Little Beast - Shop now
Buy new:
$28.38
$19.55 delivery December 27 - January 9
Ships from: Seated Scribe Books
Sold by: Seated Scribe Books
$28.38
$19.55 delivery December 27 - January 9. Details
Arrives after Christmas. Need a gift sooner? Send an Amazon Gift Card instantly by email or text message.
Only 2 left in stock - order soon.
$$28.38 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$28.38
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Seated Scribe Books
Ships from
Seated Scribe Books
Returns
Returnable until Jan 31, 2025
Returnable until Jan 31, 2025
For the 2024 holiday season, eligible items purchased between November 1 and December 31, 2024 can be returned until January 31, 2025.
Returns
Returnable until Jan 31, 2025
For the 2024 holiday season, eligible items purchased between November 1 and December 31, 2024 can be returned until January 31, 2025.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
$26.28
FREE delivery December 31 - January 7. Details
Or fastest delivery December 26 - 30. Details
Arrives after Christmas. Need a gift sooner? Send an Amazon Gift Card instantly by email or text message.
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$28.38 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$28.38
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Ships from and sold by PRIME-BOOKS.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Not in the Flesh Hardcover – International Edition, November 27, 2007

4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars 1,347 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$28.38","priceAmount":28.38,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"28","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"38","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"7D87gy72d9LCqnBg2zp%2F6kOkNTjv21dFGHJGkBxOs0wn3xvbNqX6EcttNv1g4XkXgg6Qj36fOCuwuqD%2Ff5XW39Y2xm6UOipAzeOjMc2ey173GvknCUx10cf34qYUdetqMEteZVhBs9utqyYujESQiOqVn4JPqUcI%2FKZiVkVttybG7rdN2Zd2uQ%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$26.28","priceAmount":26.28,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"26","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"28","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"7D87gy72d9LCqnBg2zp%2F6kOkNTjv21dF6wALnhu6%2Fp19fBjhqiFs2lSeqPj7T7NucgYkHVruYrMGisguPHT1XfLeTwKTBxYWkvQxvUx1k07DDZk8qo4%2FcbDdWE3GgAjrvrb2t9okI7IJP%2BNVfFHScJL0KMWGmTRHrosQYueyopcuPFKqbYXwCDcVdQO8XZGp","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

From award-winning author Ruth Rendell – “without a doubt the grand dame of British crime fiction,” (The Gazette) – comes the chilling new Inspector Wexford novel.

Searching for truffles in a wood, a man and his dog unearth something less savoury–a human hand. The body, as Chief Inspector Wexford is informed later, has lain buried for ten years or so, wrapped in a purple cotton shroud. The post mortem cannot reveal the precise cause of death. The only clue is a crack in one of the dead man’s ribs.
Although the police database covers a relatively short period of time, it stores a long list of Missing Persons. Men, women and children disappear at an alarming rate–hundreds every day. So Wexford knows he is going to have a job on his hands to identify the corpse. And then, only about twenty yards away from the woodland burial site, in the cellar of a disused cottage, another body is discovered.

The detection skills of Wexford, Burden, and the other investigating officers of the Kingsmarkham Police Force, are tested to the utmost to see if the murders are connected and to track down whoever is responsible.
"All the Little Raindrops: A Novel" by Mia Sheridan for $10.39
The chilling story of the abduction of two teenagers, their escape, and the dark secrets that, years later, bring them back to the scene of the crime. | Learn more

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Ruth Rendell has won many awards, including the Crime Writers’ Association Gold Dagger for 1976’s best crime novel with A Demon in My View; a second Edgar in 1984 from the Mystery Writers of America for the best short story, The New Girl Friend; and a Gold Dagger for Live Flesh in 1986. She was also the winner of the 1990 Sunday Times Literary Award, as well as the Crime Writers Cartier Diamond Dagger Award. In 1996 she was awarded the CBE and in 1997 became a life peer.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

CHAPTER ONE

Tom Belbury died in May and now that summer was over his brother missed him more than ever. Neither of them had married so there was no widow and no children, only the dog Honey. Jim took Honey to live with him, he had always liked her and it was what Tom had wanted. When he knew he hadn’t long to live he worried a lot about Honey, what would happen to her after he was gone, and though Jim assured him repeatedly that he would take her, Tom said it again and again.

