fight, 209,
8. Pivot, 285,
9. The Black Tradition of Arms and the Modern Orthodoxy, 297,
Notes, 319,
Select Bibliography, 355,
Index, 365,
CHAPTER 1
BOUNDARY-LAND
Robert Williams returned home from the army in the spring of 1946to the same bitter irony that had confronted countless black veteransbefore him. They shed blood to protect democracy abroad, and bled again underracial apartheid at home.
Monroe, North Carolina, remained much the same as when Williams was a boyand witnessed a scene of petty brutality that confirmed what it meant to be on thewrong side of the color line. Turning the corner toward the courthouse, he steppedinto the scene of a burly white cop arresting a woman in a fashion that captured thestatus of Negroes across the South. The man with a badge was "Big Jesse" Helms Sr.,father of the future United States senator. For the rest of his life, Williams carriedthe image of Big Jesse flattening that woman with a sock to the jaw, and then draggingher off to jail with her dress up over her head and screaming as the concretesinged her back and thighs. As an old man, Williams the revolutionary—leaning ona cane, sporting a big, grey afro—would talk like it was yesterday about the laughterof the white bystanders and how the cluster of black courthouse loiterers hung theirheads and scurried away.
The courthouse loiterers represented a particular stripe of man. Some would saythat Robert Williams was a different kind of man. Maybe so. But more importantis that Robert Williams was not alone. He is an exemplar, but he was not unusual.He was part of a long tradition of black men and women who thought it just andnatural to answer aggression with corresponding force. They kept and carried gunsand believed in self-defense as a fundamental right. Their story is obscured by thepopular narrative of the nonviolent civil-rights movement. But alongside that narrative,deep in the culture, is a rich vein of grit and steel. Robert Williams was heirto that tradition. His bloodline was thick with it.
Williams's early experiences confirmed the privilege of white skin, but that didnot cow him. Even though his people were no match for the power of the state andthe culture of Jim Crow, when pushed to the wall, they bucked up and fought back.There is a hint of this in the Williams clan back as far as grandfather Sikes. Over thecourse of his life, Sikes Williams was a slave, a farmer, a reconstruction newspapereditor, a perpetual optimist, and finally, always, a realist. In the middle of a hostileenvironment, with powerful reasons to despair, Sikes Williams worked hard andhoped for the best for himself and his family. He also understood his responsibilityin that moment where his next breath or the safety of those he loved was threatenedby imminent violence. One of Robert's prized possessions was a rifle that, accordingto family lore, had been used by Sikes Williams in matters of life or death.
Grandpa Sikes was a hero of Robert's imagination. But the firsthand confirmationof the Williams family backbone came in another childhood episode, whenword spread that a mob was forming to lynch a Negro who had fought with police.Rumor circulated that in addition to dragging the man from his cell for a hangingor burning, the mob also was planning to run some black folk out of town. The oldpeople, and some young ones, who had witnessed the terror of the lynch mob, hidor prepared to flee.
Williams's father, "Daddy John" heard the rumors too. But when it was timeto head out for work on the graveyard shift at the mill, he picked up his lunch pailand left the house as usual. The only difference this time was, before stepping outthe door, he slipped a pistol into the pocket of his overalls. Fortunately, neither thelynching nor the chasing came that night. But Robert never forgot his father's steelin that environment of fear and carried with him the image of that pistol, slippedquietly into the overalls pocket of a man who was not looking for trouble.
Later, when Robert Williams became an inflammatory figure, white peoplewould say he should be more like his father, someone they considered a good Negrowho kept his place. Robert knew the only difference between them was that DaddyJohn had the luck never to face a threat that would have turned him into a badNegro with a gun. While the casual observer might take his kindness for weakness,even as an old man, Daddy John thanked his luck and still prepared for the worst."Always the shotgun was there," Robert remembered, "it was always loaded and itwas always at the door. And that was the tradition."
