Buy new:
$68.39$68.39
FREE delivery:
Wednesday, Nov 23
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Wallace Brothers LLC
Save with Used - Good
$36.31$36.31
FREE delivery:
Tuesday, Nov 22
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Prime Goods Outlet
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
88% positive over last 12 months
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
Nosferatu (The Vampyre / Phantom Der Nacht) [DVD]
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
| Additional DVD options | Edition | Discs | Price | New from | Used from |
|
DVD
February 16, 1999 "Please retry" | — | 1 |
—
| — | $16.56 |
|
DVD
September 26, 2006 "Please retry" | — | 1 |
—
| — | $23.99 |
|
DVD
"Please retry" | — | — |
—
| — | — |
Enhance your purchase
| Genre | Horror |
| Format | Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, DVD, Full Screen, Widescreen, NTSC |
| Contributor | Isabelle Adjani, Dan van Husen, Carsten Bodinus, Klaus Kinski, Clemens Scheitz, Lo van Hensbergen, Martje Grohmann, Bruno Ganz, Jan Groth, Werner Herzog, Bram Stoker, Roland Topor, Walter Ladengast, Rijk de Gooyer See more |
| Language | German, English |
| Runtime | 1 hour and 47 minutes |
Frequently bought together
![Nosferatu (The Vampyre / Phantom Der Nacht) [DVD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41JQ5EMVBCL._AC_UL116_SR116,116_.jpg)
Customers also search
Product Description
Product Description
In 1979, award-winning director Werner Herzog and his volatile star Klaus Kinski embarked on a milestone in international cinema: a dual language remake of F.W. Murnau's legendary 1922 horror classic "Nosferatu." Filmed on breathtaking locations throughout Europe and simultaneosly shot in both German and English-speaking versions that created fascinating differences in tone and texture, Werner Herzog's "Nosferatu" has become recognized worldwide as the definitive version of the Dracula legend. This two disc set contains both the English and German version.
Amazon.com
Werner Herzog's remake of F.W. Murnau's original vampire classic is at once a generous tribute to the great German director and a distinctly unique vision by one of cinema's most idiosyncratic filmmakers. Though Murnau's Nosferatu was actually an unauthorized adaptation of Bram Stoker's Dracula, Herzog based his film largely on Murnau's conceptions--at times directly quoting Murnau's images--but manages to slip in a few references to Tod Browning's famous version (at one point the vampire comments on the howling wolves: "Listen, the children of the night make their music."). Longtime Herzog star Klaus Kinski is both hideous and melancholy as Nosferatu (renamed Count Dracula in the English language version). As in Murnau's film, he's a veritable gargoyle with his bald pate and sunken eyes, and his talon-like fingernails and two snaggly fangs give him a distinctly feral quality. But Kinski's haunting eyes also communicate a gloomy loneliness--the curse of his undead immortality--and his yearning for Lucy (Isabelle Adjani) becomes a melancholy desire for love. Bruno Ganz's sincere but foolish Jonathan is doomed to the vampire's will and his wife, Lucy, a holy innocent whose deathly pallor and nocturnal visions link her with the ghoulish Nosferatu, becomes the only hope against the monster's plague-like curse. Herzog's dreamy, delicate images and languid pacing create a stunningly beautiful film of otherworldly mood, a faithful reinterpretation that by the conclusion has been shaped into a quintessentially Herzog vision. --Sean Axmaker
Stills from Nosferatu: The Vampyre/Phantom Der Nacht (Click for larger image)
Product details
- Aspect Ratio : 1.85:1
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- MPAA rating : PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
- Product Dimensions : 0.7 x 7.5 x 5.4 inches; 0.32 Ounces
- Director : Werner Herzog
- Media Format : Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, DVD, Full Screen, Widescreen, NTSC
- Run time : 1 hour and 47 minutes
- Release date : July 9, 2002
- Actors : Klaus Kinski, Isabelle Adjani, Bruno Ganz, Roland Topor, Walter Ladengast
- Subtitles: : English
- Language : German (Dolby Digital 5.1), English (Dolby Digital 5.1), Unqualified
- Studio : Starz / Anchor Bay
- ASIN : B00005YJMX
- Writers : Bram Stoker, Werner Herzog
- Number of discs : 2
- Best Sellers Rank: #95,706 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #1,339 in Foreign Films (Movies & TV)
- Customer Reviews:
Videos
Videos for this product

2:34
Click to play video

View the Trailer for <i>Nosferatu</i>
Merchant Video
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Werner Herzog, like Van Sant, has a reputation as a maverick filmmaker to uphold. “Psycho” was an American classic that must have made a big impression on Gus. “Nosferatu” seems to have had a lot of impact on Herzog. His dedication to recreating the atmosphere of the original is commendable. But not that interesting for those of us who like our undead to be a little livelier.