‘Haven’t I promised over and over? You want me to put it in writing and get it witnessed? I will if that’s what you want.’

‘No, I trust you. She’s a good dog.’

His trust hadn’t been misplaced. Jim lived in the cottage that had been the brothers’ parents’ home and there Honey went to live with him. She was no beauty, owing her ancestry to an apparent mix of spaniel, basset hound and Jack Russell. Tom used to say she looked like a corgi and everyone knew corgis were the Queen’s dogs, having so to speak the royal seal of approval, but Jim couldn’t see it. Nevertheless, he had grown attached to Honey. Apart from fidelity and affection, she had one great virtue. She was a truffle dog.

Every September, at the beginning of the month, Tom and Honey used to go into one patch of woodland or another in the neighbour-hood of Flagford and hunt for truffles. A lot of people scoffed. They said truffles couldn’t be found in Britain, only in France and Italy, but there was no doubt Honey found them, was rewarded with a lump of meat, and Tom sold the truffles to a famous London restaurant for £200 a pound.

Jim disliked the taste but he liked the idea of £200 and possibly more. He had never been truffle-hunting with Tom but he knew how it was done. This was why a mild and sunny morning in late September found him and Honey in what their neighbours called the posh part of Flagford where Flagford Hall faced Athelstan House across Pump Lane, each amid extensive grounds. They had no interest in these houses or their occupants. They were heading for Old Grimble’s Field which filled the corner between the gardens of Athelstan House and two identical detached houses called Oak Lodge and Marshmead.

Like the Holy Roman Empire which Gibbon said was neither holy, Roman nor an empire, this open space wasn’t a field, nor was Grimble particularly old or really called Grimble. It was an overgrown piece of land, about an acre of what estate agents describe asa corner plot. Due to years of inattention, saplings had grown into trees, shrubs into bushes, roses and privet and dogwood into hedges and trees had doubled in size. Somewhere in the middle of this burgeoning woodland stood a semi-derelict bungalow which had belonged to Grimble’s father, its windows boarded up, its roof slowly shedding its tiles. Tom Belbury had been there truffle-hunting with Honey the year before and pronounced it rich in members of the genus
Tuber.

Because Tom carried the rewards for Honey unwrapped in the breast pocket of his leather jacket, he usually smelt of meat that was slightly ‘off’. Jim hadn’t much liked it at the time but now he recalled it with affection. How pleased dear old Tom would be to see him and Honey heading for Old Grimble’s Field in close companionship, following his old pursuit. Perhaps he could see, Jim thought sentimentally, and imagined him looking down from whatever truffle wood in the sky he found himself in.

Honey was the director of operations. Tom used to claim that she was drawn to a particular spot by the presence of truffle flies hovering around the base of a tree, and now she led Jim to a mature tree (a sycamore, he thought it was) where he could see the flies himself.

‘Get digging, girl,’ he said.



The irregular warty lump, about the size of a tennis ball, which Honey unearthed she willingly relinquished in exchange for the cube of sirloin steak Jim took out of a hygienic ziplock bag he had brought with him.

‘This old fungus must weigh a good half-pound,’ he said aloud. ‘Keep on with the good work, Honey.’
Honey kept on. The truffle flies annoyed her and she snapped at the swarms, scattering them and snuffling towards where they had been densest. There she began digging again, fetched out of the rich leaf mould first a much smaller truffle, then one about the size of a large potato and was rewarded once more with pieces of sirloin.

‘There’s a lot more flies buzzing about over there,’ Jim said, pointing to a biggish beech tree which looked a hundred years old. ‘How about moving on?’

Honey had no intention of moving on. So might a diamond prospector refuse to abandon the lode where gems worth a fortune had already come to light, until he was sure the seam had been exhausted. Honey sniffed, dug, slapped at the flies with her paws, dug again. No more truffles were foraged and the object which she had unearthed was of no interest to her. It lay exposed on the chestnut-coloured soil, white, fanlike, unmistakeably what it was, a human hand.