Robert Williams was honorably discharged from the service, but only barelyso. He served at least one stint in the brig for insubordination, or, in his words,"refusing to be a nigger." Back home, he faced a similar problem. Monroe in 1946was Klan territory. And it was not long before the insubordinate soldier was in conflictwith the Invisible Empire.
Bennie Montgomery was Williams's childhood friend. Bennie was woundedin the Battle of the Bulge and discharged with a metal plate in his head. He wasnever really the same after that. Out of the service, Bennie cycled quickly back tohis ordained place in the Jim Crow South—into the fields, chopping and shoveling.Home only a few months, he got into a scrap with his white employer. With thepleasures of Saturday night on his mind, Bennie approached the boss around noonand asked for his wages. Workers were always paid at the end of the day, and Bennieknew it. The boss rewarded his impudence with a slap and a kick. They tussled. Bythe end of it, Bennie had pulled a knife and killed the man. Later, police foundBennie, still in bloody clothes, drinking beer at a local dive, just sitting there likenothing had happened.
The Klan threatened to lynch Bennie. So the authorities moved him fromMonroe. He was quickly convicted of murder and executed. But the execution ofBennie Montgomery did not satisfy the Klan. When the state shipped his bodyback home for burial, the Klan proclaimed that the remains belonged to them. Theyplanned to drag Bennie's body through the streets.
Before that could happen, the black men of the community met at a barbershopand worked up a plan. By the time the Klan motorcade reached the HarrisFuneral Home to seize Bennie's body, forty black men with rifles and shotgunswere already in place, hidden where the cover allowed. The motorcade stopped. Theblack men showed themselves and leveled their guns. Unprepared for a real fight,the Klansmen drove away and Bennie got a civilized burial.
Robert Williams was one of the men who drew down on the Klan that night.That same year across the South, black veterans marched and protested and armedthemselves against reprisals in Birmingham, Alabama; Decatur, Mississippi; andDurham, North Carolina. Among these men was a young Medgar Evers, home fromthe army and pressed to the edge of an armed confrontation at the Decatur courthouse,where a mob rose against his attempt to register to vote. Robert Williamswas not alone.
Monroe had a slippery hold on Williams. After marrying Mabel and seeinghis first son born, he ranged north to Detroit for work on the assembly lines. Butalmost as soon as he was gone, he talked of returning home. By 1950, he had movedthe family back south and enrolled under the GI Bill in the North Carolina Collegefor Negroes in Durham. He wanted to be a writer. A year before finishing, with hisgovernment money spent, Williams moved north again for work. He and Mabelsublet a little apartment on Eighty-Eighth Street, in New York City. The buildingwas not generally available to blacks, but the Williamses got in through some radicalunionist friends Robert had met at work. The white neighbors were less enlightenedthan Williams's progressive coworkers. Retreating from the hostility, Mabel stayedin the apartment most of the time. She kept a 9-millimeter pistol close by. It was nota place to make a home, and the Williamses soon left, with Robert chasing workwherever there was promise or rumor of it.
In 1954, induced by promises of training in radio and journalism, Williamsenlisted in the Marine Corps. Posted at Camp Pendleton, California, he waspromptly installed as a supply sergeant. The promise of training in journalism evaporatedwith the explanation that blacks did not work in the Information Services.Angry and defiant, Williams fired off missives to Congress complaining about thebait and switch. Then he sent a nasty letter and a telegram to President Eisenhower,threatening to renounce his US citizenship in protest of his mistreatment. This ultimatelywas enough to earn him a dishonorable discharge from the Marines and atrain ticket back to Monroe.
Despite Williams's immediate circumstances, the outlook actually was brighteningfor blacks in 1954. The United States Supreme Court had ruled in Brownv. Board of Education that "separate but equal" was unconstitutional. But it wouldtake far more than a Supreme Court opinion to kill off Jim Crow. White oppositionto Brown was deep and often vicious. North Carolina governor Luther Hodges,immediately went nuclear, fulminating about black and white amalgamation. Stategovernment bureaucrats schemed to maintain de facto segregation. In Monroe,the white reaction against those who aimed to live the message of Brown ran fromveiled warnings to economic reprisals, to threats and acts of violence.