F.W. Murnua’s 1922 “Nosferatu” really is a classic, at that. The sets, the harsh lighting, the shadows, the incredibly creepy performance by Max Schreck, it’s an amazing accomplishment. I remember seeing it on TV at an inappropriately young age and finding some bits scary as hell. Especially when the Count rises out of his coffin, not like somebody getting out of bed but as a rigid body going horizontal to vertical in one eerie move. Silent movie planking!
Herzog’s tribute? Color and sound don’t really fit here. When Mel Brooks made the wonderful “Young Frankenstein”, one of his best decisions was to film in a beautiful, luminous black and white. There’ve been good Draculas in color; Coppola’s lurid 1992 version was thoroughly enjoyable in garish saturated colors. Herzog’s? As a worshipful tribute to the silent film, maybe monochrome would’ve worked better.
Similarly, the worshipful reproduction of the silent movie era’s stagey performances just clash with the color and sound. Count Dracula himself is the most lifelike actor in the cast. Klaus Kinski is not only wearing a wonderful simulacrum of Max Schreck’s makeup and fingernails, he does a loving, sympathetic performance. Not easy to do while wearing rat teeth and three inch nails.
But Lucy, Harker, Van Helsing and Mina all seem to be doing their impressions of what their characters would be like if they were taking a whole lot of Percodan. And using a whole lot of eyeshadow. Lucy looks like a drugged raccoon before she’s even heard the name “Dracula”.
Numb, dull, almost stoned line readings and stiff action. In the silent movie days, when cameras were bulky and nearly immovable, makeup was heavy and acting was mostly pantomime, this sort of near motionless and emotionless performance might have made more sense. Here, it’s just odd. The most terrible things happen around these people, and they might as well be reading their lines from the sports pages of the Amsterdam Gazette. Renfield seems to be the only one having a good time. He’s kept his sense of humor in a severely under-written role. In the book, and in most Dracula movies, he’s a pivotal character, I mean. Here, he laughs inappropriately, plucks at the Count’s sleeve, and vanishes from the story.
Of course, the silent “Nosferatu” ditched about two thirds of the Bram Stoker story, partly for legal reasons and mostly to keep the running time reasonable, I suspect. There’s only so much plot you can fit into an impressionist silent movie without a whole lot of title cards. But Herzog had no such proscriptions. By holding to the format of the original (except the tacked on ending, with Bruno Ganz fitted with his own set of rat dentures, that is. Murnau knew when to call it finis; Herzog should’ve stopped with the stake), he ditched most of Stoker’s more interesting characters, denied Lucy her staking scene, turned Van Helsing from a protagonist into a buffoon, and eliminated the dash back to Transylvania. Which is one of the most dramatic parts.
I might be prejudiced in favor of more action oriented vampire pictures. This is more of a fever dream Dracula, with rats. Way, way too many rats. Seriously, while I like rats as much as the average viewer, there are limits. More bats, please, less rats. And less traveling scenes; Harker rides to Transylvania, going through lengthily photographed lush scenery. OK, we get it. Harker rides back through, etc. Dracula on shipboard, that adds to the story. Harker on a horse, not so much. And what is the deal with the rustic kid sawing away on a screeching fiddle? Seriously, what’s up with that? The only thing it adds to the scenes is the realization that this boy does not have a future in music.
There are some amazing shots; the overhead view of the train of caskets in the plague-stricken town square should be in every director’s notebook. And there are some silly bits of business, the dancing and last supper in the plague-stricken town square, scenes that belong in some other, worse movie. This is a vampire movie, not Fellini. And enough with the rats. You couldn’t fit that many rats on a Royal Caribbean cruise ship, let alone the Count’s little three-mast boat.
There’s surprisingly little vampirizing going on; the Count does some sucking on Harker and then on Lucy (after perving on her legs, even!). But that’s it. He doesn’t do the bolt upright scene from the Murnau, and he doesn’t go up in a puff of smoke when hit by the rising sun. He apparently has a myocardial infarction or maybe a stroke, and that’s all Herzog wrote. You want a more to-the-book and more fun Dracula, check out Coppola’s. You want a loving and kind of dull tribute to a long-ago movie, Herzog and Kinski have one for you.
