Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
New Ideas from Dead Economists: An Introduction to Modern Economic Thought Paperback – April 6, 2007
by
Todd G. Buchholz
(Author),
Martin Feldstein
(Foreword)
|
Todd G. Buchholz
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length368 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherPlume
-
Publication dateApril 6, 2007
-
Dimensions5.25 x 0.75 x 8 inches
-
ISBN-100452288444
-
ISBN-13978-0452288447
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
"If you read only one economics book this year, read this one.”—Larry Summers, Secretary of the Treasury for President Clinton, Director of the National Economic Council for President Obama
“Outstanding… fun to read.”—The Wall Street Journal
“This wide-ranging survey of economic thought combines a witty and clear exposition with a high degree of accuracy.”—Milton Friedman
“Precious few books… on any academic subject succeed at being witty and amusing. This is one of them. Bravo!”—William F. Buckley, Jr.
About the Author
Todd G. Buchholz is an internationally acclaimed economist who advises ABC News, as well as some of the world's leading investment funds. He has served as a director of economic policy at the White House and is a contribuiting editor for Worth magazine. Buchholz holds advanced degrees from Cambridge University and Harvard Law School and was awarded the Allyn Young Teaching Prize by Harvard University's Department of Economics.
Start reading New Ideas from Dead Economists on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Plume; Revised, Updated edition (April 6, 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 368 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0452288444
- ISBN-13 : 978-0452288447
- Item Weight : 9.9 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.25 x 0.75 x 8 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#73,768 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #134 in Theory of Economics
- #206 in Economic History (Books)
- #213 in Economic Conditions (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
146 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on March 13, 2014
Verified Purchase
I'm giving "New Ideas from Dead Economists" three stars. A former economic advisor to George H W Bush, Buchholz clearly has a conservative bias...but then all or at least most economists have a viewpoint that falls somewhere along the conservative/liberal continuum. With this caveat in mind, Buchholz gives us a useful outline of the basic ideas associated with major economists from Adam Smith to John Muth and the Rational Expectations school of economic thought (although I'm not sure where the "New" part of his title come in).
Buchholz offers a useful critique of John Maynard Keynes which concedes that, while Keynes' ideas are correct in their theoretical aspect, they are flawed in their political aspect. Specifically, while most people say they oppose debt, in reality they will fight to keep deficit spending that benefits them--which may be ok on the down side of the business cycle when deficit spending is needed to stimulate the economy, but very bad on the up side when we need to run surpluses to pay down debt run up during the down side. Problem is, as soon as a booming economy threatens to produce a surplus there is popular pressure to cut taxes rather than pay down debt, further stimulating an already overheated economy and leading to the next bust. But if only the stimulus part of Keynes' theory is politically doable, then the long term result will be unmanageable debt such as we now see in Greece.
A more fundamental argument I have with Buchholz is his advocacy of investing Social Security Trust Fund money in private markets. Many conservatives advocate this, which I find ironic, since direct government investment into the private sector (thereby making it less "private") is what otherwise is known as socialism. Ideology aside, given the enormous leverage government bureaucrats would then have to manipulate the market, direct government investment in private markets would provide frightening temptations for corruption. That is why the original Social Security Act dictated that Social Security surpluses be invested in government bonds, which are perfectly good and conservative investment vehicles that are held by individuals, banks, insurance companies and governments around the world. There is also the problem that government bonds not purchased by the Social Security Trust Fund would be sold instead on the open market (since we still need to finance our deficit)--meaning that instead of owing a portion of our debt to our own future retirees, more of that debt would be owed to those same banks, insurance companies and wealthy individuals, many of them foreign.
In summation, "New Ideas from Dead Economists" is informative and a book well worth reading as long as one keeps in mind that Buchholz writes from a particular viewpoint.
Buchholz offers a useful critique of John Maynard Keynes which concedes that, while Keynes' ideas are correct in their theoretical aspect, they are flawed in their political aspect. Specifically, while most people say they oppose debt, in reality they will fight to keep deficit spending that benefits them--which may be ok on the down side of the business cycle when deficit spending is needed to stimulate the economy, but very bad on the up side when we need to run surpluses to pay down debt run up during the down side. Problem is, as soon as a booming economy threatens to produce a surplus there is popular pressure to cut taxes rather than pay down debt, further stimulating an already overheated economy and leading to the next bust. But if only the stimulus part of Keynes' theory is politically doable, then the long term result will be unmanageable debt such as we now see in Greece.