In 1956, the Klan held a huge rally, led by Reverend James "Catfish" Cole, atent evangelist and carnival barker from South Carolina. Cole stirred up supportthrough a series of rallies, some drawing more than fifteen thousand people. In thespace of a few months, two murders, a cross burning, and dynamite attacks wereattributed to the Klan. The combination of economic pressure and violence dampenedlocal enthusiasm for the NAACP's efforts to press enforcement of Brown.
When Robert Williams joined the Monroe NAACP, membership was downto six, and the chapter was ready to disband. Fearing economic sanctions as well asKlan violence, the comparatively middle-class folk who had run the branch handedWilliams the presidency and soon abandoned the organization. Set adrift by the cautiousstrivers, Williams recruited new members from people who had been ignoredby the clique of black bourgeoisie. He went to the pool halls, the street corners, andthe tenant farms, and to the black veterans, some of them comrades in the 1947defense of Bennie Montgomery's remains. Within two years, Williams would growthe Monroe branch from basically just him, to more than three hundred members.
One of Williams's first controversial acts as chapter president came after a youngblack boy drowned at a local swimming hole. Monroe had a pool for whites. It wasbuilt with public money but excluded blacks, who were relegated to ponds, lakes, orold quarries. Every summer black children drowned in these makeshift swimmingholes. The Monroe Parks Commission briefly considered granting black kids one ortwo days a week to swim. But that was deemed too expensive because of the needto change the pool water after Negroes used it. When Williams and his allies continuedto press the issue, including one encounter where he brandished a pistol toescape a threatening crowd of counter-protesters, whites circulated a petition askingthat "local Negro integrationists especially Williams and NAACP Vice President,Dr. Albert Perry, be forced to leave Monroe."
The petition was at least nominally democratic compared to the work of Klanpotentate Catfish Cole. Cole whipped up sympathetic crowds screeching that "aNigger who wants to go to a white swimming pool is not looking for a bath. He islooking for a funeral." Cole held five rallies over as many weeks. At the end of eachone, the Klan drove through Monroe's black section, blaring horns, throwing debris,and shooting into the air. At the head of these drives was Monroe Police chief, A. A.Mauney, who described them as "motorcades" that he led simply to keep order. Onat least one occasion, members of the motorcade fired shots into Dr. Albert Perry'shome. Williams complained and requested intervention from the mayor and thegovernor and with notable persistence sent another letter to President Eisenhower.The only evident response was from local politicians who explained that the KuKlux Klan had a right to meet and organize, same as the NAACP.
Around the same time, the death threats started. The main targets wereWilliams and Dr. Perry. Williams began wearing a Colt .45 caliber automatic pistolwherever he went. The gun was familiar, identical to the US Army Model 1911sidearm. Surplus Colts were widely available in the civilian market and sometimessold through the US government's Civilian Marksmanship Program, administeredby the National Rifle Association, which Williams promptly joined. Williamscarried the big gun in a hip holster, "cocked and locked," the hammer clicked back(some would say menacingly), so with a quick swipe of thumb safety, the gun wouldfire eight fat 230 grain slugs as fast as he could press the trigger.
Williams carried the .45 out of legitimate fear of attack, but it was still aninflammatory act. Up to that point, the Monroe NAACP had enjoyed a smatteringof support from progressive whites. That support had faded when Williams pushedthe swimming-pool issue. It ended entirely when he began wearing the Colt.
Although Williams was president of the Monroe chapter, many whites felt thatthe vice president, Dr. Albert Perry, was the greater threat. He was comparativelyaffluent, and many suspected he was the group's primary financial backer. Unlikemany middle-class black folk, Perry was relatively immune from white economicpressure.