Or, rather, the bones of a human hand, flesh, skin, veins, tendons all gone.

‘Oh, my lord, girl,’ said Jim Belbury, ‘whatever have you gone and found?’

As if she understood, Honey stopped digging, sat down and put her head on one side. Jim patted her. He put the three truffles in the plastic bag he had brought with him for that purpose, placed the bag inside his backpack and removed from it his mobile phone. Jim might be an old countryman, once an agricultural labourer and living in a cottage with no bathroom and no main drainage, but still he would no more have gone out without his mobile than would his fifteen-year-old great-nephew. Unaware of the number of Kingsmarkham police station, he dialled 999.



CHAPTER TWO

The thing that had come out of the pit lay exposed for them to see, a bunch of bones that looked more than anything like broomsticks, a skull to which scraps of decomposed tissue still adhered, all wrapped in purple cotton. They had been digging for two hours, an operation watched by Jim Belbury and his dog.

‘Man or woman?’ Chief Inspector Wexford asked.

‘Hard to say.’ The pathologist was a young woman who looked like a fifteen-year-old model, thin, tall, pale and other-worldly. ‘I’ll tell you when I’ve taken a closer look.’

‘How long has it been there?’

Carina Laxton eyed Wexford and his sergeant, DS Hannah Goldsmith who had asked the question. ‘And how long have you two been in the Force? Isn’t it about time you knew I can’t give you an immediate answer when a cadaver’s obviously been buried for years?’

‘OK but is it months or decades?’

‘Maybe one decade. What I can tell you is you’re wasting your time taking all these measurements and photographs as if someone put it there last week.’

‘Maybe Mr Belbury can help us there,’ said Wexford. He had decided not to mention the fact that Jim Belbury was trespassing, had probably been trespassing for years. ‘Did your dog ever dig here before?’
‘Not on this spot, no,’ said Jim. ‘Over there where there’s more bigger trees. Can I ask you if you reckon it’s what you call foul play?’

Wexford was tempted to say, well, no, you can’t, but he relented. ‘Someone buried him or her, so you have to–’ he began but Hannah interrupted him.

‘Law-abiding people don’t bury bodies they find lying about, you know,’ she said sharply. ‘Perhaps you should be on your way, Mr Belbury. Thank you, you’ve been very helpful.’

But Jim wasn’t to be dismissed so easily. Finding Wexford sympathetic and everyone else — Hannah, the scene-of-crime officer, the photographers, the pathologist and various policemen — of no account, he began giving the chief inspector details of all the houses and their occupants in the vicinity. ‘That’s Mr Tredown’s place next door and down there’s the Hunters and the Pickfords. Over the other side that’s Mr Borodin. I’ve lived in Flagford all my life. There’s nothing I don’t know.’

‘Then you can tell me who owns this land.’ Wexford extended his arm and waved his hand. ‘Must be at least an acre.’

His politically correct sergeant murmured something about hectares being a more appropriate measurement ‘in the present day’ but no one took much notice of her.

‘An acre and a half,’ said Jim with a glare at Hannah. ‘We don’t have no hectares round here. Them belongs in the Common Market.’ Like many people of his age, Jim still referred in this way to the European Union. ‘Who owns it? Well, Mr Grimble, innit? This here is Old Grimble’s Field.’

Though he might possibly be compounding a felony, seeing that the subterranean fungi in the bag properly belonged to this Grimble, Wexford thanked Jim and offered him a lift home in a police car.

‘And my dog?’ said Jim.

‘And your dog.’

His offer gratefully accepted, he and Hannah moved away, heading for the road where police vehicles were parked along the pavement. It became, within a short distance, Flagford High Street, a somewhat too picturesque village centre where stood the ­thirteenth-century church, a post office and general store, a shop which sold mosaic tabletops, another purveying lime-flower honey and mulberry conserve, and a number of flint-walled cottages, one thatched and another with its own bell tower.

Wexford, in the car, said to Hannah that, for all the times he had been to Flagford, he couldn’t remember noticing that piece of land before.
<...