A more fundamental argument I have with Buchholz is his advocacy of investing Social Security Trust Fund money in private markets. Many conservatives advocate this, which I find ironic, since direct government investment into the private sector (thereby making it less "private") is what otherwise is known as socialism. Ideology aside, given the enormous leverage government bureaucrats would then have to manipulate the market, direct government investment in private markets would provide frightening temptations for corruption. That is why the original Social Security Act dictated that Social Security surpluses be invested in government bonds, which are perfectly good and conservative investment vehicles that are held by individuals, banks, insurance companies and governments around the world. There is also the problem that government bonds not purchased by the Social Security Trust Fund would be sold instead on the open market (since we still need to finance our deficit)--meaning that instead of owing a portion of our debt to our own future retirees, more of that debt would be owed to those same banks, insurance companies and wealthy individuals, many of them foreign.
In summation, "New Ideas from Dead Economists" is informative and a book well worth reading as long as one keeps in mind that Buchholz writes from a particular viewpoint.
22 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 8, 2012
Verified Purchase
The main premise of the book, is best summarized by the author: "It is striking that so many of the lessons of the great economists still speak to us. Each of their wisest theories has a practical point or analogy today. This book seeks their wisdom by looking at mainstream economics and asking, Who first had these insights and built these durable models? We can learn from the masters."
Todd then embarks his readers on a journey through the contributions of the greatest economists of our time. Clearly explaining how they analysed the existing models and theories of their time, and their own contributions to advance the filed of economics. He does so, in a very simple style that is accessible to any audience regardless of their background in that field.
What truly sets this book apart is the breadth of content, spanning a period of several centuries. Sufficient depth is included so that one gains an appreciation and broad understanding. The included references make it easy for one to dive deeper into more details. A must read for anyone seeking an introduction and/or a broad understanding of the field of economics!
Below are key excerpts from the book that I found particularly insightful:
1- "Russia's 1998 debacle teaches us that a market economy must rest on a dependable legal system. A free market does not mean utter chaos; it requires ground rules."
2- "Economics if the study of choice. It does not tell us what to choose. It only helps us understand the consequences of our choices."
3- "...as an economist isolates causes and estimates their influence, the degree of influence changes...Economics may not be a "hard" science. But that does not mean it is an easy science. Because it is so fluid, it is hard to hold in place and to study."
4- "Smith clearly defined the proper role for government: first, providing for national defense; second, administering justice through a court system; third, maintaining public institutions and resources such as roads, canals, bridges, educational systems, and the dignity of the sovereign."
5- "The point of Ricardo's analysis: free trade makes it possible for households to consume more goods regardless of whether trading partners are more or less economically advanced."
6- "By investing, the capitalist gives up the immediate gratification of buying goods. His return on investment pays him for waiting, for delaying his pleasure. If everyone consumes everything now, society will produce nothing new. Thus, profits play a crucial role."
7- "...four very important areas in which economists have dramatically transformed traditional legal analysis: negligence law; property law; criminal law; and corporate finance."
8- "There is clearly more to economics than prices, profits, rents, and costs. Laws, morals, fashions, and philosophies all contribute to an economy. They may support it, or they may tear it down."
9- "What does it mean to be Keynesian? Two basis propositions will suffice here: (1) the private economy may not reach full employment; (2) government spending can spur the economy into filling the gap."
10- "Keynes cleverly speculates that the way to make money in the stock market is not to be the best corporate analyst, but to be the best at guessing what others think is good."
11- "This movement, called monetarism, admits that the economy does have an accelerator and a brake, but insists that the accelerator should be marked "higher money supply" and the brake "lower money supply...the monetarists portray the Federal Reserve Board...as the driver."
12- "With perhaps uncustomary humility, Friedman claims that economists do not know enough about monetary policy to manipulate it wisely."
13- "We are all Keynesians now, thanks to Keynes. We are all monetarists now, thanks to Friedman. And we are all eclectics now, thanks to a turbulent world."
14- "This problem emerges again and again in democracies. Motivates organizations trample on the interests of consumers, who individually have a small stake in the outcome. Ultimately, the individual consumers are hurt badly as a national efficiency and income fall."
15- "Rational Expectations theory predicts that government stimulus does not spur the economy and that government contraction does not hurt...Why do most economists tend to agree with Rational Expectations theorists when they talk about the stock market, yet explode in disagreement when speaking of the macroeconomy? The fact is, the stock market is a more efficient...it is quite liquid...In contrast, real markets for goods and services show more complexity and rigidity."
16- "...each of the economists we have studied, despite their many differences, warned us that governments always face political pressures to take measures that can ruin good economies...Because even good economic policies often produce victims, economists have a very tough time persuading democratic governments to take good advice. Good economics may not be popular economics, especially in the short run."
17- "Parents must eventually learn to teach their children how to handle uncertainty - not how to ensure stability."
18- "For most of man's life on earth, he has lived no better on two legs than he had on four . Give the economist a little credit for explaining and depicting the brief, shining moments when there has been a difference."