One night, Perry's wife interrupted a chapter meeting with a panicked call. Theyhad received another death threat. She knew about the earlier threats, of course. Butthis was the first time she had answered the phone herself and heard a voice drippingwith venom say we are going to kill you.
Dr. Perry rushed home. The rest of the men disbanded the meeting, retrievedtheir guns, and went to guard Perry's house. They camped that night in his garage,some sitting up in folding chairs with shotguns and rifles across their laps, othersstanding watch and napping on cots, with rifles and shotguns stacked nearby. Theysoon determined that the threat was too serious for such ad hoc measures and developedan organized system of rotating guards. Off and on, more than sixty of themguarded the Perrys in shifts.
In October 1957, Catfish Cole held another big Klan rally in Monroe, followedby the traditional motorcade. The destination was Dr. Albert Perry's house. As theyapproached, some of the hooded revelers fired shots at Perry's neat brick split-level.They were surprised at the response. Anticipating the threat, Williams and theblack men of Monroe fired back from behind sandbags and covered positions. Oneaccount puts it this way:
It was just another good time Klan night, the high point of which would comewhen they dragged Dr. Perry over the state line if they did not hang him or burnhim first. But near Dr. Perry's home their revelry was suddenly shattered by thesustained fire of scores of men who had been instructed not to kill anyone if itwere not necessary. The firing was blistering, disciplined and frightening. Themotorcade of about eighty cars, which had begun in a spirit of good fellowship,disintegrated into chaos, with panicky, robed men fleeing in every direction. Someabandoned their automobiles and had to continue on foot.
Maybe exaggerated in memory, another defender recalled, "When we startedfiring, they run. We run them out and they started crying and going on.... TheKlans was low-down people that would do dirty things. But they found out that youwould do dirty things too, then they'd let you alone. [They] didn't have the stomachfor this type of fight. They stopped raiding our community." In the aftermath, thelocal press was actually critical of the Klan, attributing the incident significantlyto the provocative motorcade. The city council agreed. In an emergency meeting,it passed an ordinance banning KKK motorcades. Outside Monroe, however, thedefiance of Williams and his neighbors prompted sympathetic responses like the$260 contribution from a congregation in Harlem to purchase rifles and requestsfrom other communities for help in setting up black rifle clubs.
This was a time of tremendous stress for Williams. His financial situation wasprecarious. White employers or lenders often tightened the screws on blacks whopressed the civil-rights agenda. At least partly due to his activism, Williams had difficultyfinding and keeping work. His frustration is evident in an article he wrotefor the newsletter, the Crusader. He disdained "Big cars, fine clothes, big housesand college degrees." Manhood, Williams claimed, was more elemental. It meantstanding up and taking care of people who depended on you.
(Continues...)Excerpted from NEGROES AND THE GUN by NICHOLAS JOHNSON. Copyright © 2014 Nicholas Johnson. Excerpted by permission of Prometheus Books.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- Publisher : Prometheus; First Edition (January 14, 2014)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 384 pages
- ISBN-10 : 161614839X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1616148393
- Item Weight : 15 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.96 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #412,870 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #15 in Firearms Weapons & Warfare History
- #1,844 in African American Demographic Studies (Books)
- #3,493 in Sociology Reference
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Nicholas J. Johnson is Professor of Law at Fordham University School of Law. He is a 1984 graduate of Harvard Law School. He is author of two books, NEGROES AND THE GUN: THE BLACK TRADITION OF ARMS and FIREARMS LAW AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT, Regulation Rights and Policy. His scholarship includes, Firearms Policy and the Black Community: An Assessment of the Modern Orthodoxy, Connecticut Law Review; The Statutory UCC, Catholic Law Review; Rights Versus Duties, History Department Lawyering and the Incoherence of Justice Stevens’ Heller Dissent, Fordham ULJ; Supply Restrictions at the Margins of Heller and the Abortion Analogue: Stenberg Principles, Assault Weapons, and the Attitudinalist Critique , Hastings Law Journal; Imagining Gun Control in America: Understanding the Remainder Problem, Wake Forest Law Review; Taking this Right Seriously, National Law Journal; Self- Defense? George Mason Journal of Law Economics and Policy; A Second Amendment Moment: The Constitutional Politics of Gun Rights, Brooklyn Law Review; Showdown Between Federal Environmental Closure of Firing Ranges and Protective State Legislation, Indiana Law Review; The Boundaries of Extra-compensatory Relief for Abusive Breach of Contract, Connecticut Law Review; Principles and Passions: The Intersection of Abortion and Gun Rights, Rutgers Law Review; Plenary Power and Constitutional Outcasts: Federal Power, Critical Race Theory and the Second, Ninth and Tenth Amendments, Ohio State Law Journal; Regulatory Takings and Environmental Regulatory Evolution: Fordham Environmental Law Review; Shots Across No Man's Land: A response to Richard Aborn, Fordham Urban Law Journal; EPCRA'S Collision with Federalism, Indiana Law Review; Beyond the Second Amendment: An Individual Right to Arms Viewed Through the Ninth Amendment. Rutgers Law Journal; Cracks in the Foundation: Legislative Review of Agency Rule-making, Dickinson Law Review.
