
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$24.33$24.33
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Sarasota Book Depot
Save with Used - Acceptable
$15.31$15.31
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: -OnTimeBooks-
1.76 mi | Ashburn 20147
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé Paperback – December 30, 2012
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length358 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherOlive Branch Press
- Publication dateDecember 30, 2012
- Dimensions6 x 1.2 x 9 inches
- ISBN-101566567297
- ISBN-13978-1566567299
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11PaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Jan 13Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
9/11 Unmasked: An International Review Panel InvestigationDavid Ray GriffinPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Jan 11Only 14 left in stock (more on the way).
Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11HardcoverFREE Shipping by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Jan 11
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And DistortionsPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Jan 14Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
The 9/11 Mystery Plane: And the Vanishing of AmericaPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Jan 11Only 7 left in stock (more on the way).
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book well-researched with proper citations. They appreciate the factual content and rational arguments presented in clear, concise writing that makes it an easy read.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers appreciate the book's research quality. They find the factual content good, with proper citation of sources. The author presents the evidence in a remarkable way, along with his insight and critical analysis. The book provides a good summary of what has changed since DRG's original book on 9/11, and is well-documented with 100 pages of chapter-by-chapter analysis.
"...well-researched detail and rational arguments that are hallmarks of Dr. Griffin's work...." Read more
"...All of these points and more are the building blocks of Griffin’s book, yet he doesn’t stop at these broad highlights...." Read more
"...on the plus side this book was very well researched and it cited all the sources which supported his arguments, which were very convincing...." Read more
"...Such is the force of his arguments and the wealth of evidence he marshals that it is simply not possible for anyone with an open mind to fail to be..." Read more
Customers find the writing style clear and concise, making it an easy read.
"...will find new information here, presented in the precise, and very readable style Dr. Griffin has brought to each of his books on the subject...." Read more
"...David's clear concise writing makes it an easy read...." Read more
"...Written in precise language, and resembling a court record in its detail, it will leave any thinking person with only one conclusion -- 911 was a..." Read more
"David Gray Griffin is a extremely articulate, factual-based and intellectual writer. I have enjoyed this book a lot...." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 10, 2008Dr. David Ray Griffin revises and extends his groundbreaking first 9/11 book, The
New Pearl Harbor, in a second volume. It follows closely on the heels of his 9/11
Contradictions - An Open Letter to Congress and the Press, also published this year.
In that book, he presented 25 direct contradictions - instances in the official account
where there are unexplained major conflicts between the evidence and what the U. S.
Government - in the form of the Commission - would have us believe.
With this work, Dr. Griffin cements his place as the pre-eminent spokesperson for
the growing number of people who demand answers to an expanding list of questions
about 9/11 - answers that can only come from a thorough and truly impartial
investigation of the largest unsolved crime in our history.
The latest in an impressive line of 9/11 works, this book updates, corrects, and
extends the account in The New Pearl Harbor, following the structure of that book,
making a number of corrections to the record, but adding a great deal of detail and new
information that has been uncovered since its publication in 2004. Even those members
of the 9/11 Truth Movement who have immersed themselves thoroughly in the subject
will find new information here, presented in the precise, and very readable style Dr.
Griffin has brought to each of his books on the subject. Readers who are new to the
subject would do well to start with the first volume, since it still provides one of the best
presentations of the basic facts available. Readers experienced with 9/11 analysis and
research in all its forms, likely will not be astonished by revelations in this work - our
capacity to be surprised has been somewhat dulled by the daily parade of insults to
intelligence that pass for governance in the era of Bush, but they will be gratified by the
well-researched detail and rational arguments that are hallmarks of Dr. Griffin's work.
In "Revisited", to pick an example, the section dealing with the information brought
out by the London Sunday Times on Sibel Edmonds, who defied a gag order to expose
corruption, espionage, high-level protection of foreign agents, and proliferation of
nuclear technology - all studiously ignored by the domestic media - is a grim illustration
of the debased state to which our "free press" has devolved. The quiet deconstruction of
former Solicitor General Ted Olson's report, in which he related details about the alleged
hijacking of Flight 77 based on phone calls that the FBI now claims did not occur,
should have caused headlines in the Washington Post, but at least the record is
corrected here.
As in his previous book - 9/11 Contradictions and its predecessors - he presents
evidence that exposes the inadequacies and sometimes the mendacity of the official
explanation, as represented by the 9/11 Commission Report and the thinning ranks of
its defenders. In doing so, his primary focus is on those incompatibilities between the
official account and the public record, or instances where the public record has been
manipulated or distorted to bolster a misleading view of events.
