Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
87% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
89% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Follow the Authors
OK
The New Soft War on Women: How the Myth of Female Ascendance Is Hurting Women, Men--and Our Economy Hardcover – October 17, 2013
|
Caryl Rivers
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Rosalind C. Barnett
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
-
Print length288 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherTarcherPerigee
-
Publication dateOctober 17, 2013
-
Dimensions6.25 x 1 x 9.25 inches
-
ISBN-100399163336
-
ISBN-13978-0399163333
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Editorial Reviews
From Booklist
Review
—Publishers Weekly
"In page after page, these authors catalog the barriers that women still confront…[and] support their argument with solid data and illuminating anecdotes."
—Library Journal
“This is the book you have been waiting for. In meticulous and maddening detail, the authors lay out the studies and statistics that show how women are getting overlooked and underpaid in the workplace. And by showing that the gender wage gap typically begins right out of school, they blow a million sorry excuses for the pay differential right out of the water. It’s not business. It’s bias.”
—Carolyn Maloney, U.S. Representative for New York’s 12th Congressional District
“The New Soft War on Women is myth-shattering, disturbing, persuasive, and hopeful all at once. The authors argue that discrimination isn’t gone, it’s gone underground, and they show what to do about it to ensure that women’s talent isn’t lost. Anyone who cares about a thriving economy—and her own career—should grab this powerful book.”
—Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Harvard Business School professor and bestselling author of Confidence and SuperCorp: How Vanguard Companies Create Innovation, Profits, Growth, and Social Good
“While the rest of the punditocracy either proclaims or bemoans the ‘end of men,’ veteran observers Caryl Rivers and Rosalind Barnett say ‘not so fast.’ This bracing, clear-sighted, and well-researched book cautions against such premature self-congratulation and reminds us of the startling inequalities yet to be righted.”
—Michael Kimmel, author of Guyland and SUNY Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Gender Studies
“Finally, finally, finally—a book that pulls together and makes sense of the most credible research on women in the workforce. If you have been confused by the media hype, if you are a woman, if you manage women, or if you are a business decision maker, this is a must-have book for you!”
—Ellen Galinsky, President, Families and Work Institute
About the Author
Rosalind C. Barnett is a senior scientist at the Women’s Studies Research Center at Brandeis University. Her pioneering research on workplace issues and family life in America has been sponsored by federal grants, and she is often invited to lecture at major venues in the United States and abroad. Dr. Barnett has a private clinical psychology practice and is the author of scholarly and popular books and articles.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : TarcherPerigee; First Edition (October 17, 2013)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0399163336
- ISBN-13 : 978-0399163333
- Item Weight : 0.035 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 1 x 9.25 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#2,939,863 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #6,635 in Feminist Theory (Books)
- #8,386 in General Gender Studies
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
My daughter is told: hey, you can do anything. Nice thought, but not true, and this book explains why the myth of 'women now have it all and do and be anything' is a bit of a blow-back not based on facts and figures but on anecdote. Try walking down a deserted street. Has that changed in 30 years? Neither has the workplace.
If it were up to me, I'd make this required reading in every university business school.
While I think the book is interesting, and it certainly should be read by employers to know which situations to avoid, it seemed to quote a lot of women whining. I don't want to say that what these women described wasn't true, in fact I know it to be true by personal experience. Such situations happen. But there is a great difference between single cases and a general trend. The high number of anecdotes distracts from the research also presented.
I suppose the book is easier to read this way, but it makes it harder to believe the authors' claims. It is probably impossible to get hard data for the gender bias the author's describe, and thus we have to believe them that this kind of bias happens often (or not).
I also think that men might encounter similar situations, but maybe react differently, which could have been discussed more. I remember a blog on women experiencing burnout where a male blogger wrote that women work overtime because the work has to be done while men work overtime to get a promotion. This is an obviously subjective comment, but illustrates that the problem is more complex than the authors of this book would like us to think.
I agree with the authors that there are still many problems waiting to be solved, and I think this book is a great contribution to a necessary discussion.
I would like stories from women who do get ahead
I was disappointed in the book
Yawn
They wrote in the first chapter of this 2013 book, “Women’s gains in the workplace either have stalled our or are in grave danger of being rolled back. While more women than ever before are studying … in college and professional schools, there is a real question whether they will ever attain leadership positions in the areas in which they have been trained. Women have made dramatic gains in higher education and employment… But these dramatic gains have NOT translated into money and influence… It may be counterintuitive to think that education and employment don’t yield the sort of money and power that they do for men. But that is indeed the case. Despite the fact that the pipeline is getting filled with educated and talented women, their way forward is too often blocked. Under a veneer of success and progress, what we call the New Soft War on Women is growing in strength…
“New barriers and old biases… shackle women as they try to move ahead in the arenas of business, academia, the sciences and politics. Picture, if you will, two people, a man and a woman… Both are equally qualified… But only one of these people, the man, is unencumbered. The other, the woman, carries a fifty-pound pack on her back… The farther along she does on the path, the more formidable the barriers become, and the harder it gets for her…” (Pg. 1-2)
They suggest, “The New Soft War is as bad for the bottom line as it is for women themselves. It threatens the creation of a workplace that’s good for everybody. When we treat women as a marginal group, whose needs are unique to them, we are going down the wrong path. We generate needless tensions and invidious comparisons between men and women. If, however, we avoid the trap of focusing on gender and treat all employees equally, everybody benefits… We must all embrace a new paradigm that places women at the center of twenty-first economic realities, not on the fringe… The burden of discrimination has to disappear. This book offers a roadmap to achieving those goals.” (Pg. 12)
