Top critical review
5 people found this helpful
I'd not buy it again
on September 11, 2014
Publisher doesn't seem to understand that this is supposed to be a radiology text. Images take a backseat to texts.
I really can't think of one.....
-Insufficient number of images.
-Horrible quality of images. Paper they used reminds me of newspaper quality paper.
-Text is also poor. They've crammed brain, head and neck and spine into a 600 page text. You'll not gain understanding of topics. But, you'll get a lot of "This disease has this appearance on CT/T1/T2 etc" without teaching you pathologies to make you understand them and differentiate them.