Todd then embarks his readers on a journey through the contributions of the greatest economists of our time. Clearly explaining how they analysed the existing models and theories of their time, and their own contributions to advance the filed of economics. He does so, in a very simple style that is accessible to any audience regardless of their background in that field.
What truly sets this book apart is the breadth of content, spanning a period of several centuries. Sufficient depth is included so that one gains an appreciation and broad understanding. The included references make it easy for one to dive deeper into more details. A must read for anyone seeking an introduction and/or a broad understanding of the field of economics!
Below are key excerpts from the book that I found particularly insightful:
1- "Russia's 1998 debacle teaches us that a market economy must rest on a dependable legal system. A free market does not mean utter chaos; it requires ground rules."
2- "Economics if the study of choice. It does not tell us what to choose. It only helps us understand the consequences of our choices."
3- "...as an economist isolates causes and estimates their influence, the degree of influence changes...Economics may not be a "hard" science. But that does not mean it is an easy science. Because it is so fluid, it is hard to hold in place and to study."
4- "Smith clearly defined the proper role for government: first, providing for national defense; second, administering justice through a court system; third, maintaining public institutions and resources such as roads, canals, bridges, educational systems, and the dignity of the sovereign."
5- "The point of Ricardo's analysis: free trade makes it possible for households to consume more goods regardless of whether trading partners are more or less economically advanced."
6- "By investing, the capitalist gives up the immediate gratification of buying goods. His return on investment pays him for waiting, for delaying his pleasure. If everyone consumes everything now, society will produce nothing new. Thus, profits play a crucial role."
7- "...four very important areas in which economists have dramatically transformed traditional legal analysis: negligence law; property law; criminal law; and corporate finance."
8- "There is clearly more to economics than prices, profits, rents, and costs. Laws, morals, fashions, and philosophies all contribute to an economy. They may support it, or they may tear it down."
9- "What does it mean to be Keynesian? Two basis propositions will suffice here: (1) the private economy may not reach full employment; (2) government spending can spur the economy into filling the gap."
10- "Keynes cleverly speculates that the way to make money in the stock market is not to be the best corporate analyst, but to be the best at guessing what others think is good."
11- "This movement, called monetarism, admits that the economy does have an accelerator and a brake, but insists that the accelerator should be marked "higher money supply" and the brake "lower money supply...the monetarists portray the Federal Reserve Board...as the driver."
12- "With perhaps uncustomary humility, Friedman claims that economists do not know enough about monetary policy to manipulate it wisely."
13- "We are all Keynesians now, thanks to Keynes. We are all monetarists now, thanks to Friedman. And we are all eclectics now, thanks to a turbulent world."
14- "This problem emerges again and again in democracies. Motivates organizations trample on the interests of consumers, who individually have a small stake in the outcome. Ultimately, the individual consumers are hurt badly as a national efficiency and income fall."
15- "Rational Expectations theory predicts that government stimulus does not spur the economy and that government contraction does not hurt...Why do most economists tend to agree with Rational Expectations theorists when they talk about the stock market, yet explode in disagreement when speaking of the macroeconomy? The fact is, the stock market is a more efficient...it is quite liquid...In contrast, real markets for goods and services show more complexity and rigidity."
16- "...each of the economists we have studied, despite their many differences, warned us that governments always face political pressures to take measures that can ruin good economies...Because even good economic policies often produce victims, economists have a very tough time persuading democratic governments to take good advice. Good economics may not be popular economics, especially in the short run."
17- "Parents must eventually learn to teach their children how to handle uncertainty - not how to ensure stability."
18- "For most of man's life on earth, he has lived no better on two legs than he had on four . Give the economist a little credit for explaining and depicting the brief, shining moments when there has been a difference."
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2017
Verified Purchase
A very readable, and sometimes even humorous, introduction to major economic thinkers. Things get a little dense when you get to Keynesian economic policy, but understandably so. I would highly recommend this book for anyone looking to not only trace basic macroeconomic thought development, but to look at how those developments influenced our world, and how we got to where we are today.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 6, 2016
Verified Purchase
We ordered this book for my daughter's AP econ class. She recommended it to me when she was done with it, and I loved it, too. The book is an easy-to-read, great overview of some of the most famous economists (and one or two I didn't know), their ideas/theories and the context in which they developed them. Lots of information packed into a concise, brief intro to various economists.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2018
Verified Purchase
Reading this book gave me a well-rounded understanding of the history and theory of economics.
You might find that he tends to break up trains of thought with comedic relief that seems outdated and tacky (older readers may disagree). More importantly, he doesn’t spend enough time applying the ideas of economics to contemporary issues. He does provide some good examples, but that piece didn’t live up to the standard of the title.