The already long list of inconsistencies, impossibilities, unexplained conflicts, circular
arguments, and downright contradictions in the Commission's official conspiracy theory
is further burdened by another heaping helping with this volume. Were the media the
least bit interested in the pursuit of the true story of 9/11, the official story and the
actions enabled by the passive acceptance of it by a fearful public and a cowed
Congress would most likely have already collapsed.
The Truth movement, in which Dr. Griffin has played a leading, perhaps dominant
role, has brought forward a very large body of evidence buried or omitted by the
commission ostensibly assembled to investigate the event. The efforts of the media
establishment to confine knowledge and public discourse about this evidence to a
counter-culture ghetto have been remarkably effective. When the subject does surface
in the mainstream, it is subjected to ridicule and dismissal with the inevitable ready-
made pejorative "conspiracy theory", which is invariably applied to non-approved
versions of events, discouraging the average citizen from taking it seriously. In this
book, and several others, it is made clear that the government version is, itself, no less
a conspiracy theory, and a far-fetched one at that. Dr. Griffin, in his books and with an
energetic lecture schedule, is doing his part and more to break out of this ghetto. His
calm and rational examination of the matter does him and the movement great credit.
The secrecy with which the current administration conducts itself, and its
documented efforts to propagate self-serving propaganda, do nothing to inspire
confidence that they have dealt, or will ever deal, with the issues of 9/11 with any more
integrity than they showed in the buildup to the invasion of Iraq. On the contrary, the
way the administration has dealt with 9/11 appears more and more an inseparable part
of a strategy to establish the "War on Terror" as a brand name for a long-term imperial
foreign policy. As it stands, the most charitable possible reading of administration
actions and the subsequent Commission Report is as a criminal coverup that makes
Watergate look like a tea party.
With the cooperation of a supine press and a complicit Congress, and despite what
appears to be breathtaking incompetence emanating from the top, the machinery of
empire grinds forward, appearing to have Iran in its sights. This book throws more sand
in the gears of that machinery. A great many in the Truth movement believe that the key
to stopping the endless chain of war, infringements on our rights, and human rights
abuses, all committed in our name and allegedly to keep us "safer", is exposure of the
truth about 9/11 and holding those who are truly responsible to account. Absent a
revival of investigative journalism - a dim prospect at best, in view of the media
ownership concentration - books like this one, arming the informed citizen with solid
information and providing a basis for demanding direct action, appear to be our best
hope.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 15, 2009It is true that you may fool all of the people some of the time;
you can even fool some of the people all of the time;
but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.
President Abraham Lincoln
Two thousand four hundred years ago Plato warned us for the deformed perspective of people living in a cave. In his story, they saw persons walking by a hole in the upper part of the cave reflected as shadows on the walls of the cave, and considered those shades as the "reality". In September 2001 Bush warned us for dangerous men living in faraway caves, which he held responsible for the greatest attack on American territory since Pearl Harbor... Is he right ? Or were we shown the shadows of reality on television ?
Who agrees with Socrates that the most important task for human beings is searching for the truth, we have breaking news. Thierry Meyssan of the Réseau Voltaire was the first whistleblower. He warned us for the first shadows of reality. When he looked at the images of the hole in the Pentagon - 19 m width - that we were shown on television, he understood there was no way a Boeing 757 with a wingspan of 38 m could have made only such a small hole. This fact stimulated curious people all over the globe to continue investigate what really happened on 9/11. The actual 911-truth-movement brings together architects, engineers, firefighters, pilots, philosophers and citizens, united by their common interest in discovering what really happened. The author of this book does an important effort to clarify some important points.
If we investigate closely the disaster with the twin towers, we quickly understand that the official version is false. To begin with, following the firm Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson, the structural design of the twin towers was conceived in such a way that it could withstand the collision of a Boeing 707 : "The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707-DC-8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse." On 9/11 the planes hit the towers at respectively 440 and 540 mph, what means that their kinetic energy was below the design parameter. Collapse of the towers should thus not have occurred.
The official version further claims that the buildings collapsed due to fire. However, *never before in history* a skyscraper with a steel structure collapsed because of a fire. Now, consider for a minute that we want to believe the official story, and that the fire weakened the steel structure of those buildings. What should we have seen then ? A local failure or in the worst case the collapse of the upper floors. End of story.