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Doubleday Canada (November 27, 2007)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 272 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0385662386
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0385662383
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 15.9 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.25 x 0.98 x 9.29 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars 1,347 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Ruth Rendell
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Edgar Award–winning author Ruth Rendell (1930-2015) wrote more than seventy books and sold more than twenty million copies worldwide. A fellow of the Royal Society of Literature (London), she was the recipient of the Grand Master Award from the Mystery Writers of America and a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Crime Writers’ Association. Rendell’s award-winning novels include A Demon in My View (1976), A Dark-Adapted Eye (1987), and King Solomon’s Carpet (1991). Her popular crime stories featuring Chief Inspector Reginald Wexford were adapted into a long-running British television series (1987–2000) starring George Baker.

Customer reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
1,347 global ratings

Customers say

Customers find the book easy to read and well-written. They appreciate the lifelike characters and engaging plot. However, some readers found the book dull and uninteresting. There are mixed opinions on the surprise elements in the story - some found it surprising and complex, while others felt the ending was predictable and outlandish.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

8 customers mention "Readability"8 positive0 negative

Customers find the book easy to read. They say it's a nice mystery novel by Ruth Rendell and one of her best works.

"...This isn't a wonderful Rendell but it is a very good read and a genuine education in the process. Sometimes that is plenty enough...." Read more

"Thought it was brilliant - kept me going all the way -had no idea who did what until the last 2 chapters - then again I love Ruth's story..." Read more

"...The Wexford books are still good, and not too sensational. Liked it a lot." Read more

"...Good reads..." Read more

4 customers mention "Writing quality"4 positive0 negative

Customers enjoy the writing quality of the book. They find it well-written and a pleasant read.

"...I can see why she is has such a sterling reputation. She's a wonderful writer, an acute observer of human nature, has a great ear for dialogue, and..." Read more

"...Well written and always something to surprise me." Read more

"Wexford novels are so great. I would like to have this detective on my case if I had one. If you haven't read Ruth Rendell you are in for a treat." Read more

"wonderful read, as always with Ruth Rendell. I love the Westford series!" Read more

5 customers mention "Enjoyment"2 positive3 negative

Customers have different views on the book's enjoyment. Some find the characters enjoyable and lifelike, keeping their interest. Others feel the book lacks a compelling storyline and seems dull to them.

"This book seemed dull to me...." Read more

"Kept my interest, wanted to finish to know the end result. Very entertaining!" Read more

"...I am a huge fan of Inspector Wexford but this book was not enjoyable...." Read more

"...Her attention to the surroundings of the characters in her books are enjoyable and lifelike. I am happy that she is such a prolific writer." Read more

5 customers mention "Surprise"3 positive2 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the book's surprise. Some find it well-written and engaging with a complex plot, while others feel the story lacks surprises and is outlandish.

"...And the story in this mystery, as ever, is puzzling and well-crafted, with various interesting characters popping up and dropping out...." Read more

"Love Inspector Wexford, but there was !little surprise at the end. A coup!e of the characters (Maeve and Claudia) were not too believable." Read more

"...Well written and always something to surprise me." Read more

"...The story was quite outlandish, too. A little more effort was called for, but was lacking." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on August 28, 2008
I've been pretty hard on Ruth Rendell lately. I miss the startling acid observations in her earlier psychological thrillers and their wicked plot twists. I miss her writing as Barbara Vine, under which she produces her best work. After spending several decades in her company, I think I've gotten greedy and for that I'm sorry.

The worst Ruth Rendell is better than the best of many of her contemporaries (P.D. James excepted) and this above-average Wexford mystery is a very nicely done book. It has a Christie-ish feel to it and that's not a bad thing. In fact, English country murders are a wonderful tradition and I'm glad to see this one come along. It starts and ends with a truffle-sniffing dog, which is an education unto itself, and progresses along a path that takes us into the company and homes of some of the best and worst people you can expect in an English country village. Two bodies, two murders, possibly related but possibly years apart are at the heart of the book and there is an especially tough subplot where Wexford becomes acquainted with female genital mutilation as a cultural practice carried over by African immigrants.