His papers are available at this link
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189202
Related products with free delivery on eligible orders
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book informative and thorough in its historical examination of self-defense in African-American history. They describe it as an excellent, readable, and well-worth studying book. The book details the courageous stories of African-Americans using firearms for personal self-defense and to get their freedom.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book informative and well-researched. It provides an interesting perspective on a rarely-discussed subject. The book is described as an excellent history lesson that covers an important aspect of American history.
"...His narrative includes slave rebellions, the Underground Railroad, lynchings, The Ku Klux Klan in all its iterations, the civil rights movements of..." Read more
"...It is a fairly progressive author’s trip down memory lane and how the facts of violent self-defense have been scrubbed from the anti-Slavery and..." Read more
"...It traces the Tradition to the colonial period and takes care to fully develop the narrative throughout the post-bellem through pre-Civil Rights era..." Read more
"...Professor Johnson has done a magnificent job chronicling the history of "negroes and the gun". It is a book about great victories and great defeats...." Read more
Customers find the book readable and engaging. They say it's an eye-opening and must-read for anyone interested in US history. The book is well-researched and well-written, making it useful for both conservatives and liberals to understand. While some parts were good, others felt the information was repeated. Overall, readers describe it as an excellent choice and an enjoyable and thought-provoking read through the Black Tradition.
"...It is well written, well documented, and well reasoned...." Read more
"...34;The True Remedy for the Fugitive Slave Bill is a good revolver, a steady hand, and a determination to shoot down any man attempting to kidnap."..." Read more
"Yes it is an eye opening and must read book for anyone interested in US history, Black history, or gun control...." Read more
"...I enjoyed the book and, more importantly, it gave me new insights into the black experience." Read more
Customers find the book provides a valuable study of self-defense within African-American history. It details the courageous stories of African-Americans defending themselves when no one would. The book shows how Black Americans used firearms for personal self-defense and to get their freedom.
"...This book elaborates on a long history of African-American self-defense, from slaves fighting against their would-be masters and up to civil rights..." Read more
"How can I begin? This book shows how Black Americans used firearms for personal self defense and to get their freedom...." Read more
"...Nevertheless, Johnson has provided a valuable study of self-defense within the African-American community which can easily be overlooked if one..." Read more
"...when the cameras went away, and the sun went down, it was guns that kept people safe. It serves as food for thought even today." Read more
Customers find the book illuminating and a must-read for anyone interested in an underreported piece of history.
"Yes it is an eye opening and must read book for anyone interested in US history, Black history, or gun control...." Read more
"This book really is quite illuminating. Self-Defense is seen to be an innate human characteristic common to all societies...." Read more
"...like to thank Professor Johnson for writing this much needed and eye opening book which tells our stories as Americans of African descent." Read more
"Iluminating... a great look at an under reported piece of the American fabric..." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 22, 2014Throughout much of the nineteenth century and all of the twentieth century, landmark civil rights decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) have mostly involved Black defendants. These decisions established voting rights, equal opportunity, equal access, desegregation of schools and a host of other rights that Blacks had been denied since the beginnings of the republic.
