Buy used:

$107.07

$19.98 delivery July 11 - 31. Details

Deliver to Finland

Used: Good | Details

Sold by glenthebookseller

Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.

Only 1 left in stock - order soon.

Add to List

Added to

Unable to add item to List. Please try again.

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Color:

To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the author

Bjørn Lomborg

Follow

The Nobel Laureates Guide to the Smartest Targets for the World 2016-2030 Paperback – April 20, 2015

by Bjørn Lomborg (Author), Bjorn Lomborg (Editor)

4.3 6 ratings

See all formats and editions

Sorry, there was a problem loading this page. Try again.

There is a newer edition of this item:

The Nobel Laureates Guide to the Smartest Targets for the World
$13.96
(32)
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.

In 2000, the Millennium Development Goals set a few, highly effective targets for the world, e.g. halve the proportion of poor and reduce childhood mortality by two-thirds. These targets have been a huge success. Now, the world must decide its targets for the next 15 years. The UN has proposed 169 targets, but not all are equally effective. Copenhagen Consensus has asked 60 teams of the world s top economists to weigh up the social, environmental and economic benefits and costs of 100+ targets across 22 global topics from Air Pollution and Education to Water. The world will spend $2.5 trillion on these targets 2016-2030. Picking the best targets can triple the benefits for the world s poorest. This book can help us choose better.

Print length

154 pages
Language

English
Publisher

Copenhagen Consensus Center
Publication date

April 20, 2015
ISBN-10

1940003113
ISBN-13

978-1940003115
See all details

Bjorn Lomborg
249
Paperback
$10.99
$16.01 shipping
Bjorn Lomborg
2,722
Paperback
$11.29
$15.81 shipping
Bjorn Lomborg
407
Paperback
$7.99
$15.25 shipping
Bjørn Lomborg
531
Paperback
$22.39
$18.88 shipping
Bjørn Lomborg
386
Hardcover
$15.48
Get it as soon as Wednesday, Jul 10
$15.81 shipping
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Bjørn Lomborg
23
Hardcover
$89.78
$18.34 shipping
Temporarily out of stock.

Editorial Reviews

Review

Stephen J. DUBNER: Hey podcast listeners. The episode you re about to hear is called Fixing the World, Bang-for-the-Buck Edition. In it, you ll hear how a bunch of economists have teamed up to measure the ROI, or return on investment, for the development goals set by the United Nations. In other words: if you only have $100 or, in the case of the UN, $100 billion let s say to fight something like global poverty, what s the best way to spend that money? What s the ROI on early education vs. job training vs. small-business subsidies? /.../ --FREAKONOMICS podcast 10/02/2014

Champions of aid aren't used to having their homework marked in this stark fashion, and some didn't like it at first. As Ambassador Elizabeth M. Cousens, the U.S. representative to the U.N. Economic and Social Council, told Mr. Lomborg, I really don't like you putting one of my favorite targets in red. But she added, I'm glad you re saying it, because we all need to hear economic evidence that challenges us. Having gone through this useful document myself, I found myself in full sympathy with those forced to choose among them. But at least this sort of analysis provides some rigor and direction. --The Wall Street Journal, Matt Ridley, author of The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves and a member of the British House of Lords

We welcome this contribution form the Copenhagen Consensus Center and remain confident that it, along with all ideas and similar initiatives from civil society stakeholders, will enrich the deliberations. --Amina Mohammed, Special Advisor to the Secretary General of the United Nations on Post-2015 Development Planning

About the Author

Dr. Bjorn Lomborg is Director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center and Adjunct Professor at University of Western Australia. He researches the smartest ways to improve the environment and the world, for which he was named one of TIME magazine's 100 most influential people in the world. His numerous books include The Skeptical Environmentalist, Cool It, and How to Spend $75 Billion to Make the World a Better Place.

Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Copenhagen Consensus Center; First Edition (April 20, 2015)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1940003113
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1940003115
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 7.1 ounces

Best Sellers Rank: #3,883,632 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews:
4.3 6 ratings

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Videos

Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!