Rendell has done her homework here and does not flinch as she takes on this most difficult of subjects. This isn't a wonderful Rendell but it is a very good read and a genuine education in the process. Sometimes that is plenty enough. And oh, by the way, I just found out that a Barbara Vine book entitled The Birthday Present is due out later this year. Can't wait!
9 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on June 21, 2008
In her 21st Inspector Wexford novel, the extremely prolific Ruth Rendell at age 78 is not writing at the top of her form; this is not vintage stuff, rather it is Rendell Lite. We are see-sawed back and forth through interview after interview with the same witnesses. How do I fill up 303 pages? Oh, yes, I'll go back and interview the two wives again, or I'll introduce the theme of African female mutilation.
This being Ruth Rendell all of this manic plotting is done with more success and aplomb than others could do it, but her style isn't as elegant and as brilliant as in her other books. Perhaps she has grown sick of dull, old Wexford. He's a much more gentlemanly detective than Ian Rankin, for example, has dreamed up in Rebus.
So many witnesses interviewed, and so many of the witnesses have detailed memories that are astounding. There are two seemingly unrelated murders. One goes back eight years, one eleven years so the forensics people here are dealing with skeletal remains.
Wexford's wife Dora actually does helpful things in this book rather than serve as the cardboard cutout spouse seen in some earlier books. The team of detectives are not clearly delineated; Peter Robinson in his procedurals gives us fuller portraits.
In several of the many, many interviews, Wexford doesn't ask a crucial question; he and Rendell are saving it for later. Red herrings, like pennies from heaven, rain down all over the narrative landscape.
When she finally gets to her denouement, it seems to make a kind of sense which doesn't quite flow out of a lot of the nonsensical story plotting that has preceded it.
Perhaps it's time for Inspector Wexford to step down and get a computer-savvy guy in there.
12 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2008
The thing I love about Ruth Rendell is that in addition to having a good who-dun-it, she also explores how British life is changing and what ordinary people think of that. She does that again in this one. I guess I'll concede that she sometimes allows characters to do this in a self-conscious way that might seem a "tad" dated. But her characters aren't supposed to be hip urbanites who wouldn't possibly use a term from the 90s. They're supposed to be small-town police officers who are generally well-meaning, but a bit befuddled by it all. And that comes through. I just get lost her in books and forget the events aren't real. She's wonderful.
6 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 1, 2009
An inveterate Anglophile, I've always looked forward to my next visit, but after reading this book, I'm not so sure. The general atmosphere and attitudes are so off-putting, political correctness gone wild. It may be that so many of the strong opinions are those of the younger women, and Ruth Rendell, being my age, wants to demonstrate that she's "with it." Of course, like any compassionate human being, I'm horrified by the appalling Somali butchery, but I guess I was just not ready to confront such graphic, repetitious descriptions. Where is the kinder, gentler England of James Herriott and Agatha Christie? And where would I go to find food other than Indian, etc.?
6 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2015
I finally decided to read one of Rendell's books and I'm glad I did. I can see why she is has such a sterling reputation. She's a wonderful writer, an acute observer of human nature, has a great ear for dialogue, and can give the reader an insightful look at a character with just a few descriptive lines. I'll go back and read them all now that I've read this one. Note: If you buy this book on Kindle be prepared for occasional spots of ragged editing. I found them a bit jarring but not enough to put the book down.
Reviewed in the United States on May 14, 2018
Well done and fairly good character development, tho indiv police could be more defined. And if one didnt want to be called ‘guv’ he could accomplish that- so an annoying repetitive quip.
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on August 2, 2008
If you love Rendell's writing style--and who wouldn't-- you'll like this book. NOT IN THE FLESH is a bit more Agatha Christie-style than most, but she has created some loathsome characters in the "Wives Tredown" and an amoral neighbor who is less than forthcoming. You'll want to wring some necks, that's certain. Not memorable but that's not necessarily the point, is it?
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2019
Will Wexford solve this mystery? In another wonderful Rendell read he will have to look back to see forward. An horrendous subplot dealing with mutilation will also divert his team from the course of justice. Trifling? Truffling!