You might find that he tends to break up trains of thought with comedic relief that seems outdated and tacky (older readers may disagree). More importantly, he doesn’t spend enough time applying the ideas of economics to contemporary issues. He does provide some good examples, but that piece didn’t live up to the standard of the title.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2013
Verified Purchase
This book is a well-written, accessible survey of Western economic thought, told through biographical accounts of famous/influential economists. It provides helpful insight into names and ideas that pop up frequently in discussions of everything from TARP and the government's stimulus programs (Keynes) to global warming and the Mad Max movies (Malthus). Todd Buchhoz manages to make this foray into the dismal science both interesting and entertaining. I highly recommend it to anyone looking for a quick, fun primer on modern economic ideas.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Gary D.
3.0 out of 5 stars
Ok. Expected more.
Reviewed in Canada on April 27, 2020Verified Purchase
I expected more detailed explanation of dead economist's theorist. Didn't get it.
dumbo
5.0 out of 5 stars
vraiment remarquable
Reviewed in France on July 6, 2010Verified Purchase
Un peu de biographie, des explications simples des concepts économiques, une écriture agréable, quelques traits d'humour, l'ouvrage est véritablement remarquable. Le tour de force de l'auteur est d'avoir réussi à synthétiser l'évolution de la pensée économique de façon à ce que le lecteur ait davantage l'impression de lire un roman qu'un ouvrage "académique" (ce qu'il n'est pas totalement). Les préférences de l'auteur ressortent parfois (marx est dépeint comme un alcolique, dépensier et infidèle... ce qu'il a été en partie mais tout de même) mais l'ouvrage est globalement "neutre" du point de vue de l'idéologie. L'ouvrage a constitué pour moi une véritable très bonne découverte.
wontonwoo
5.0 out of 5 stars
経済学の潮流を分かり易く
Reviewed in Japan on May 18, 2008Verified Purchase
経済学の歴史を振り返りながら現在(と言っても3,4年前だが)起こっている経済の現象について書かれている。
数式は掛け算と割り算の組合せ1つだけであり、グラフはなく読み物として楽しい本である。
例えば比較優位性の説明が分かり易く書かれている。残念ながらこの概念を理解していないエンジニア、
ビジネスパーソンが多いのが実情である。金融の世界でなぜ円と円のスワップ取引が行われているか、
ITの営業はなぜプログラムを書かないか知っていれば仕事で役に立つ概念ではあるのだが。
制度派経済学のThorstein Veblen氏に関する章で"The engineer wants to build a better mousetrap;
the manager wants to trap the consumer."とあり笑わせて貰ったが、このように小難しく経済理論だけを
説明しているのではなく様々な逸話を織り交ぜて経済学者の人柄も読ませてくれる。
マルクスが考慮しなかった資本家の本質「労働者だけがいれば良いのではなく、無形資産(Intangible Assts)を
持つ資本家の評価こそが資本主義社会成功の鍵であるといった事であるとか、デヴィッド・リカードの人としての
評価"I never argued or discussed a question with any person who argues more fairly or less victory
and more for truth."といった感銘を受ける事が多く書かれていた。
英語のレベルは中級程度だと思う。全く経済学を知らない方でも十分楽しめると思う。
一度経済学を勉強した方々は特に楽しめる一冊。
数式は掛け算と割り算の組合せ1つだけであり、グラフはなく読み物として楽しい本である。
例えば比較優位性の説明が分かり易く書かれている。残念ながらこの概念を理解していないエンジニア、
ビジネスパーソンが多いのが実情である。金融の世界でなぜ円と円のスワップ取引が行われているか、
ITの営業はなぜプログラムを書かないか知っていれば仕事で役に立つ概念ではあるのだが。
制度派経済学のThorstein Veblen氏に関する章で"The engineer wants to build a better mousetrap;
the manager wants to trap the consumer."とあり笑わせて貰ったが、このように小難しく経済理論だけを
説明しているのではなく様々な逸話を織り交ぜて経済学者の人柄も読ませてくれる。
マルクスが考慮しなかった資本家の本質「労働者だけがいれば良いのではなく、無形資産(Intangible Assts)を
持つ資本家の評価こそが資本主義社会成功の鍵であるといった事であるとか、デヴィッド・リカードの人としての
評価"I never argued or discussed a question with any person who argues more fairly or less victory
and more for truth."といった感銘を受ける事が多く書かれていた。
英語のレベルは中級程度だと思う。全く経済学を知らない方でも十分楽しめると思う。
一度経済学を勉強した方々は特に楽しめる一冊。
Deals related to this item
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: john smith, accounting theory, from the new world