In 2008 and again in 2010 two more Black plaintiffs brought cases involving another enumerated civil right, the right to keep and bear arms, to SCOTUS where these rights were upheld and the Second Amendment clarified to state that self defense with arms was a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States.
One of the ironic parts of these decisions and subsequent arguments for and against the ownership of guns is that the ends of the political spectrum that oppose and promote civil rights for Black seem to have switched sides - Northern liberals are against while Southern conservatives have clasped it to their bosoms. It wasn't always this way.
Nicholas Johnson is a Harvard educated Professor of Law at Fordham University who has been a primary scholar of the Second Amendment. He has numerous publications on the subject with special emphasis on the Black community and the history of Black gun ownership from the times of slavery, through the terror attacks of the hundred years following the Civil War and up till today's extraordinary high rate of murder and armed mayhem that plagues many inner city communities.
His book, Negroes and the Gun: The Black Tradition of Arms, is a well documented history of the use of arms by Black people throughout US history, especially in the South. His narrative includes slave rebellions, the Underground Railroad, lynchings, The Ku Klux Klan in all its iterations, the civil rights movements of the 1960s and the recent depredations of Black on Black crime that is occurring in the twenty-first century.
Professor Johnson cites numerous sources including journals, newspaper articles, speeches, letters and personal interviews with the actors involved including both sides of the stories. He is not afraid to show how the use of arms failed to save Black men and women from terrorist gangs nor is he unwilling to demonstrate when Black men used arms to harm others or commit illegal acts. But the focus of his book is that up until relatively recent times, it was considered a right for anyone to protect their families and self from dangerous situations, including Blacks.
Since the beginning of this country there have been laws specifically restricting Blacks from owning firearms. The first laws were to protect slave owners but the majority of these laws were post Reconstruction efforts (including the infamous Jim Crowe laws) to disenfranchise Blacks from any rights. These laws were used to invade the homes of Black families by hastily deputized Klan members prior to and during the civil rights era including a number of "riots" such as the Tulsa Riots in 1921. The main problem seemed to be "Scary Black Men with Guns."
This book is deliberately titled "Negroes and the Gun" to evoke a response. Rob Williams was a civil rights leader in the 1960s who advocated armed resistance to the violence of the Klan and others . He was president of the North Carolina NAACP chapter, set up local NRA sponsored rifle clubs (if you were a member you could obtain inexpensive surplus rifles and pistols through the Civilian Marksmanship Program - you still can) and eventually knocked heads with the national office due to his rejection of pacifism. His book, Negros with Guns (written while he was an exile in Cuba), outlines his story and reasons for armed defense and is still considered controversial, enough so that Professor Johnson used a similar title to make a point.
The Rob Williams issue of armed defense was not that Blacks had guns, this has been a tradition with rural Blacks (and Whites) for centuries in this country, rather that Williams advocated open carry during marches and made comments that Blacks had a right to defend themselves in pro-active ways. He introduced the idea of "scary Black man" to the NAACP whose primary source of income was liberal white city dwellers. His expulsion from that organization was a result of his conviction that the White establishment would not protect civil rights workers from the terror groups that haunted the South in those days.
Interestingly, none of the main characters doubted that Blacks had a right to protect themselves. Even Martin Luther King, Jr. was quoted as saying that men had a right to protect their families with arms. The issue was more one of optics and money. There were plenty of instances of armed civil rights workers many of which are documented in this book.
To be fair (and Professor Johnson is very fair in his analysis of this issue) Rob Williams stepped into that gray area between self defense and threat, but the response to his First Amendment rights of speech was to brand him a terrorist even though he never did anything other than speak his mind.