One of the best parts of this film is the look of it. The atmosphere of Nosferatu The Vampyre is as much a character as the speaking players; it draws you in and instills a bleak darkness from the first shots of those foreboding landscapes. This atmosphere is done no justice by the transfer on this disc. Just for clarity, I am referring to the Shout Factory blu-ray. The shots with plenty of daylight look marvelous, with a crisp clear picture. The darks, on the other hand, leave much to be desired. It is understandable that some haze and static will be unavoidable on older films, with older cameras having a tough time capturing vivid dark shots. The issue here is that I have seen restorations done by others (Arrow, Criterion) that manage to do much more with even older, and sometimes damaged films. With this film in particular, much more attention should have been paid to the darkness of such a "dark" movie. I can't help but feel that more could have been done to clean up the picture, and I hope that Criterion or some similar collection picks up this film and does it justice.
As a sort of disclaimer, I am aware that the viewing screen has a lot to do with the picture quality, but again, I have seen plenty of restoration blu-rays on my TV that don't look nearly as "dirty".
I haven't seen anything like this in my life.
It's like a folk music or something like M. Night Shyamalan <THE VILLAGE> kind of enviorment but it is even sorry to compare with that movie since shyamalan's movie was a crap but this one is a true work of art.
This is not a horror film. If I have to describe it, it can be only say as an art film.
I finally bought the Samsung 4K Ultra HD monitor and a upscale bluray player and the disc was an HD remastered Bluray disc. The picture and the sound was just perfect as if I was watching the movie that was shot yesterday with HD camera, not with an old filmstock back in 1979.
i heard many things about Werner Herzog and honestly own his movies like 6 but not been able to see any of them since there are so many movies that I have in lince await for me to see.
Now that I am totally mesmerized by this film, I have to watch all of his films include the great <Aguirre Wrath of God> an many others.
This film's story is nothing new. If you have watched <Coppola's DRACULA> there is nothing more to say about this film.
But truely the image of the movie is just stunning.
It is shot in Geremany and the language is also German. Be aware not to watch this film with English dubbed version. it's a crab.
Klaus Kinski's part acted as Dracula is so much different with Gary Oldman.
Once great teacher said true great film does not tells everything with dialogue but with visual words and enviornments.
Kinski does not talk much like Gary. Gary talks much all right. And that is more instantly appeals to the audience. Yes.
But Kinski's face expression makes us think. It's truely scary at the end and stays in our heart for days. It won a lot of film festivals at the end because it is way much powerful after all.
There is not much blood either.
As I told you this is not all horror. Maybe it's more of a historic tale. Folk tale.
I know that it's not based on a true story. There is no such thing as dracula a blood sucking human.
But then again, when watching this film, we kind of believe there is.
The movie is that much powerful.
If I have my own theater, no matter how much it takes, I would want to invite as many people as possible and want to show you this movie for sure.
It's a true work of art that I really want to show.
The wood is truely amazing charactor itself.
The music is stunning.
Klaus Kinski, Isabelle Adjani's pale face, Bruno Ganz's weakness are just true work of art.
And the light, camera are just memorable.
I am glad that I bough the bluray although at that time I didn't know that there is other sites that I can buy this in cheaper price and happen to buy from Amazon US but it was worth buying with around 23$.
The picture is just perfect HD remastered and the sound is HD sound 5.1 great. Couldn't be better.
You should definately watch this in any coast.
Top reviews from other countries
Hey - wait a minute! It's supposed to be about vampires, isn't it?
But if the eternal theme of all literature is Love and Death, what happens if Death is taken away?
Only love and sacrifice remain.
Taking as a starting point the 1922 silent movie, Herzog reworks the story beautifully, from the 'trademark' opening sequence to the inevitable and maybe even regrettable end. Even under the make-up, Klaus Kinski is sublime and the use of colour contrasts wonderfully with the B&W original. This film should have an appeal beyond 'art house', and is highly recommended.
Der Film wagte den Versuch, Murnaus heute recht genau 100 Jahre alten Stummfilm, aus einer Zeit als Filme so unerträglich langsam wie musikalische Opern inszeniert wurden, ins Zeitalter des Farbfilms und des Tonfilms zu übertragen.
Das Resultat war unbefriedigend. Auch für die Menschen des Jahres 1978, obwohl man damals noch keine Idee vom Rumms-Krach-Fetz Action-Kino unserer Tage hatte. Das Ding war und ist einfach zu langsam. Regisseur Werner Herzog wollte das Tempo des historischen Originals beibehalten - eine arge Fehlentscheidung - und bestand ausserdem darauf, seinem eigenen Markenzeichen, dem Verzicht auf alle Spezialeffekte, treu zu bleiben.
Nonsens. Wie soll ein Vampir-Film ohne Spezialeffekte funktionieren? Sogar Murnau servierte im Jahre 1922, als die primitive Technik wahrhaftig Null Spezialeffekte erlaubte, einige überraschende Effekte, die der Zeit damals weit voraus waren, um seinen Vampir glaubhaft zu machen. Herr Herzog dagegen glaubte ein halbes Jahrhundert später, Solches nicht nötig zu haben.