Upload your video

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Bjørn Lomborg

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Dr. Bjorn Lomborg is an academic and the author of the best-selling "The Skeptical Environmentalist" and "Cool It". He challenges mainstream concerns about development and the environment and points out that we need to focus our limited resources and attention on the smartest solutions first. He is a visiting professor at Copenhagen Business School, and president of the Copenhagen Consensus Center which brings together top economists, including seven Nobel Laureates, to set data-driven priorities for the world.

Follow him on twitter: bjornlomborg

Lomborg is a frequent commentator in print and broadcast media, for outlets including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, CNN, FOX, and the BBC. His monthly column is published in 19 languages, in 30+ newspapers with more than 30 million readers globally.

Customer reviews

4.3 out of 5

6 global ratings

2 star

0%

1 star

0%

Zero tolerance for fake reviews

Sort reviews by

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

George Willis

Brains Meet Power

Reviewed in the United States on July 14, 2015

Verified Purchase

Lomborg and his team combine goodwill and good scholarship to inform the capital allocation decisions faced by international development practitioners. The stakes for humankind could not be higher. Brains meet power.

One person found this helpful

Helpful

Terry D. Taylor

A good and thoughtful review of development alternatives

Reviewed in the United States on June 15, 2015

Verified Purchase

A good and thoughtful review of development alternatives. I enjoy Lomborg's books, and imagined I'd be more enthusiastic about this one. Its short length sacrifices description of the methodologies used to perform cost/benefit calculations. The reader is referred to sources that provide this information, which admittedly could have expanded the length so much that it would have been less readable. While I understand the tradeoff, it leaves the reader wanting more. But the typos cannot be explained away. There is at least one typo per page -- really appalling. It makes the entire book poorer. If no one read it before it went to print, that's not excusable. And I'm not being picky about the mistakes.

5 people found this helpful

Helpful

Nicolas Steinmetz

A sane, evidence based proposal to improve the world ...

Reviewed in the United States on November 26, 2015

Verified Purchase

A sane ,evidence based proposal to improve the world.

Helpful

Chad M

Excellent, yet safeguards against accidental nuclear launch, and robust SETI / LINCOS projects are also important

Reviewed in the United States on December 24, 2015

Making the world a better place will call for new goals and strategies over the next fifteen years. The author provides a superb list of goals, especially ones that are achievable and feasible. For example, UN funding of reproductive health measures, coral reef protection, and other health and education measures provide returns in the near term, as described in the section “How to read this book”. In this book, returns of between fifteen and one hundred dollars for every dollar spent on a development program are considered excellent. However, when the US, Russia, and China increase funding for safeguards of their nuclear arsenals, as advised by the “Nuclear Threat Initiative” (NTI), the returns are potentially orders of magnitude higher those described in the first part of this book.

First, new funding by the US, Russia, China and other nuclear-armed powers in order to prevent accidental launch of nuclear missiles are urgently needed. Significantly, Nobel Laureate Steven Weinberg writes in “Lake Views: This World and the Universe” that his many efforts to alert the US of this risk have received only minimal attention. Yet this is not a new topic, the risk and need for government funding was also spotted very early by Theodore Brewster Taylor, a colleague of Freeman Dyson. Ted Taylor co-authored “Nuclear Theft: Risks and Safeguards”. He was, in Dyson’s views, one of the greatest citizens of the 20th century, yet nearly unknown to the general public. Today, NTI carries on this work, but frequently needs to raise funds so that US and Russia can cooperatively work together and minimize to nearly zero the risk of an accidental or non-state actor use of nuclear weapons. Dollar for dollar, funding NTI is potentially more important than many of the goals listed in this new book by the Copenhagen Consensus Center. On the other hand, it is arguable that there is ample money from governments and foundations for both NTI, like-minded government departments, and all of the higher-priority sustainable development goals in this book.