Negroes and Guns is not only a compelling historical read, it is a compelling argument for the right to own arms by law abiding citizens. It is well written, well documented, and well reasoned. I suspect it will have very little influence on those who strongly inhabit both sides of this debate - they have too much to lose to be reasonable - but it does have interesting ideas about how a country where the ratio of gun ownership is 100,000 guns per 100,000 people (and growing) and whose individual states all allow concealed carry should approach the issue in a fair and reasonable way.
We can all agree that violent criminals who terrorize others should not have guns. We can all agree that mass killings by mentally unstable persons needs to be addressed in a way that is meaningful and not just low hanging fruit. And we can all agree that gun ownership has significant responsibilities that are unique to this right.
I think that this book helps in that discussion. The historical experience of Blacks in this country has always been the bellwether in our practical implementation of civil rights in the USA. Once again that history is teaching us how to do the right thing.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2014This book is headed for college classrooms everywhere. It is a fairly progressive author’s trip down memory lane and how the facts of violent self-defense have been scrubbed from the anti-Slavery and Civil Rights movement. As a lawyer he documents the book exhaustively and as far as I can tell completely. He documents, time after, time how enslaved Africans, how fugitive Africans would fight their way to freedom with guns. How they had an underground market (gun shows) to buy, and or steal these guns. How these guns and their willingness to use them allowed many enslaved Africans to get to Free States. And once there, how many fugitive Africans would arm themselves with guns against those sent to re-captured them.
I love the picture of Harriet Tubman one of the "conductors" of the underground railroad which helped enslaved Africans get to Canada (primarily) standing with a rifle. People claim she never used the rifle she was always pictured with, however the woman scouted for the Union army invading the south.
This book appears to mainly for liberals, progressives and those active in, or study about the Civil Rights struggle, thus its language is in their nomenclature. It is a useful book for conservatives to read and understand for discussion with liberals, progressives and people who have a deep respect for the civil rights era. The history of the fight against slavery and the civil rights struggle has been modified and right of self-defense, political violence has been minimized. The truth is (as you would expect) there were people who used violence and there were many more people who used non-violence. Both were useful at times and under difference circumstances.
"The True Remedy for the Fugitive Slave Bill is a good revolver, a steady hand, and a determination to shoot down any man attempting to kidnap." - Frederick Douglass, 1854
- Reviewed in the United States on October 2, 2014There are several good books on this topic (that I've read); this one is likely the best. It traces the Tradition to the colonial period and takes care to fully develop the narrative throughout the post-bellem through pre-Civil Rights era. Other books concentrate on the Civil Rights era. As such, it much more fully develops the Tradition as compared to its siblings.
Significantly, the author attributes the demise of the Tradition largely to the ascendancy of Black politicians. The dis-empowered vs. the empowered have always had a love vs. hate relationship to arms. Arms possession by the commoner implied the threat of disorder (as well as the order of self-defense). Once Black politicians secured control of municipal power they faced the same threat of disorder that their white predecessors struggled with. Snuffing out the Tradition became an important tactic in the attempt to maintain control.
Overcoming the history, oral and recorded, of the Tradition was a significant accomplishment. We might wonder how it was accomplished. It's achievement was largely based on overlaying the carefully-restrained Tradition of arms exclusively for self-defense with the legitimate history of Non-Violance. The prominence of the latter buried the former. Yet, the story that remains falls short of a full history.
The reader is left with a legitimate question: Would the velvet glove of Non-Violance have achieved the Civil Rights revolution had it not contained an iron fist not-so-completely hidden within? Did the possibility of a TWO-way shooting war play an important role in compelling Washington to finally intervene in the social affairs of the South?
Is the Civil Rights revolution a legitimate successor to the history of the common man rising up to challenge the crown? Does it follow in the footsteps of the British Glorious Revolution and the American war for independence?
Top reviews from other countries
K broReviewed in the United Kingdom on December 1, 20145.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Excellent read. Changes the narrative about armed blacks.
One person found this helpfulReport