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Helen
5.0 out of 5 stars Great read
Reviewed in Canada on December 30, 2016
Ruth Rendle is always a winner....wish there were even more!!
Sudhir P.I
3.0 out of 5 stars First impression
Reviewed in India on June 12, 2015
my first of Ruth Rendall. Her style is impressive & engaging. But the plot struck me as too concocted.
anne peakall
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Reviewed in Australia on May 5, 2015
One of Ruth Rendell's very good stories.
Evelyne N.
3.0 out of 5 stars assez laborieux et peu excitant
Reviewed in France on September 21, 2010
Ce commentaire s'adresse à ceux qui, comme moi, ne connaissent pas encore l'oeuvre de Ruth Rendell. A mon avis ce n'est pas un bon début pour la découvrir ni surtout pour accompagner son inspecteur Wexford dont l'épaisseur psychologique et humaine ne transparaît guère ici.

On a droit au déroulement assez fastidieux d'une enquête qui piétine et tourne en rond, dans un style assez plat, mais qui finit par capter peu à peu l'attention, sans doute après qu'on s'est familiarisé avec le contexte et les personnages, et on parvient à lire jusqu'au bout cette élucidation d'un double meurtre remontant à onze et huit années.

En résumé : un cadavre est déterré par un chien (renifleur de truffes) dans le terrain d'une propriété abandonnée puis au cours de l'enquête un autre cadavre un peu plus récent est découvert dans la maison abandonnée. Peu à peu les liens entre les deux affaires se dévoilent mais les mobiles particulièrement mesquins des meurtriers laissent songeur sans qu'il y ait de réel suspense.

En parallèle on nous narre un fait divers d'excision dans une famille d'origine malienne, là on a un peu la chair de poule mais on ne comprend pas vraiment ce que ça vient faire dans le récit sauf à vouloir militer en faveur de ces malheureuses victimes d'une coutume barbare.
Sissel M. Østdahl
5.0 out of 5 stars Another unputdownable treat from Ruth Rendell
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 20, 2007
The Dales of Yorkshire are the venue for the books by a couple of today's finest British crime writers. Having just finished Peter Robinson's latest book "Friend of the Devil", Ruth Rendell's brand new Inspector Wexford novel "Not in The Flesh" conveniently landed in my mail box and made for some more first class reading from another dependable master.

This time a body is found by Jim Belbury and his dog Honey searching for truffles in a wood outside Kingsmarkham. According to the medical examiner, the body has lain buried 10-11 years and a computer search for missing persons at that time is started. Chief Inspector Wexham knows that a long investigation lies ahead. People go missing at an alarming rate in Britain, somewhat like 500 a day nationwide.

Then another body is found in a cottage cellar only twenty yards away from the woodland burial site and the detection skills of Wexford, Burden and the rest of the Kingsmarkham Police Force are tested to the utmost in order to solve the murders and find out whether they might possibly be connected.

Chief Inspector Wexford is yet another great detective personality who over the years has come to seem like a dear old friend. As with Robinson's Alan Banks, we also get to know about Wexford's private life. His wife Dora, his two daughters and his special love for his youngest daughter Sheila.

Wexford is a peaceful, down to the earth kind of man. No dashing hero, but just as attractive in his own special right. In fact, Wexford is a bit like everybody's grandfather. Being among the last of a generation uncomfortable with and strange to computers and other technical wonders in today's world, he trusts his instincts and experience - and with great results at that.

Another thing about the Wexford series. It's very English. Of course Kingsmarkham is not untouched by a modern and changing England. There is for instance a small colony of immigrants from Somalia in the town. However, the description of Kingsmarkham and surroundings, its population, traditions, the way people talk - it's not only very non-urbane but a bit like a breath from an almost forgotten time. Blessedly oldfashioned and oddly peaceful in spite of the horrible crimes being investigated.

Ruth Rendell has written numerous of other books, usually deemed by reviewers to be better than The Wexford Series. However, the Wexford books are my favourite Rendell novels. Having read and enjoyed them all, "Not in the Flesh" was another unputdownable treat. A great concept from a superb writer.