Beyond the near term of fifteen years, and supposing that the world becomes more stable and prosperous, there are certain long-term science endeavors worth pursuing. With new funding of between one billon and five billion dollars per year, there is potential for a joint US-EU-Russia-China-India-Japan project to preserve, unify, and then broadcast selected aspects human knowledge, but this time on an interstellar scale. A forerunner to this idea is the Arecibo Interstellar Message (AIM) sent on November 16, 1974, and described in image and words on page 290 of “Cosmos” by Carl Sagan and in the original television show also entitled “Cosmos”. The message is a mathematical representation of a binary counting convention, atomic numbers of certain elements, nucleotides, the Solar System, humans, radio towers, and several other features. This is an early attempt at transforming aspects of human knowledge into an abstract form, and in a format that can be sent to other solar systems by radio. However, for a robust SETI program, the refinement of the “Lincos” concept would be needed. “Lincos” or lingua cosmica was developed by Dr. Hans Freudenthal, and more recently by Alexander Ollongren (both of these Dutch citizens and their research is described in print and on Wikipedia). Today, a new kind of Arecbio Interstellar Message (AIM) could be sent, and for “short money” at the UN or government level. One approach is to use the “Great Universal Catalogue” (GUC) by Martin Rees and Bernard Carr, as featured on page 514 of “Cosmic Imagery” by John D. Barrow. Just as AIM is a signal that can be interpreted as a two-dimensional image, so too can GUC be sent by radio signal, as a pattern of “on” and “off” signals, readable as a set of lines where the combination of “on” and “off” signals produces a specific pattern, which is highly distinct and significant on GUC. I expect that given the nature of the past AIM, many other signals could be devised. One reason why GUC could be part of a new kind of AIM is also because its proportions are universally valid, and geometric. Again, a well-funded SETI / Lincos program would include a vast range of information and signals, well beyond GUC but almost certainly including the “Great Universal Catalogue” by Rees and Carr.

Moreover, GUC may be modified by changing the values of the axes. A first modification would be to change the y-axis to a time values, for past, present, and future, and to keep the x-axis as distance. A second modification would be to have three axes, with the x-axis as distance, the y-axis as time, and the z-axis as mass. If this is sensible, and can be mathematically developed into a hypothesis, my idea is that GUC can become the basis of more dynamic graphs representing change through space, time, and mass, describing in graph format the half-lives of elements, stellar evolution, the evolution of the Earth, and certain aspects of the evolution of life. In an optimistic scenario, the abstract representation of the best aspects of human knowledge could be summarized and then sent by radio into space, to exist for eons ahead of us, and may just possibly be received and comprehended by other intelligent life.

In the past, debates about funding SETI, even for a few tens or hundreds of millions of US funding per year would raise the question of its utility for contemporary human affairs. However, Carl Sagan has skillfully answered this criticism. He points to how astronomy provided evidence of the runaway greenhouse effect, the Venus Syndrome, which is being studied today with an elevated sense of urgency (though the consensus is that a hot state or hothouse climate is far, far more probable than a runaway greenhouse effect in the foreseeable human future). Similarly, study of comets points to evidence of geologic extinction, which in turn led Sagan to raise concerns and Congressional testimony about a nuclear winter scenario after nuclear war in the 1980s. Now, questions may arise about the use of funding SETI / Lincos with one to five billion dollars per year. The preliminary answer I provide is that transforming human knowledge into an abstract form, capable of being broadcast into interstellar space, would preserve the knowledge over vast eons as it travels at the speed of light into space. Since preservation of knowledge in material or silicon form requires the continuing chemical integrity of the material, not to mention the avoidance of wars, ecological collapses, and geologic change, it is subject to loss. On the other hand, by transforming knowledge into a form of light that can propagate into space, it is preserved for beings lucky enough to exist, evolve, and discover the knowledge. Here on Earth, the nature of the knowledge remains with us for our own contemplation.

Yet there is another potential benefit worth considering: Lincos, or a form of a universal language could be an important part of developing Artificial Intelligence (AI). That is, since one goal of AI researchers is to assemble and unify human knowledge and reach the “Singularity”, as described by Ray Kurzweil, the research into “Lincos” for SETI is potentially one facet of this goal. If Lincos succeeded, it would mean that computers have one example of a universal mathematical language capable of describing a wide range, but not all, of human knowledge. Centuries ago, Gottfried Leibniz also sought a “characteristica universalis” but unfortunately lacked today’s computing power. Now, Ray Kurzweil and researchers such as Nick Bostrom believe we may be nearing the “Singlularity”. Can Lincos and a robust SETI program be part of this endeavor, if only in an indirect way? I’ll have to wait for the answer.

Helpful

Unsupported image file format.

Image file size is too large.

Image Unavailable

Follow the author