But we didn't see this on 9/11. The twin towers collapsed totally. Consider - once again for the sake of argument - that we want to believe that the whole steel structure collapsed due to a fire on the upper floors; then again our faith is put under great stress, since the collapse of the twin towers occurred at *free fall speed*. For those who have left school a long time ago, this free fall speed was illustrated unintentionally by some unlucky people trapped in the smoke on the upper floors. Some of them preferred to jump. Not only those people, but the two buildings, collapsed in ten seconds. In the case of the people it was clear that the air didn't offer the slightest resistance. In the case of the buildings this meant that the underlying structure - 100.000 ton of steel - imploded "miraculously". Who refuses to believe in the "revenge of Allah" and prefers to stick to the elementary laws of nature formulated by Newton in 1687 cannot explain this without other forces necessarily happening to produce this incredible speed of collapse. Forces that broke the resistance of the underlying floors in a controlled manner. Forces known as... explosions.
Witnesses are confirming this. A lot of reporters mentioned explosions when covering the events of 9/11, including CNN, FOX, CBS and NBC. Explosions were also heard by 118 firefighters, among other survivors. William Rodríguez, the "last survivor" to be rescued from under the debris of the twin towers, and received by Bush as a hero in the White House, soon became his worst nightmare, because he continues to claim that the twin towers collapsed due to explosions.
Explosions also explain why surrounding buildings were hit by enormous pieces of steel from the twin towers. Some of them weighted several tons and flew over a distance of 180 m.
On 9/11 the twin towers weren't the only buildings that were demolished. A third building collapsed, some hours later. The WTC-7-building (Salomon Brothers Building), not hit by a plane, collapsed with the astonishing speed of six seconds. This event hasn't even been explained by the 9/11 commission in their 571 pages long report. Now, remember this building wasn't exactly a newspaper stand, but a huge skyscraper of 47 floors.
Two New York City officials - Michael Hess and Barry Jennings - went to this building, shortly after the first WTC-tower was hit, looking for their boss, the mayor, since in this building the Emergency Services Department was located. Apparently, mayor Giuliani was better informed, and had already moved on. While Hess and Jennings were inside WTC-7, they heard several explosions, and were even temporarily caught within this damned building. Afterward, this building would be evacuated and the firefighters were withheld to intervene.
The other building hit on 9/11 was the Pentagon. That is even weirder, since more than once, the Pentagon has been called the safest and best-defended building in the world. The airspace above the Pentagon is a no-fly area. Everything that flies above it without a US-military transponder will be knocked down immediately. If a Boeing-757 would fly close to the Pentagon, it would be shot down without pity. Only a flying object of the *own army* - like a missile - could come close, without activating the air defense system.
The big bosses of the Pentagon were delighted with the choice of the "terrorists" on 9/11. The audit area was completely destroyed, just a day after Rumsfeld told that the Pentagon was missing [...] trillion dollars. April Gallop, a survivor, declared that she saw "flames coming out of the computers", what is confirmed by another witness, Tracy Webb. She and other witnesses also claim to have heard explosions. Apparently, the "terrorists" didn't leave anything to pure luck. The computers with the audits had to be destroyed completely. Since 9/11 this investigation has been suspended. This raises the question who were the actual "terrorists" : a wild man living in a cave in Afghanistan or the big bosses of the Pentagon themselves, for whom war is big business?
If the Pentagon was not hit by a plane, but by a missile, this raises a second question : where is the plane ?
Now, let's first consider the twin towers again. Several eyewitnesses claim that the planes that hit the twin towers were no commercial airliners. Eyewitnesses speak of grey planes, without windows. Even FOX reported live having seen a "plane without windows" that "looked like a cargo plane". Several pilots on the website [...] confirm also that the proportions of the planes that can be seen on the official images don't correspond with a Boeing-767.
This leads us to conclude that not only flight 77 but also flights 11 and 175 are "missing". This raises the question if those planes were really hijacked. How do we know under normal circumstances that a plane is hijacked ? Because the pilot forms the code "7500" on the transponder. Not one of the eight (co-)pilots has succeeded on 9/11 to fulfill this simple standard procedure, that only takes about 2 to 3 seconds. Apparently, the Arabs were very handy with their box cutters... Have you ever thought about this ? Would you be able to kill a chicken with such a "knife", let alone : a human being ? On 9/11 occurred the impossible : the pilot ánd the copilot were murdered with box cutters, in less than three seconds ! And this operation was executed four times without a flaw ! Why were we moved to believe in such a nonsense ? Well, there seemed to be some cell phone communications between "stewardesses" and "passengers" who informed us on this "hijacking by Arabs". A small, but not insignificant detail was overlooked : cell phones couldn't communicate with the ground in 2001. This technology only became available in 2004, after installing a special "picocell" in the airplane, and this was installed for the first time in Europe in 2008 !!!