So mussten die Schauspieler des Jahres 1978 den totalen Mangel an Effekten durch eigene Anstrengung ausgleichen - und sie erbrachten großartige Leistungen.
Bruno Ganz - damals jung, ja wirklich, den gab's auch in jung - redet nicht viel, aber er überzeugt als stiller Protagonist, der am Ende dem Vampirismus verfällt. Isabelle Adjani liefert eine großartige Leistung als melancholische Heldin, die am Ende durch Selbstaufgabe den Vampir besiegt. Klaus Kinski hat hier die schwierigste Rolle seines Lebens, und er liefert. Er begriff, dass er durch den totalen Verzicht auf Spezialeffekte schachmatt gesetzt war. Und so erfand er einen Vampir jenseits der Film-Norm, züngelnd und schleichend wie ein giftiges Reptil, passend zu seinen zwei seltsam spitzen Schneidezähnen, die eher wie Injektions-Nadeln wirken. Das war eine stille, lauernde Kreatur aus Alpträumen.
Der Film überzeugt trotzdem nicht, weil er viel zu langsam geschnitten ist. Es gibt großartige langsame Szenen, wie zB. den Moment als das Segelschiff mit dem Sarg von Nosferatu in den Hafen einfährt. Und es gibt überflüssige langsame Szenen die nur Zeit kosten, die den Zuseher fragen lassen: "Ja und? Wofür war das nun gut?" So kann man keinen Film machen, wenn die Zuschauer interessiert bleiben sollen.
Ein anderes Problem war die dämliche Überzeugung der späten 1970er Jahre, dass man Traditionen unbedingt durchbrechen muss, notfalls auch mit Vulgarismen. Die quintessentielle Szene dieser Art findet nahe dem Ende statt. Isabelle Adjani läuft über den Hauptplatz der altertümlichen Hafenstadt, versucht die Menschen zu warnen. Doch Niemand hört ihr zu. Die Bevölkerung befindet sich einerseits durch die unheilbare tödliche Pest, andererseits durch die paranormal-suggestiven Fähigkeiten des Nosferatu, in einem endzeitlichen Wahn. Alle wollen feiern, wollen die paar Tage, die ihnen noch bleiben, mit Tanz und Suff verbringen.
Isabelle Adjani in ihrer bleichen, unwirklichen Schönheit, irrt von Einem zum Anderen, wird zum Tanz gezerrt, reisst sich los, läuft dem nächsten Narren in die Arme, muss sich erneut freikämpfen. Einfach excellent, was die Dame und einige Dutzend namenlose Nebendarsteller da abliefern.
Das ist wirklich gut. Das hätte sogar Murnau beeindruckt. Und dann - dann läuft plötzlich ein Schwein ins Bild. Ja genau, ein großes fettes Mastschwein. Und es sche***t einen Haufen Fäkalien auf das Kopfstein-Pflaster der stimmungsvollen Altstadt. Das mag ein gewisser Regisseur als provokativ oder progressiv oder einfallsreich empfunden haben. Jaaa, wir sind sozialkritisch. Jaaa, Sinnbild für eine Gesellschaft die total aus den Fugen gerät. Aber es ist leider nur dämlich. Passt keinesfalls in einen Vampir-Film. Joschka Fischer meets Nosferatu. So geht's nicht.
Genau so muss man sich - leider - diesen Film geben. In einzelnen Sequenzen. Denn es gibt hochkarätige Momente, die jeden Freund von Gothic und düsteren Stimmungen geniesserisch an seinem Rotwein-Glas schnuppern lassen. Und es gibt überflüssige Szenen, die man besser schnell überspringt. Unser immenses Glück ist, wir leben nicht mehr im Jahr 1978. Wir haben statt Video-Band heute DVD und BluRay, und so kann man flott und präzise zur nächsten Szene wechseln, wenn Herr Herzog wieder mal langweilt. Die Schauspieler in diesem Film sind absolut phantastisch (Ausnahme: der hölzerne, frei von jeder Ausstrahlung befindliche Van Helsing) und sie hätten wahrhaftig einen besseren Film verdient.
Die aktuelle DVD/BluRay ist unterirdische Qualität. Direkt vom alten, total abgenudelten VHS Video-Band kopiert. Ohne jede Nachbearbeitung. Aber: in 10 Jahren wird es diesen Film gar nicht mehr zu kaufen geben. Also holt ihn euch, solange es ihn noch gibt.


![Werner Herzog and Klaus Kinski: A Film Legacy [DVD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41ZTFZ2YW0L._AC_UL140_SR140,140_.jpg)

![Nosferatu The Vampyre [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/916lsay2sUL._AC_UL140_SR140,140_.jpg)