They further explain the “Soft War” concept: “Why do we call it ‘soft’? Because… today’s barriers are more subtle and insidious than the old ones… This isn’t an overt conspiracy to hold women back. Instead, it’s a perfect storm of economic, political and social factors that combine to threaten women’s progress… If you’re a female in a top job and you slip up in a man’s world, you’re most likely out the door. If you’re working on a project with a man, he’ll probably get the credit you deserve… Why do we use the term ‘war’? Because the statistics we’ve just cited about women’s lack of progress are casualty figures… [Women] are blindsided by all the rhetoric about how good they’ve got it. They may even believe it.” (Pg. 5-6)
They state, “What’s true in corporate America and in Washington is also true in academia… A similar situation… has been identified at the Harvard Medical School… senior male faculty appropriated their important research findings for internal use while prohibiting them from publishing those findings under their own names. These discriminatory practices severely limited, if not precluded, their opportunities to advance up the tenure ladder at Harvard. Interestingly, these women had no family responsibilities; they either had no children or their children were grown. Thus, the men who created and perpetuated these inequities could not blame the women’s failure to succeed on the familiar excuse that their family demands precluded their total devotion to their jobs, which was key to their success.” (Pg. 30-32)
They point out, “It’s not only men, but women as well, who have an adverse reaction to assertive female managers. Kristen, the vice president of a global public relations agency, said, ‘Surprisingly, I find that both men and women have this response to a female manager… My objective feedback is received as subjective critique---which it is not… Yet somehow, people take it personally and project it back onto me. Women do it to other women as much if not more than men, oddly.’” (Pg. 41)
They also ask, “Why are angry women penalized? Because women simply aren’t supposed to be angry… a woman may be seen as an angry, out-of-control person, no matter what caused her reaction… Her anger may therefore lead those around her to accord her less status. However, when men explode, the picture is very different. Their anger is seen as understandable; they’re just getting mad when … a plan falls apart. They’re OK—their competence isn’t questioned. They don’t lose status.” (Pg. 47)
They observe, “New research shows that kids are affected by stereotypes much earlier than we had once thought, and educators and parents may well be ignoring---and sometimes even inadvertently promoting---the spread of these stereotypes… It is a step forward that many middle school girls are getting the message that ‘of course girls can do math and science.’ Still, these messages are way too late. Research has shown that even when girls say they believe this message, they don’t REALLY believe it. Too often, they just know what parents and teachers want them to say.” (Pg. 95-96)\
They acknowledge, “Even though they have the ability to succeed, women all too frequently avoid the very careers that will reap the most economic rewards in the future. This is a troubling trend, because people with math and science backgrounds will undoubtedly be in high demand and richly rewarded as our knowledge-based economy grows. Even more discouraging is the reality that fewer women than men who earn these degrees will go into these fields… the proportion of men choosing a career in science or engineering was much greater than the proportion of women doing the same. So, girls who are taking and excelling in courses that will supposedly allow them to enter high-paying math and science careers are still not choosing those careers.” (Pg. 100)
They explain, “The media blitz has probably convinced people that young women have fast outpaced young men when it comes to going to college… It turns out that the central tenet of the ‘ascendance of women’ argument is based on bogus statistics. There is not now---and never was---a startling 15 percent gender gap in college enrollments. How did the figure emerge? You can get that number only by factoring in older, nontraditional students… And an enrollment boom among older women is further skewing the numbers.” (Pg. 152-153)
They assert, “it is so difficult that many women get discouraged along the way. Some drop out, some question their own abilities… Also, women---who are just as prone to gender stereotypes as men---may simply take themselves out of the running… these limiting beliefs need to be uprooted. In the New Soft War, it’s often the invisible barbed wire that can tear you up. Powerful men may also fail to recognize the difficult path that their female colleagues have to navigate.” (Pg. 164) Later, they add, “We are seeing the recurrence of an old pattern. Women are just as busy as men in campus activities, but---as in the days before Betty Friedan published The Feminine Mystique ---more young women are stepping back to let the men take the visible leadership positions.” (Pg. 170)
They observe, “The pressure to increase the chores involved in mothering is enormous… a retired distinguished professor … sees the idea that mothers must live only for their babies’ welfare as a new form of sexism that keeps women---if not exactly barefoot and pregnant---pushed back to home and hearth. Throughout history, women have been kept out of the public sphere because of their duties at home. One argument against women’s getting the vote in the United States was that exposing [them]… to the rough and tumble world of politics would render them less motherly. That same fear, though less bluntly stated, rears its head in today’s overwrought dialogue about the need for intensive, or ‘attachment,’ parenting.” (Pg. 188)
They observe, “Wall Street fathers worked 90 percent as many hours as their childless male colleagues and received MORE money---122 percent as much money as childless men. Why do men get this bonus? Because married men and fathers are seen as being highly productive, motivated and committed, whereas married women and mothers are seen as conflicted, divided in their loyalties and unable to perform at a high level… To the extent that employers share these beliefs, they will, perhaps unwittingly, view mothers as less committed to or less competent in workplace settings. In these ways, employers will subtly discriminate against mothers.” (Pg. 197-198)
They conclude, “Winning the New Soft War has to be an urgent national priority… There is cause for optimism... The United States is losing ground in the global economy, and our competitors have gotten the message and we are acting on it… U.S. men are invested more than ever before in their family lives, and since they are overwhelmingly in two-earner families, they are committed to their wives’ economic success. And women themselves are increasingly unlikely to hang back and forfeit the monetary and personal success they have worked hard for and deserve. At long last, we must move from rhetoric to action… The New Soft War can be won if we can summon the will to battle.” (Pg. 241-242)
This is a thought-provoking book---whether one agrees with it 100% or not on every point---and will be of keen interest to anyone studying the contemporary situation for women, men, and families.