Now, if the four commercial airplanes on 9/11 weren't hijacked by Arabs, then what happened to them ? Let's go back to April 2001 first of all. It was the first time in history that an unmanned plane flew from the US to Australia, by remote control.
A remote control system could break in in the command system of a commercial airliner if the software has a back door. A remote system shuts off the transponder, what resolves the mystery why the code "7500" was never received. The Boeings were indeed hijacked on 9/11, but not by Arabs, but by an American computer system. This was probably on board of the large military aircraft E-4B - the "Doomsday Plane" - that has the most sophisticated military command and control apparatus, and which was circling over Washington when the Pentagon was hit, as shown on CNN and seen by a lot of eyewitnesses. The White House was even evacuated at this moment, due to the presence of this plane.
President Eisenhower warned us of the "military industrial complex" on the 17th of January 1961 in his farewell speech. That is what we're up to. The US are a permanent war economy. Producing weapons becomes absurd if there are no wars to fight. Therefore, most wars are initiated under false pretexts. President Kennedy intended to break the power of the military industrial complex. He wanted to stop the insanity of the nuclear arms race by making peace with the Soviet Union. He wanted to involve the whole world in a Pax Americana. He wanted to withdraw all troops from Vietnam by 1965 and therefore signed the order NSAM #263 on the 11th of October of 1963. The military industrial complex doesn't like to be dragged about. The weapons industry is the biggest enterprise of the US. Its interests are defended with all possible means. If it is necessary, they do in their own country what they do regularly in other countries of the world : kill the president.
It's important to distinguish the shadows from the reality, the lies from the truth. And let's keep in mind some wise words from Albert Einstein : "The injustice in the world doesn't exist because some people commit it; it exists because the great mass ignores it." Read this book, inform yourself, your friends and your family members.
Top reviews from other countries
FrederickCraigReviewed in Canada on May 26, 20135.0 out of 5 stars Manditory reading for everyone who has an opinion about 9/11
The evidence is presented clearly and objectively. No hysteria. Just the facts. And the facts contradict the official story. A must read for anyone who has an opinion about 9/11.
-
Rafael Morís PablosReviewed in Spain on November 22, 20135.0 out of 5 stars Irrebatible desenmascaramiento del ataque de falsa bandera del 11-S
Irrebatible desenmascaramiento del ataque de falsa bandera del 11-S. Su único fallo es no insistir más en lo más descarado, que es la imposibilidad física de la 'explicación oficial' del derrumbe de las 3 torres.
SeaGoat under SiriusReviewed in the United Kingdom on March 10, 20105.0 out of 5 stars Griffin devours corporate circus ring masters' stillborn clown, Bush
Griffin's evidence rips to shreds the burlesque, over-sized, checked pants that Bush's circus ring masters fitted badly to their stillborn clown.
This is a seminal work. It is the supernova that births new realities. It is a binary-star to the the superb, companion volume, "The New Pearl Harbor", because, whilst that book bravely raised many of the big questions that have become cornerstone to "9/11 truth", it was an inquiry into the oddities and coincidences in the official 911 theory, the likes of which would have had film producers turning down putative scripts as too far fetched. A Swedish film producer told this writer, "no one will believe that one of Bush's brothers had been indirectly in charge of security at the World Trade Centre" - and yet, it is a fact! Then there's the fact that the commission report into the whole tragedy actually failed to mention the mystifying collapse of the third New York skyscraper that day; a building the same size as some of the tallest buildings in Europe - and not a word about its demise! The latter book, "The New Pearl Harbor, Revisited" is published 5 years after its companion volume. It is not a reprint; not an updated version. It is a second volume; a stand-alone 2nd part in a 2 book set. They form an indispensable pair of great tomes. "The New Pearl Harbor, Revisited" is a contemporary, hard-hitting, evidence-packed tome that delivers a killer-blow to the thoroughly undermined official 911 theory. Stark facts and stunning insight fills every page. It's quite a shocker and it is very gripping stuff. I felt like I could not put it down; I had to turn another page. That's where the likeness to a great horror novel, or a suspenseful thriller ends, for this is not a work of fiction. If only it were...
Taking just one chapter will allow me to illustrate how Griffin works around the lies and deceits of the official story. The chapter about the generally less-discussed (and not seen) Pentagon strike reminds us that to believe the official story, i.e. the government-sponsored conspiracy theory, we not only have to be naïve but we must ignore the facts, and the endless, contradictory stories and muddled official eye-witness accounts.
Officially, according to the Bush government, Flight 77 returned to Washington, from where it had departed, under the control of short-in-stature but apparently super-human strong-men, who had rounded-up both pilots and passengers, by threatening them with small blades attached to plastic handles. According to the official theory, they forced one and all to the back of the plane. They took the stick and doomed themselves and hostages. How did the administration know this? They knew, because, coincidentally, the wife of the then U.S. Solicitor General, Ted Olsen, was onboard, and according to him, in an interview he gave on Fox TV, on 14th September 2001, she called him twice, collect-call (he said she had a problem with her credit cards), from an air-phone, on the seatback in front of her seat. From here she told him of the situation on-board; that the pilots had been forced from the cockpit and they were in the back of the plane with her and the others. Then, according to the official theory, the trained and fanatical pilots executed a circus-style feat of flying and crashed the plane into The Pentagon, the best defended building on the planet, surrounded by its own state-of-the-art, ground-to-air missile defence batteries; and squadrons of fighter jets a few minutes scramble-call away, at nearby Andrews Air Force base; not to mention Langley, a little further a-field. Taking down a handful of traffic lights in the 2 seconds before it struck, the doomed jet was filmed by up to 80 different video cameras in the locale but the FBI were collecting the films within 5 minutes of the crash and we are not at all allowed to see the footage, for national security reasons (we have seen just one or two frames - just 2 tiny parts of 1 second - from a video that the government wanted us to see).
In contrast, here are some of Griffin's facts. They give short shrift to the official theory. Griffin reminds us that the American Airlines Boeing 757 that purportedly crashed into The Pentagon was not fitted with seat-back air-phones in 2001 - a rather big point this, as the story of what happened on that plane comes directly from the U.S. Government's Solicitor General, who told the world that his wife made her last ever calls to him, at his Washington desk, from such a seat-back phone. The FBI have since also contradicted his later story, where he said he had been mistaken and she had actually called him from her cell phone. In 2006, at the trial of the so-called "20th hijacker", the FBI stated that Olsen never, ever spoke to his wife, the beleaguered Barbara Olsen, at any time during her ordeal aboard the doomed plane; not on a cell (the technology was not available at the time), nor via an air-phone (the plane did not have them). Why did Olsen lie? Was he coerced? So, we no longer have any witness testimony from onboard. The Bush version of events regarding the Pentagon strike, asks us to believe that a poorly-trained religious devotee, who was a very poor trainee-pilot - according to his flight schools - who'd only flown a few hours in small aeroplane, with an instructor, flew, for the first time ever, a Boeing 757 (taking over control during a mid-air fight, with a very tough pilot (according to family and friends he would never have been willing to give-up his plane) who oddly failed to squawk a panic code to ground control (an action that would have only taken 3 seconds and an action that we are told to believe was 3-seconds too long for all of the 8 doomed pilots on that day). He then took the huge plane into what has been called a military-style, precision manoeuvre (air traffic control staff who were watching the transponder-less plane, via radar, commented that it must be military) which included a 7,000 foot downward spiral, at 530mph, exiting that same dramatic move at a little over 200 feet above the ground. Not only did he brilliantly avoid detection by the automated missile defence batteries at The Pentagon, that will shoot at anything within a certain range, except for friendly, i.e. military or government transponder-fitted planes, he cleverly also missed a 224-foot-high broadcasting antenna mast, which stood directly in his path to The Pentagon, after which, and in just 3 seconds flat, he dived, at over 530mph, to near-ground, pulling-up, to level-off at a staggering 10xG-force, hitting the first of a series of street lampposts, chopping them down, without leaving any turbulence damage to the cars or lawns 20-feet below, and then smashed-into, coincidentally, the newly renovated and scarcely occupied (least important, on that day) wedge of the Pentagon, i.e. the wedge furthest from Rumsfeld's office. The Pentagon was hit a few feet above lawn-level, between ground and first floor, somehow without churning a blade of grass or hitting the massive electrical workers' fittings, which were on the lawns at that spot, on that day; and was left, initially, with quite a small hole, a few yards (or meters) across, where the nose of the plane - according to Rumsfeld, punctured the re-enforced concrete! As for the much, much harder titanium metal engines ... well they just vaporized, or so goes the official story. Not that anyone claims the fires were 6 times hotter than the fires in The Twin Towers (titanium only vaporizes at about 3000 degrees, whereas carbon fires fed by jet fuel burn at a fraction of that). The tail and the wings must have vaporized before touching the outer walls too as, immediately after the strike there was just the hole, no laterally smashed areas, from the wings and no vertically destroyed facia, from the tail. Interestingly Rumsfeld is seen on film, shortly after the strike, scurrying across the lawn, helping as a stretcher bearer. That seems very odd behaviour for a U.S. Defence Secretary: a man should have been in the bunker, directing operations, as any other Defence Secretary would have been, at a time when his country was under multiple attack - it was an hour after the first strike and they weren't meant to know anything about who/what/how, so Secret Service should have had him off the ground, and down a hole in a few seconds but they didn't. Transport Secretary Minetta has stated that he was with Rumsfeld, in The Pentagon, shortly beforehand and over-heard Rumsfeld being warned of the approach, to which Rumsfeld gave a stand-down order; to let the object keep coming! Interestingly, during Rumsfeld's first TV press interview, during the morning, he stated that it was "a missile" that hit The Pentagon. The front elevation of the struck part of The Pentagon collapsed about 30 minutes after it had been hit, though US government sponsored publications like "Popular Mechanics" mentioned that the collapse happened as the plane struck. Their `911-debunking' special edition was edited by a member of Michael Chertoff's family. Michael Chertoff was Bush's Homeland Security Minister. He now, together with the ex-head of the CIA, under Bush, manufactures the full body scanners we are being pressed into using, and airports are being pressed into buying, at 100,000 a time! It's a great business: terror. For them, at least.
This is a must-read for everyone who cares about what really happened and the way we all had the wool pulled over our eyes. Griffin's evidence rips to shreds the burlesque, over-sized checked pants that Bush's circus ring masters fitted badly to their stillborn clown.
Mark AdamsReviewed in the United Kingdom on August 29, 20245.0 out of 5 stars Scary
It is amazing what you can get if you really try hard enough.
ADReviewed in the United Kingdom on September 12, 20115.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Exposé
Once again the author brings his analytical skills to bear on the latest information and developments in the tragic events of 9/11/01. The additional information he has gleaned since his last work has only reinforced the doubt and extreme suspicion of the "official conspiracy theory" as to what happened. Best examples are the near free-fall descent of the buildings, inexplicable as conventional fire and collapse, especially Building 7 which was not even hit by any aircraft; the alleged impact of a Boeing jetliner into the Pentagon which left virtually no wreckage; the alleged cell-phone calls from 30,000 feet which, given the technology available in 2001, were a physical impossibility; and so on.
Mr Griffin leaves no stone unturned, and the more I read this book, the more angry I felt that the cover-up that was undoubtedly placed over the whole affair, is still in place 10 years later. Whilst I suspect that there may well have been a plot hatched by terrorists, it seems clear to me that someone somewhere picked up on the plot and ensured that it was carried through to its conclusion. Other authors, notably Webster Tarpley, have examined the possibility that 9/11 was some kind of attempted coup d'état, and this is quite possible in the light of the fact that security codes were known to the perpetrators in making their threats to Air Force 1.
The strange coincidence of the "mock terror drills" that were taking place the same day, whereby false blips were placed on ATC screens, is also covered here. It seems that maximum confusion was placed on the system which, for example, enabled "something" to impact the Pentagon without let or hindrance. The confiscation and hiding of the complete CCTV evidence at the Pentagon, which must be in existence somewhere, surely is a massive indication of some sort of covert activity.
The list of anomalies goes on and on, the story put out by the mainstream media remains in place, as does the ridicule and contempt heaped upon those like Griffin, Tarpley, Jones and others, who are merely trying to establish the truth as to what happened. The glaring omissions and inaccuracies of the 9/11 Commission only serve to heighten the suspicions of the public at large.
As time goes on, of course, memories will dim and the events will be consigned to history. A similar process happened with the Kennedy assassination. There is still a lot of material, however, coming out of the woodwork for those seeking the truth to examine. Whether the whole truth will ever be known is open to conjecture, but I have to admire David Ray Griffin and his colleagues in their dedication to their cause.




